Author Topic: Misleading?  (Read 3589 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« on: October 10, 2006, 09:56:50 PM »
http://www.bridges4kids.org/Charter-Private.html

Hidden Lake Academy

Dahlonega, GA.

Phone: 1-800-394-0640.  

Cost: $5,000 a month - is a medical tax write off if a doctor writes that the school is needed.  Also health insurance will reimburse some when itemized bills provided by the school are submitted.

Parent Comment:  "It was a life saver for our son and I would have chosen it again.  He is so self-regulated and his self-confidence has come a long way. He has made good friends among students and staff.   He would never have had all the opportunities without this school.   He has grown emotionally, physically, and spiritually at HLA. He is ready to move on to College now."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HLA Treats Autism?
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2006, 09:59:43 PM »
http://tinyurl.com/ycjtz9


Atlanta: Autism Resources
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2006, 10:20:57 PM »
http://www.bpkids.org/site/PageServer?pagename=res_ga
Child and Adolescent BiPolar Foundation
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2006, 09:48:17 AM »
Speaking of misleading...

One of HLA's current employees is reporting that Little Napoleon is telling the staff and parents that there will be "no movement" in the  current lawsuit for "18 months."

Funny that an arbitrary number like, say, the length of the program, would be floated out there to employees itching to get new jobs or parents enrolling their kid.

Parents:  You should not even be considering enrolling your kid at this place now or ever, based on its shady reputati9on and practices.

Staff:  Get those resumes out ASAP.  Your going to be needing jobs very soon.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2006, 10:47:53 AM »
Does Big Brother think he can delay responding to the lawsuit for 18 months?

Come on little General your 21 days are just about up........
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2006, 11:47:37 AM »
The idea that he could say something like that, and mean it, reflects a serious mental problem and a complete lack of understanding about the way the law works.

Does he really think that he has control of the people suing him and the legal system powering it?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline odie

  • Posts: 179
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2006, 12:46:42 PM »
Let's face facts here. It is entirely possible through various motions that this case doesn't go to trial for 18 months. However it would make more sense just to settle it out of court just to kill the publicity surrounding it. Does Len really want to have ALL his books looked into and have someone following his money trail or just chalk this one up. It's really obvious that he has made some really stupid judgements but I don't think he is a complete bumbling idiot.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
die

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2006, 12:52:12 PM »
Quote from: ""odie""
Let's face facts here. It is entirely possible through various motions that this case doesn't go to trial for 18 months. However it would make more sense just to settle it out of court just to kill the publicity surrounding it. Does Len really want to have ALL his books looked into and have someone following his money trail or just chalk this one up. It's really obvious that he has made some really stupid judgements but I don't think he is a complete bumbling idiot.


good points, but the people bringing the suit aren't in it for the money.  they are demanding a jury trial and won't settle.  the books will be opened, the facts laid bare and that diminutive crook will have to testify - like it or not.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
18 months
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2006, 08:26:19 PM »
As with any class action suit, there is a signup period for plaintiffs.  This is probably the 18 months your referring to.  It seems like many posters are harboring a lot of anger and jump to conclusions without really knowing what they are talking about.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Programmie-Trans 9000

  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.billyandhoward.com
Misleading?
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2006, 09:15:33 PM »
Quote
As with any programmie idiot, I'm just here to do damage control. Len pulled that number completely out of his ass. I harbor a lot of stupidity and make shit up without really knowing what I'm talking about.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Y ONLY DRIVERS ARE MASS DRIVERS, BITCH.

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 18 months
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2006, 02:05:33 AM »
Quote from: ""sensai""
As with any class action suit, there is a signup period for plaintiffs.  This is probably the 18 months your referring to.  It seems like many posters are harboring a lot of anger and jump to conclusions without really knowing what they are talking about.


Yet you somehow do? The reality is you havent got the slightest clue. Or would you care to explain how you think Len would even know what the sign up period was?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline LMJ630

  • Posts: 72
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Next court date
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2006, 10:22:34 AM »
From the court itself:

10/10/2006   ORAL ORDER granting 16 Proposed Consent Order. The defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs' complaint on or before 11/20/06. Entered by Judge William C. O'Kelley on 10/10/06. (dcs) (Entered: 10/10/2006)

Anyone can call the courthouse and find out information.  Just ask for the Clerk of Courts.

http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/publicaccess.htm
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« Reply #12 on: October 27, 2006, 10:38:03 AM »
what does that mean?  i am not sure i understand what that last post meant...meaning...i don't know what the court is doing...are they allowing the suit or is this still part of the signing up portion?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2006, 10:48:39 AM »
It means that the hosejob is starting now, and the judge generously gave them 40 days to respond to it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline LMJ630

  • Posts: 72
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Misleading?
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2006, 10:53:05 AM »
Please bear in mind that my understanding of the federal court system is limited - my experience is more with state systems - so if I get something wrong, please correct me.

The defendants in the case have until 11/20 to answer the original complaint filed by the plaintiffs.  Basically, they have to submit a paper saying, "No, I didn't do this, or this, or this."  They have to rebut every accusation from the original complaint.  Most likely they will also submit a motion to dismiss.

In regards to more plaintiffs being added: the original complaint requested class action status.  I didn't see anywhere that the judge has certified the case as a class action yet.  If he does, then plaintiffs can be added throughout the process - I'm not sure if that would delay the case but it may if the discovery process has to start anew for each plaintiff.  I'm not sure if more plaintiffs can be added if the case is not certified as a class action.

Hope this helps.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »