« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC  (Read 7962 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« on: June 25, 2006, 01:51:00 PM »
cafety.org
caica.org
youthrights.org
tbfight.com
nospank.net
teenadvocatesusa.org
isaccorp.org
astart.com
Voy Forums
Lemondor
Heal Online
Swat the WWASP
Anti WWASP

WHY IS IT TEEN ADVOCATES AND ISAC HAVE NO recent articles, stories, current events, any information on the largest organization of alleged child abuse neglect parent fraud - WWASP and WWASPS?

Shelby, Barbe, care to answer? Some people do find it strange.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2006, 02:09:00 PM »
Teen Advocates USA is not a watchdog group and ISAC, which is maintains an extensive database of material relevant to many many programs, including WWASPS.

Their news articles page has WWASPS related articles.

http://isaccorp.org/articles.html

Now, how come CAICA has nothing on Whitmore or PURE? And what's with their LAME facility watchlist?

LOL - best be careful what you wish for, ANON.

It ain't always what it looks like.

 :wave:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2006, 02:35:00 PM »
The operative word here is RECENT news articles, for example where is the Joanne Green story ROUGH LOVE from the Miami New Times and the TAKING A BEATING article from the Missoula Independent? Why no recent articles about WWASP? Care to answer, Shelby Barbe? SMells like someone sold out to me. It seems you people are just obsessed with the PURE/WHITMORE/CAICA.WWASP is far wider spread than Whitmore or PURE could ever dream to be. You all are obsessing as usual and very non-productive. but it feeds your egos and WWASP spies and makes you all feel better. i htink people should really ask these questions, and get some answers.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2006, 02:45:00 PM »
WTF are you talking about ANON?

Sounds like YOU are the one confused.

Why don't you ask CAICA some important questions like why their facility watchlist doesn't have the name of a program where the co-owner has been charged with child abuse and is going to trial in September?

Can you name any other program that should be on a watchlist?  IIRC, the program (Whitmore) is still operating.  Is this correct?  If so, shouldn't other parents at least know about it?

If not, why not?  Please explain ANON. Seems like everybody wants charges brought against alleged abused programs but when it happens, it ain't news?  

That's fucked up my friend.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2006, 02:57:00 PM »
Sure is fucked up.
Sue Scheff PURE supports the Sudweeks, and Cheryl Sudweeks's criminal trial for abusing 4 children begings September 2006.
CAICA supports Sue Scheff PURE.
CAICA does not have one single thing on Whitmore on CAICA and this is a CRIMINAL TRIAL for abusing innocent children.
And let's not forget WHO GOT PAID FOR REFERRING those children to Whitmore Academy---you got it, SUE SCHEFF / PURE.
Something sure does stink here.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2006, 03:34:00 PM »
WWASP may be "wider spread" but WHEN WAS THERE A CRIMINAL TRIAL scheduled against one WWASP employee for abusing a child?
WHEN?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2006, 03:41:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-06-25 12:34:00, Anonymous wrote:

"WWASP may be "wider spread" but WHEN WAS THERE A CRIMINAL TRIAL scheduled against one WWASP employee for abusing a child?

WHEN?"


Hmmm, that's a good question.  Don't think there ever has been one.  At least that I have ever heard about.

Lots of articles but no trial, except civil lawsuits, right?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2006, 03:50:00 PM »
Has a civil lawsuit EVER actually gone to trail?
Don't think so.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #8 on: June 25, 2006, 03:50:00 PM »
tial, that is.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #9 on: June 25, 2006, 04:33:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-06-25 11:35:00, Anonymous wrote:

"The operative word here is RECENT news articles, for example where is the Joanne Green story ROUGH LOVE from the Miami New Times and the TAKING A BEATING article from the Missoula Independent? Why no recent articles about WWASP? Care to answer, Shelby Barbe? SMells like someone sold out to me. It seems you people are just obsessed with the PURE/WHITMORE/CAICA.WWASP is far wider spread than Whitmore or PURE could ever dream to be. You all are obsessing as usual and very non-productive. but it feeds your egos and WWASP spies and makes you all feel better. i htink people should really ask these questions, and get some answers."


Back in the ole days when PURE was calling itself a non-profit foundation, I could see people being confused about what PURE was (I think they even had a different name??)

But that was quite awhile ago.  What's IZZIE's excuse?  This is 2006.  PURE RESULTS?  WTF does that mean????

 ::kma::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2006, 06:16:00 PM »
WTF

THIS TOPIC IS "TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC" AND A QUESTION WAS ASKED ABOUT WHY THEY DON'T POST RECENT ARTICLES. LET'S NARROW THIS DOWN, AND MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, SOMEONE WILL STAY ON TOPIC AND WILL ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS.

TEEN ADVOCATES - WHY HAS BARBE FOR THE LONGEST TIME NOT MENTIONED ANYTHING ON HER WEBSITE ABOUT THE LARGEST, THE ALLEDGEDLY MOST ABUSIVE, PROGRAM OUT THERE - WWASP? WHY?

ISAC - THE LINK THE ANON PROVIDED IS NICE BUT THIS LINK MAKES IT EVIDENT THAT THERE IS NOT ONE ARTICLE LISTED ON THAT PAGE ABOUT WWASP.

REMEMBER, CARIE BOCK GOT $12,500 FROM WWASP - HMMM. COULD THERE BE MORE SELL-OUTS?

FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO WILL CONTINUE WITH YOUR OBSESSION ABOUT SUE/PURE/CAICA/WHITMORE/IZZIE, ETC., FEEL FREE TO CONTINUE BUT PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTION. INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #11 on: June 25, 2006, 07:41:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-06-25 15:16:00, Anonymous wrote:

"WTF



THIS TOPIC IS "TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC" AND A QUESTION WAS ASKED ABOUT WHY THEY DON'T POST RECENT ARTICLES. LET'S NARROW THIS DOWN, AND MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, SOMEONE WILL STAY ON TOPIC AND WILL ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS.



TEEN ADVOCATES - WHY HAS BARBE FOR THE LONGEST TIME NOT MENTIONED ANYTHING ON HER WEBSITE ABOUT THE LARGEST, THE ALLEDGEDLY MOST ABUSIVE, PROGRAM OUT THERE - WWASP? WHY?



ISAC - THE LINK THE ANON PROVIDED IS NICE BUT THIS LINK MAKES IT EVIDENT THAT THERE IS NOT ONE ARTICLE LISTED ON THAT PAGE ABOUT WWASP.



REMEMBER, CARIE BOCK GOT $12,500 FROM WWASP - HMMM. COULD THERE BE MORE SELL-OUTS?



FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO WILL CONTINUE WITH YOUR OBSESSION ABOUT SUE/PURE/CAICA/WHITMORE/IZZIE, ETC., FEEL FREE TO CONTINUE BUT PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTION. INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW. "


Izzat chu, Lizzie?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Joyce Harris

  • Posts: 516
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #12 on: June 25, 2006, 09:17:00 PM »
I don't know anything personally about what ISAC or TAUSA posts on their websites.
But, I would like to know why Isabelle at CAICA lied and said I requested that she remove Whitmore from CAICA.
Isabelle claims to be a child advocate, and I believe any true child advocate would want the public to be aware that the owner of Whitmore Academy has been charged with criminal child abuse and is facing a criminal trial for abusing 4 children in September 2006.
This issue at Whitmore has nothing to do with ISAC or TAUSA.
I would like for Isablelle to answer thses direct question: Why isn't Whitmore Academy on her Watchlist at CAICA? Why doesn't Isabelle do the RIGHT thing and let the public know that Whitmore Academy's owner, Cheryl Sudweeks is facing a criminal trial in September?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #13 on: June 25, 2006, 10:18:00 PM »
The Anon typing all in CAPS.
What do you mean by "sell out" when you refer to ISAC and TAUSA and refer to Carey Bock "selling out?" What are you talking about?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
TEEN ADVOCATES USA / ISAC
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2006, 10:22:00 PM »
I'm not going anywhere near that one. :lol:

Oh god.  Long story and I don't really know all the details.  Anyone else out there able to condense it into something coherent?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »