Author Topic: The Who  (Read 840377 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3915 on: July 01, 2009, 07:09:18 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "Guest"
Doesn't Ursus own TheWho's account now?  Hey, Ursus, would you mind if all of TheWho's new anonymous posts are linked to his user account?  I think if you say it's OK, then we should just update the post list of the account so we can get to the bottom of who is Who and who isn't Who.  Hey, it's your account and  you should be able to see all the posts, right?

Psy, if Ursus says yes, do you think it would be possible to move TheWho's anonymous posts under the account?  I don't think it's fair for Ursus not to have access to TheWho's posts in their entirety.  He did buy the rights to all of TheWho's postings. What do you think?

This seems fair.  TheWho is always acting like he's some great capitalist tycoon, so I know he wouldn't object to this plan because, of course, when Ursus bought the brand, so to say, he did in fact buy all of the rights present and future as any standard business transaction.  To cheat Ursus out of the intellectual property he purchased in good faith for a good cause is immoral.

Worth considering for sure.  It is a pretty good argument.  I don't see anyone objecting.

Exactly.  The bidding was on the who's account and it was understood that the who would be gone.  Imagine, the who has lied and defaulted on the deal.  Ursus, you should look into suing him.  You own the entity formerly dba "theWho" which includes all real and intellectual property attached to "theWho".  The stilted language, the ellipsis, the "ha, ha, ha", and the whole perverse industry philosophy of the who were purchased by you.  He's reneging.  He always reneged.   Now the reneger is doing business again as the who in all but name.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3916 on: July 01, 2009, 07:14:03 PM »
Oh, this is precious.  This is both legally sound and representative of business orthodoxy.  I would like to voice my support for resolving this on the basis of capitalism, as TheWho would have wanted if he were here with us.  It absolutely adds value to Fornits while simultaneously honoring the valid contract which bestows upon Ursus full control of TheWho's sum total of products.  I like it a lot, people.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3917 on: July 01, 2009, 07:37:03 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "Guest"
Doesn't Ursus own TheWho's account now?  Hey, Ursus, would you mind if all of TheWho's new anonymous posts are linked to his user account?  I think if you say it's OK, then we should just update the post list of the account so we can get to the bottom of who is Who and who isn't Who.  Hey, it's your account and  you should be able to see all the posts, right?

Psy, if Ursus says yes, do you think it would be possible to move TheWho's anonymous posts under the account?  I don't think it's fair for Ursus not to have access to TheWho's posts in their entirety.  He did buy the rights to all of TheWho's postings. What do you think?

This seems fair.  TheWho is always acting like he's some great capitalist tycoon, so I know he wouldn't object to this plan because, of course, when Ursus bought the brand, so to say, he did in fact buy all of the rights present and future as any standard business transaction.  To cheat Ursus out of the intellectual property he purchased in good faith for a good cause is immoral.

Worth considering for sure.  It is a pretty good argument.  I don't see anyone objecting.

All I see so far is supportive feedback, so there's no reason not to do it I guess,,  I wonder what Deborah would say?  It was always funny to watch her tear Whooter into tiny pieces,
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3918 on: July 01, 2009, 07:42:25 PM »
Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction"
Oh, this is precious.  This is both legally sound and representative of business orthodoxy.  I would like to voice my support for resolving this on the basis of capitalism, as TheWho would have wanted if he were here with us.  It absolutely adds value to Fornits while simultaneously honoring the valid contract which bestows upon Ursus full control of TheWho's sum total of products.  I like it a lot, people.

Why do you support suing RobertBruce?  He gave up the rights to TheWho name and now only has RobertBruce, RobertBruces and LittleCats.  Maybe more who knows.  He can no longer log in so Ursus has the right to do with it as he wishes.  Are you going to sue him for talking about TheWho?
Doesnt make sense to me.  Havent seen TheWho post here in awhile.
What is your motive?  Are you still pissed that Bruce made a fool out of you while posting as TheWho?  You guys should try to work this out off line, in my opinion, before heading to court.  Save you both some money.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3919 on: July 01, 2009, 07:49:47 PM »
No, you've misunderstood.  Ursus owns The Who's account and anything The Who creates belongs to Ursus.  If RobertBruce is The Who and all of those other people all of their posts will appear under the user The Who.  Then you would be able to prove what you said and you can really stick it to RobertBruce.  It's win-win, dude.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3920 on: July 01, 2009, 07:52:37 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction"
Oh, this is precious.  This is both legally sound and representative of business orthodoxy.  I would like to voice my support for resolving this on the basis of capitalism, as TheWho would have wanted if he were here with us.  It absolutely adds value to Fornits while simultaneously honoring the valid contract which bestows upon Ursus full control of TheWho's sum total of products.  I like it a lot, people.

Why do you support suing RobertBruce?  He gave up the rights to TheWho name and now only has RobertBruce, RobertBruces and LittleCats.  Maybe more who knows.  He can no longer log in so Ursus has the right to do with it as he wishes.  Are you going to sue him for talking about TheWho?
Doesnt make sense to me.  Havent seen TheWho post here in awhile.
What is your motive?  Are you still pissed that Bruce made a fool out of you while posting as TheWho?  You guys should try to work this out off line, in my opinion, before heading to court.  Save you both some money.

Don't see anything about suing here.  But he probably wouldn't need to sue cuz the deal is already done.  So now let's just hook up all of the posts by the person who has previously posted as The Who.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3921 on: July 01, 2009, 07:56:22 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "Guest"
Doesn't Ursus own TheWho's account now?  Hey, Ursus, would you mind if all of TheWho's new anonymous posts are linked to his user account?  I think if you say it's OK, then we should just update the post list of the account so we can get to the bottom of who is Who and who isn't Who.  Hey, it's your account and  you should be able to see all the posts, right?

Psy, if Ursus says yes, do you think it would be possible to move TheWho's anonymous posts under the account?  I don't think it's fair for Ursus not to have access to TheWho's posts in their entirety.  He did buy the rights to all of TheWho's postings. What do you think?

This seems fair.  TheWho is always acting like he's some great capitalist tycoon, so I know he wouldn't object to this plan because, of course, when Ursus bought the brand, so to say, he did in fact buy all of the rights present and future as any standard business transaction.  To cheat Ursus out of the intellectual property he purchased in good faith for a good cause is immoral.

Totally agree with this.  No way The Who would want this settled any other way than by the free market.  If he was here he'd say the same.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3922 on: July 01, 2009, 07:59:37 PM »
that "brucie did it guy" left as soon as this new topic was brought up. wierd.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3923 on: July 01, 2009, 08:10:50 PM »
After you guys are all done with your linking and connecting then Bruce can get around to finishing his confession:

This link should help refresh everyones memory on where we are:

Confession Part I

Okay, everybody, you can put the torches out now.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3924 on: July 01, 2009, 08:14:45 PM »
Awesome!  So when we link up The Who's  posts brucies will show up there, too.  Then he'll look like the ultimate fool!  Let's do it!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3925 on: July 01, 2009, 08:17:01 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "Guest"
Doesn't Ursus own TheWho's account now?  Hey, Ursus, would you mind if all of TheWho's new anonymous posts are linked to his user account?  I think if you say it's OK, then we should just update the post list of the account so we can get to the bottom of who is Who and who isn't Who.  Hey, it's your account and  you should be able to see all the posts, right?

Psy, if Ursus says yes, do you think it would be possible to move TheWho's anonymous posts under the account?  I don't think it's fair for Ursus not to have access to TheWho's posts in their entirety.  He did buy the rights to all of TheWho's postings. What do you think?

This seems fair.  TheWho is always acting like he's some great capitalist tycoon, so I know he wouldn't object to this plan because, of course, when Ursus bought the brand, so to say, he did in fact buy all of the rights present and future as any standard business transaction.  To cheat Ursus out of the intellectual property he purchased in good faith for a good cause is immoral.

hey even the "brucie did it guy" want to do this now!  it will be his revenge on brucie once and for all,,
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3926 on: July 01, 2009, 08:17:52 PM »
Given that thewho already gave his permission once in linking thewho with littlecats, and given Ursus' now owning the username, it would seem the original permission granted would still apply. Since the ip address would remain the same, any postings Whooter has made since being banned and promising never to return would still be included correct?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3927 on: July 01, 2009, 08:18:48 PM »
S-

You were right, he didn't notice.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3928 on: July 01, 2009, 08:47:47 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "Guest"
Quote from: "Guest"
Doesn't Ursus own TheWho's account now?  Hey, Ursus, would you mind if all of TheWho's new anonymous posts are linked to his user account?  I think if you say it's OK, then we should just update the post list of the account so we can get to the bottom of who is Who and who isn't Who.  Hey, it's your account and  you should be able to see all the posts, right?

Psy, if Ursus says yes, do you think it would be possible to move TheWho's anonymous posts under the account?  I don't think it's fair for Ursus not to have access to TheWho's posts in their entirety.  He did buy the rights to all of TheWho's postings. What do you think?

This seems fair.  TheWho is always acting like he's some great capitalist tycoon, so I know he wouldn't object to this plan because, of course, when Ursus bought the brand, so to say, he did in fact buy all of the rights present and future as any standard business transaction.  To cheat Ursus out of the intellectual property he purchased in good faith for a good cause is immoral.

hey even the "brucie did it guy" want to do this now!  it will be his revenge on brucie once and for all,,

Cool.  The "RobertBruces Did It" guy and the actual RobertBruce agree on this one thing anyway.  Let's get it going then.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3929 on: July 01, 2009, 08:53:57 PM »
Ha,Ha,Ha, He could only stomach his own words for a week until he cowers away and edits his posts.  I have to give you credit,though Brucie, I thought you would back down after a couple of days.  But your dishonesty always catches up to you sooner or later Bruce.  Accountability was never your strength, was it.
The RobertBruce Confession (after he lost his backbone)
"Last edited by RobertBruce on 01 Jul 2009, 23:25, edited 1 time in total. "

I still have the unedited version for those of you who haven’t read it yet.

RobertBruce wrote: sigh*

I guess there isnt much point in hiding it. TheWho and I are one and the same. I created the character a few years ago as a means of serving as a lightining rod for programmies. I'd been posting on here for about 2.5 years when I came up with the idea. I wanted to give all the anti-program posters an opportunity to showcase everything that's sick and wrong with this industry. What better way to do that then to actually have someone who was so clearly brainwashed, and believed in this nonsense so ardently that nothing could disuade him from the truth. An absolute moron who couldnt recognize the truth even when it was staring him straight in the face, or just wouldn't. A complete jackass who could never stand to acknowledge when wrong, and he always is. Before you get too upset with me think about what my creating thewho has done for us. Under his guise I would repeatedly make ridiculus claims, or refute obvious facts, only to then turn around and have the proof provided. Remember my numbers concerning the deaths occuring in these places? How I refused to add multitudes of kids who had been murdered, thus drawing more attention to the ones who had. How many more names did the rest of you post on here in an effot to prove "me" wrong? Or how I as thewho kept declaring these places "safe" despite the fact that he refused to include abuse. Remember when I had him claim 60 kids a week were being killed in public schools? Making nonsensical claims about public schools that had no bearing in reality. All the times I had him dismiss or ridicule kids who were abused. I am sorry for that, it was difficult, I know everyone of you was truly abused, and tortured. I wasn't exaggerating by any means when I mentioned how many parents pm'd me as RobertBruce thanking me for shutting thewho up. At the same time I can't tell you how many programmies, and child abuse advocates pm'd me as thewho, giving me pointers, telling me what they believed was inside information on us, and giving me inside information on themselves, believing it was all in confidence. CCM Girl, Function Junction, Anne, the list goes on and on, sorry kids your secrets were very much put to good use. In truth thewho is based on a real person, and he really is as much of a stupid jackass as I made him out to be. In any event I hope you all understand my motivations, it was never to trick anyone, and I'm sorry if I offended any of you. My feelings against these kiddie prisons is that they are all just that, and they serve no good for anyone but greedy child abusers.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »