Author Topic: The Who  (Read 815109 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3570 on: June 25, 2009, 04:52:26 PM »
Glad to oblidge. I wonder if you couldn't get a little more specific in your claims about me trying to antagonize others by calling them "homosexual". I ran a quick search and it turns out (save this post of course) that I've never used the word "homosexual" on here before. Ever. In addition I've never used the word "faggot", "cock sucker", "butt fucker", or "queer". I've used the word "gay" a total of 39 times on here, with some of those being me quoting other posters, not actually using the word myself. In those times I did use the words I didnt come across any dispariging comments, as I am not generally the kind of person who would.  Now I know thewho has at several points made disparing commments towards gays. I stopped posting here for a while, and he lied and began claiming that I as RobertBruce had stated I was bi. He further acknowledged receiving this "information" from an HLA staff member (hence the libel and breaking of HIPPA laws). He then created a alternate username similar to my own and began arguing with himself, yet still losing. Later when I returned to the site he pm'd me and actually apologized. He stated that he himself was gay and was wondering if I'd ever thought about it. I let him down as gently as I could, I told him I was just into women, but that his lifestyle was his choice. I think he still took it pretty badly. So in summation, no, homosexuality wasn't something that was discussed with me while at HLA.

As to the coward comments, well I just sort have to call it like I see it. I cannot for the life of me fathom why anyone would be so ardent about a position or viewpoint, state something they believe to be facts, and then refuse to ever back up their claims. If that was all the person was going to do, why did they bring it up to begin with? Further why would someone make something up, and then try and demand that others prove them wrong? Why would they rant and rave about an issue, yet refuse to answer questions about their own statement. It seems to be the only legitimate reason would be because the person actually knows they're wrong, they can't back it up, they just believe if they ignore the truth for long enough, eventually it will go away. This is a person who is honestly afraid of being wrong. Hence, a coward. To answer your other question, no, this topic didnt come up at HLA either. Although I did once recieve a work assignment for proving a counselor wrong. I was happy to receive it.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2009, 06:36:28 PM by RobertBruce »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3571 on: June 25, 2009, 04:54:52 PM »
To answer your other question, you may have missed it in my earlier post, you might want to pay more attention. Dysfunction and I were not at HLA at the same time, nor do I believe he was a peer group counselor.


Did you have any other questions about my time there?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Inculcated

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 801
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3572 on: June 25, 2009, 05:04:28 PM »
To "Who" it may concern:
As far as Sock puppet /alter egos Who who else are you?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
“A person needs a little madness, or else they never dare cut the rope and be free”  Nikos Kazantzakis

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3573 on: June 25, 2009, 05:18:26 PM »
Just the one.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2009, 06:37:02 PM by RobertBruce »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3574 on: June 25, 2009, 07:03:57 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Just those two.

So the only time you reference bi or gay was when you are logged in as TheWho.  Why did you continue to fight with yourself online using two different id's?  Why did you publically antagonize Dysfunction Junction and make him look foolish.   Trying to say that the more offensive posts where made by someone else doesnt work because there can only be one identity/username called "TheWho" or"RobertBruce" or "psy" etc.  I cant log in and pretend to be psy or Ursus etc.  So you have been very offensive on this board but what you are saying is you were not offensive when logged in as RobertBruce.
Your argument and logic is interesting.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3575 on: June 25, 2009, 07:35:31 PM »
^^The Who^^  Fictitious "family man."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3576 on: June 25, 2009, 07:44:47 PM »
Quote from: "Guest"
^^The Who^^  Fictitious "family man."
Yeah, who would have thought, the whole thing was a scam right from the beginning.  Orchestrated by a fellow survivor no less.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3577 on: June 26, 2009, 12:26:18 AM »
Quote
So the only time you reference bi or gay was when you are logged in as TheWho. Why did you continue to fight with yourself online using two different id's? Why did you publically antagonize Dysfunction Junction and make him look foolish. Trying to say that the more offensive posts where made by someone else doesnt work because there can only be one identity/username called "TheWho" or"RobertBruce" or "psy" etc. I cant log in and pretend to be psy or Ursus etc. So you have been very offensive on this board but what you are saying is you were not offensive when logged in as RobertBruce.
Your argument and logic is interesting

Thewho never made Dysfunction look foolish, quite the opposite. Thewho never won a single argument, least of all with Dysfunction. He was owned time and again. Often thewho would claim that he would acknowledge he'd been proven wrong if Dysfunction could meet a certain criteria. Dysfunction of course would, and  thewho was still too stupid and obstinant to accept he'd been proven wrong. Remember when he refused to back up his own claim about the majority of mental health experts buying into this abusive industry?

As to additional posters being on here under existing usernames, I'm not sure what to tell you. I know some time ago there was this cry baby bitch who posted on here until he was banned. He would on a daily basis be forced to put his foot in his mouth. He loved to try and go back and alter posts after he'd been proven wrong on issues, and he hated the quote function. Everytime someone hit him over the head with his own comments he'd claim he was the victim of some imaginary conspiracy and his posts had been altered. Who knows.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2009, 06:38:43 PM by RobertBruce »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3578 on: June 26, 2009, 12:54:10 AM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Thewho never won a single argument, least of all with Dysfunction. He was owned time and again.

Silly boy, Row-row-Brucie! You WISH! The only one that "owns" Whootie is ME! rrrrrRRRRRAHRRRrrrrr!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3579 on: June 26, 2009, 07:09:32 AM »
Bruce, all I can say is that you are a sick man for doing what you did.  Do you realize how much time you wasted going back and forth between TheWho and RobertBruce?  For what reason?  All you accomplished was to get yourself banned, making hurtful comments to fellow survivors.  This is suppose to be a safe haven for survivors and you come here day after day boasting about being thewho.  Whats up with that?  Who is it that you are speaking to?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3580 on: June 26, 2009, 08:18:02 AM »
Do you realize how many kids I saved from this abusive industry? Because thewho was too stupid to ever accept facts in arguments with him facts and figures were brought to light so much more often. He was beaten over the head with the evidence. I can't tell you how many parents pm'd me thanking me for providing the evidence they needed not to send their child to one of those death traps. I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Besides, are you going to tell me you didnt think it was funny watching thewho get his ass handed to hm, time and time again. Him and all his child abusing buddies, I know I enjoyed watching them try their hardest, but still losing.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3581 on: June 26, 2009, 08:36:14 AM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Do you realize how many kids I saved from this abusive industry? Because thewho was too stupid to ever accept facts in arguments with him facts and figures were brought to light so much more often. He was beaten over the head with the evidence. I can't tell you how many parents pm'd me thanking me for providing the evidence they needed not to send their child to one of those death traps. I'm sure I'm not alone on that. Besides, are you going to tell me you didnt think it was funny watching thewho get his ass handed to hm, time and time again. Him and all his child abusing buddies, I know I enjoyed watching them try their hardest, but still losing.

But why did you ridicule fellow survivors?  You were in a program yourself but you found humor in dismissing other survivors stories and making fun of them.  I didnt see the humor or the point of this.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3582 on: June 26, 2009, 09:17:42 AM »
Must have been thewho. I know how terrible and disgusting this industry is, ask Psy about it.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2009, 06:39:31 PM by RobertBruce »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3583 on: June 26, 2009, 09:26:38 AM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Must have been the clone. I know how terrible and disgusting this industry is, ask Psy about it.

You are not being truthful.  Only one person can have the log-in TheWho.  This cannot be duplicated and has been confirmed.  So it leaves "you" as the only one who ridiculed survivors for your own amusement.  Now that you are exposed you are trying to distance yourself from the more embarrassing posts.  You are a liar and a weasel RobertBruce hiding behind a user name to ridicule fellow survivors.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3584 on: June 26, 2009, 09:30:47 AM »
Nope. I mentioned this before, I'm not a coward who needs to hide or attempt to attack from the shadows. Psy please link up all my posts, under any username. Why don't you do the same?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »