« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 113 114 [115] 116 117 ... 286   Go Down

Author Topic: The Who  (Read 861622 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1710 on: February 15, 2007, 07:54:59 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
The Who, besides being a liar, and the most misinformed person around: really must be a woman. "She" sure dislikes DJ, that's for sure, and is merely trying to present empty arguments that go round-and-round. Deletion of privous posts to cover her lies are pointless. Then doing the "girl thing" and saying DJ dislikes women, that really blew her silly, silly cover.

Give it a rest WHO. You are a silly person.


someone's been at this for a while.  this look familar??? she's been grinding away like this for years!  the who's a CHICK, too!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1711 on: February 15, 2007, 07:58:55 PM »
To the statistics guy:

You're obviously very well educated about the finer points of this branch of mathematics.

You are, however, not very smart in another area.

You're still replying to the troll.

WITHOUT REPLIES, THE TROLL DIES.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1712 on: February 15, 2007, 09:15:58 PM »
Who gives a shit?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Ganja

  • Posts: 606
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1713 on: February 15, 2007, 09:18:58 PM »
About what?  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1714 on: February 15, 2007, 09:24:52 PM »
About whether theWHo posts here or not? Or whether people respond to him.. its just one freakin thread. Dont click on it if you dont want to read it.

This group effort to try and control the crowd so we dont speak to the EVIL DOER who who should be in the corner with his dunce cap on, facing the ground in shame...... I think the more the programmies talk the better. Give them a megaphone and let them explain how crazy they really are.

If you censor the village idiot, people might start wondering what he is saying might have some merit. If you let him walk the village screaming all day long.. well its a more effective strategy.

So... really.... who gives a shit?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1715 on: February 15, 2007, 09:25:05 PM »
You're a layman, and it shows.

"points" on a graph created by interpolation is an ESTIMATE, it is NOT A DATUM.

There is a huge distinction between actual data and an estimated output of a function.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1716 on: February 15, 2007, 09:26:25 PM »
People people people, Its a waste of time, Cindy is incapable of ever accepting or understanding that he's been proven wrong. No point in really trying to show him the light. He just cant get it, the brain damage is far too exstensive. In alot of ways he strikes me a runner at the special olympics. He runs the race and loses yet for some reason he keeps on running in circles, insisting he can still win long after hes lost.


The best way to deal with him is to either ignore him which isnt nearly as funny.

or

Continue to embarrass him and confront him with the fallacies of his own logic.

He cant stand that and its hysterical to watch.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1717 on: February 15, 2007, 09:27:57 PM »
TheWho's MO:

"If I'm wrong, I'll find another angle, and once I've ran out of angles I'll repeat old shit hoping they forgot it (or because I forgot it was wrong or in some way incorrect myself) until everyone gets tired and goes away, then convince myself I won".
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1718 on: February 15, 2007, 09:29:06 PM »
Can we at least stop pretending that we post here for some morally righteous cause?

TheWho thread is not a righteous cause, sorry to break it to you guys.

This is PURE shits and giggles, nothing more.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1719 on: February 15, 2007, 09:29:47 PM »
PURE shit ?  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1720 on: February 15, 2007, 09:36:37 PM »
For example.....

Quote
Havent seen any data coming from you Bob that meet the parameters, just critisism....thats what we call...Zero value added.


Oh Cindy my data adds plenty of value did you forget mine is accurate while yours is pure drivel?

You are correct on one point though, my data doesnt fit your parameters. The reason of course being that as Ive explained to you several times over, I simply dont give a shit about your parameters. No one else uses them and you set them up for the sole purpose of serving your agenda. Add that to the fact that youve changed your parameters and data several times over.

In the meantime my data doesnt exclude pertinant information-something parents value.

Speaking of which Im still waiting on you to explain how being a program parent qualifies you to determine what information parents need and what information they dont.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1721 on: February 15, 2007, 09:37:18 PM »
Quote from: ""Nihilanthic""
TheWho's MO:

"If I'm wrong, I'll find another angle, and once I've ran out of angles I'll repeat old shit hoping they forgot it (or because I forgot it was wrong or in some way incorrect myself) until everyone gets tired and goes away, then convince myself I won".


exactly.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1722 on: February 15, 2007, 09:41:37 PM »
Quote
Thanks for another Classic Bobism... I am sure the CDC and NCES are sweating and worried Bob has just exposed them...lets see if they shut their website down now and go home....


Youre sure about alot of things but youre a delusional nutjob. As it stands I dont believe either website should "shut down". I simple pointed out that the data from the two sites apparently doesnt agree thus you should not use it and claim it to be reliable data. Of course youre a moron so you will anyway.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1723 on: February 15, 2007, 09:42:51 PM »
Quote
I typically only repost the data if someone asks me to or if the data set has been updated or revised.


You mean when you change the data. I'm curious though can you provide many examples of people asking you to report your nonsense?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1724 on: February 15, 2007, 09:56:31 PM »
More questions you failed to notice yesterday Cindy, or dodged.

1. Since you claim to have not followed the cases regarding the deaths in the PTS how can you certain a judge ruled them as not being homicides?

2. If a child died in a similar manner to how most of the kids in the PTS died (restrained to death) would you in the public sector likely be brought up on criminal charges?

3. Do you believe the 300lbs asst. counselor who sat on the kid at Eckert and killed him should have been brought up on criminal charges?

4. Do you believe the program owners have the kids best interest at heart.

5. How can you claim to have the kids safety in mind when you repeatedly discount their deaths or dismiss their experiences?

6. Where is the support from all these "concerned parents" you claim to work with?

7. How does donating to charity or spending time with kids help kids locked up in the PTS?

8. Since you never actually experienced one of these places how can claim it to be a positive experience?

9. How does being a program parent qualify you to decide what information parents should or should not have?

Quote
I believe staying the course based on old or nonexistent data is being ?dumb as a bag of rocks? as you call it. Basing ones decision on experiences that occurred in the 1980?s and refusing to look at recent data is really short sighted and only serves to mislead the parents and in the long run hurt the children.


This has got to be one of my favorites. Cindy considering currently on fornits you have posters incarcerated as long as 30 years ago and as recently as six months ago, would we have a better understanding than you with your lone experience as a program parent?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 113 114 [115] 116 117 ... 286   Go Up
« previous next »