Author Topic: The Who  (Read 861639 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1695 on: February 15, 2007, 03:55:08 PM »
Estimation from interpolation is not the creation of data... unless you're getting really meta about it and saying that it is data generated from the interpolation function itself.

However it is not a "REAL" datum as... it doesn't exist (or was not collected) if you have to interpolate it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1696 on: February 15, 2007, 03:57:41 PM »
Quote
In engineering and science one often has a number of data points, as obtained by Sampling or experiment, and tries to construct a function which closely fits those data points.


Funny you mention this, because I happen to be an engineer.  This is exactly what I told you earlier: interpolation is used to create a function, not a datapoint, as you have insisted.

So all you did was quaote what I already said and tried to say I didn't say it even though I said it verbatim.  It also happens to directly contradict what you said - that interpolation creates datapoints.

Thanks for proving beyond doubt that you were and are wrong about this and that you cannot accept responsibility for being wrong, nor admit it.  You've proven both of my points.  One, you have no idea what you're talking about and two, you will say or do anything to avoid admitting it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1697 on: February 15, 2007, 04:00:38 PM »
Quote from: ""Nihilanthic""
Estimation from interpolation is not the creation of data... unless you're getting really meta about it and saying that it is data generated from the interpolation function itself.

However it is not a "REAL" datum as... it doesn't exist (or was not collected) if you have to interpolate it.


Yes, Niles!  You've grasped it on the first go-round!  Neatly done.

Now why can't the self-described expert make this connection.

Interpolation creates a function which is in no way, shape or form data.

Precisely my point, precisely as I argued it.  Now TheWho quotes me and says I'm arguing against myself.  Brilliant chap. :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1698 on: February 15, 2007, 04:06:26 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote
our math gurus to run an interpolation of the data to estimate the numbers as they would fit into our year.

Again, interpolation involves fixed data points, not estimations of data points.  Fire your gurus and yourself.

My original quote saying that interpolation involves datapoints, but does not create them.  This proves either you can't read, or you will tie yourself in knots to avoid saying you don't understand the topic.

Quote
Notice that interpolation is used to calculate a function and not datapoints.

I also said this.

Then you say this:

Quote
Why is this so hard for you to understand? Yes it does use datapoints !! why are you arguing this? Ha,Ha,Ha. You say I am being critical but you keep coming back with the wrong information.


I already said it USES datapoints, but CANNOT CREATE THEM.  

You QUOTED me then proceeded to MISquote me in your idiotic response!  Classic!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1699 on: February 15, 2007, 04:34:46 PM »
Okay Bob, er I mean guest, I guess we could go round and round.  Our guys create a function based on existing data to fit our needs (interpolate).....this is our application ... and it works well and the IRS and CPA types like the results of our interpolation.

"Filling in unknown values in a sequence by examining known values. " .......... Creating data points

Here, check out the definition we use:

http://www.investorwords.com/2573/interpolation.html
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1700 on: February 15, 2007, 05:29:39 PM »
The subject of interpolation came about when we were discussing the differences in the time frames of the NCES data and the CDC data.  The NCES uses the time frame July1, thru June where the CDC uses the more traditional January thru December.  I believe we ascertained that the NCES requests a custom report (From the CDC) to fit their needs which led to the discussion of interpolation, anyway ?we have reviewed much data over the past few days and have not found an instance for the last 3 years in a TBS.  Here is what we look like today:

July 1, 1999 thru June 2000 [/u]

Outside a TBS: -----There where 1,537 Homicides  and 1,415 suicides (NCES)& (CDC)
Inside a TBS --------There where 0 Homicides and 2 suicides.*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2000 thru June 2001  

Outside a TBS: -----There where 1,466 Homicides and 1,493 suicides (NCES)& (CDC)
Inside a TBS --------There where 0 Homicides and 1 suicide.  (Data set still open)*
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2001 thru June 2002  

Outside a TBS: -----There where 1,468 Homicides and 1,400 suicides (NCES)& (CDC)
Inside a TBS --------There where 0 Homicides and 0 suicides.  ( Data set still open)*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2002 thru June 2003  

Outside a TBS: -----There where 1,515 Homicides and 1,331 suicides  (NCES)& (CDC)
Inside a TBS --------There where 0 Homicides and 0 suicides.  ( Data set still open)*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 1, 2003 thru June 2004  

Outside a TBS: -----There where 1,437 Homicides and 1,285 suicides (NCES)& (CDC)
Inside a TBS --------There where 0 Homicides and 0 suicides.  ( Data set still open, 72 sources reviewed, mostly emails and news articles)*

TBS - Therapeutic Boarding Schools
NCES ? National Center for Education Statistics
CDC -- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
* - Data found here on fornits, internet news articles, posts and PM?s
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1701 on: February 15, 2007, 07:05:18 PM »
Quote from: ""TheWho""
Okay Bob, er I mean guest, I guess we could go round and round.  Our guys create a function based on existing data to fit our needs (interpolate).....this is our application ... and it works well and the IRS and CPA types like the results of our interpolation.

"Filling in unknown values in a sequence by examining known values. " .......... Creating data points

Here, check out the definition we use:

http://www.investorwords.com/2573/interpolation.html


This is exactly wrong and exactly why I say you've no grasp of the subject matter.  You don't understand the difference between data and assertions made thereabout.  

What you describe cannot be, by definition, a datapoint.  It is an artificially created conclusion drawn by a human being using mathematics to estimate a particular phenomenon in original, empiric data (interpolation).  

This is the fundamental reason that illustrates that you simply do not comprehend the subject; the very premise of your argument is false, therefore any conclusion you draw from this premise is necessarily false as well.  This is basic, introductory logic.  You ne3d to take some classes.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Ganja

  • Posts: 606
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1702 on: February 15, 2007, 07:06:10 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
116, now.

WITHOUT REPLIES, THE TROLL DIES.

Still counting...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1703 on: February 15, 2007, 07:34:06 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""TheWho""
Okay Bob, er I mean guest, I guess we could go round and round.  Our guys create a function based on existing data to fit our needs (interpolate).....this is our application ... and it works well and the IRS and CPA types like the results of our interpolation.

"Filling in unknown values in a sequence by examining known values. " .......... Creating data points

Here, check out the definition we use:

http://www.investorwords.com/2573/interpolation.html

This is exactly wrong and exactly why I say you've no grasp of the subject matter.  You don't understand the difference between data and assertions made thereabout.  

What you describe cannot be, by definition, a datapoint.  It is an artificially created conclusion drawn by a human being using mathematics to estimate a particular phenomenon in original, empiric data (interpolation).  

This is the fundamental reason that illustrates that you simply do not comprehend the subject; the very premise of your argument is false, therefore any conclusion you draw from this premise is necessarily false as well.  This is basic, introductory logic.  You ne3d to take some classes.


Here let me try to explain this again, this is really basic stats, okay one more time:

In Origin, the interpolation and extrapolation operations allow you to add data points to your dataset where there once were no data points. Interpolation allows you to add new data points between pairs of existing data points, while extrapolation allows you to add data points that extend beyond the beginning or ending values of your data range.

We are filling in datapoints:

Here is another link for you:

http://www.originlab.com/index.aspx?s=8&lm=115&pid=81
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1704 on: February 15, 2007, 07:34:13 PM »
Quote
I believe we ascertained that the NCES requests a custom report (From the CDC) to fit their needs


No.  You simply made this up and now say it was "ascertained."  It wasn't.  This is your guess, not a fact.  Strangely, you can't ascertain the difference between something real and factual and something you made up.  Why does that not surprise me...?

This guy is living in Bizarro World. :silly:  ::bangin::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
The Who
« Reply #1705 on: February 15, 2007, 07:35:51 PM »
@The Who

Who do you work for?
If you don't feel like answering that one, what area do you work in? what is your job?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1706 on: February 15, 2007, 07:37:18 PM »
The funny thing about this argument is it has nothing to do with the data we are collecting,  it has to do with some people at my company and how they deal with missing parameters to satisfy our CPA?s.  But I think it will serve some purpose.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1707 on: February 15, 2007, 07:42:04 PM »
118 pages now.  It just keeps going, and going, and going...::soapbox::

It's too funny that the Whomeister keeps getting proven wrong over and over and will never admit it, he just keeps on banging away at it.  This is probably the type of behavior that infuriated his daughter so much and inflamed her difficulties. I can definitely see how someone so out of touch with reality and so insistent on never admitting he was at fault for anything or wrong about anything could wear down that poor kid until she'd do anything to get away from it.  I bet he never tells her about his posting here.  If she ever read any of it she'd be so embarrassed it's not even funny.   He's actually more than likely even sicker than she already thinks.  This would put it over the top for her.  Betcha.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1708 on: February 15, 2007, 07:44:57 PM »
Quote from: ""TheWho""
The funny thing about this argument is it has nothing to do with the data we are collecting,  it has to do with some people at my company and how they deal with missing parameters to satisfy our CPA?s.  But I think it will serve some purpose.


Oh yeah, it serves a purpose alright.  Shines a little light on what a crackpot you are!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1709 on: February 15, 2007, 07:49:49 PM »
@Psy-

Who's employment is like the first dozen pages of this glorious thread...  Enjoy. :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control