There are TBS?s which are very effective and safe for your children and they know it but they have an agenda.
Like HLA? Another 'better', Cream 'o the Crop program you were defending last year?
TheWho would have you believe that programs are
100 times safer, when nothing could be further from the truth. When a program or parent makes such outlandish claims, ask them to cite their sources. There are a few white papers out that attempt to spin success. What a parent should know is that there have been no third-party independent research studies conducted on the industry. Every study they can provide you has been conducted by industry people.
I would advise any parent to talk to parents who've had kids in programs, but don't limit it to the ones the program refers you to. Read the HLA forum for information from ex teens (some adults now), parents, and staff.
You will find examples of rape, inappropriate sexual contact between staff/student and student/student, attempted suicides, hazing incidents (violence), staff mistreatment (violence).
You will read that HLA accepts adjudicated youth, some who left campus to serve their sentence and returned. They accepted seriously distressed kids that put the others at risk. Offer an incentive plan to counselor to decrease attrition. Conduct strip searches. How kids have access to drugs, tobacco, alcohol. Unqualified staff and teachers. Manual labor performed by the kids that enhances the property value. Withhold records and pre-paid tuition. Misappropriated donations. Unlicensed and regulated by the state. Most of this, contrary to their marketing. There is a link on the HLA forum to the Federal Lawsuit that is in progress.
That's a sampling, from one of the Premier programs in the industry. People thought they were different too, until the program fell under scrutiny and the truth began to emerge. Would ASR stand up to the same scrutiny? Perhaps time will tell. But, ASR has a very similar history to HLA. The same CEDU person started both programs. Both use experimental CEDU techniques. Both have aggressively fought the state to remain unlicensed. Why? If they are operating above board, what do they have to be concerned about?
TheWho would have you believe that TBSs are 'effective' when his own daughter returned to drug use and smoking after 16 months in a TBS (as 98% do), moved away and didn't speak to him for 2 years, and didn't go on to college.
If that is success, what does failure look like?
They had 16 months to 'fix' Who's kid. What did they do during that time?
She is not an exception.
They should be embarrassed to take $6000 a month from parents and do little but keep their kid in a holding tank. But, as Who states, it is a market driven by demand. Parents are duped about the services they are paying for and have no skill in evaluating the services provided. So the industry continues to profit. Don't limit your research to Fornits, read StrugglingTeens, where you'll find many, many such 'success' stories. Some who tried multiple TBSs and wilderness programs. Look around MySpace. Thanks to the internet, the information is easily accessible now, and one reason programs won't be able to operate as fradulently as they have in the past.
If you talk to any experienced professional they will tell you that the length of time a teen 'gets off course' is typically about 18 months.
Save your money and grief. Stick it out with your kid. $6000 a month will buy a lot of local services, and the family can actually be involved in the process, as they should be. You can't re-build relationships and resolve issues in 15 minute phone calls once a week and quarterly visits, or even on video conference calls. It's the antithesis of therapy. They know this and will strongly encourage you to make a post-program placement so your child doesn't return home and dash the illusion that the program 'worked'. When kids appear to be successful, it is inspite of the program, not because of it. All programs are spin-offs of CEDU, which was a spin-off of Synanon. The methods and techniques are experimental and not evidence-based. CEDU went bankrupt due to excessive lawsuits. With any luck, there will be a domino effect, and one-by-one the remaining spin-offs will fall.
YOU are quiet likely the only person in the world who has a genunie vested interest in your child. Authentic therapy would not require that you sever contact with your child- you are there only source for reporting abuse and discrepancies in policy. Authentic therapy includes the family on a regular basis and doesn't isolate the child or treat him/her in a bubble. Authentic therapy would not expose a child to injury or the risk of death. Do your research.