Author Topic: The Who  (Read 794651 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Guest

  • Guest
Re: The Who
« Reply #3315 on: September 18, 2008, 12:41:04 AM »
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "xczv"
Try to visit my site and judge me there.  Tell me what you think of me in front of everyone on my site.


http://http://www.adventistchat.net/

Wait, so you're inviting someone to come on your site and fight with you, but you'll sue them if they do.  Is that right?

Yes, that is right.  You are protecting this demon by allowing him to post here, you are not practicing tolerance by allowing this.  If you had any moral responsibility you would all come together and send him off.  If this vulgar monster comes to my site I will identify him and bring him to court.[/quote]






Memo to anne:

TheWho’s pretending to be “me,” SDA.

I’m not a 7th day Adventist. Lol. My posts are the first "sda," "ads" and "meww" Everyone else is thewho, youth murderer and torturer.

What a pathetic, unseemly piece of dishonest on Who’s behalf!

See what I mean about him/her being so transparently untrustworthy that he works against the industry?

What person could see him/her, supposedly a middle aged parent, act like that, and value any "testimony" it provides? Or find him/her, especailly since it posts here from morning untill night, anything but a warning against the madness of the cults he/she represents?[/quote]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Guest

  • Guest
Re: The Who
« Reply #3316 on: September 18, 2008, 12:45:06 AM »
Weird triple post.

And who's presence here hurts out freedom of speech, not helps it.

 This is true for many reasons. One is our current inability to post images. It's the who's constant posting of scat porn that instigated this change.

Now you can't post images, or even quote posts with images in them, which are like a quarter of the posts here.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anne Bonney

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5006
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3317 on: September 18, 2008, 03:13:17 AM »
Quote from: "SDA"
Weird triple post.

And who's presence here hurts out freedom of speech, not helps it.

 This is true for many reasons. One is our current inability to post images. It's the who's constant posting of scat porn that instigated this change.

Now you can't post images, or even quote posts with images in them, which are like a quarter of the posts here.


So what do you suggest be done?  It's already been proven that you can't ban people.  They just go get proxies.  I don't think anyone wants to eliminate anon posting, so what should be done?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
traight, St. Pete, early 80s
AA is a cult http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult.html

The more boring a child is, the more the parents, when showing off the child, receive adulation for being good parents-- because they have a tame child-creature in their house.  ~~  Frank Zappa

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: The Who
« Reply #3318 on: September 18, 2008, 04:28:43 AM »
Quote from: "SDA"
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "SDA"
you are a Monster
Try to visit my site and judge me there.  Tell me what you think of me in front of everyone on my site.


http://http://www.adventistchat.net/

Wait, so you're inviting someone to come on your site and fight with you, but you'll sue them if they do.  Is that right?

Yes, that is right.  You are protecting this demon by allowing him to post here, you are not practicing tolerance by allowing this.  If you had any moral responsibility you would all come together and send him off.


Ok.  TIme for the local administration to chime in on free speech.  Read this exchange here:

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=24149&p=313434#p313411

Quote
If this vulgar monster comes to my site I will identify him and bring him to court.

For what?  and if you can figure out a "what", can you prove it with admissible evidence?


Look.  I can't stand TheWho either, but it's not worth setting a precedent by banning him (not that banning would work, since he would simply use a proxy and come back as a guest).  Just read the above link I gave you and maybe you'll change your mind.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: The Who
« Reply #3319 on: September 18, 2008, 04:35:09 AM »
Quote from: "SDA"
Weird triple post.

And who's presence here hurts out freedom of speech, not helps it.

 This is true for many reasons. One is our current inability to post images. It's the who's constant posting of scat porn that instigated this change

Good argument, but there is no evidence it was him who was posting that porn.  It came from a bunch of proxies.  I'm not sure I believe it was him either, since there are plenty of others with (arguably far more) motive, and it's just not TheWho's style.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Guest

  • Guest
Re: The Who
« Reply #3320 on: September 18, 2008, 05:58:35 AM »
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "SDA"
Quote from: "SDA"
you are a Monster
Try to visit my site and judge me there.  Tell me what you think of me in front of everyone on my site.


http://http://www.adventistchat.net/





Ok.  TIme for the local administration to chime in on free speech.  Read this exchange here:

http://www.fornits.com/phpbb/viewtopic. ... 34#p313411

Quote
If this vulgar monster comes to my site I will identify him and bring him to court.

For what?  and if you can figure out a "what", can you prove it with admissible evidence?


Look.  I can't stand TheWho either, but it's not worth setting a precedent by banning him (not that banning would work, since he would simply use a proxy and come back as a guest).  Just read the above link I gave you and maybe you'll change your mind.

PSY YOU ARE TALKING TO THE WHO!!!

Also, there's something fucked up with the quotes. You can't post more than "3 embeded quotes" or something. And half the time, the quotes don't go up right.. Anyone else have this problem?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Guest

  • Guest
Re: The Who
« Reply #3321 on: September 18, 2008, 06:26:25 AM »
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "SDA"
Weird triple post.

And who's presence here hurts out freedom of speech, not helps it.

 This is true for many reasons. One is our current inability to post images. It's the who's constant posting of scat porn that instigated this change

Good argument, but there is no evidence it was him who was posting that porn.  It came from a bunch of proxies.  I'm not sure I believe it was him either, since there are plenty of others with (arguably far more) motive, and it's just not TheWho's style.

I'm pretty sure it is, based on its pretending to be me a while ago. The other entity you speak of, Psycho Sue Scheff, has a different style—she posts those “psy is gay and a killer” threads, right? No, porn’s a little vulgar for her. Who else? The Benchmark people? I guess it could be anyone…but he was the only consistent presence through this time.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Guest

  • Guest
Re: The Who
« Reply #3322 on: September 18, 2008, 06:40:08 AM »
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "SDA"
Weird triple post.

And who's presence here hurts out freedom of speech, not helps it.

 This is true for many reasons. One is our current inability to post images. It's the who's constant posting of scat porn that instigated this change.

Now you can't post images, or even quote posts with images in them, which are like a quarter of the posts here.


So what do you suggest be done?  It's already been proven that you can't ban people.  They just go get proxies.  I don't think anyone wants to eliminate anon posting, so what should be done?

1)Ban thewho.
Ban all “easy proxies.” The kind you buy, the “anonymouse” types. That way you can only post with the “sophisticated” proxies like tor, OO…these work, but take FOREVER.

The porn man and thewho operate on a deluge modality. Slow. them down. They’ll still post, but not to the point it’s too invasive

2)Get over it, it’s just porn. Re-allow free speech.(Yeah, I get the irony in wanting who banned, but wanting images allowed i.n.o “free speech” but while I don’t mind censoring thewho, not everyone should be censored because of him. Who’s a special case: a multi-year cancer whose devoted himself to derailing threads with day-in day-out with nonsensical repetitive program propaganda)

3) Let images be posted and people have the choice whether to click on them again

4) Allow people to choose whether they want to view images or not by some magic geek voodoo I’m not familiar with.

5) Give the who's i.p to anonymous. YOU may not be able to find out who he is through it, but THEY can. Find out what program he's connected to, post that info.

6) Watch this forum continue to slide into obscurity.

7) Other suggestions?

8) I like the number 8. It's more than 7, less than nine. Yeah.....8
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Guest

  • Guest
Re: The Who
« Reply #3323 on: September 18, 2008, 08:47:10 AM »
Quote from: "sda"
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "SDA"
Weird triple post.

And who's presence here hurts out freedom of speech, not helps it.

 This is true for many reasons. One is our current inability to post images. It's the who's constant posting of scat porn that instigated this change.

Now you can't post images, or even quote posts with images in them, which are like a quarter of the posts here.


So what do you suggest be done?  It's already been proven that you can't ban people.  They just go get proxies.  I don't think anyone wants to eliminate anon posting, so what should be done?

1)Ban thewho.
Ban all “easy proxies.” The kind you buy, the “anonymouse” types. That way you can only post with the “sophisticated” proxies like tor, OO…these work, but take FOREVER.

The porn man and thewho operate on a deluge modality. Slow. them down. They’ll still post, but not to the point it’s too invasive

2)Get over it, it’s just porn. Re-allow free speech.(Yeah, I get the irony in wanting who banned, but wanting images allowed i.n.o “free speech” but while I don’t mind censoring thewho, not everyone should be censored because of him. Who’s a special case: a multi-year cancer whose devoted himself to derailing threads with day-in day-out with nonsensical repetitive program propaganda)

3) Let images be posted and people have the choice whether to click on them again

4) Allow people to choose whether they want to view images or not by some magic geek voodoo I’m not familiar with.

5) Give the who's i.p to anonymous. YOU may not be able to find out who he is through it, but THEY can. Find out what program he's connected to, post that info.

6) Watch this forum continue to slide into obscurity.

7) Other suggestions?

8 ) I like the number 8. It's more than 7, less than nine. Yeah.....8

anon just hacked sara palins email
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3324 on: September 18, 2008, 11:42:10 AM »
LDS ,out of all the people who post here on fornits your type is by far the most dangerous.  You like to control and have exposed anyone who has a different opinion then yours, deny them of their individual right of free speech, try to bring them into the open.  If this cannot be accomplished individually then you suggest denying entire groups of people by shutting down proxy server access, while at the same time you protect your individual freedom by posting under several user names, ADS, SDA,ASDA,MEEW etc.,to cover your tracks.  You can easily go back and review what I have posted years ago by doing a search under my user name and I do post anonymously when being trolled or when I cannot log it, but you seem to be ashamed of what you write so you change user names at will.

If you read back we were all discussing the rights of children until you jumped in and decided to troll and derail this thread with your personal agenda.  The reason psy had to discontinue the use of images is because of people like you who feel their individual rights are above everyone elses without regard to other people posting here.



...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3325 on: September 18, 2008, 11:59:34 AM »
Quote
and have exposed anyone who has a different opinion then yours

As do you.

Quote
and I do post anonymously when being trolled or when I cannot log it

Or you when feel the urge to pretend to be other people or are looking to avoid being held accountable for your own comments.

Quote
people like you who feel their individual rights are above everyone elses without regard to other people posting here.

And spamming the board was you considering others?

Pot meet kettle.

Cindy is it your belief that 60 kids per week die violent deaths in public schools?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3326 on: September 18, 2008, 01:36:33 PM »
Quote from: "TheWho"
LDS ,out of all the people who post here on fornits your type is by far the most dangerous.  You like to control and have exposed anyone who has a different opinion then yours, deny them of their individual right of free speech, try to bring them into the open.  If this cannot be accomplished individually then you suggest denying entire groups of people by shutting down proxy server access, while at the same time you protect your individual freedom by posting under several user names, ADS, SDA,ASDA,MEEW etc.,to cover your tracks.  You can easily go back and review what I have posted years ago by doing a search under my user name and I do post anonymously when being trolled or when I cannot log it, but you seem to be ashamed of what you write so you change user names at will.

If you read back we were all discussing the rights of children until you jumped in and decided to troll and derail this thread with your personal agenda.  The reason psy had to discontinue the use of images is because of people like you who feel their individual rights are above everyone elses without regard to other people posting here.



...

Wow, not sure what to say.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3327 on: September 18, 2008, 01:48:34 PM »
Quote from: "ADD"
Quote from: "TheWho"
LDS ,out of all the people who post here on fornits your type is by far the most dangerous.  You like to control and have exposed anyone who has a different opinion then yours, deny them of their individual right of free speech, try to bring them into the open.  If this cannot be accomplished individually then you suggest denying entire groups of people by shutting down proxy server access, while at the same time you protect your individual freedom by posting under several user names, ADS, SDA,ASDA,MEEW etc.,to cover your tracks.  You can easily go back and review what I have posted years ago by doing a search under my user name and I do post anonymously when being trolled or when I cannot log it, but you seem to be ashamed of what you write so you change user names at will.

If you read back we were all discussing the rights of children until you jumped in and decided to troll and derail this thread with your personal agenda.  The reason psy had to discontinue the use of images is because of people like you who feel their individual rights are above everyone elses without regard to other people posting here.



...

Wow, not sure what to say.

"Fuck you" would be a good place to start. It sounds like he's describing his StrugglingTeens site and not LDS.

ARGUING WITH THE WHO IS LIKE ARGUING WITH A RACIST.  YOU ACCOMPLISH NOTHING.  IGNORANCE IS IN HIS BLOOD.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
This thread sucks
« Reply #3328 on: September 18, 2008, 02:06:09 PM »
::)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: The Who
« Reply #3329 on: September 18, 2008, 02:16:45 PM »
Quote from: "TheWhoNoNo"
"Fuck you" would be a good place to start. It sounds like he's describing his StrugglingTeens site and not LDS.

ARGUING WITH THE WHO IS LIKE ARGUING WITH A RACIST.  YOU ACCOMPLISH NOTHING.  IGNORANCE IS IN HIS BLOOD.


Aww, that is not right, dont care what you say.  Read back a bit and it doesnt matter to me what anyone says free speech is free speech.  It is not right that LDS or ADS try to silence someone because of what they say.  No one was banned when the porn was being posted and that is worse than having a bad opinion.  Your priorities are fucked up.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »