Author Topic: The Who  (Read 862456 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1035 on: January 18, 2007, 10:52:46 AM »
Quote
ZenAgent said:

Eight randomized clinical trials have proven that MST enhances parenting
skills and improves the familial environment. In a study with random assignment
comparing MST group-based parent training with traditional parent
training, MST achieved better outcomes in parental ability to control children?s
problem behaviors, increased parental positive responses to children,
and improved child compliance (Brunk et al., 1987). However, parent training
surpassed MST in the improvement of social problems, likely due to the group
context of parent training. Both interventions show significant reductions in
child externalizing behaviors, parenting stress, and family functioning (Brunk
et al., 1987).


Zen, this is where we run into problems with TheWho.  He doesn't understand what a clinical trial is or how it is the benchmark of effectiveness.

He refuses to admit that clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of any approach.

One more time, Who.  Why is it that not one single program in over thirty years has conducted or has allowed a researcher to conduct a single clinical trial of their methods?[/b]

This is a critical point, Who.  Practitioners see new treatment modalities being created and employed all the time, with one major difference ffrom the programs you support: every single method developed is introduced only after a clinical trial has been completed that proves efficacy.

You see the MST research comes with a full report on efficacy and it has only been around for a few years.  Same with FFT (Functional Family Therapy).

Since, for over thirty years, there has never been a clinical trial performed at any program, one must have to wonder what are these people trying to hide???[/b].

Anecdotally, I can tell you the answer.  In my experience working in two programs, one the oldest and largest in the USA, and the other the model upon which all NATSAP facilities (including ASR, which was founded by the same person who started up the original) were created, treatment outcomes showed utter failure, and sometimes a clinical degradation of the patient's condition - THEY GOT WORSE![/b]

Discuss.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1036 on: January 18, 2007, 11:11:33 AM »
Quote
It was based on our last conversation before I left for Asia, you didn?t seem up for any open discussion.

The last real conversation you and I had prior to you leaving for Asia centered on you claiming that HLA not having a nurse wasn't nessecarily a problem. I believe you are confusing me for someone else. If you can provide a link or a time frame for this conversation I will look into it and apologize if I'm mistaken, but I'm fairly positive that you are the one in the wrong here. Can you offer a link?

Quote
I have not said anyone was lying about their experience at a program.

Out and out lying? That I'm not sure of, you have however said it in a roundabout way, you've discounted peoples experiences.

Quote
But I have seen first hand as have many that these school are effective, very effective. There haven?t been any studies or evidence that support that any children have been hurt by ASR, in fact the evidence supports overwhelmingly the opposite.Posted: 26 Jun 2006 02:31  

Here you claim to have seen first hand the effectiveness of not just ASR but many schools. Not to mention discounting any student who claims to have been hurt in ASR.



Quote
I think they would accept a balanced argument, if for any other reason to try and educate that person.

Do you believe most people in that situation are even interested in learning the truth? Even you refused to accept evidence when it was staring you in the face. Why?

Quote
I have never refuted anyones? story of their time spent inside a program. I may not have believed some of the documentation that was presented, some lists that have been shown to me, or agreed that any of us know what the owners of these places are thinking or what motivates them. I just don?t believe that these people wake up in the morning and say lets build a school, load it with kids who have a problem and then abuse them. It sounds like fun. No I don?t agree with that mentality, I think most of these school are run with the best intentions in mind and are willing to change policies if they are found to be abusive.

Okay I cannot speak to the owners initial mindsets. Maybe most of them do at the beginning want to help kids, but get lost along the way. Let's look at just HLA, if they truly have the best intentions in mind why would they avoid state regulation and oversight? Why would any of these places?

Quote
That is why I like fornits. I feel I have the freedom to speak against places that I feel abuse kids (Straight) and speak for places that I feel do not (ASR).

Okay understand that sites like the discuss hla board do not allow for dissenting opinions or for speaking out against the programs. Fornits is one of the few places we can do that, so for you to claim that fornits needs to be balanced isnt exactly the case (even though to some degree it is) because for every fornits there is a discusshla.

Quote
I don?t feel I dodge any questions. If I say ?I feel the majority of fornits posters seem to be biased towards not liking programs.? Someone may call me on it and say ?Prove it?!! This is almost an impossible task to gather names and present a statistical model to cover those who have left or do not respond to my survey and then get buy-in from everyone to accept the model which in turn would affect the credibility of the results. I would just say ?No, this is my opinion?. If the person still asked for proof, this would not be dodging the question?. My answer was ?No?. If you hold one person to a standard then everyone needs to be.

The standards are the same, when you make claims like "TBS's are safer than public schools" this warrants a source. Otherwise you are feeding parents bad information. So when someone asks you for a source and you refuse you are dodging the question.


Quote
If someone says ? theWho no one here wants to hear your views anymore? ?fornits posters don?t believe what you say? are you going to jump in and demand these people come up with a statistical study to prove the scales tip in their favor?


Probably not simply because I can see it with my own eyes, but if you demanded a survey to prove the claim I would take part and encourage others to do the same. But when you or someone else starts talking about things you cannot see or cannot know first hand then yes I would ask that proof be provided. The thing is though most of the people who are anti program (for lack of a better term) do provide proof of some sort. Its people on your side of the fence the pro program that ususally dont.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1037 on: January 18, 2007, 11:13:39 AM »
Quote from: ""ZenAgent""
Who.......

Everyone I talk to here is against programs for damn good reasons, that's why this forum is here.......  What if somebody sent a kid to ASR because they bought your bullshit and something terrible happened?  Are you that positive it's such a great place?  I don't know much about you, but I can't see doing what you're doing without some financial motivation.

I would feel absolutely awful.  Imagine a parent coming on here and having a daughter in crisis and considering ?Swift River? and hears the banter that ?All? schools are abusive and "every" child is subject to abuse and he blindly buys into it, lock stock and barrel.  So he decides against sending her and she gets a hold of a lethal dose of Heroin and she dies a week later.  


Quote
You returned from Asia?  Who are you - Gary Glitter?


Not sure what you mean.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1038 on: January 18, 2007, 11:13:45 AM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Deborah""
Quote from: ""TheWho""
Sorry guest, this is what you get here if you don?t embrace the group position or take a viewpoint outside of theirs.  Parents move on before anyone can get a message to them.  Its more about dumping their anger in a post as apposed to helping any kids, its too bad.  I think there is a lot of value that Fornits can add to a parents decision instead of just trashing their point of view and chasing them off.

The "guest" is well aware of what happens on Fornits. She is no stranger. There will always be parents such as yourself who condone the abuse and consider it 'therapy'.

let me guess...  amoral annie from minnesota, the program pimp?

confirm please, as my bs detector is set to 'ottawa5' right now.


Nope, not O5.  I'll give a hint.  Fill in the blank: "Sorry, _______!"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1039 on: January 18, 2007, 11:18:14 AM »
Very interesting! What does a clinical trial entail, exactly? (I know this may be kinduvva a dumb question, but hey, I'm a little dumb about this stuff...) Thanks in advance.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ZenAgent

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1720
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.freepowerboards.com/strugglingppl/index.php
The Who
« Reply #1040 on: January 18, 2007, 11:34:57 AM »
Quote from: ""TheWho""
Quote from: ""ZenAgent""
Who.......

Everyone I talk to here is against programs for damn good reasons, that's why this forum is here.......  What if somebody sent a kid to ASR because they bought your bullshit and something terrible happened?  Are you that positive it's such a great place?  I don't know much about you, but I can't see doing what you're doing without some financial motivation.

I would feel absolutely awful.  Imagine a parent coming on here and having a daughter in crisis and considering ?Swift River? and hears the banter that ?All? schools are abusive and "every" child is subject to abuse and he blindly buys into it, lock stock and barrel.  So he decides against sending her and she gets a hold of a lethal dose of Heroin and she dies a week later.  


Quote
You returned from Asia?  Who are you - Gary Glitter?

Not sure what you mean.



That's why I'm pushing for parents to ask questions - questions ASR won't answer.  If they can't reassure you of their program's effectiveness and safety, don't send your kid.  

Nevermind about Gary Glitter.  Go to Bangkok much?
« Last Edit: January 18, 2007, 11:52:16 AM by Guest »
\"Allah does not love the public utterance of hurtful speech, unless it be by one to whom injustice has been done; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing\" - The Qur\'an

_______________________________________________
A PV counselor\'s description of his job:

\"I\'m there to handle kids that are psychotic, suicidal, homicidal, or have commited felonies. Oh yeah, I am also there to take them down when they are rowdy so the nurse can give them the booty juice.\"

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1041 on: January 18, 2007, 11:49:05 AM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Very interesting! What does a clinical trial entail, exactly? (I know this may be kinduvva a dumb question, but hey, I'm a little dumb about this stuff...) Thanks in advance.


This describes the process for medical devices and drugs mostly, but it gives an idea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_trial

Basically speaking, a clinical trial is a tightly controlled study with a control group and an experimental group.  The study is performed on both groups and the results are compared to find statistical relevence.

This has been done on every major approach to mental health treatment except "TBS," "EG" and "Wilderness Therapy."  The facilities that employ these practices do so at the peril of their clients, as the methods they use have been clinically verified to be ineffective or harmful in various studies over many years.

That being said, no one has ever been permitted to directly study these programs, only their methods (e.g. LGAT, confrontation therapy, regression therapy, etc.), which, again, are proven to be ineffective or harmful.

One MAJOR, MAJOR selling point of any healthcare facility is research proven, effective methods.  It brings in clients if it is proven to be effective.  Why then, does the TeenHurt industry claim effectiveness but cannot provide data to prove it?  Well, because the data suggest it is a failure.  

If they actually had clinical evidence that their programs work, you can bet your ass that they would publish it.  It would totally invalidate criticisms like those on this site.

Again, ask yourself why there is extensive clinical trial data on modalities that are nascient, but none for these haggard old programs???

The programs don't want to shit where they eat.  It's that simple.  They're not going to blow up their own spot and destroy their revenue stream!
« Last Edit: January 18, 2007, 11:57:31 AM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1042 on: January 18, 2007, 11:51:13 AM »
Quote
The last real conversation you and I had prior to you leaving for Asia centered on you claiming that HLA not having a nurse wasn't nessecarily a problem. I believe you are confusing me for someone else. If you can provide a link or a time frame for this conversation I will look into it and apologize if I'm mistaken, but I'm fairly positive that you are the one in the wrong here. Can you offer a link?

Thank you, no I cannot provide a link.  I am not going back thru 6 months of posts and try to prove to you what I felt your frame of mind was at the time.  There is no empirical data to mine.  Sorry you are hurt by it but it was my opinion.

Quote
Out and out lying? That I'm not sure of, you have however said it in a roundabout way, you've discounted peoples experiences.

No I don?t believe I ever had.


Quote

Quote
But I have seen first hand as have many that these school are effective, very effective. There haven?t been any studies or evidence that support that any children have been hurt by ASR, in fact the evidence supports overwhelmingly the opposite.Posted: 26 Jun 2006 02:31


Here you claim to have seen first hand the effectiveness of not just ASR but many schools. Not to mention discounting any student who claims to have been hurt in ASR.

No I didn?t,  I said ?These schools are effective?.  TBS?s ?are? effective.  School teachers make good role models,  Refrigerators keep items cold? etc.  These statements are true although some teachers rape their students, some refrigerators don?t work properly, they are still accepted as true statements..
I think it has been said here many times that there lacks a good third party study of these programs.  I have seen overwhelming evidence that kids come out safe from these places.  For one example, the suicide rate, as we found, was lower in TBS?s than in the public sector.

http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/crime03/1.asp


Quote
Okay I cannot speak to the owners initial mindsets. Maybe most of them do at the beginning want to help kids, but get lost along the way. Let's look at just HLA, if they truly have the best intentions in mind why would they avoid state regulation and oversight? Why would any of these places?


Why should they embrace regulations and oversight?  Why would anyone, it?s a ton of paperwork, costs money.  Very few of us would have driver?s licenses unless we were forced to.  We all see ourselves as good drivers I believe.  The same with DSS,  I don?t think every family would want DSS coming to visit once a month to check up on them.  It?s a pain in the ass, y0u need to be home that day rearrange your schedule.  Its not that they feel they are bad parents but if many had the choice they would say no thank you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1043 on: January 18, 2007, 11:53:34 AM »
Quote from: ""ZenAgent""
Quote from: ""TheWho""
Quote from: ""ZenAgent""
Who.......

Everyone I talk to here is against programs for damn good reasons, that's why this forum is here.......  What if somebody sent a kid to ASR because they bought your bullshit and something terrible happened?  Are you that positive it's such a great place?  I don't know much about you, but I can't see doing what you're doing without some financial motivation.

I would feel absolutely awful.  Imagine a parent coming on here and having a daughter in crisis and considering ?Swift River? and hears the banter that ?All? schools are abusive and "every" child is subject to abuse and he blindly buys into it, lock stock and barrel.  So he decides against sending her and she gets a hold of a lethal dose of Heroin and she dies a week later.  


Quote
You returned from Asia?  Who are you - Gary Glitter?

Not sure what you mean.


That's why I'm pushing for parents to ask questions - questions ASR won't answer.  If they can't reassure you of their program's effectiveness and safety.  

Nevermind about Gary Glitter.  Go to Bangkok much?


No, Russia, Kazakhstan.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ZenAgent

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1720
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.freepowerboards.com/strugglingppl/index.php
The Who
« Reply #1044 on: January 18, 2007, 11:57:28 AM »
Quote from: ""TheWho""
[
Why should they embrace regulations and oversight?  Why would anyone, it?s a ton of paperwork, costs money.  Very few of us would have driver?s licenses unless we were forced to.  We all see ourselves as good drivers I believe.  The same with DSS,  I don?t think every family would want DSS coming to visit once a month to check up on them.  It?s a pain in the ass, y0u need to be home that day rearrange your schedule.  Its not that they feel they are bad parents but if many had the choice they would say no thank you.


Jesus, that's lame.  These places are HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS.  They're taking over parenting for you.  We're not talking garages,  we're talking about people working on your kid's head.  If they embraced it, they wouldn't be mentioned on here.  Hell yes, they should be absolutely required to adhere to strict regulations.  Count the dead kids, who.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
\"Allah does not love the public utterance of hurtful speech, unless it be by one to whom injustice has been done; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing\" - The Qur\'an

_______________________________________________
A PV counselor\'s description of his job:

\"I\'m there to handle kids that are psychotic, suicidal, homicidal, or have commited felonies. Oh yeah, I am also there to take them down when they are rowdy so the nurse can give them the booty juice.\"

Offline ZenAgent

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1720
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.freepowerboards.com/strugglingppl/index.php
The Who
« Reply #1045 on: January 18, 2007, 12:06:20 PM »
Quote from: ""TheWho""
No, Russia, Kazakhstan.


Oh.  Lot of fresh trade in fallen super powers, huh?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
\"Allah does not love the public utterance of hurtful speech, unless it be by one to whom injustice has been done; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing\" - The Qur\'an

_______________________________________________
A PV counselor\'s description of his job:

\"I\'m there to handle kids that are psychotic, suicidal, homicidal, or have commited felonies. Oh yeah, I am also there to take them down when they are rowdy so the nurse can give them the booty juice.\"

Offline Ganja

  • Posts: 606
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1046 on: January 18, 2007, 12:22:58 PM »
Quote from: ""ZenAgent""
Quote from: ""TheWho""
[
Why should they embrace regulations and oversight?  Why would anyone, it?s a ton of paperwork, costs money.  Very few of us would have driver?s licenses unless we were forced to.  We all see ourselves as good drivers I believe.  The same with DSS,  I don?t think every family would want DSS coming to visit once a month to check up on them.  It?s a pain in the ass, y0u need to be home that day rearrange your schedule.  Its not that they feel they are bad parents but if many had the choice they would say no thank you.

Jesus, that's lame.  These places are HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS.  They're taking over parenting for you.  We're not talking garages,  we're talking about people working on your kid's head.  If they embraced it, they wouldn't be mentioned on here.  Hell yes, they should be absolutely required to adhere to strict regulations.  Count the dead kids, who.

Pretty flimsy, indeed!

Damn, Who.. for someone who has pretty good taste in music, you sure seem rather scandalous...

Sorry, but you do...

I'll see if I can come up with another musical prescription for you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1047 on: January 18, 2007, 12:39:47 PM »
Quote
Thank you, no I cannot provide a link. I am not going back thru 6 months of posts and try to prove to you what I felt your frame of mind was at the time. There is no empirical data to mine. Sorry you are hurt by it but it was my opinion

Oh it didn't hurt me, I simply brought it up to prove a point. You routinely make comments you cannot back up. This would seem to be a prime example of such. Your opinion may be that I feel the best way to handle teen issues is to ignore them but you have nothing to back up this claim and thus are incorrect. In laymans terms you've been proven to be wrong. I'm curious to see whether or not you will acknowledge this.

Quote
Quote:
Out and out lying? That I'm not sure of, you have however said it in a roundabout way, you've discounted peoples experiences.


No I don?t believe I ever had.

Sure you did, I even provided you an example.

Quote
But I have seen first hand as have many that these school are effective, very effective. There haven?t been any studies or evidence that support that any children have been hurt by ASR, in fact the evidence supports overwhelmingly the opposite.Posted: 26 Jun 2006 02:31

By claiming that there is no evidence that any children have ever been hurt by ASR you are effectivly discounting the experiences of any student who claims otherwise. Picture it this way, Anne has mentioned many times that she was once raped. If you were to state that her attacker was a humanitarian who had never harmed a soul you have effectively discounted the fact that he did hurt her, even without flat out calling her a liar.

Quote
No I didn?t, I said ?These schools are effective?. TBS?s ?are? effective. School teachers make good role models, Refrigerators keep items cold? etc. These statements are true although some teachers rape their students, some refrigerators don?t work properly, they are still accepted as true statements..
I think it has been said here many times that there lacks a good third party study of these programs. I have seen overwhelming evidence that kids come out safe from these places. For one example, the suicide rate, as we found, was lower in TBS?s than in the public sector.

The schools are effective based on what? Based on your experience? I'm sorry but that is not enough to claim that all TBS's are effective across the board. Not even close. This is where we run into the issue again of you believing that your opinion is sufficent. I can surmize that some refridgerators keep things cold because I know my own does and I know that I've been in other homes where I found the same to be true. I also know that some teachers are good roll models while others should have never been allowed in the class room, this based on my own experience. You do not know TBS's to be effective. For one there has never been any study done proving or even suggesting as much, two you only experienced one TBS. You could state that a single TBS proved effective for you, nothing else. You are not entitled to discuss anything else because you haven't experienced anything else.


Quote
For one example, the suicide rate, as we found, was lower in TBS?s than in the public sector.

http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/crime03/1.asp

While I'm impressed that you finally tried to back up your claim you apparently did so without actually looking at what this source had to say. This in no way discusses or compares suicide rates between public schools and TBS's. So in reality you havent backed up your claim at all simply because you still seem to believe there was only a single suicide in all TBS's within a 30 year period. As I proved to the other day this is not the case. The best way to prove your point would be for you to look at suicide rates across the board in TBS's compared to suicide rates across the board in public schools. Then look at the percentage with how many kids are in public schools (I believe a little over 50 million) versus how many kids are in TBS's (I think I've seen the number 30,000 tossed out there) then you can see what the percentage of kids is that committ suicide in TBS's  versus the percentage of kids that committ suicide in public schools. I believe you'll find that percentage to be much higher in TBS's.

Quote
Why should they embrace regulations and oversight? Why would anyone, it?s a ton of paperwork, costs money. Very few of us would have driver?s licenses unless we were forced to. We all see ourselves as good drivers I believe. The same with DSS, I don?t think every family would want DSS coming to visit once a month to check up on them. It?s a pain in the ass, y0u need to be home that day rearrange your schedule. Its not that they feel they are bad parents but if many had the choice they would say no thank you.

You're more of a program devotee than I thought. I would agree with you that going to the DMV is a pain in the ass, however I recognize that forcing people to have drivers licenses makes the roads safer. All you've done here is contridict yourself see:

Quote
I think most of these school are run with the best intentions in mind and are willing to change policies if they are found to be abusive.


If these schools were really putting the best interest of the kids first and trying to create a safe enviroment than they would have no problem putting up with a little extra paper work. You've just proven that they are only interested in one thing: the bottom line and keeping kids quiet. Thank you Who.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
The Who
« Reply #1048 on: January 18, 2007, 01:19:03 PM »
Quote from: ""Ganja""
Quote from: ""ZenAgent""
Quote from: ""TheWho""
[
Why should they embrace regulations and oversight?  Why would anyone, it?s a ton of paperwork, costs money.  Very few of us would have driver?s licenses unless we were forced to.  We all see ourselves as good drivers I believe.  The same with DSS,  I don?t think every family would want DSS coming to visit once a month to check up on them.  It?s a pain in the ass, y0u need to be home that day rearrange your schedule.  Its not that they feel they are bad parents but if many had the choice they would say no thank you.

Jesus, that's lame.  These places are HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS.  They're taking over parenting for you.  We're not talking garages,  we're talking about people working on your kid's head.  If they embraced it, they wouldn't be mentioned on here.  Hell yes, they should be absolutely required to adhere to strict regulations.  Count the dead kids, who.
Pretty flimsy, indeed!

Damn, Who.. for someone who has pretty good taste in music, you sure seem rather scandalous...

Sorry, but you do...

I'll see if I can come up with another musical prescription for you.


I agree they should be required to have oversight and adhere to strict regulations.  But I dont expect anyone to call them up and say hey come inspect me, make sure I do my job right.  Most everyone feels they themselves are doing a good job and dont need oversight.  It needs to be forced on them.  If I wasnt required to get a drivers license or I wouldnt get in trouble for not having one I wouldnt have one.  What good would it do me?  I consider myself a good driver.  If the fine for getting caught was $5.00 I probably still wouldnt get one.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ZenAgent

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1720
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.freepowerboards.com/strugglingppl/index.php
The Who
« Reply #1049 on: January 18, 2007, 01:22:24 PM »
Quote from: ""TheWho""
Quote from: ""Ganja""
Quote from: ""ZenAgent""
Quote from: ""TheWho""
[
Why should they embrace regulations and oversight?  Why would anyone, it?s a ton of paperwork, costs money.  Very few of us would have driver?s licenses unless we were forced to.  We all see ourselves as good drivers I believe.  The same with DSS,  I don?t think every family would want DSS coming to visit once a month to check up on them.  It?s a pain in the ass, y0u need to be home that day rearrange your schedule.  Its not that they feel they are bad parents but if many had the choice they would say no thank you.

Jesus, that's lame.  These places are HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS.  They're taking over parenting for you.  We're not talking garages,  we're talking about people working on your kid's head.  If they embraced it, they wouldn't be mentioned on here.  Hell yes, they should be absolutely required to adhere to strict regulations.  Count the dead kids, who.
Pretty flimsy, indeed!

Damn, Who.. for someone who has pretty good taste in music, you sure seem rather scandalous...

Sorry, but you do...

I'll see if I can come up with another musical prescription for you.

I agree they should be required to have oversight and adhere to strict regulations.  But I dont expect anyone to call them up and say hey come inspect me, make sure I do my job right.  Most everyone feels they themselves are doing a good job and dont need oversight.  It needs to be forced on them.  If I wasnt required to get a drivers license or I wouldnt get in trouble for not having one I wouldnt have one.  What good would it do me?  I consider myself a good driver.  If the fine for getting caught was $5.00 I probably still wouldnt get one.


I guess you don't know about Santa's NATSAP white paper...offering to let anyone walk in and inspect any NATSAP facility.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
\"Allah does not love the public utterance of hurtful speech, unless it be by one to whom injustice has been done; and Allah is Hearing, Knowing\" - The Qur\'an

_______________________________________________
A PV counselor\'s description of his job:

\"I\'m there to handle kids that are psychotic, suicidal, homicidal, or have commited felonies. Oh yeah, I am also there to take them down when they are rowdy so the nurse can give them the booty juice.\"