« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down

Author Topic: SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED  (Read 6882 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #45 on: May 02, 2006, 09:46:00 PM »
these producers do need to know what programs Scheff refers to
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #46 on: May 03, 2006, 12:57:00 AM »
Apparently the Sudweeks have been in trouble before:

MEXICO ORDERS UTAH PAIR TO SHUT CENTERS AND LEAVE
February 22, 2001  

http://isaccorp.org/whitmore/whitmore-a ... 22.01.html

Mark Sudweeks Found Guilty of Cruelty to Animals
August 2002

http://isaccorp.org/whitmore/animalcruelty.pdf
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #47 on: May 03, 2006, 09:54:00 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #48 on: May 04, 2006, 11:29:00 AM »
Quote
On 2006-05-03 18:54:00, Anonymous wrote:

"



mverboud@wanadoo.fr"


Are these "for real" email addresses for the French documentary makers?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #49 on: May 04, 2006, 11:40:00 PM »
Call Sue Scheff and ask. She should be "in the know" about this.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #50 on: May 05, 2006, 12:08:00 AM »
Quote
Productions and Xystus
Visitor
 
   Re: ILLEGAL Tranquility Bay Documentary - 2006/04/14 17:21 You have our documentary, Tranquility Bay, on the Internet and are distributing it in other ways. This is copyrighted material that took us several years to produce. The film has not been approved for distribution in North America, nor are you authorized to distribute our film in any location. Therefore, we ask that you immediately cease and desist from the illegal distribution our documentary or we will have no choice but to seek criminal prosecution and civil damages against you.

France and America operate under the same international copyright laws. The law of copyright protection extends to our film. See 17 U.S.C. § 102(a); 17 U.S.C. § 106. Remedies for infringement include injunctive relief, monetary relief in the form of damages (lost profits), profits (gained by defendant in excess of lost profits) or statutory damages, impoundment and destruction of infringing material, criminal penalties, attorney's fees and costs.

We again underscore that you are to immediately cease and desist. You will need to remove the links to our film from your website or media, and otherwise stop all distribution of our film. Otherwise the necessity of our having to proceed further against you will occur very quickly.

Thank you and we look forward to your anticipated cooperation.


Thank you,
Javier Salgado
Xystus, L.L.C.
Pembroke Pines, Florida

Mathieu Verboud
Zadig Productions
Paris, France
I cant FUCKING BELIEVE these people KNOW what is going on, MADE that documentary, and then act like stupid money grubbing asshats, JUST LIKE THE PEOPLE THEY MADE THE DAMN DOCUMENTARY ABOUT, and are more worried about their fucking wallets than about saving the very same kids who are being abused as we speak so they could make a buck.

Jesus christ. I think this is more about "hur hur, the americans eat their young" than actually trying to do something about it, or about the kids.

Money, money, money. Is that all? Feel good about those kids suffering in Tranquility Bay, and every other program, right now, while you tell people to stop disseminating the first video we have for proof of this to try to warn people and get parents to save their kids from these places?

Harriet Beecher Stowe, they are not. Just slam america and make a buck, but not actually help the suffering children you display on your work.

Tell ya what. How about you greedy whores go fuck yourselves, Ill keep seeding the torrent, and then find offshore hosting for it OUTSIDE OF COPYRIGHT LAWS and spread links like cancer?
 :idea:

Fuck your profits. Theres something much more important at stake here, than money. Happy Cinco De Mayo, assholes.

-Son of Liberty
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #51 on: May 05, 2006, 09:51:00 AM »
Oh hey, just figured Id post an update:
209.21 mb of uploads on the WWASPS video torrent last night.

 :grin:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline BuzzKill

  • Posts: 1815
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #52 on: May 05, 2006, 10:19:00 AM »
First I need to be clear that I an NOT "in the know". I have heard bits and pieces concerning this film that I believe to be true. I heard - that WWASP had it tied up in court in France to stop distribution in the states. Then I saw a forwarded copy of an email that said they had expanded the injunction to stop distribution world wide. This came after the uproar when shown in Australia.

I speculate (stress on speculate) that the posting on the net caused some troubles in court - even tho there was absolutely nothing the French could be expected to do about it. Such is the nature of the net.

I speculate this is why they were all spastic over it; and wrote anyone and everyone who had the link up making threats. I speculate they had to - just to show they tried to "follow the rules" - whatever the rules might be.

Some folks got rather nasty threats from Paula Reeves, making accusations and threatening all kinds of troublesome consequences. THAT is something I find a unexplainable. Does she represent the French in America? I don't think so. She'd be bragging about if so. So, who does she think she is, I wonder? Why did she not leave it to the French to deal with it? I mean, they seem to have had a handle on it.

But the point I am trying to make - the complaints and threats from the French may not have had as much to do with profits as legal maneuvering. Yes, they used the copyright laws as a pressure point - but I speculate this is only b/c this is the only point they have that gives them any authority.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #53 on: May 05, 2006, 12:10:00 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #54 on: May 05, 2006, 12:16:00 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #55 on: May 08, 2006, 04:50:00 PM »
Where can I find Sue Scheff's website?  PURE?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #56 on: May 08, 2006, 10:01:00 PM »
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #57 on: May 08, 2006, 10:09:00 PM »
On the PURE webpage Sue Scheff has the nerve to state they offer programs "...we would send our own children to."

Does anyone actually believe Sue Scheff would send her son or daughter to Whitmore Academy?
Cheryl Sudweeks has been criminally charged with abusing 4 children.
Think Sue would trust the Sudweeks to care for HER own children?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #58 on: June 01, 2006, 06:42:00 PM »
Whats the deal with the criminal case against Sudweks?  Is it dismissed or not adn what does scheff have to do with this case?  I'm just wondering on her connectionnn.Anywon know?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF NEEDS TO BE SUED
« Reply #59 on: June 01, 2006, 06:49:00 PM »
Sue Scheff /Pure referred the children to Whitmore Academy.
The criminal trial for Cheryl Sudweeks is scheduled for September 2006.
The civil case is active against the Sudweeks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
« previous next »