On 2006-05-06 15:10:00, Nihilanthic wrote:
"
On 2006-05-06 07:19:00, Three Springs Waygookin wrote:
"With the kind of case that kid is facing all you really need is a blind monkey to plea out the details with the right spin. ...to disarm the people (is) the best and most effective way to enslave them...
-- George Mason
"
My family was completely railroaded on a case with zero evidence and accusations that changed every time the 'victims' were interviewed.
NEVER underestimate the ability of a DA to "make a case" where there isnt one. "
Amen.
We saw a case in animal court where the owners of a rottie were railroaded because the judge hated the breed of dog.
Their dog had been chained in their yard when someone who they'd told to leave it alone came in the yard, teasing it, and got bitten.
Absolutely not their fault, under the laws of our state and county.
They had a witness (neighbor) who was home and watching and saw the whole thing.
The chick who got bit lied and said the dog was loose---but she didn't even show up to court. The judge relied on the inadmissable hearsay testimony of the animal control officer about what the chick had said.
Zero admissable evidence, and they were not even allowed to call their witness on their behalf---they tried. Since the woman was not there, they were (obviously) not allowed to cross examine the witness against them.
They were innocent, and they got convicted because the judge hated rottweilers, and already had made up his mind that if you were an accused in his court, you were guilty.
We looked him up. The judge's prior job was with the DA's office prosecuting habitual offenders. But yeah, he's completely impartial. Not.
Their constitutional rights were violated six ways from Sunday, and the judge felt absolutely confident in doing so because of ONE THING:
They didn't have a lawyer.
Get a lawyer. Get a good lawyer. If you have a lawyer and he isn't rubbing his hands and salivating over defending a client from a felony charge who only stole 37 dollars, then your lawyer sucks---get a better one.
It's the DA's job to get convictions and put people away, not to be fair.
It's the judge's job to be fair, but without a lawyer? Fat chance. The DA knows the judge. If the DA thinks he can get away with murder with that judge--he probably can.
Also, there's an old saying: A good lawyer knows the law. A great lawyer knows the judge.
Julie
(If the people with the rottie had had a lawyer, the judge still *could* have done everything he did, but the lawyer would have appealed, and won. And he also could have referred the judge for disciplinary action, which likely would have stuck.)