« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Skakel Back in the news  (Read 6245 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline screann

  • Posts: 189
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« on: April 02, 2006, 03:46:00 PM »
I hope this wiil clear Mike.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2006, 04:27:00 PM »
I saw that too.. Traded a few emails with his attorney on Friday.Hopefully this will help him out.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2006, 07:14:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-04-02 13:27:00, Anonymous wrote:
 Traded a few emails with his attorney on Friday.


Oh please. Can you say "look at me look at me, I emailed Skakels lawyer"

Puke. Shut up.

Skakel was found guilty by a jury of his peers. How does he need "help"
Did your emails "help"?  

Mickey Sherman couldnt help the poor bastard. Anyone think a pair of pro-bono ambulance chasers are going to make a difference?

The fucker is guilty. Let him rot.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2006, 08:22:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-04-02 16:14:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2006-04-02 13:27:00, Anonymous wrote:
 Traded a few emails with his attorney on Friday.




Oh please. Can you say "look at me look at me, I emailed Skakels lawyer"



Puke. Shut up.



Skakel was found guilty by a jury of his peers. How does he need "help"

Did your emails "help"?  



Mickey Sherman couldnt help the poor bastard. Anyone think a pair of pro-bono ambulance chasers are going to make a difference?



The fucker is guilty. Let him rot.



"

Lots of people get convicted of crimes by a jury of their peers.That does not make them guilty of anything.Anyone who has faith in our judicial system,hasnt never had to depend on it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2006, 01:31:00 AM »
Oh please. Youre right, the judicial system is a farce but its a statistical fact that 99.9 percent of people convicted of a crime actually commited that crime.

Micheal Skakel beat Martha Moxley to death with his own mothers 6 iron golf club in a jealous rage.
He then went to Elan and told two different people he killed her.

Joe Ricci made it look like Mike was lying, mocked him, and kept him in the program....A kennedy cousin in Elan is good press (for Elan)
Not to mention the tuition going into Joe And Jerrys pockets.
Ricci even refused to testify in a grand jury investigation.
Gee, I wonder why???
Duh!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2006, 06:58:00 AM »
Quote
On 2006-04-02 22:31:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Oh please. Youre right, the judicial system is a farce but its a statistical fact that 99.9 percent of people convicted of a crime actually commited that crime.



Micheal Skakel beat Martha Moxley to death with his own mothers 6 iron golf club in a jealous rage.

He then went to Elan and told two different people he killed her.



Joe Ricci made it look like Mike was lying, mocked him, and kept him in the program....A kennedy cousin in Elan is good press (for Elan)

Not to mention the tuition going into Joe And Jerrys pockets.

Ricci even refused to testify in a grand jury investigation.

Gee, I wonder why???

Duh!

"

You just might be right,I dont think we will ever know. I dont believe the story that we have been fed. 99.9 % i think is not accurate.
Joe absolutely did more harm to Skakel than good.. that I do believe.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2006, 10:00:00 AM »
Mike Did NOT do it :exclaim:  :exclaim:  :exclaim:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2006, 11:58:00 AM »
Quote
On 2006-04-03 07:00:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Mike Did NOT do it :exclaim:  :exclaim:  :exclaim: "


Well that settles it!!!
Someone should print that post and bring it to the judge!...Set "Mike" free!

My god theres some stupid fucking pathetic idiots in here.

A jury says Micheal Skakel killed Martha Moxley.  

The dude aint gettin out of prison, its not going to happen, hes there, his wife divorced him because of what she knew. None of his family showed up in his defense, no alibi, no credibility, no nothing.

Guilty fuck is where he belongs.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2006, 02:15:00 PM »
Maybe you did it. Shut the fuck up. Do you even know him?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2006, 02:30:00 PM »
None of that matters here @ fornits....
Talk about seeking attention
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #10 on: April 13, 2006, 10:33:00 PM »
Just a lurker here...

Not that it makes much difference, but Michael's appellate team is not working pro bono and they are one of the most well respected and high-powered appellate firms in Connecticut. That said, every one of Michael Skakel's appeals to the Connecticut Supreme Court was rejected.

Before they have a chance to get anywhere near a courtroom with the Bryant tale, they are going to have to offer Mickey Sherman up on a writ of "inadequate counsel", 'cause Mickey (and his investigator) had Bryant's summary before Michael was convicted.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #11 on: April 13, 2006, 10:45:00 PM »
wow
that IS a strange turn
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2006, 08:57:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-04-13 19:33:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Just a lurker here...



Not that it makes much difference, but Michael's appellate team is not working pro bono and they are one of the most well respected and high-powered appellate firms in Connecticut. That said, every one of Michael Skakel's appeals to the Connecticut Supreme Court was rejected.



Before they have a chance to get anywhere near a courtroom with the Bryant tale, they are going to have to offer Mickey Sherman up on a writ of "inadequate counsel", 'cause Mickey (and his investigator) had Bryant's summary before Michael was convicted."


Why thank you Jeraldo! LOL

Karen? Is that you?
Or maybe its Marc Fuhrman?
Or one of the Dorthy Moxley fan club nutcases?

OR is it one of the "Justice" bunch?
Dom Dunne? Nah, he's too busy making money exploiting victims.
Couldnt be Dan Bostdorf could it?
Oh no, You dont write that well, unless of course the woman that Joe had sex with while you were married to her wrote it for you. ROFL

Speaking of Dan, since Joe is dead, are you able to go snorkeling now without seing the Italian hit-men with spear guns in black helicopters chasing you?

Regardless, thanks for the dose of reality in this little fantasy site. Whats the forecast for Micheals crap shoot?

And whodafuck is paying for it?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2006, 10:15:00 PM »
HEY Doug is that you? Karen here lol I cant see that....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Skakel Back in the news
« Reply #14 on: April 15, 2006, 02:42:00 AM »
Quote
On 2006-04-14 19:15:00, Anonymous wrote:

"HEY Doug is that you? Karen here lol I cant see that...."


You cant see what?
Of course its me you silly SanFansiscan.
Is it really you?

If so, tell me, what does this mean to you:

IUPG

And the answer is?

Did you ban me from the MC site for plageurism? (sp)
The blimp story really is mine I swear to dog!


Maybe Ill sign up over at the MC site again. Though I really dont like MC much any more other than for the memory of things Id prefer to forget! As Joni would say....HA!


Self employed, Living in Seattle. Lifes real good.
Miss my buddy from Frisco...Whats up witchew girlfren?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »