On 2006-03-02 14:57:00, Anonymous wrote:
"You are publishing the information by posting it here, so they will come after you, too. Truth is a defense, so you better hope it is all true. "
Again, you are not an attorney and do not (obviously) know how this type of case works.
I have already stated that I received it from another party. This party represented it to me as true and provided internal emails to bolster the claim. I am sharing it as it was sent to me, unaltered. I am allowed by law to share ANYTHING that was sent to me, so long as it is accurately represented and unaltered in its original condition. It is.
I have shared it with two other parties and am arranging its delivery in hard and soft copy to an attorney representing families who are taking legal action against HLA. I did not write it, nor do I attest to it's origins, except how it was represented to me. I have no liabilty for these documents whatsoever. I am simply reporting what was reported to me, accurately and fully.
If you have a problem with that, then you have a problem with a free press and, by extension, the American way.
If you want to take legal action, I suggest you start with the person who released the documents, Mr. Poole, although they carry NO CONFIDENTIALITY warnings and as such are not protected by law (I've already consulted a 1st amendment attorney who is more than willing to sue the shit out of anyone who tries to infringe upon my constitutional right to tell the story).