You still haven't answered how you can delete whatever gets in the way of your information control here, any thread by me or anyone else that YOU decide is something that should be deleted, and then say that you can't delete what you want to delete.
You have not explained that yet.
You have been censoring and deleting quite a lot, noticeable to all the folks watching the football game. Who's to say those posts weren't valid information, valid things for a Straight survivor to say or read? Who are you to say what their purpose is and decide to delete them from the communications of survivors to survivors here? Again, YOU show that YOU decide what is a worthy thread or not around here, and delete according to YOUR vision and will.
Therefore, all of your complex and purposefully confusing claims that you cannot and do not moderate are shown to be false.
If people can post here all kind of lies over and over again about how they fucked Helen Petermann, why can't someone come here and joke around about bananas and stuff all morning without you getting your paranoid tyrant in there deleting everything?
I can't control you, quit being so paranoid. I CAN however, say whatever the fuck I want to say within the parameters of your technological advancement over all the posters in your kingdom here. You rule by forced forfeit, but I am showing the people how they too can really and truly post whatever they want in response to your stated word that people can post whatever they want and you cannot and will not do anything about it.
Now, again, if you can delete and lock threads on any old day you want when you get up and decide to feel threatened by the excessive number of threads that seem to be silly or subversive or somehow saying something other than that which YOU want said here, why can't you with equal ease of deployment take down the slander on Straight survivors?
Whether or not anyone else has decided that their cause is in agreement, that the slander and personal names can and should be taken down, not because I can control you or ever could or would, but because we here when all is said and done know darn well there is a modicum of moderation already in that Antigen has deleted and censored and lied and engaged in distraction tactics already, so she can just as easily take down the slander on survivors, is not my concern. I see that Ginger likes to delete. I am showing her some things to delete that could just as easily, and with equal reason to the reason behind the deletion of anything I or anyone else says, be deleted.
Otherwise, if we are in agreement that nothing can get deleted, then nothing can get deleted. Either some things can with equal reason get deleted, or nothing can get deleted. Or you, Ginger, find yourself at the helm of a cult by virtue of your control of what gets deleted and what does not get deleted. What you deem to be "denial of service" attacks are really just denial of your control of a space that is inherently socially owned. Within the parameters of the ability of the people to own the space and actually do what they want within it, they will, it is only natural.
