On 2005-12-04 20:35:00, Anonymous wrote:
"
And perhaps if she'd taken her concern to the appropriate authorities, she wouldn't have been sued at all.
Does reporting suspected abuse constitute a breach of confidentiality?
I find it interesting and curious that other ex-staff (DJ, Jarhead) who 'talk about' HLA are not being sued. Why was Marla targeted?"
Dysfunction left very early on, employees may not have been forced to sign a confidentiality agreement at that time. Jarhead is pro HLA why would they come after him?
Marla on the other hand did sign an agreement stating she would not tell the truth about HLA. However she choose to do the right thing and suffered for it.
As far as illegal issues I dont believe Marla discussed many of those aspects, although her comments concerning the girl who thought she might kill herself would have warranted DCS intervention.
She may have spoken with them I dont know. She posted on here for the same reason I do. To make sure parents here the truth.
[ This Message was edited by: RobertBruce on 2005-12-04 21:38 ]