Author Topic: Licensing and regulation  (Read 4173 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Licensing and regulation
« on: October 30, 2005, 04:09:00 PM »
Ladies and gentlemen (and not so gentle folk), may I bring to your attention a recent chapter of a long and sordid story.

I find myself out of the mainstream, even among ppl who agree w/ me that this industry is one fucked up manifestation of the ugly side of our culture which we desperately need to address. I'm very much encouraged by signs of growing interest in the topic (that, after all, has been my primary objective; to foster and nurture a growth of interest).

However, I find very little comfort in the idea that the regulators have mounted up and are riding to the rescue. Here's why. I can't see any significant difference between the current call for licensing and regulation and the one that started in SW Florida close to 30 years ago.

Here's the New Times copy. http://www.newtimesbpb.com/issues/2004- ... ure_6.html

I've copied the entire article here, just in case they don't keep it available forever. http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=7384&forum=9

Please note that, ever since the early `80's, Straight, LIFE, SAFE and Growing Together have been licensed and, ausensibly, monitored and overseen on a daily basis. Has it done the trick? Are the children currently interred to the tender mercies of the staff and group at Growing Together safer?

I would argue that they're actually less safe, more screwed by virtue of these crack pots' having acquired and maintained their licenses. Many attempts have been made to call them on the carpet for the things they do to kids and families. All have fallen flat, obviously. It always starts out w/ a valid complaint of behavior that, if it had taken place in the home or in public, would be criminal. And it always devolves down to petty bullshit about licensing issues, square footage, whether the confinement is enforced w/ dead bolt locks or 'just' motion detectors and doors blocked by sleeping inmates.

In other words, licensing and regulation don't do the trick. They only distract the public from the ugly, difficult, uncomfortable facts of the matter. And, just like most of us when we were in group were happy to pretend something never happened when Staff called for a song, they're more than happy to focus on the minutae of licensing status and pretend there never was a broken child or disowned parent at the core of the issue.

What do ya'll think?

As men's prayers are a disease of the will, so are their creeds a disease of the intellect.
--Ralph Waldo Emerson, American essayist, poet, philosopher

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline katfish

  • Posts: 543
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.cafety.org
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2005, 04:38:00 PM »
Hey ginger-

I agree with what you are saying, I've been wondering the same thing- like Provo Canyon is accredited and we all have heard the stories coming out from there...the plan of action, at least what I would like to be a part of is to figure out how to make regulation and accredidation an effective way of preventing abuse.  The reason reg. is so important to begin with and they we must go from there, is b/c w/o it we have nothing and can't address the problem.  Once we have regulation we can address the problematic aspect of accediting bodies.  Like anything else though, one foot in front of the other- baby steps.

I naively thought that reg. would solve everything, but it won't as you point out and it has it's own problems that we will have to contend with when things get to that point.  

At least, this is how i see it.  It's frustrating for me b/c...progress is so slow and I only recently came to realize how ineffective these accrediting bodies can be- hence Provo and others and what that that will mean in terms of securing the safety and appropriate care of youth in this country.  Tons of work ahead of us, everyone...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.
Margaret Mead

Offline katfish

  • Posts: 543
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.cafety.org
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2005, 04:43:00 PM »
btw- if you look at APA ethics, etc, I think you will find that they reflect a kind of care that is absent in what you describe, but is the standard for accredidation.  That's not to say it's implemented everywhere, but as I said before and as I see it- there's no reason it should not be.  I would be careful confusing the issue- at the core their is a standard and mistreatement is not sanctioned- even if it happens.  The ethical treatment of youth is something that should be secured- period.  Because it's not by accrediting bodies does not mean that the mistreatment itself is acceptable.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.
Margaret Mead

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2005, 04:58:00 PM »
For example:

Quote
While DCF's investigations of Growing Together are less aggressive than they were ten years ago, the state agency continues to find significant problems. During the most recent inspection, on December 19, 2003, investigators discovered documents that suggested staff was too quick to use physical force and that children continued to sleep on mattresses on the floor. State law requires children to have a full bed and frame.


Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a significant problem!!!! Not in the context of this issue, anyway. A significan't problem would be, say, clear, extreme, agrivated harassment 24/7 for months at a stretch. THAT is significant! Can any of you folks who have not been through it yourselves, but have started to catch onto the dirty little deals of this story even imagine what that's like? Try.

You start w/ an open ended intake 'interview' that feels (and is) much more like an interrogation of an enemy combatant. Over the course of hours or, in rare instances, DAYS, you, a teenaged kid, come to realize that there is just no possible way out of that except by signing on to whatever may occure beyond that door. Fact and reason have no currency here and your wishes and opinions are irrelavent. If you disagree w/ the staff's assessment, well then you're just in denial.

And so you sign on w/ your own hand and signature. That, btw, is the first really big mindfuck. That signature has no legal value whatever, having been obtained from a minor under duress w/o legal or even layman counsel. But the kid don't know that (heh!) [just imagine GW Büsh's signature smirk and cackle here] Next stop, the bathroom or maybe another tiny little room for your strip search and piss test.

From that point forward, unless and until you satisfy Group and staff that you accept that you are a druggie in need of radical treatment and that working the Program is your only hope for survival, it doesn't get any better. Honest to God, it doesn't.

Here's how much that can effect people. Different people respond in different ways. I've always been pretty passive.

One time, I had forgotten to pee during the regimented nightly speed drill through the bathroom. I think there were two oldcomers and 3 or 4 newcomers sharing a single little bathroom and in a house out in Osprey w/ sulphur filled well water. Driving from Osprey to Gandy Blvd. every morning and night (including open meeting nights, on which we did it morning and very early the next morning) we were not getting anywhere NEAR enough sleep.

In fact, sleep was what it was all about, everybody relished every spare minute we could squeeze in under any circumstances that would not violate Program rules. The rules pervaded and dominated every aspect of every moment of our existance.

So I wake up in the night with a dire need to pee. I didn't want to wake up my oldcomer to get her to unlock the door. She wasn't getting any sleep either. And, besides, that would have meant she would have to wake up the other oldcomer, to guard against any false moves (in case this was just a ploy in a well coordinated escape attempt).

I didn't hate her, as you might expect. I had had 10 years to learn Program culture and I fully understood that she didn't have any choice, she was just doing what she had to to get through it, just like everybody.

So what would you do? Me? I groped around in the dark for a suitable container, found the top to her very pretty plastic laundry hamper w/ the pretty flowers painted on it and used that. Then I went back to sleep. There was some "discussion" about it in the morning. Next night, same thing happened, only I didn't wake up. Instead, I woke up to the realization that I was in the middle of peeing all over the bedroom floor where I slept and that the whole trip to the bathroom and the toilet I thought I had been sitting on had been just a dream.

Like I said, I really was a very passive kind of kid. I might worry a point of argument to a slow and painful death by boredom sometimes. But, when it came to standing up for myself in the face of conflict, I nearly always defered, held it in and waited for a less stressful oportunity to meet my own needs.

Somehow, that got resolved. I think I just made it a point to pee every chance I got. Took me fully 21 days to bring myself to insist on being given enough time to move my bowels w/ an audience. And I'm not the only one. Funny thing is that, when my oldcomer first noticed how distended I was, she spent at least an hour trying to force me to admit that I was pregnant because I was such a whore. Me? I didn't even know why. I just knew I wasn't pregnant, damn it! LOL

Now, I ask you, what has the licensing and regulation lobby got to offer to remedy that?

Not a place upon earth might be so happy as America. Her situation is remote from all the wrangling world, and she has nothing to do but to trade with them.
--Thomas Paine



_________________
Drug war POW
Straight, Sarasota
`80 - `82
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2005, 05:37:00 PM »
Sorry, Kat. I hadn't stepped off my soap box when you replied.

Quote
On 2005-10-30 13:38:00, katfish wrote:

"Hey ginger-



I agree with what you are saying, I've been wondering the same thing- like Provo Canyon is accredited and we all have heard the stories coming out from there...the plan of action, at least what I would like to be a part of is to figure out how to make regulation and accredidation an effective way of preventing abuse.  The reason reg. is so important to begin with and they we must go from there, is b/c w/o it we have nothing and can't address the problem.  Once we have regulation we can address the problematic aspect of accediting bodies.  Like anything else though, one foot in front of the other- baby steps.


And how well has that worked out so far?

You think we have nothing else? I think you're mistaken, but I don't blame you at all. The only reason I have even an inkling of the other alternative is because I'm old and my dad was older still and he was one of those odd freaks who insisted on questioning every new and modern technology, including (maybe even especially) the stunning advances in social engineering.

The alternative to a regulated or unregulated private teen prison system is... NOTHING! At least, nothing new. Want to protect your kids against stranger danger? Let them all go out and play like we used to. There's just no better way to eliminate the level of seclusion in public necessary to kidnap a kid. And there's no better way to keep tabs on what's going on in your neighborhood than to have a bunch of indescreet children running wild, poking their noses into everthing.

In other words, people (by that I mean the current crop of parents) need to quit stressing and worrying themselves and everyone around them over the typical trials and trevails of growing up. We've been doing it successfully for some thousands of years since we first put stick to soft clay and there's every indication that we, especially we here in America, will keep it up w/ ease for another few thousand years.  

We've been taking baby steps for about as long as I can remember. But they seem to be leading in the wrong direction. Instead of preventing abuse, we're codifying the proper, legal way to do it effectively w/o leaving overt forensic evidence.


Immortality: A toy which people cry for, And on their knees apply for, Dispute, contend and lie for, And if allowed Would be right proud Eternally to die for.
--Ambrose Bierce

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2005, 05:45:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-10-30 13:43:00, katfish wrote:

"btw- if you look at APA ethics, etc, I think you will find that they reflect a kind of care that is absent in what you describe, but is the standard for accredidation.  That's not to say it's implemented everywhere, but as I said before and as I see it- there's no reason it should not be.  I would be careful confusing the issue- at the core their is a standard and mistreatement is not sanctioned- even if it happens.  The ethical treatment of youth is something that should be secured- period.  Because it's not by accrediting bodies does not mean that the mistreatment itself is acceptable.  "


Yeah, and if you look at the printed rules and espoused dogma of any of the Seed spin offs, it's the same. In print, they have nothing but the highest regard for the youth in their care. Hell, they all started out on front row themselves. But that breaks w/ the reality on the ground (or in the group room, as it were)

Even now, if you're a bit nebish, you can look in on the ongoing argument between me and my brother over The Seed. That's been going on for at least 20 years. He still insists that the Seed was all about love and honesty and honor and all that. He does concede that Straight may have been worse, but only cause he wasn't there to wittness the same tired and weak dogma coming out of the mouths of Seedlings who staffed Straight as he'd heard over on Ft. Lauderdale.

Doesn't matter how abusive the actual day to day treatment of the captives, so long as they can make it look good on paper.

No, I don't have any faith left in regulation, legislation or litigation to make this situation any better, EXCEPT one thing. That thing is that regulation, legislation and litigation are the national passtime. If you want people to think about an issue and respond as they see fit, those are the next best ways to make that happen after direct appeal to the IVth Estate. That's what I'm banking on; the media, all of it, from satire to legally defensible documentary. Education (rampant talking out in group) is the key, I'm convinced of it.

Why should we take advice on sex from the Pope? If he knows anything about it, he shouldn't.
--George Bernard Shaw, Irish-born English playwright

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Deprogrammed

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 740
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.pathwayfamilycenter.fornits.com
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2005, 08:24:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-10-30 14:45:00, Antigen wrote:

"
Quote

On 2005-10-30 13:43:00, katfish wrote:


"btw- if you look at APA ethics, etc, I think you will find that they reflect a kind of care that is absent in what you describe, but is the standard for accredidation.  That's not to say it's implemented everywhere, but as I said before and as I see it- there's no reason it should not be.  I would be careful confusing the issue- at the core their is a standard and mistreatement is not sanctioned- even if it happens.  The ethical treatment of youth is something that should be secured- period.  Because it's not by accrediting bodies does not mean that the mistreatment itself is acceptable.  "




Yeah, and if you look at the printed rules and espoused dogma of any of the Seed spin offs, it's the same. In print, they have nothing but the highest regard for the youth in their care. Hell, they all started out on front row themselves. But that breaks w/ the reality on the ground (or in the group room, as it were)



Even now, if you're a bit nebish, you can look in on the ongoing argument between me and my brother over The Seed. That's been going on for at least 20 years. He still insists that the Seed was all about love and honesty and honor and all that. He does concede that Straight may have been worse, but only cause he wasn't there to wittness the same tired and weak dogma coming out of the mouths of Seedlings who staffed Straight as he'd heard over on Ft. Lauderdale.



Doesn't matter how abusive the actual day to day treatment of the captives, so long as they can make it look good on paper.



No, I don't have any faith left in regulation, legislation or litigation to make this situation any better, EXCEPT one thing. That thing is that regulation, legislation and litigation are the national passtime. If you want people to think about an issue and respond as they see fit, those are the next best ways to make that happen after direct appeal to the IVth Estate. That's what I'm banking on; the media, all of it, from satire to legally defensible documentary. Education (rampant talking out in group) is the key, I'm convinced of it.

Why should we take advice on sex from the Pope? If he knows anything about it, he shouldn't.
--George Bernard Shaw, Irish-born English playwright


"


A prime example of Ginger's thoughts, concerns, worries is what just happened recently in Ohio:

Three valid complaints were just recently denied by ODADAS regarding complaints against their very "lovely" pet mind experiment called Kids Helping Kids.
This program is regulated and certified by the state of Ohio....what a joke considering that they are using the exact same thought reform tactics at KHK that they used at Straight Inc./Seed.

warm regards,
-DP

I don't believe in God. My god is patriotism. Teach a man to be a good citizen and you have solved the problem of life.
--Andrew Carnegie, Scottish-born American industrialist and philanthropist

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"So, you can make me cum ...that doesn\'t make you, Jesus"....Tori Amos copyright
Read about Pathway Family Centers here.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2005, 01:18:00 AM »
QUOTE: Instead of preventing abuse, we're codifying the proper, legal way to do it effectively w/o leaving overt forensic evidence. ////

Ginger has valid points. Kat sounds frustrated because she is coming to realize that this is not going to go away over night and that the process is going to be long and tough. And, that maybe there are things that need to be looked at that might not have been considered.

Yes, like Kat others of us agreed that licensing, regulation, and litigation were the answer. But it's becoming abundantly clear that those things are not the answer to this massive problem. We have to begin to dig deeper. It's not to say that these things are not a good start in that they may cause media attention and get the word out there about the abuse. But in the big scheme of things, as pointed out, this has been going on for some 30 years and what have we seen? We need to be honest with ourselves and agree that what we are seeing is growth - growth of the industry, and that they are keen and clever. Take NATSAP, that in and of itself is scary. People fall for the fact that NATSAP regulates programs when in reality they are regulating themselves. They are program operators who are on the board. Just like the new board in Montana where 3 on the board are program folks and 2 are from the general public. Not fair, in my book. That's not usually effective, now is it. Typically there would be outside agencies monitoring and regulating an industry such as this. But in this case it just doesn't work that way.

We have a long way to go so we'd better all hunker down and figure out how we can help in a truly meaningful way.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2005, 10:51:00 AM »
"We need to be honest with ourselves and agree that what we are seeing is growth - growth of the industry, and that they are keen and clever. Take NATSAP, that in and of itself is scary. People fall for the fact that NATSAP regulates programs when in reality they are regulating themselves. They are program operators who are on the board. Just like the new board in Montana where 3 on the board are program folks and 2 are from the general public. Not fair, in my book. That's not usually effective, now is it. Typically there would be outside agencies monitoring and regulating an industry such as this. But in this case it just doesn't work that way. "

A few points you might consider: NATSAP does not self-regulate. It doesn't regulate at all. You send them a check, sign a paper saying you agree with their ethics and principles, and then don the holy mantle of NATSAP purity.

The difference in the Montana board is that they ARE monitored by an outside agency---the department of labor and industry's health care licensing bureau. Your assumption that this sort of self-regulation (really a mis-nomer) doesn't work needs support and documentation, because in Montana, it works very well. There are about 40 state boards that regulate many different professions, and there's a nice climate of teamwork rather than an adversarial relationship (which is truly the kind that never accomplishes much).
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2005, 05:00:00 PM »
I agree that there should be one law, one very strong law, that would protect the children in any residential program. One FEDERAL law for all states. Individual state laws is frightening and there is way too much room for error.

Here are some things I found on natsap.org website:

NATSAP'S INTERVENTIONS, ETC.: http://www.natsap.org/BehaviorMgtPrinc.pdf (any NATSAP member may resort to physical restraint ... "Mechanical restraint: a procedure where a mechanical device such as leather belts, posy belts, straight jacket, hand cuffs, and other devices are used to restrict the movement of an individual. Therapeutic holds (see 4.4) that are longer than 30 minutes in duration, are also considered restraint procedures." Check out 4.4, it tells you that the child can receive mechanical restraints for such things as punching a wall, scratching or carving in an attempt to cause damage, etc. - wonder what "etc." can be construed to mean. Also, slapping, kicking ... damaging furniture ...) I don't know about any of you who have had their own teenagers, or who have been around teenagers, but it is not unusual to walk into a home where teenagers live to find a hole in a wall. I've seen it many times in the homes of friends who have normal families. Kids get angry sometimes, kids hit walls sometimes, kids make holes in walls sometimes. I don't think the punishment should include the words "leather belts, posy belts, straight jacket, hand cuffs..." - I don't know, am I too permissive? What? Or do others here find that normal kids and normal folks sometimes get angry, sometimes hit a wall, sometimes damage furniture, yet they don't end up in a straight jacket, do they?

NATSAP'S SUPPLEMENTAL PRINCIPLES: http://www.natsap.org/Supplemental%20Pr ... 202004.pdf

NATSAP'S PRINCIPLES:

The following principles of good practice have been unanimously adopted by the board of directors and membership of the National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs as basic principles of practice ascribed to by member programs and schools. Full members certify compliance with the practice principles while associate members aspire to these principles, but are not yet in full compliance.  The intent of this statement of practice principles is to raise the general level of operating practice within therapeutic programs and schools.

These guidelines refer to therapeutic programs and emotional growth schools as ?program/schools? and refer to client/students as ?program participants?.

1.0  ADHERENCE TO STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS

The program/school shall adhere to all applicable state and federal laws in conducting the operation, including administration, hiring and employee practices, observance of safety regulations, and the care of program participants.

2.0  ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

The program/school has a responsibility and duty to strive to provide its program participants with appropriate ethical and professional service in all areas of operations.

2.1  The program/school will have a written plan for governance, program administration, and professional services.  The Plan includes the following elements.

2.1.1  Introduction and history of the program/school.

2.1.2  A delineation of the responsibility of the governing body including, policy development, responsibility for implementation, compliance, amendment, and oversight of the policies.

2.1.3  Mission Statement.

2.1.4  Philosophy of the program/school.

2.1.5  Description of the population the program/school serves, including admission, non-admission and discharge criteria.

2.1.6  Description of services provided.

2.1.7  Organizational Structure including an organizational chart.

2.1.8  Tuition / Fee statement including all ancillary cost, and refund policy.

2.1.9  A plan for self-evaluation and program/school improvement.

2.2  The program/school shall have proof of general liability, professional liability, fire, and vehicle insurance coverage as appropriate.

2.3  The program/school will follow accepted accounting practices.

2.4  Member schools/programs will:

2.4.1  Not offer or accept payment for referrals.

2.4.2  Represent facts truthfully to program participants and third-party payers.

2.4.3  Disclose fully all costs and fees for service.

2.4.4  Respect copyrights, trade authorship, and proprietary information, and will not plagiarize or use materials, documents, or resources from other sources or programs without permission.

2.4.5  Not use a name or marketing strategy that misleads the public or makes guarantees of outcome to consumers.

2.4.6  Disclose fully all ownership and financial relationships between associated programs, services, and professionals where there is a potential for a conflict of interest.

3.0  EMPLOYEE PRACTICES

The program/school will only provide services (including assessment services), that lie within the scope of the service, training and qualifications of its staff.  The program/school will accurately and factually represent the competence, education, training, certification and experience of its employees.  NATSAP members will not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation.

3.1  Hiring Practices

3.1.1  Applicants are required to complete an Application for Employment. The application form must include the following.

3.1.1.1    Previous place(s) of employment.

3.1.1.2    Signature, verifying that all information is correct and factual.

3.1.2  Upon extending an offer for employment, the program/school will obtain:

3.1.2.1    A criminal background check including driving history.

3.1.2.2    A minimum of two professional references (written or verbal).

3.1.2.3    Proof of professional credentials.

3.1.2.4    A medical examination or statement signed by the employee assuring fitness to execute the physical and mental requirements delineated in the job description.

3.1.2.5    If the employee is required to drive a company vehicle, or is asked to transport program participants in his/her own car, the Department of Motor Vehicle will be contacted to determine that the respective employee has a valid driver license.

3.2  On-Going Employee Practices

3.2.1  Each employee will have a written job description.  The job description will include the following:

3.2.1.1    Job title.

3.2.1.2    Duties and responsibilities.

3.2.1.3    Minimum level of education, training and work experience required for the position.

3.2.1.4    Physical demands of the position.

3.2.1.5    Lines of authority. (Delineation of supervisory responsibility)

3.2.2  The program/school shall have written Employee Policies and Procedures that will include policies on:

3.2.2.1    New Employee orientation procedures including:

3.2.2.1.1  Orientation in philosophy, objectives and services.

3.2.2.1.2  Emergency procedures. (Fire, Disaster, etc.).

3.2.2.1.3  Current program/school policy and procedures including behavior management.

3.2.2.1.4  First aid and CPR training.

3.2.2.1.5  Statutory responsibilities, including those covered by state and federal laws.

3.2.2.2    Continuing staff training and development.

3.2.2.3    Performance appraisals.

3.2.2.4    Methods for filing and addressing employee grievances.

3.2.2.5    Disciplinary actions, termination, and discharge practices.

3.2.2.6    Sexual and other forms of harassment or misconduct.

3.2.2.7    Abuse reporting laws

3.2.2.8    Vacations, holidays, illness, extended leave, military leave, and jury duty.

3.2.2.9    Volunteers, interns, and contract personnel if applicable.

3.2.2.10  Confidentiality and information disclosure within the limits recognized by appropriate professional standards, including state and federal regulation.

3.2.2.11  Transporting program participants and their parents/guardians.

3.2.2.12  Prevention and investigation of allegations levied by program participants regarding employee misconduct.

3.3  Personnel File

3.3.1  The program/school will maintain a personnel file on each employee that includes:

3.3.1.1    Application and/or resume

3.3.1.2    Background clearance.

3.3.1.3    Proof of credentials including education, licensure, certifications, etc. as applicable.

3.3.1.4    Proof of  medical examination or statement of ability to perform duties.

3.3.1.5    Signed job description.

3.3.1.6    Documentation of new employee orientation and ongoing staff development training.

3.3.1.7    Performance evaluation(s).

3.3.1.8    Emergency contact information.

3.3.1.9    Documentation of disciplinary actions, termination or discharge.

3.3.1.10  Signed confidentiality agreement regarding the exchange of information concerning program participants, their families, and fellow workers.

3.3.1.11  Copy of driver?s license (if employee is required to drive a company vehicle as part of the job).

3.3.1.12  Documentation of employment status e.g., hourly, salary, part-time, full time, exempt, non-exempt, etc.

4.0  ADMISSION/DISCHARGE POLICY

The program/school will have a written Admission Policy, which defines the enrollment criteria and delineates inclusion and exclusion criteria.  Such criteria will be consistent with the mission of the program/school.  Admission forms will provide pertinent history including family, medical, psychiatric, developmental, and educational background information.

4.1  The Admissions screening process will examine the physical, emotional, behavioral, and academic history, in order to determine whether the program is appropriate in light of the prospective participant?s needs and limitations

4.2  The program/school will provide program participants, parents, legal guardians, or other pertinent parties with a clear and informed statement of the nature of the services that will be provided including, risks associated with these services.

4.3  Upon admission, a file will be created for each program participant, containing the following:

4.3.1  Demographic information including emergency contact information.

4.3.2  Basic medical, family, behavioral, legal, educational, information including past and current assessments.

4.3.3  A signed statement indicating receipt of a copy of the student handbook or statement of Participants Rights and Responsibilities, or a witness attesting to the participant?s refusal to sign.

4.3.4  Contract, release and consent forms.

4.3.5  Documentation of communication with parents, legal guardians, payer sources and other parties.

4.3.6  Photograph.

4.3.7  Copy of any grievance filings and action taken.

4.3.8  Documentation of services rendered.

4.3.9  Discharge summary and academic transcripts

4.4  The program/school will conduct on going assessment to determine appropriateness of continued placement.

4.5  Upon termination or discharge of a program participant, the program/school will make appropriate recommendations for continuing care and/or education.

5.0  BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.1  The program/school shall have a written Behavior Management Plan which describes:

5.1.1  How human dignity and rights will be respected in the application of behavior management practices.

5.1.2  Special treatment / intervention processes including such techniques as: seclusion, restraint, therapeutic holding, passive holding.

5.1.3  Procedures for handling emergency situations such as suicidality, abuse, assault, and runaway.

5.1.4  Acceptable and non-acceptable consequences.

5.1.5  On going training procedures for employees.

6.0  PARTICIPANT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

6.1  The program/school will have a written Student Handbook or statement of Program Participant Rights and Responsibilities as appropriate to the setting, purposes, and pertinent state and federal law.  Such manual or statement will include statements regarding the following rights:

6.1.1  To receive care or services within the program?s capability, mission, and applicable law and regulations.

6.1.2  Freedom from discrimination.

6.1.3  The expectation of a safe environment with respect of human dignity.

6.1.4  Respect for privacy of information and records of each individual and family served.

6.1.5  A description of any restrictions in communication or visitation.

6.1.6  A description of privileges and limitations for participants.

6.1.7  A description of access to religious services and practices.

6.1.8  A statement indicating that the program/school retains the right to maintain a contraband free environment and a description of any search or testing procedures used in this effort.

6.1.9  Procedures for student/participant grievance and complaint will be clearly outlined along with a statement guaranteeing freedom from retaliation for making complaints.

6.1.10  A diet that is nutritionally sufficient for age and activity level.

7.0  HEALTH CARE ACCESS

7.1   The program/school will have a policy on health care that addresses the following issues:

7.1.1  Access to appropriate medical care.

7.1.2  Delineation of whom is authorized to dispense medications.

7.1.3  A policy on storing, accounting, and security of medication.

8.0     SAFETY

8.1   The program/school shall have Plant, Technology and Safety Policies and Procedures containing the following:

8.1.1  A fire and disaster plan which includes the following:

8.1.2  Delineating responsibility of all employees in the event of fire or other disasters

8.1.3  A description of available emergency services, escape routes, relocation plans, and other contingency plans.

8.1.4  Documentation of all fire and emergency drills.

8.1.5  Policies concerning staff training for emergencies and access to emergency medical care.

8.1.6  A safety committee who will be responsible for risk management as well as training and implementation of emergent procedures.

8.2  A policy or procedure for equipment maintenance and repair

8.3  An Infectious Disease Control policy

9.0  INCIDENT REPORTING

9.1  The program/school will have an Incident Reporting policy and procedures, including a reporting mechanism to the governing body.
 


NATSAP - MISSION

The National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs serves as an advocate and resource for innovative organizations which devote themselves to society?s need for the effective care and education of struggling young people and their families


 
  The National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs (NATSAP) was created in January of 1999 to serve as a national resource for programs and professionals assisting young people beleaguered by emotional and behavioral difficulties. NATSAP publishes a directory annually to inform professionals, programs, and families about the many residential placement alternatives available to help struggling young people.
Listed alphabetically, the schools and programs in the Program Directory are diverse. From boarding schools and residential treatment centers to wilderness programs and group homes, the directory's listings offer a wide range of programmatic types, lengths of stay, and services to meet the needs of a variety of troubled young people. The upper section in each listing provides the reader with pertinent contact and program information, while the paragraph section is split into three parts describing operational philosophy, candidate and population specifics, and an overview of how services are provided.

Matching the services of a particular school or program to the specific needs of a young person is arguably the most important decision that will ever be made on behalf of that young person. The NATSAP directory serves well as a quick reference guide. While it is not intended by itself to supply enough information to make a placement, it can help start the process. NATSAP encourages programs, professionals, and families to have appropriate academic and psychological testing conducted and to use multiple informational resources before suggesting or pursuing a placement for any young person in any program.

Each young person has his or her own specific needs that must be determined in detail before placement in any program is appropriate. Since NATSAP has no means of determining the needs of young people whose counselors or families may be using this directory, we do not recommend specific programs.

The National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs is not an accrediting or licensing body at this time. We are a volunteer membership organization supporting professionals and programs in their efforts to help troubled young people. Gaining full membership in NATSAP is a multiyear process.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #10 on: October 31, 2005, 07:05:00 PM »
"A sweet 34,000 campaign, and the whole concept of regulation is cast by the wayside."


Not that it was cast by the wayside; it was moved to the right department. But come on, TSW. What do you suppose the health department spent on their lobbying campaign? And they don't even have to report it as such. Why are they so adamant? Could it be relevant that, according to their own internal memo and testimony in the legislative hearings, just starting a study would cost over a quarter million a year?  

For them, it's all bucks, and so is most of the regulatory business. As pointed out already, it guarantees absolutely nothing. There have been far more deaths and scandals per capita in state-run licensed programs than in private, non-licensed.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #11 on: October 31, 2005, 07:44:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-10-31 16:05:00, Anonymous wrote:




For them, it's all bucks, and so is most of the regulatory business. As pointed out already, it guarantees absolutely nothing. There have been far more deaths and scandals per capita in state-run licensed programs than in private, non-licensed.

Ok, that is a little misleading. There are more kids in state run and licensed programs, and most of them haven't got wealthy parents.

Never the less, TSW, I think you're missing my point. I just described to you a few of the stressors I experience as a newcomer at Straight (which was licensed, and so are the still operating spin offs). Now, you can regulate away things like locks on the doors, but how do you regulate away another inmate who's willing to sleep in front of the door to prevent escape? You can regulate mandatory access to phones, but how do you regulate away the subtler forms of retribution.

Hey, technically? Any kid who was not court ordered in Straight has always had the legal right to leave. They just wouldn't be allowed to and, if they asked, they'd get yelled at, started over, loss of 'priviledges' like a balanced diet.

How would you write the law that would effectively protect kids in treatment from a million little annoyances and stressors that, all together, amount to a dangerous level of harassment?

I don't think there can ever be such a law. I don't think law enforcement is the right tool to use here. You think individual state regulation is frightening? I think this issue falls into the province of individuals, families and communities. Happy Haloween! lol

Seriously,
Quote
On 2005-10-31 08:18:00, Three Springs Waygookin wrote:


The real problem is money. This sick industry just makes to damn much money. It might be better off handing out printing presses to let these programs run off their own gelt. With this money comes power, and with power comes influence. I wonder just how many politicians the pain and suffering of children has bought in this country?


Well, what do you think will happen when there's a Federal government office with a shiny new budget in charge? Remember that at least 3 former Straight staff went on to hold the cabinet level posision of Drug Czar. You think Alberto Gonzalez is going to vigerously investigate and prosecute complaints about intense group interrogation? In fact, you can't trust a damned thing the Federal Government does wrt drug treatment. These crazy bastards are actually fighting hard to keep up the Federal prohibition on medical marijuana in all the states that have legalized it. They actually held a crippled woman at gun point and demanded that she get up and walk out of her hospital bed. You think these people are going to see to the dignified, safe and proper treatment of pot smoking teenagers?

I think we, as a culture, need to have a better understanding of the problem so the current and next generation of us will not tolerate, far less pay for, this kind of 'treatment'. We take an hysterical position on so many intertwined issues here. For instance, that all illicit drug use is, not just not to be desired, but so horribly bad and dangerous as to justify any response, no matter who dies, never mind whether it makes a damned bit of sense or not.

That's a myth. That's a BIG one among them and Americans need to grow the fuck up about it.

May your days be joyfully challenging and your words artfully true
-- Ginger Warbis SMA, `00

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #12 on: October 31, 2005, 08:08:00 PM »
****Kids get angry sometimes, kids hit walls sometimes, kids make holes in walls sometimes. I don't think the punishment should include the words "leather belts, posy belts, straight jacket, hand cuffs..." - I don't know, am I too permissive? What?

Of course not.
If the intention is to 'teach' anything, the teen should learn that punching a hole in a wall will cost them some time and money. Purchasing the materials to repair the hole and acutally repairing it. It's not difficult these days, provided the hole is not huge. All the materials are available at the local WalMart or hardware.

What does a mechanical restraint, or any restraint for that matter, teach? A consequence that is totally unrelated to the incident.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #13 on: October 31, 2005, 08:18:00 PM »
More than that, why is the kid that frustrated? What problem are they unable to resolve? In too many cases, I think it's that they get fed up to the eyebrows w/ disrespectful, undignified treatment by alleged adults.

Sometimes, punching a wall is just about the sanest, healthiest thing anybody ever did.

[Religion is] the daughter of hope and fear, explaining to ignorance the nature of the unknowable.
--Ambrose Bierce

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Licensing and regulation
« Reply #14 on: October 31, 2005, 08:25:00 PM »
Oh, two other things. Thanks for all the kind words, you guys. Means a lot to me.

And a sumation. I'm basically with Will Rogers on this; giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenaged boys. Giving the Fed and local governmnets even more money and power would be counterproductive. We should take it away, keep it, spend it as we see fit in the communities where we live. That would help all by itself.

But, in the mean time while the 50 Billion Dollar Gravy Train has been rolling, we've gotten an infestation of a particularly onorous variety of vermin established in all levels of community and government. We desperately need to expose these people for who and what they are and count on our good neighbors to help us throw the bums out so they can quit voting themselves raises!


In the 60's people took acid to make the world weird. Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it normal.
--Unknown



_________________
Drug war POW
Straight, Sarasota
`80 - `82
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes