On 2005-10-04 18:51:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Why does anyone need to provide proof to you whether Carlbrook or any other school is a great place? You keep slamming all the schools as a whole, and when someone points out that you are wrong, you demand proof. The issue isn't whether Carlbrook is a great place. Many posters on this forum have pointed out that many of the Carlbrook grads go on to good colleges and that the academics at Carlbrook are strong. You have seen the list of colleges and a faculty member has confirmed the academic success of the grads. I'm sure Carlbrook isn't Exeter, but it obviously does not fit into your basket of abusive, deceptive teen jails.
A poster on another thread who was the parent of a Carlbrook kid had some issues with the school. It isn't a perfect place. It does seem to work for some kids. "
Because in a free society with a free market, criticism is abundant and businesses, products, and people need to prove themselves. Emotional Growth is very anti criticsm (and anti critical THOUGHT) but the real world isnt'.
I'll put it this way. Would you buy a car, or a computer, if it sucked? Do people called CRITICS not have jobs to review them and point out all the bad in them? And isnt it the job of the manufacturer to demonstrate its a good product? Well, hey, same for service!
Carlbrook has yet to prove itself as anything but just another emotional growth program. Wow, there is 'academics'! Makes sense when thats what its accredited for when its really an emotional growth program, not a traditional academy.
But hey, when Carlbrookies are coming out saying they had to pass workshops to go up levels, after we say "hey its just antoher LGA based program" you know what that does? It proves us RIGHT.
So yeah, its perfectly okay for us to say EVERY program sucks, and that EVERY program has to prove itself good. The only reason parents get sucked into this bullshit is because all the information is controlled, intercommunication is shunned and up until now the only way to find out any objective information was word of mouth.
Lon Woodbury's website has yet to issue a critical review of anything, and no program will speak bad about themselves, and there are no critics out there except us. So, if you don't like it, there are two things you can do:
1. Tell people not to come here and just use the people who are referred as business.
2. Prove us wrong.
Real hard to guess what Carlbrook is reliant on.
The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble by us, and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic.
--Charles Robert Darwin, English naturalist