Author Topic: Mountain Park Accademy  (Read 3577 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« on: December 09, 2002, 03:14:00 PM »
*moderator's note* message forwarded from a NYRA member:

Currently in Oklahoma there is a bill being presented that will require a hearing and a court order for parents to be allowed to send their child to a residential treatment behavior modification school. This bill will also outlaw the "escort" abduction services, and will require that in an emergency situation, where a child is placed into a facility for their own protection without a hearing, that they will be given a hearing within 14 days of their enrollment in such a program with a social worker being assigned to determine whether the child actually needs such a program, not just taking the parents' word for everything.

I have been speaking with a Senator's aide on this matter, and I believe she has had some personal experience with a family member being sent to one of these lock-up facilities. She is personally pushing for this bill to be passed. As a survivor of one of these facilities myself, and an Oklahoma resident, she has asked me to speak to the State Judiciary Committee if they have any problems pushing this bill through.  

One bit of opposition the woman has told me is that many law makers are saying, "Well, we don't have those types of schools here." Not true. I personally know of at least 3 which ARE in Oklahoma and have been in operation since at least the mid 1980's. The problem is, if you're not a member of the "network" of churches, psychiatrists, educators and other groups that uses these facilities as a cure-all for teenage behavior problems, you don't usually know where to look. These schools are usually in secluded areas, and are not widely publicized. This is the problem we are facing now. We are having to look far and wide in the Oklahoma country-side to find these schools and show proof to the legislature that it IS a problem here.  

If any of you out there are famliar with programs in Oklahoma, please contact me at http://www.mountainparksurvivors.com
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline FaceKhan

  • Posts: 395
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2002, 02:12:00 AM »
I used to be active in NYRA a few years ago and I have recently become the moderator for the "Gulag Schools" forum on their site at http://www.youthrights.org


This is very good news, even if the law does not pass at least it is a start. Since this is an issue that destroys families and is so painful to so many. Think of the all the people who are affected when a kid is disapeared and the numbers start to become astronomical. Since this is a phenomenon mostly of the upper-middle class and wealthy, it was inevitable that someone in power would be hurt by this industry and try to do something about it. Perhaps now is the time that the momentum needed to fix this problem is at hand.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
All of the darkness of the world cannot put out the light of one small candle.\"

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2002, 03:46:00 PM »
You wrote:
One bit of opposition the woman has told me is that many law makers are saying, "Well, we don't have those types of schools here." Not true. I personally know of at least 3 which ARE in Oklahoma and have been in operation since at least the mid 1980's.

More times than not, parents send their teens to other states, so it wouldn't matter if Ok had programs or not.
Would this action include out-of-state placements? That's crucial, in my opinion.
Deborah
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2002, 03:56:00 PM »
Federal Laws already exist. The Interstate Compact on Placement of Children (ICPC) in out-of-state facilities is more stringent, but then it doesn't cover in-state placements.  And good luck finding any state official that will enforce it. Texas didn't have a clue.
Deborah
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline FaceKhan

  • Posts: 395
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2002, 04:22:00 AM »
Unfortunately the ICPC just requires too much interagency communication to be effective. State agencies do not have the resources to enforce it and even if they did the damn thing is so complicated. The problem is that if a state bans these programs or heavily regulates them and prohibits placement without an opportunity for the kid to have a hearing and an advocate, then parents send the kids out of state and the other state agencies will not cooperate in getting the kid back. If you make it so the other state has to accept the kids placement as in ICPC then the other state is burdened with having to regulate all the other states' kids.  

What you need is a uniform ban on all escort services (with criminal kidnapping penalties applying to violators) , a requirement of a hearing either at the federal level or uniform across all states and strict regulation including a ban on isolating kids and a requirement that they can speak to their advocate/lawyer at anytime privately.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
All of the darkness of the world cannot put out the light of one small candle.\"

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2003, 11:14:00 PM »
Suits, arrest renew reform school debate
Matt Franck
Post-Dispatch
09/25/2003

A felony abuse charge and two recent lawsuits  including one filed Thursday have revived criticism of a strict breed of religious reform schools that are unregulated by Missouri.

A lawsuit filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Cape Girardeau accuses Mountain Park Boarding Academy, near Poplar Bluff, Mo., of abusing and falsely imprisoning students. The suit seeks damages totaling $36.9 million for five former students and two sets of parents.

Meanwhile, a similar school operated by a former Mountain Park employee also is under investigation.

Nathan Day, who operates Thanks to Calvary Baptist Church and Boarding Academy near Waynesville, Mo., was arrested in July and has
since been charged with a Class B felony of child abuse in a case involving an Illinois teen. A lawsuit filed against the school last month accuses the ministry of abusing the teen to the point of rendering him catatonic.

Thanks to Calvary and Mountain Park are among at least six teen reform ministries in the state that are exempt from state licensing. The schools share a similar adherence to corporal punishment and Bible-based discipline.

Several parents credit the ministries with rescuing their children. Supporters include Andrew Allen, of Stockbridge, Ga., who said
Thursday that the recent lawsuit does not alter his positive view of Mountain Park. "Our experience was that Mountain Park provided a
refuge for our daughter," Allen said. "She was not mistreated at the school."

Despite that kind of testimonial, ministries like Mountain Park have long attracted critics and abuse inquiries.

Oscar Stilley, a lawyer from Fort Smith, Ark., said the lawsuit he filed against Mountain Park should give more credibility to those seeking to close the schools.

"I think we've got enough pieces here to show the true picture," he said.

Stilley sued Mountain Park last year on behalf of a 17-year-old Arkansas boy. That suit is pending, but Mountain Park officials have rejected it as being based on the allegations of one rebellious
child, whose parents continue to support the school.

The lawsuit filed Thursday includes complaints from four parents, who accuse the Mountain Park administrators of misrepresenting the school's austere discipline.

Doug Hoover, of Lewisville, Texas, said in an interview Thursday that his stepdaughter tested positive for the psychotropic drug Thorazine a week after leaving Mountain Park.

Hoover said he picked the Baptist school, in part, because he was told they did not use drug therapy.

His stepdaughter, Erika Teasely, 15, said she was given a white pill regularly throughout her four-month stay at the school this year. "They told me it was for a bug that was going around," she said
in an interview.

The 60-page lawsuit includes dozens of allegations of mistreatment, including censored mail, medical neglect and excessive paddling.

Marilyn Lueken, of Freeland, Wash., said she paid $1,250 a month believing she was sending her daughter to a loving environment. She withdrew her daughter last summer after two years at the school when she began to suspect mistreatment.

Lueken said her daughter, Shari, 17, has since said she was dragged around a running track by her hair for refusing to run laps. The lawsuit also said she and a staff member would engage in acts of self-mutilation together.

Lueken said her daughter is now in a 24-hour residential treatment center.

The lawsuit claims the school denied one student her hearing aids and forced her to beat up a classmate for disobeying the school's rules.

Other plaintiffs in the lawsuit include Jamie Kaufmann Woods, 20, of Summit, Ill.; Tracey Brazil Ozuna, 20, of Kuna, Idaho; and Jessica
Deboi, 22, of Nampa, Idaho.

Sam Gerhardt, who operates Mountain Park, could not be reached for comment Thursday, nor could John. L. Oliver Jr., a Cape Girardeau lawyer who has represented the school in the past.

Meanwhile, Al W. Johnson, a St. Louis lawyer representing Thanks to Calvary Baptist Church and Boarding Academy, said he believes state officials are unfairly targeting the teen ministries.

Johnson said criminal charges against his client, Nathan Day, are meritless and are based on a campaign by state child-protection workers to shut down the ministries simply because they believe in corporal discipline.

Day is accused of paddling Christopher Jensen, 16, of Marseilles, Ill., until he developed deep bruises on his legs and buttocks.

A civil lawsuit filed by his mother, Deborah Stedman, claims that the punishment placed the boy in a catatonic state which has required
hospitalization.

Stedman's attorney, Tyce Smith of Waynesville, Mo., said the boy likely will require continued treatment.

Johnson, however, said the boy was healthy when he was removed from the school as part of the investigation. "At the time he was taken from Calvary, he was not showing any signs of physical or mental stress," he said.

Johnson said investigators interviewed 70 students at the school and could not find other cases of abuse.

Johnson has defended Heartland Christian Academy, where workers were charged two years ago with forcing children to stand in deep manure
as a punishment. But most of those charges have been dismissed. Heartland has since sued authorities claiming child-protection workers unfairly removed children from the school. A judge is expected to rule on that case soon.

Johnson said he believes the teen ministries he has represented have a far better track record than state-run institutions that treat youth.

"I think they are holding them to a much higher standard than the state facilities," he said.

Missouri is one of a few states that exempt faith-based institutions from regulations governing residential treatment centers. As a result, several ministries that have faced regulatory hassles elsewhere have relocated to Missouri. For example, abuse investigations in Mississippi caused the founders of Mountain Park to close their doors there.

Legislation to license the reform schools has failed the past several years in Missouri, with lawmakers concerned the bill would infringe on religious liberties.

Reporter Matthew Franck:
E-mail: mfranck@post-dispatch.com
Phone: 636-500-4106
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline FaceKhan

  • Posts: 395
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2003, 11:46:00 PM »
Religious freedom does not mean the right to beat and rape children. You can believe anything you want but if you hurt some kid in the name of god I am going to hunt you down in the name of god.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
All of the darkness of the world cannot put out the light of one small candle.\"

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2003, 12:06:00 AM »
I always appreciate your humor and wit, Face.
As they say "an eye for an eye"?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2003, 09:48:00 PM »
A personal account of Mountain Park.
http://pub57.ezboard.com/fwevebeenthere ... ID=5.topic


http://www.mountainparkhorrors.netfirms ... swills.htm
U.S. District Court
Eastern District of Missouri (Southeastern)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 03-CV-18
Kellar v. Wills, et al
Filed: 02/19/03
Assigned to: Honorable Charles A. Shaw
Jury demand: Plaintiff
Demand: $4,000,000
Nature of Suit: 360
Lead Docket: None
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Dkt# in other court: None
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2003, 08:55:00 AM »
Isn't this the same school that Alexia Parks writes about in her book, An American Gulag?

http://www.teenliberty.com
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2003, 10:59:00 PM »
You know, I'm not a lawyer, but something that *might* be effective at stopping out-of-state placements would be a law that stated that boarding school placement did not change the child's state of residence for purposes of custody suits, and that in the case of placement of a child in a restrictive boarding school without the home-state-mandated court hearing and assigned caseworker, that that placement shall be considered prima facie evidence in any custody dispute that leaving the child in the care of the person who placed them in the facility without a hearing is *NOT* in the best interests of the child.

Basically, I'm not up on all the legalese, but draft the law so that if Mom or Dad places the kid out of state in a RBS without the required hearing, that if the other parent or a grown sibling or aunt, uncle, or grandparent sues for custody, their getting it is darned near a foregone conclusion (unless the person suing is clearly unfit or the kid is produced in court and says they don't want to go with grandma, or somesuch).

Because then when the relative the court gives custody to shows up at the out-of-state facility with a lawyer and the custody papers and demands the release of the kid, they're gonna get the kid.

It won't prevent all such placements, but it will give the other relatives a better chance at rescuing the kid.

And, if the kid really needs residential treatment, well, the parents can go through the proper channels and get the hearing before shipping the kid off.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2007, 01:11:56 AM »
whatever happened to this law?
Is it ilegal to transport a kid across state lines?
Uhh? That's news to me, and, apparently, the cops that did NOTHING about the "intervention" they saw transpiring in front of them.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Mountain Park Accademy
« Reply #12 on: November 27, 2007, 06:35:37 PM »
the abduction busisness needs to be outlawed immediately. Hopefully, the hearings wil end with that being outlawed. Especially, shipping kids outside of the US, where there is no chance whatsoever of legal penalty for abuse (how could that be justified?)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »