Carlbrook

[Anonymous]

I couldn't disagree more. Most of the useful information I find posted here is done so by anonymous posters dropping by to tell their story. TSW has thousands of posts and I don't take anything he says seriously. I dont really care who says what, I think it's the message that is important. So many people are used to arguing the people instead of arguments they don't know what to do when an anonymous critic steps up. The founding fathers during the revolution wrote under surnames, does that mean we should not take seriously what they were saying? I love this forum but people shouldnt forget the thing that made it great is unmoderated discussion no matter how brutal that might be.

Anons are a bunch of fucking PUSSIES....

Wait a minute....

[Anne Bonney]

Most of the useful information I find posted here is done so by anonymous posters dropping by to tell their story. TSW has thousands of posts and I don't take anything he says seriously. I dont really care who says what, I think it's the message that is important. So many people are used to arguing the people instead of arguments they don't know what to do when an anonymous critic steps up. The founding fathers during the revolution wrote under surnames, does that mean we should not take seriously what they were saying? I love this forum but people shouldnt forget the thing that made it great is unmoderated discussion no matter how brutal that might be.

Yep, me too.  'Cept I'm not as hard on TSW as you.

[Anonymous]

Deborah- No, that is not libel because your identities are not known. Mine is.  You can't slander or libel a fictitious name.  There has to be harm or the strong potential for harm.

AFAIK you have to prove you were actually harmed.  Tell me if i'm wrong on that.

Karen.  Look.  People hate you here.  I tried to negotiate and smooth things over and things might have subsided until you started publicly whining about libel on this site.

NO employer is going to read 160+ pages of Fornits and believe anything about you.  Good luck proving you were harmed by anything that was said here.  I doubt you could make a good case out of this.

Attempting to censor anything on the internet is utterly futile.  There is always an archive, always a copy. Once something is on the internet it DOES NOT DISSAPPEAR.  Period.

Let it go Karen.  Time and time again you respond to provocation.  You take the bait and you add to it, ensuring the conflict rages on and on and on.  That is why you are a lawyer and not a peacemaker.

Whether or not  RB's accusations are true or not (i cannot say either way.  I don't trust anybody), trying to shut him up is pointless and futile.  I think you know this.  The question remains:  If you know it is pointless to rattle your saber, why do you?

My guess?  You feed on conflict...  So do many others.  I don't expect this to end here, or for you to just turn the other cheek (ultimately the easiest way to end conflict), but i would hope you at least ask yourself why you feel the need to respond to things you know don't have a chance in hell of damaging you. The more you prolong it, the more you make an issue out of it, the larger the conflict will get.  You are making an issue out of nothing.  I only hope you know why you are doing it.

As I have said before.  I wash my hands of the issue.  Yes TSW fired the first shot but you knew it was going to happen.  My hope was that you would be mature/wise enough to ignore it.

I'm not blaming you, or anybody in this.  Ultimately, however, the only fault ever worth looking at is one's own.  It is the only person you have full control over (despite the 12 step cop-out of "it's all in god's hands(we weren't responsable)" to feel better about the guilt of past misdeeds).

You cannot change your past, but you can change your role in your future.  Without your role in this conflict, it cannot continue, you choose to prolong it.

As much as this post seems harsh please do not take offense.  I really do have best wishes for you and your family.

cheers,
Mike

I hope Karen does sue this board, it's evil, bad for the people who get libeled, bad for the participants who often appear too disordered to realize what is healthy, bad for the few parents who get caught up in its lies when they should be concentrating on getting help for their children.

Go for it Karen, this kid named psy is giving YOU legal advice about whether this is libel, is that funny?  (equally funny : he's a regular at this site and he's worried that YOU thrive on conflict, funnier and funnier).

Check out the thread and general web postings on Susan Scheff's suit and also new federal legislation about cyber-stalking which may well cover situations like yours.

Sue this unholy place out of existance, make it melt under the weight of litigation costs, and from what I hear of its meager revenues that shouldn't be such a big weight.

Start by getting some letters from potential clients who were put off hiring you by the libels posted here, go after the board, its owner and the posters themselves.

And I bet others come forward to join you.

[Anne Bonney]

I hope Karen does sue this board, it's evil, bad for the people who get libeled, bad for the participants who often appear too disordered to realize what is healthy, bad for the few parents who get caught up in its lies when they should be concentrating on getting help for their children.

Go for it Karen, this kid named psy is giving YOU legal advice about whether this is libel, is that funny?  (equally funny : he's a regular at this site and he's worried that YOU thrive on conflict, funnier and funnier).

Check out the thread and general web postings on Susan Scheff's suit and also new federal legislation about cyber-stalking which may well cover situations like yours.

Sue this unholy place out of existance, make it melt under the weight of litigation costs, and from what I hear of its meager revenues that shouldn't be such a big weight.

Start by getting some letters from potential clients who were put off hiring you by the libels posted here, go after the board, its owner and the posters themselves.

And I bet others come forward to join you.

 :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:


Be my guest.  Add to Ginger's collection.

http://www.dchfans.org/dchfans/

 ::fuckoff::  ::both::  ::fuckoff::  ::both::  ::unhappy::  ::stab::  ::bwahaha::  ::bwahaha::  ::bwahaha::

[Anonymous]

Deborah- No, that is not libel because your identities are not known. Mine is.  You can't slander or libel a fictitious name.  There has to be harm or the strong potential for harm.

AFAIK you have to prove you were actually harmed.  Tell me if i'm wrong on that.

Karen.  Look.  People hate you here.  I tried to negotiate and smooth things over and things might have subsided until you started publicly whining about libel on this site.

NO employer is going to read 160+ pages of Fornits and believe anything about you.  Good luck proving you were harmed by anything that was said here.  I doubt you could make a good case out of this.

Attempting to censor anything on the internet is utterly futile.  There is always an archive, always a copy. Once something is on the internet it DOES NOT DISSAPPEAR.  Period.

Let it go Karen.  Time and time again you respond to provocation.  You take the bait and you add to it, ensuring the conflict rages on and on and on.  That is why you are a lawyer and not a peacemaker.

Whether or not  RB's accusations are true or not (i cannot say either way.  I don't trust anybody), trying to shut him up is pointless and futile.  I think you know this.  The question remains:  If you know it is pointless to rattle your saber, why do you?

My guess?  You feed on conflict...  So do many others.  I don't expect this to end here, or for you to just turn the other cheek (ultimately the easiest way to end conflict), but i would hope you at least ask yourself why you feel the need to respond to things you know don't have a chance in hell of damaging you. The more you prolong it, the more you make an issue out of it, the larger the conflict will get.  You are making an issue out of nothing.  I only hope you know why you are doing it.

As I have said before.  I wash my hands of the issue.  Yes TSW fired the first shot but you knew it was going to happen.  My hope was that you would be mature/wise enough to ignore it.

I'm not blaming you, or anybody in this.  Ultimately, however, the only fault ever worth looking at is one's own.  It is the only person you have full control over (despite the 12 step cop-out of "it's all in god's hands(we weren't responsable)" to feel better about the guilt of past misdeeds).

You cannot change your past, but you can change your role in your future.  Without your role in this conflict, it cannot continue, you choose to prolong it.

As much as this post seems harsh please do not take offense.  I really do have best wishes for you and your family.

cheers,
Mike

I hope Karen does sue this board, it's evil, bad for the people who get libeled, bad for the participants who often appear too disordered to realize what is healthy, bad for the few parents who get caught up in its lies when they should be concentrating on getting help for their children.

Go for it Karen, this kid named psy is giving YOU legal advice about whether this is libel, is that funny?  (equally funny : he's a regular at this site and he's worried that YOU thrive on conflict, funnier and funnier).

Check out the thread and general web postings on Susan Scheff's suit and also new federal legislation about cyber-stalking which may well cover situations like yours.

Sue this unholy place out of existance, make it melt under the weight of litigation costs, and from what I hear of its meager revenues that shouldn't be such a big weight.

Start by getting some letters from potential clients who were put off hiring you by the libels posted here, go after the board, its owner and the posters themselves.

And I bet others come forward to join you.

One of the funnier trolls I've read in a while. Three cocks out of five.   :tup:  :tup:  :tup:

[Anonymous]

I see Karen is back pretending to be someone else. Some things never change.  :roll:

[psy]

I don't quite know why i am bothering to respond to this troll...  Perhaps i am just bored.

I hope Karen does sue this board, it's evil, bad for the people who get libeled, bad for the participants who often appear too disordered to realize what is healthy, bad for the few parents who get caught up in its lies when they should be concentrating on getting help for their children.

Karen is accusing RB, not the board of libel idiot.  You can't sue a content provider for things users post.  This matter is between Karen and RB.

Go for it Karen, this kid named psy is giving YOU legal advice about whether this is libel, is that funny?

Was i giving her legal advice? No.  Was i giving her common sense advice? Yes.

(equally funny : he's a regular at this site and he's worried that YOU thrive on conflict, funnier and funnier).

I also post on ST (and am one of the very very few who have not been banned over there).  Go find a post of mine (besides a recent one one to TSW) that is intended to provoke conflict.  Please...  Read my msg history.

Check out the thread and general web postings on Susan Scheff's suit and also new federal legislation about cyber-stalking which may well cover situations like yours.

Sue won by default.  The defendant had recently lost her home from Katrina and could not afford representation.  The "victory" was hollow.

Sure.  Go ahead and use untested, poorly written, constitutionally unsound, cyber-stalking legislation.  Base the entire case on it I dare you.  It's about time somebody struck that down.

Sue this unholy place out of existance, make it melt under the weight of litigation costs, and from what I hear of its meager revenues that shouldn't be such a big weight.

See the X-mas tree.  I've yet to add a bunch more ornaments on it.  How the fuck would you know how much revenue Fornits recieves?

Plus, as i've already said multiple times, Karen can't sue Fornits as it is.

Start by getting some letters from potential clients who were put off hiring you by the libels posted here, go after the board, its owner and the posters themselves.

And I bet others come forward to join you.

 :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:   Karen knows that she has no case for damages.  If she sued it would be on the grounds of malicious intent.  AFAIK (stands to reason) She would also have to prove RB knew his allegations were libelous.

Please.  Mess with us worthless junkie malcontents.  We know nothing.

[Antigen]

I got the strangest fuckin letter in the mail today ....

[psy]

I got the strangest fuckin letter in the mail today ....

Oh please tell me you put it up on DCHfans.  Where's the "pray" emoticon.

[Troll Control]

I got the strangest fuckin letter in the mail today ....

Does this mean that I get to sue Karen as well?  She has lied many times on here saying I was fired from HLA.  Isn't that libel?  Sure sounds like it!

[Nihilanthic]

Can I sue her for internet disruption?

[psy]

I got the strangest fuckin letter in the mail today ....

Does this mean that I get to sue Karen as well?  She has lied many times on here saying I was fired from HLA.  Isn't that libel?  Sure sounds like it!

if(( it had malicious intent towards you OR did harm you ) AND ( Karen knew it was not true OR didn't know if it was true )) { you have a case }
AFAIK IANAL

[Anne Bonney]

I got the strangest fuckin letter in the mail today ....

That crazy letter in the straight forum isn't even that funny! Give it up!

It is to those of us who know the players and the subjects of the posts.  Don't read it if you don't find the humor in it.

[Anonymous]

I got the strangest fuckin letter in the mail today ....

That crazy letter in the straight forum isn't even that funny! Give it up!

It is to those of us who know the players and the subjects of the posts.  Don't read it if you don't find the humor in it.

-Or read it again and again until you slowly start to go insane.

[Anonymous]

Does this mean that I get to sue Karen as well? She has lied many times on here saying I was fired from HLA. Isn't that libel? Sure sounds like it!

Your real name has to be connected wiith the libel.