Is there a point to trying a civil case on a chatboard with people who couldn't find the law with both hands, a compass, and a map?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
WWASPS hasn't figured out yet that they're going to have effective critics no matter what they do. The situation has snowballed to the point that they can't shut the criticism up anymore.
If the criticism has to come from Miller on the floor of Congress and be *quoted* all over the internet (Congress critters who speak on the floor can't be sued for anything they say there), the criticism of them *is* going to continue.
I think the SLAP suit against the Earnshaws is a tragedy, I think they should be in touch with the ACLU to at least get amicus briefs filed in the case if at all possible, and the Earnshaws have my best wishes that they prevail.
Keep in mind that the Earnshaws *can't* defend themselves in the pseudo-trial on Fornits because they cannot comment on pending litigation.
I do not speak for the Earnshaws, I am not affiliated with the Earnshaws, but the fact that people involved in pending litigation really can't (wisely) comment on anything about the case is very well known by anyone who is not a moron.
Those of us who aren't morons will simply have to wait for the case to work its way through before we hear the post-litigation comments of the people involved.
Until then, there's simply no point in discussing it.
Program-pusher idiots *can*, of course, but it's pointless---as is crediting anything they have to say from gloating on up.
-"You can't kill the truth. Well, okay, you can kill the truth, but it'll always come back to haunt you."- -- J. Michael Straczinski
Timoclea
