Is it a longitudinal study? Because lots of programees assert undying devotion until the brainwashing wears off.
And, my thing is, whether or not someone is sober doesn't justify extreme coercive, psychologically abusive programs that depend on chronic, trenchant degradation to bring about "change." I also could not condone any program that doesn't recognize the emotional health of personal boundaries. Sharing should be safe and voluntary. Also, I do not believe you build someone by tearing them down first. That is BS. I've seen too many babies thrown out with the bathwater. Last, I would not want my mental health tied into adherence to theocratic programming.
The study was done on 186 participants. Six variables were used during the study:
1) what proportion of the program participants were still drug free (urinalysis testing was conducted for all 186 participants.
2) no legal involvements
3) employed or pursuing education
4) a part of a family unit
5) participating in church activities
6) physical and mental health.
The National Opinion Research Center of the University of Chicago developed the survey instrument, located survey participants, conducted the personal interviews, and obtained a urine sample to test for drugs. The National Medical Services, Inc., of Philadelphia, PA, conducted the drug screening detection for this population.
This study was conducted 7 years after the subject's involvment with Teen Challenge (I'm not sure how long it takes for "brainwashing" to wear off).
I can say that I personally graduated from Teen Challenge in 2007, and have had quite the journey since I left the program. From living/ working with my father to get back on my feet. To living in a place, by myself, where I was living off of Raman Noodles because I was so broke. 6 years later, I have a wife and two daughters, am active in my church, and have a great job working for the Army!
I agree with you that a person's sobriety "doesn't justify extreme coercive, psychologically abusive programs that depend on chronic, trenchant degradation to bring about 'change.'" No arguments there.
"I also could not condone any program that doesn't recognize the emotional health of personal boundaries. Sharing should be safe and voluntary." I agree with you here also. No arguments.
I really only tend to disagree with this part: "I do not believe you build someone by tearing them down first." Just speaking from my own personal experience, I would say that this is exactly what I needed - though Teen Challenge does not do this on an emotional or physical level (moreso on a spiritual level). I came into this program thinking that I was hot stuff! I could turn a broke DVD into 50 bucks if you gave me a few hours! The rules that I was expected to follow in Teen Challenge were total crap, and I was above them! It eventually broke me down - on a spiritual level - and humbled me to the point where I finally began to acknowledge that I needed help for my addictions. This was what eventually led me to change.
Let me ask you a question... Do you think that military bootcamp is abusive? Emotionally, physically, or spiritually? Do you think that our soldiers leave their training "Brainwashed?"
I'm asking this for a reason. I am former military, and went through Teen Challenge with several guys who used to be enlisted, and it seemed like the guys who were ex-military had an easier time adjusting to the rules and the structure of Teen Challenge. We may have fought the system at first, but we oftentimes were a little quicker to turn that corner and start doing what was required of us in this program. Once you start to go with the curriculum, and follow the rules, the program is actually a walk in the park!
I'm trying to figure out why you talked about someone's mental health being tied into the adherence to theocratic programming..?? I guess I'd have to agree with you there also. There are mental (often times neuro) problems, then there are spiritual problems. Theology and mental health are seperate things, and should stay as such. No arguments here.