Moderator Helping Cover Up Abuses

[psy]

I used this post because it was relevant. Come on guys, let up a bit.

posting.php?mode=quote&f=22&p=388525

Re: Joel, That's Who

New postby Samara » December 6th, 2010, 3:46 pm
This is all, as Shaggy just said in another OFFA topic, playing into Whoot's hands. As an alternative, what if we just discussed objectively improving the moderation process, instead of bashing Joel in highly inflammatory threads.

(Samara I used you post, hope you didn't mind)

Totally agree. I'm up to modifying the system a little, and if i don't take a certain suggestion, i'll at least explain why.

[Dysfunction Junction]

Well, the proof is in the pudding, isn't it.  After Whooter spent all night on Fornits trying to deny the facts all of the threads were restored.  All I had to do was play with my kid and hit the rack early.  That was easy.

 Obviously, the gatekeeper made a mistake again and was overruled again.  

My point once more is that if the gatekeeper actually knew the rules and followed them, none of this would have happened and he would not have had to publicly reverse himself and smear egg on Whooter's face one more time.  " Ha,Ha,Ha..."

@psy - you might want to reread your pms and revise what you said above.  Reread where you told me I had to "promise" to do something and you will see your statements above are not accurate.  That's all I have to say on that subject.

[Whooter]

Well, the proof is in the pudding, isn't it.  After Whooter spent all night on Fornits trying to deny the facts all of the threads were restored.  All I had to do was play with my kid and hit the rack early.  That was easy.

 Obviously, the gatekeeper made a mistake again and was overruled again.  

My point once more is that if the gatekeeper actually knew the rules and followed them, none of this would have happened and he would not have had to publicly reverse himself and smear egg on Whooter's face one more time.  " Ha,Ha,Ha..."

?



...

[Dysfunction Junction]

Yep, that's right Whooter.  All of the threads are restored despite your impotent all-night protestations.  I was right all along and Joel was overruled and had to restore the threads.  How sad you spent all night on it and still came up short, huh?  I guess when you have a fabricated family you have some extra time.

[Whooter]

Yep, that's right Whooter.  All of the threads are restored despite your impotent all-night protestations. I was right all along and Joel was overruled and had to restore the threads.  How sad you spent all night on it and still came up short, huh?  I guess when you have a fabricated family you have some extra time.

I think you have finally lost it DJ.



...

[none-ya]

psy wrote;
"You can't just decide to overthrow the moderator every time he disagrees with you."

Yea but the moderator shouldn't bury your posts just because HE don't agree  with them.

" I have received 0 emails complaining about him so far for the record".

Maybe not emails, but I do know you've received pms on his incompetence, because complained to you myself.

[Dysfunction Junction]

I actually won it, Whooter.  All threads are restored over your impotent protestations.  You lost it.  I won it.  See the difference? ; )

[Whooter]

I actually won it, Whooter.  All threads are restored over your impotent protestations.  You lost it.  I won it.  See the difference? ; )

Okay, DJ, I think we all understand.  I hope today goes a little better for you.



...

[none-ya]

psy also said;
"Gatekeeper does have delete permissions for offa (only). This is publicly available knowledge (stated on forum description) and is only to be used for spam."

Well have you seen the offa forum latley? It's full of spam and porn again. Maybe the gatekeeper should worry more about his job , and less about trying to edit and censor people with legit points to make. Please don't suggest that nobody has complained about this before.He personally attacked me and had his friends and family (i was told that che was his brother)
chime in with threats andinsults when I questioned his objectivity (and still do) having been staff at a program. They are the same lot still going after me in offa. Please don't make like this is news to you.

[none-ya]

[attachment=0:3rf70eba]BRONX CHEER.jpg[/attachment:3rf70eba]

[Froderik]

After reading this thread, two comments:

If what DJ says is true in regard to the corruption of links from google » fornits, that is a legitimate consideration.

And, the spam in the offa forum is a drag; i suggest more thorough deletion or the implementation of captcha again (as a preventative measure).

[Whooter]

After reading this thread, two comments:

If what DJ says is true in regard to the corruption of links from google » fornits, that is a legitimate consideration.

And, the spam in the offa forum is a drag; i suggest more thorough deletion or the implementation of captcha again (as a preventative measure).

He is just frustrated, Frod, and gets tired of only having me to attack so he goes after the moderators sometimes.  If there were problems he would have presented a link to show us or the moderators what he is talking about.  He is very familiar with how to use a "link" or screen shot.  When he leaves this out we all know it is a non-problem or something he is making up to get attention, which he succeeded in doing.  He needs some time to calm down and we will be back on track in a day or two.



...

[Dysfunction Junction]

After reading this thread, two comments:

If what DJ says is true in regard to the corruption of links from google » fornits, that is a legitimate consideration.

And, the spam in the offa forum is a drag; i suggest more thorough deletion or the implementation of captcha again (as a preventative measure).

This is the whole point, Frod.  Joel was busy deleting threads that he called "flooding" in this thread, but, for example, this thread was posted nearly a month ago and had only two posts in it, yet because Joel is not a deliberate, thoughtful person, he didn't read it or understand its context or even look at the date it was created - he just deleted it.

So, firstly, that's a problem because there was no rule violation and how can a thread be a "flood" if its a month old with two posts?  And, secondly, it was the number one Google return for "ridge creek assault" but, because Joel 86ed it extrajudicially, outside the rules, when you clicked the link in Google, you got "The requested topic does not exist."  

In my opinion, this is doing the dirtywork of the industry trolls like Whooter by effectively burying a child rape report along with its source document, the DHS report.

So because Joel wanted to exercise his mod power to the end of continuing his personal battles with posters who criticize him, he put children at risk.  That is small thinking, petty, selfish and wrong.  Joel is not cut out for the job because he uses his power to advance a personal agenda and each time he does it, he gets his wrist slapped and has to put back the all the posts, but not until there is some big to-do over it and Psy has to step in to jerk his leash.

[Whooter]

The thread was not deleted, DJ, its still there.  Your example failed, click on your own link.  Show us the links that you claim are broken.  You are trying to blame people for events that did not occur.

You have already been proven wrong and all of this is just a fit you are having.  



...

[Dysfunction Junction]

I don't need to explain anything to you.  I explained it to the people that matter, they agreed and the posts are restored.  You're just a forum troll and you don't matter.

Like I said...proof is in the pudding.  Take your case back to the admin if you don't like the results.  You cried to them and made complaints and thought you "won" but you "lost."  They agreed with me. Get over it and move on.