By the way. I do answer good faith questions from people who are respectful.
You don't seem to be answering questions from anybody at all.
Two people have asked questions so far. You and Joel. I answered Joel. You showed me your agenda yesterday when you broke your own rules and released my personal info against my wishes,
I posted no personal information of yours and you expressly indicated that I did exactly what you wanted me to do, what you admitted quite clearly
was your desireto have done:
post proof that you fabricated the blackmail story. Not to bring it up again but did you or did you not desire to have me post proof. Consider your statements such as "I was hoping for this precise outcome" and "Post your proof I'm posterX, I'm waiting." You're a liar. Nothing more, and because you are a liar about that I do not believe the rest of your story. I do not believe you were in a program. You claim you will not answer questions but since there is no rational reason not to, I believe you
cannot. You can call us crazy conspiracy theorists like you did last time when people suspected you were PosterX, comparing it to Obama's birth certificate. They were right back then despite your whooping and hollering and chances are, they're right now too.
so I know you aren't asking in good faith. Perhaps in time, I might trust you enough to answer your questions, if you can prove to me with your posts from now on that you are in fact interested in hearing another perspective on what happens in programs. Most people here are openly hostile to this idea, of an open free for all discussion, your actions yesterday also took away from this claim. I'll post what I feel like, and answer questions when I feel like it. Like I said, I don't care what people think about me here. I'm not pushing any agenda, don't you think if I was pushing WWASP programs I'd link to them, or talk about specifics?
No, I don't, because specifics are generally very easy to refute in the case of well known programs like WWASP. There is video tape of Randall Hinton admitting he pepper sprays kids repeatedly into compliance. There is testimony of a parent who came unannounced and saw a kid duct taped to a chair (in a US based program). There is consierable evidence of abuse at Spring Creek Lodge and corruption with the local authorities as documented in the
PBS documentary, Who's Watching the kids. There is video tape, taken by the mexican authorities and given to Inside Edition of kids tied down in the sun in dog cages at High Impact. There is mountains of sworn testimony. There is the ex-director of Dundee Ranch in Costa Rica who came foward as a whistleblower and detailed horiffic accounts of abuse. There are photos of the unsanitary and inhuman isolation rooms. There is solid documentary evidence to connect the Premier Workshops to LifeSpring.
There ample evidence of deceptive marketing practiced, as evidenced on this forum (we've even been spammed by WWASP spambots). There are well documented and supported horror stories for just about every single WWASP program. Kids forced by staff to abuse other kids in the name of their treatment. Unsafe restraints... Even deaths. WWASP is absolutely the easiest to pick apart. The reason you don't mention your program is that you know that as soon as you do i'll pile on the evidence and blow your story full of holes. Just like your earlier games you played on the "boo hoo, somebody blackmailed me" thread, you're stuck, and you don't know how to continue. Your'e used to speaking to the uninformed. Your'e used to speaking to parents who do not know the right questions to ask. You're used to being able to persuade with emotion and the standard "program saved my life" marketing spiel. Solid fact is not something you deal in and when confronted you are incapable of response. That is the reason you do not respond, not out of some feigned offense.
I offend you? You
sicken me.
I'm here to tell the truth about my experiences, I'm reluctant to release personal information to a mob of people who are obviously hostile towards me.
Information about a program is not personal information. Cut the manipulation and quit with the "waah... personal information... waah... i'm not answering you... you're a meanie!".