Author Topic: Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent  (Read 11880 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« on: August 23, 2003, 11:07:00 AM »
http://www.slweekly.com/editorial/2002/ ... -09-19.cfm

A Different Picture

I was a little disappointed after reading the article ?Last Chance Camps? in your Aug. 22 edition. I worked for Red Cliff Ascent (a basic offshoot of Aspen Youth Alternatives) years ago and as a result, ?wilderness therapy? holds a special spot in my heart. Although I believe in the basic principles of wilderness therapy, these programs have a long way to go. The author, Ms. Trevelyan, painted a pretty rosy picture, which I believe is far from the truth.

She quotes Gil Hallows as saying, ?We take a very soft, gentle, compassionate approach with kids. There is no deprivation and there is no verbal or physical abuse. Kids are never force-marched. Unlike a boot camp, we do not believe in breaking students down in order to rebuild them.? True, there was never any forced marching where I worked, but I witnessed senior field staff force students who refused to hike to sit in their sleeping bags in the middle of summer until they ?hiked? or they had the other students carry the noncompliant camper in their sleeping bag while they ?hiked? until the camper decided to ?hike? on his/her own. Not a tough decision to make if you?re receiving cheap shot punches from disgruntled students as they are carrying you and while the field staff are conveniently looking the other way. Yeah, real soft and gentle.

Don?t get me wrong, I?m not saying I don?t believe in wilderness therapy, I just believe that most programs have a serious problem with administering it. Contributing factors include: poor management, lack of qualified staff (they will take almost anyone, I got hired over the phone) and very poor training?or none at all.

Next time, do some research beyond what was taken from the sales brochure for Aspen Achievement Academy. There are notable researchers on the subject here in Utah and even empirical data that paint a different picture.

To end, the article quotes Jennifer Record with Alternative Youth Adventures: ?Nobody?s going to change unless they?re out of their comfort zone.? Yes, but working with ?troubled youth? for several years has taught me that you can?t change someone who does not want to change.

MIKE SCHULTZ

Sandy
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2004, 06:14:00 PM »
hi my name is carolyn and i was put into red cliff by my parents, and let me tell you that was a far from pleasant experience. It has been two years, and I still cry when I think of the way that I was treated. Let me tell you that the way that the program was portrayed in that letter was far from the truth. Thanks, Carolyn
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2004, 06:41:00 PM »
Thanks Mike.  I'm amazed that the paper would actually run your opinion.  The paper is run by mormons as is everything in salt lake.  I say this as an EX-mormon.  Emphasis is on the EX.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kiwi

  • Posts: 173
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2004, 06:58:00 PM »
Hi Carolyn,

 :smile:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline crouseD

  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2004, 09:34:00 AM »
I'd be interested in hearing from recent students who attended Red Cliff Ascent on their experiences - both positive and negative.

Thanks,  A parent
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kiwi

  • Posts: 173
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2004, 12:13:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-12-28 06:34:00, crouseD wrote:

"I'd be interested in hearing from recent students who attended Red Cliff Ascent on their experiences - both positive and negative.



Thanks,  A parent"

You might be interested in this.  The case was settled out of court.  Jared Oscarson was lucky:  other kids in wilderness programs have died in similar circumstances.

------

GALLIAN, WESTFALL, WILCOX & WELKER Michael I. Welker #7447
Bryan R. Kohler #8835
Attorney for Plaintiff
59 South 100 East
81. George, UT 84770
Telephone: (801) 628-1682

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR

THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

CIVIL DIVISIQN

JARED OSCARSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

REDCLIFF ASCENT, INC., ASCENT, INC. JOHN & JANE DOES I thru V, and CORPORATIONS X, Y, & Z.
Defendants.

COMPLAINT

Case No. 2:02CV-3486


Plaintiff, for his complaint against Defendants, avers as follows:

1. Jared Oscarson ("Plaintiff') is a resident of Clark County, Nevada.

2. Redcliff Ascent Inc. and Ascent, Inc. (Collectively, "Redcliff") are corporations registered and doing business in Utah.

3. Redcliff's employees were, at all times complained of herein, acting within the course and the scope of their employment. Thus, Redcliff is liable for all acts of its employees complained of herein under the doctrine of Respondeat Superior.

4. The events giving rise to this cause of action took place in Utah.

5. Fictitious Defendants John Does and Jan Does I thru V and Fictitious Corporations X. Y & Z are those parties, whose identities currently are unknown to Plaintiff, who may have caused or contributed to the conduct complained of herein. When the true names of those fictitious defendants are discovered they will be substituted into this complaint accordingly.

6. Jurisdiction of this Court is proper under USC §28.1332 because there is complete diversity between Plaintiff and Defendants, and Plaintiff has suffered damages described herein in excess of $75,000. Venue is proper in the District of Utah.

7. During the time of the acts complained of, Redcliff was licensed by the State of Utah to provide outdoor therapy and evaluation for adolescents ranging from 13 to 18 years of age.

8. During the time of the acts complained of, Plaintiff was a minor enrolled in and under the care and supervision of the Redcliff Ascent Therapy Program (operated by Redcliff) and was being supervised by Redcliff's staff, which included trained wilderness experts, fully knowledgeable in CPR, first aid, and wilderness survival. Certain staff members of Redcliff at the time of the acts complained of were also certified as Emergency Medical Technicians as/well as First Responders.

9. During the time of the acts complained of, Redcliff was in the business of training and caring for youth while on outdoor expeditions, which were monitored 24 hours a day through radio transmission from Redcliffs' base station in St. George, Utah. Expedition leaders in Redcliff's program were required to radio into the base office two to three times a day for location coordinates and condition status.

10. At all times during the events complained of herein, Plaintiff was under Redcliff's care on an extended outdoor expedition in Southern Utah.

11. On or about the evening of November 1 and proceeding into the morning hours of November 2, 2000, Plaintiff experienced interrupted sleep due to severe stabbing pain in the lower abdomen. Plaintiff's symptoms continued and worsened throughout the day on or about November 2, 2000.

12. During this time, Plaintiff complained about excruciating pain in the lower abdomen but was not assessed by Redcliff's staff. Instead, Plaintiff was made to hike five (5) miles as his symptoms continued to worsen.

13. On or about the night of November 2 and early morning of November 3, 2000, Plaintiff continued to complain to Redcliff's staff as the severe visceral pain continued. During that time Plaintiff experienced severe nausea, fever, dizziness, and discoloration.

14. Redcliff's staff dismissed Plaintiffs complaints, refused to provide medical care or transport him to a medical professional, and simply administrated Mylanta gas pills without assessing Plaintiff's symptoms.

15. On or about November 3, 2000 while Plaintiff's symptoms continued to worsen, Redc1iff s' staff required Plaintiff to hike in treacherous terrain, causing Plaintiff's condition to exacerbate to the point that plaintiff became severely dehydrated, feverish, dizzy, nauseous, and disoriented. During the hike, Plaintiff fell to the ground.

16. On or about the evening of November 3,2000, Plaintiff's condition continued to worsen, but he was sent to bed without being properly assessed, transported, or referred to medical treatment.

17. On or about November 4,2000, Plaintiff was transported to the emergency room at Valley View Hospital in Cedar City, Utah. Plaintiff later was life flighted to the University Medical Center in Las Vegas, Nevada, where he was listed in critical condition and diagnosed with a ruptured appendix with severe and life threatening complications which required major surgery and extended hospital care.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION - NEGLIGENCE

18. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference each and every one of the allegations in paragraph 1 through 17 above.

19. Redcliff stood in loco parentis to Plaintiff and had a duty to exercise reasonable care in the supervision, care, and treatment of Plaintiff to the same degree that a caring and concerned parent would exercise.

20. Redcliff's staff owed a heightened duty of care commensurate with the specialized training that they had received.

21. Redc1iff and its staff breached their duty of care by failing to evaluate, treat, or report Plaintiff's serious medical condition in a timely manner, in gross dereliction of their responsibility as temporary parental custodians of Plaintiff.

22. Redcliff's and its employees' breaches of duty were the actual and proximate cause of Plaintiffs injuries, which include but are not limited to exacerbation of and complications from acute appendicitis and a ruptured appendix, and disfigurement

23. As an actual and proximate result of Redcliff's and its staff's negligence, Plaintiff was required to and did employ physicians, surgeons and other medical personal for examination, treatment, and care of his injuries. Plaintiff did thereby incur substantial medical and incidental expenses.

24. As a direct and proximate result of Redcliff's and its staff's negligence, wantonness and recklessness, Plaintiff suffered a degree of permanent impairment and will incur further medical and incidental expenses.

25. As a direct and proximate result of Redcliff's and its staff's negligence, wantonness, and recklessness, Plaintiff was unable to work for wages for a lengthy period of time and suffered a loss of expected earnings while he underwent medical treatment and recuperated from his injuries.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS

26. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference each and every one of the allegations in paragraph 1 through 25 above.

27. Defendants should have realized that their conduct involved an unreasonable risk of causing emotional distress to Plaintiff.

28. From facts known to them. Defendants should have realized that the distress caused to Plaintiff might result in illness, bodily harm, or exacerbated symptoms.

29. Plaintiff was placed in danger as a direct and proximate result of Defendants' negligent wanton conduct and breaches of duty, and Plaintiff suffered severe distress with physical symptoms as a direct and proximate result of Defendants' negligent and wanton conduct.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION BREACH OF CONTRACT

30. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference each and every one of the allegations in paragraph 1 through 29 above.

31. Upon entering Redcliff's outdoor program, Plaintiffs parents and Redcliff entered into a contract for the benefit of Plaintiff which specified that Redcliff would stand in loco parentis to Plaintiff and that Redcliff and its staff would provide all necessary care and supervision for him to the same degree that a loving and concerned parent would provide.

32. Redcliff breached said contract by failing to properly examine, treat, report or otherwise respond to and care for Plaintiff s appendicitis.

33. Redcliff breach of said contract was the actual and proximate cause of Plaintiff's physical injuries and damage, and consequential damages such as past medical expenses, future medical expenses, impairment, and lost wages.

CONCLUSION

WHEREFORE. Plaintiff request judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally as-follows:

A. As to the First and Second Causes of Action:

1. For general damages for pain and-suffering and lost quality of life, in amounts to be proved at trial;

2. For consequential, incidental, and special damages that Plaintiff has suffered, including but not limited to past and-future medical expenses and lost wages, in amounts to be proved at trial;

3. Pursuant to Utah Code Annotated §-78-27-44 for prejudgment interest-at the legal rate from the date of Plaintiffs' injuries until paid;

4: For costs-accrued and accruing;

5. For post-judgment interest at the legal rate; and

6. For such other and further relief as the court deems just under the circumstances.

B, As to the Third Cause of Action:

1. For consequential, incidental, and special damages in amounts proved at trial;

2. For the contract price;

3. For reasonable attorney fees as may be provided by contract;

4. For prejudgment interest at the legal rate;

5. For costs-accrued and accruing;

6. For post-judgment interest at the legal rate; and

7. For such further relief as the court deems just.

DATED this 25 day of April, 2002.

Bryan R. Kohler
Of and for
GALLIAN, WESTFALL, WILCOX & WELKER, L.C.

Attorney for Plaintiff

[ This Message was edited by: Kiwi on 2004-12-28 09:26 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2005, 11:34:00 AM »
You are all rediculous. If sum1 died they were suicidal obviously, which many of the kids are. I was sent to Redcliff and i loved it!! i miss it and wish i never left-Wisen up!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2005, 11:53:00 AM »
Quote
On 2005-09-02 08:34:00, Anonymous wrote:

"You are all rediculous. If sum1 died they were suicidal obviously, which many of the kids are. I was sent to Redcliff and i loved it!! i miss it and wish i never left-Wisen up!"

Suicide by appendicitis.  That's a new one.  What will these cunning teenagers think of next?  :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2005, 12:43:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-09-02 08:34:00, Anonymous wrote:

"You are all rediculous. If sum1 died they were suicidal obviously, which many of the kids are. I was sent to Redcliff and i loved it!! i miss it and wish i never left-Wisen up!"


You are obviously not smart enough to understand that death by dehydration is not suicide.  It's criminal negligence.  These brat camp owners and operators who let kids die while on their "watch" should have gotten much more than a slap on the wrist considering how "final" death is.

 :eek:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline OverLordd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 802
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #9 on: September 05, 2005, 06:27:00 PM »
I do believe he was being sarcastic.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
our walking down a hallway, you turn left, you turn right. BRICK WALL!

GAH!!!!

Yeah, hes a survivor.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2005, 03:28:00 PM »
Red Cliff Ascent is affiliated with Discovery Academy and Discovery Ranch.  Does anyone have any feedback on or experience with either of these programs?  Input is rather urgently needed.  Please feel free to write to me directly at [email protected].  Thank you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline OverLordd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 802
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2005, 03:45:00 PM »
Do a search on it. you might find what your looking for.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
our walking down a hallway, you turn left, you turn right. BRICK WALL!

GAH!!!!

Yeah, hes a survivor.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #12 on: September 15, 2005, 04:02:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-09-15 12:28:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Red Cliff Ascent is affiliated with Discovery Academy and Discovery Ranch.  Does anyone have any feedback on or experience with either of these programs?  Input is rather urgently needed.  Please feel free to write to me directly at http://www.discovery-academy-forum.com/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline AtomicAnt

  • Posts: 552
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Ex-Counselor Speaks Out- Red Cliff Ascent
« Reply #13 on: September 15, 2005, 10:52:00 PM »
Quote

To end, the article quotes Jennifer Record with Alternative Youth Adventures: ?Nobody?s going to change unless they?re out of their comfort zone.? Yes, but working with ?troubled youth? for several years has taught me that you can?t change someone who does not want to change.
[unquote]

Nonsense. Where is the data that proves that people must be 'removed from their comfort zone' (whatever that means) in order to effect change? This is just another program cliche. Why people blindly accept these statements as facts is beyond me.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »