Author Topic: And When did the LIAR Isabelle Zehnder Become a Lawyer? (Read 20256 times)

Anonymous · « **Reply #15 on:** November 10, 2006, 07:53:00 AM »

Quote from: ""Guest""

Quote from: ""Guest""
Obviously you care. if you had ever worked in a law office then you would konw that a person can be a legal secretary and a paralegal all at the very same time. but you wouldn't konw that woudl you?

A paralegal requires a certification. A legal secretary does not. Is Izzy claiming she has such a credential?

Dizzy-Izzy claimed she was a paralegal but then when others questioned her, she said she was a secretary. Then the law firm she worked for fired her for her incompetency. She disappeared for a while and found another job but not in a law office. She refers to advice she gets from "her lawyers" but no one knows who these so-called lawyers are or if they even exist. Diz-Izz has a rich fantasy life mostly thinking she is very important like Sue Scheff.

Anonymous · « **Reply #16 on:** November 10, 2006, 12:45:00 PM »

This is posted on CAICA (Disclaimer)

Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this website represents the opinions of the author and is based on court documents, interviews with victims and parents, information from government officials, court documents, over 250 news media reports, television and radio interviews, personal observations, and personal experiences. If any statement is believed to be factually incorrect, or if you desire to make a fair comment in response to any information in this web site, please contact Isabelle Zehnder, in writing, at paulareeves@paulareeves.com with your concerns or comments so corrections may be considered. Contrary opinions and fair comments are welcome.

------------------------------

Note: Paula Reeves Dot Com does not promote PURE, unlike CAICA who does (see parent resources page) yet these two disclaimers are very similar. In fairness, it appears Isabelle Zehnder only recently "expanded" the disclaimer on her website. Paula Reeves, on the other hand, has had the same disclaimer for quite some time.

Anonymous · « **Reply #17 on:** November 10, 2006, 12:51:13 PM »

Wonder why CAICA felt the need to post a disclaimer, especially one that sounds a lot like the one on Paula Reeve's (who IS a lawyer) website?

Anonymous · « **Reply #18 on:** November 10, 2006, 02:24:34 PM »

We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.

What does this statement mean? That CAICA is funded by some other entity or that it is self-funded?

Again, very confusing IMO.

Anonymous · « **Reply #19 on:** November 10, 2006, 02:26:05 PM »

Quote from: ""Guest""

Wonder why CAICA felt the need to post a disclaimer, especially one that sounds a lot like the one on Paula Reeve's (who IS a lawyer) website?

No, I don't.

Anonymous · « **Reply #20 on:** November 10, 2006, 02:28:46 PM »

Could think of one reason:

When her friend stops being her friend and she hears the words sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue

Anonymous · « **Reply #21 on:** November 10, 2006, 03:07:28 PM »

Quote from: ""Guest""

Could think of one reason:

When her friend stops being her friend and she hears the words sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue

Looks like Isabelle modified CAICA's disclaimer a few days ago (11-5-06) to read as follows:

Copyright © 2005
Last modified: 11/05/06

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this website represents the opinions of the author and is based on court documents, interviews with victims and parents, information from government officials, court documents, over 250 news media reports, television and radio interviews, personal observations, and personal experiences. If any statement is believed to be factually incorrect, or if you desire to make a fair comment in response to any information in this web site, please contact Isabelle Zehnder, in writing, at info@caica.org with your concerns or comments so corrections or additions may be considered. The author warns against privately operated children?s programs that cuts off visits or phone communication with your child, or other family members, without a court order. This should raise serious concerns about the quality and safety of such a program. This site if for informational purposes only; it is not for referrals to programs. We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.

---------------------------

We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.

So who (if anyone) does fund CAICA? Very odd statement, in my opinion but then again, CAICA does actively and even aggressively (judging by Isabelle's numerous press releases and promotional articles) recommend to it's readers (the potential consumer) the services of PURE which is a private for-profit referral company that according to it's own website is "funded by several schools and programs as well as private funding". In addition, it appears Isabelle is supportive of certain transport companies and recommends their services to it's readers (the potential consumer) as well. (See Fornits thread Escort or Abduction, You Decide).

One thing for sure is that CAICA does not appear to be a not-for-profit advocacy organization such as ISAC which is a non-profit 501 (c) corporation. If it were, I would rather expect to see a public disclosure on CAICA like ISAC has, which includes their IRS number and invites the public to verify their non-profit status.

See this press release posted on Paula Reeves:

Referral-Free Zone: Buyer Beware of Businesses Exploiting Children and Families

Anonymous · « **Reply #22 on:** November 10, 2006, 03:10:35 PM »

Quote from: ""Guest""

Quote from: ""Guest""
Could think of one reason:

When her friend stops being her friend and she hears the words sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue

Looks like Isabelle modified CAICA's disclaimer a few days ago (11-5-06) to read as follows:

Copyright © 2005
Last modified: 11/05/06

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this website represents the opinions of the author and is based on court documents, interviews with victims and parents, information from government officials, court documents, over 250 news media reports, television and radio interviews, personal observations, and personal experiences. If any statement is believed to be factually incorrect, or if you desire to make a fair comment in response to any information in this web site, please contact Isabelle Zehnder, in writing, at info@caica.org with your concerns or comments so corrections or additions may be considered. The author warns against privately operated children?s programs that cuts off visits or phone communication with your child, or other family members, without a court order. This should raise serious concerns about the quality and safety of such a program. This site if for informational purposes only; it is not for referrals to programs. We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.

---------------------------

We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.

So who (if anyone) does fund CAICA? Very odd statement, in my opinion but then again, CAICA does actively and even aggressively (judging by Isabelle's numerous press releases and promotional articles) recommend to it's readers (the potential consumer) the services of PURE which is a private for-profit referral company that according to it's own website is "funded by several schools and programs as well as private funding". In addition, it appears Isabelle is supportive of certain transport companies and recommends their services to it's readers (the potential consumer) as well. (See Fornits thread Escort or Abduction, You Decide).

One thing for sure is that CAICA does not appear to be a not-for-profit advocacy organization such as ISAC which is a non-profit 501 (c) corporation. If it were, I would rather expect to see a public disclosure on CAICA like ISAC has, which includes their IRS number and invites the public to verify their non-profit status.

See this press release posted on Paula Reeves:

Referral-Free Zone: Buyer Beware of Businesses Exploiting Children and Families

From the press release:

According to the Referral-Free Zone, the latest trend is to "appear" to advocate, while referring to another company that earns money. Ms. Earnshaw explains, "Since people have gotten wind of the for-profit referral business, referrers are now teaming up with ?child advocates.? These ?advocates? will gladly tell you how awful a particular facility is, and direct you to someone who will help you find an alternative, which happens to be a business in which they have an interest in one way or another."

Anonymous · « **Reply #23 on:** November 10, 2006, 03:44:54 PM »

"We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs."

It probably means she (CAICA) is funded by a referral company, such as PURE.

Anonymous · « **Reply #24 on:** November 10, 2006, 04:05:03 PM »

Well, IF Caica is funded by PURE (Sue Scheff)...then Izzy is "indirectly" funded by programs.
There's just no way IZZY can get around this, IF IN FACT, Caica is funded in any way by PURE, Scheff.

Anonymous · « **Reply #25 on:** November 12, 2006, 10:39:18 PM »

Miss Zehnder certainly was claiming she was a paralegal. She is a liar like Sue Scheff.

Anonymous · « **Reply #26 on:** November 13, 2006, 06:29:36 PM »

From the press release:

According to the Referral-Free Zone, the latest trend is to "appear" to advocate, while referring to another company that earns money. Ms. Earnshaw explains, "Since people have gotten wind of the for-profit referral business, referrers are now teaming up with ?child advocates.? These ?advocates? will gladly tell you how awful a particular facility is, and direct you to someone who will help you find an alternative, which happens to be a business in which they have an interest in one way or another."

Isabelle Zehnder and Sue Scheff are some of those who "appear" to advocate "while referring to another company that earns money."

Scammers:

Anonymous · « **Reply #27 on:** November 13, 2006, 07:56:56 PM »

ISABELLE ZEHNDER ("IZZY") HAS ANNOUNCED THAT SHE TOO WILL BE WRITING A BOOK ABOUT HER LIFE AS A TUPPERWARE SALESWOMAN WHO NOW DOES PRETEND-O ADVOCACY FOR "KIDS IN CAPTIVITY."

IZZY WILL CO-AUTHOR HER BOOK WITH HER FRIEND AND CAICA'S FORMER "ADVOCATE OF THE MONTH," SUE SCHEFF. CAICA IS THE FAMOUS ORGANIZATION FORMED BY IZZY, WHOSE ONLY KNOWN MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS----IZZY.

MISS SCHEFF WILL WRITE HALF THE BOOK ABOUT HER EXPERIENCES WITH BEING AT HER WITS END WITH HER TEEN AGED DAUGHTER, WHICH PLASTIC SURGEON TO USE ON HER NOSE, AND WHICH DESIGNER DRUG TO USE FOR HER ANXIOUS PERSONALITY. ALL THIS TRAUMA COMBINED TO DRIVE MISS SCHEFF TO FORM HER COMPANY "PARENTS UNIVERSAL RESOURCE EXPERTS." A/K/A PURE. $$$$ CHUMP CHANGE FOR HER COSMETIC SURGERY.

WE ARE WAITING WITH BATED BREATH FOR THE COMBINED HEARTBREAKING STORY OF THIS 21ST CENTURY POWER COUPLE TO BE RELEASED IN 2007.

Anonymous · « **Reply #28 on:** November 17, 2006, 07:09:18 PM »

Isabelle Zehnder and her alter ego CAICA have a bad reputation for literally stealing the words and photos belonging to others and so doe Sue Scheff. They have obviously both stolen from the Paula Reeves Dot Com web site and Izzy has stolen photos.

Richt Izzy? Care to respond?

Anonymous · « **Reply #29 on:** November 17, 2006, 08:15:25 PM »

How about using the deaths of teens like Aaron Bacon to promote some poem/song while at the same promoting the same industry (wilderness therapy) that took his and other children's lives? Is that what one calls "advocating" for the protecting of children?

::bangin::

Fornits
Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora
An open discussion about the troubled parent industry