Author Topic: Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school  (Read 9816 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #45 on: October 31, 2006, 02:54:52 PM »
Beats me, but if you look at their pictures, they kind of look alike.  (Scheff and Zehnder, I mean).  In my opinion, they could almost pass for twins.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #46 on: October 31, 2006, 03:09:22 PM »
Really?  Can you post their pictures?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #47 on: October 31, 2006, 03:11:55 PM »
Like side-by-side:  that would be really nice.
Wonder if they have ever been in the same place at the same time and "posed together"  for a KODAK MOMENT since they seem to be such close little friends.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #48 on: October 31, 2006, 04:17:00 PM »
Anybody know if it is against the law to parody/spoof someone or something (like a slogan?)  Is there an online poop sheet on this topic so I can learn the do's and don'ts?

 :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #49 on: October 31, 2006, 04:19:18 PM »
Ya mean like SPOOF 101?

Hmmm.  Ginger might know.  She's damn good at that stuff.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #50 on: October 31, 2006, 04:29:45 PM »
Quote
Anyone who bashes Sue and Izzy that's fine but i'd rather find the truth for myself rather than going on peoples opinion I think that the whole reason people bash these two women is because they want to blame everyone except the real culprit and that's WWASP. Who are you all against WWASP and what's been done to these kids or the people who are trying with all there might to help this isn't a game of politics in the end it's a game of who gets the word out the loudest and I think Izzy has done a wonderful job with that aspect of this issues with CAICA and so bash them all you want I think this site is infested with WWASP lovers and WWASP employed people for the truth is it's the internet and you don't know who the hell is on the other side. And as for me I don't like WWASP and I think they should be squashed!!



So your logic is that anyone who has a problem with Sue and Izzy is pro WWASPS??  Wow.  That and you almost unreadable post above show how fucking stupid you really are.  Let me spell this out for you clearly.

SUE REFERS PARENTS TO ABUSIVE FACILITIES[/color].  She was aware of the allegations of abuse at Whimore, aware that abuse charges had been filed and continued to refer people there.  Do you understand that?  Does that clear ANYthing up for you yet or are you really that slow?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #51 on: October 31, 2006, 04:47:40 PM »
Parody's are great when they are "legally correct".  Research would be important!  Here's an example of a parody that passed the smell test:  The author used a well-known slogan from a board game (Monopoly) in a parody (GET OUT OF HELL FREE)

http://www.thisistrue.com/hasbro.html

Some More info:

Question: When is parody protected from a charge of trademark infringement?

Answer: Parody is a usage of a mark that pokes fun at the mark and does not confuse the public as to the source of the usage. In determining whether there is infringement the court balances the public interest in free expression against the public interest in avoiding consumer confusion. "A parody must convey two simultaneous--and contradictory messages; that it is the original, but also that it is not the original and is instead a parody. To the extent that it does only the former but not the latter, it is not only a poor parody but also vulnerable under trademark law, since the consumer will be confused." From Cliffs NOtes, Inc. v. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, 886 F. 2d 490 (2d Cir. 1989)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #52 on: October 31, 2006, 05:07:49 PM »
Whoa: well....guess that "KODAK MOMENT" thing might not be a good idea, huh?
How about a "brownie picture...polaroid snapshot....digital-little-ole-photo-thingy...walmart-quick-kopie-pic......WHATEVER"

Just wondering if these TWO really do look like twins?
NO parody, intended---whatever that may mean.

Lighten up a bit folks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #53 on: October 31, 2006, 05:20:56 PM »
Naw, parodies are fine, in fact, they are what make America great as a free democracy.  I just don't know how to do them but plenty of other people do.  Political cartoons are also great - especially when the subject is America's losing war on drugs and the billions of dollars wasted keeping small time pot users in prison for years. Just think of all the money taxpayers would save if marijuana was legalized?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #54 on: October 31, 2006, 05:25:54 PM »
Maybe someone's just camera-shy?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #55 on: October 31, 2006, 05:33:13 PM »
So what programs of WWASPS was Scheff referring to and was she referring to WWASPS at the same time another Florida mom was referring to WWASPS called Lyn Pretzfield (Sp?)  I remember that lady (LP) getting a lot of positive press until she got into some hot water with the law.  You can read about LP on PURE's website.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #56 on: October 31, 2006, 05:47:55 PM »
Sue and Izzy are obviously on here the last couple of days!  I think more Sue though.  What do you guys think?  Not to be answered by Sue or Izzy!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #57 on: October 31, 2006, 05:54:26 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
So what programs of WWASPS was Scheff referring to and was she referring to WWASPS at the same time another Florida mom was referring to WWASPS called Lyn Pretzfield (Sp?)  I remember that lady (LP) getting a lot of positive press until she got into some hot water with the law.  You can read about LP on PURE's website.


Sue, do you think we are that dumb!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #58 on: October 31, 2006, 06:20:57 PM »
It's call DEFLECTION, Sue-SUE.
No one cares about some WWASP crook lady, who got WHAT? 10 years probation, and had to pay a bit of "restitution" and do a bit of community service for some insurance fraud?

Lynne Pretzfeld was probably making her BIG BUCKS selling kids into WWASP programs.

Sound familiar, Sue-SUE?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Texas couple claim son abused at LaVerkin boarding school
« Reply #59 on: October 31, 2006, 06:22:42 PM »
Back to those "twin pictures" of Izzy and Sue..........
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »