Author Topic: SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)  (Read 41932 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
CALLING GINGER WARBIS: Sue Scheff Anyone?
« Reply #315 on: October 20, 2006, 07:49:09 PM »
We know Ginger that you cannot speak the word "Sue Scheff" form your ginger-lips because Sue-Sue will threaten to sue you or actually sue you.  Thats why we call her Sue-Sue.  LET HER GINGER cause then she will have a lawyer to beat her into a corner.

Okay--at least give Sue Sue her own place on your web site.  call it another name like "Battleship Bee-ach"  or "Sue-Sue's Corner" or "Sue Scheff's Story"  it. ::dove::   just do it dear ginger

 :P
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)
« Reply #316 on: October 20, 2006, 08:05:48 PM »
Hmmm ... PR
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Re: Sue-sue--Names of other lawsuits
« Reply #317 on: October 20, 2006, 11:50:37 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Curious""
To the person who just wrote about Sue Scheff and her lawsuits.  There is a case coming up in Utah with her name involved.  I would be very interested if any one may know of any lawsuits Sue has been involved in.

If we could get the names and number or where they were, I can get the depositions and information for another lawsuit.  I know there was a case in Utah federal court and state court.  Anyone have the names of the suits?  It is important.  I heard she is divorced so there would be information there and she sue a person she claimed was stalking her.  What state?  Help would be very good.

Anon, have you tried researching this yourself through public records?  It appears that Broward County like many counties in the U.S. has a free public search service that allows one to search circuit court, county court, family court, etc. records by the parties name or case number.  You may need to know the person's full name and middle initial.  If there is a terms of use, you should read it as it would explain what the policy is concerning accessing public records.

http://www.clerk-17th-flcourts.org/bccoc2/Default.asp?

Click on PUBLIC ACCESS CASE SEARCH



Try this link instead:
http://www.clerk-17th-flcourts.org/bccoc2/Default.asp?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)
« Reply #318 on: October 23, 2006, 12:01:03 AM »
How can Sue Scheff refer children and their parents to these schools when she is not an Educational Consultant...? An Ed. Con. is not to take 'monies' from the schools for referrals...If she does not take money from the parents and she is not licensed as an Ed. Con.
does that mean she is free to take money from the schools?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)
« Reply #319 on: October 23, 2006, 12:55:41 AM »
Educational Consultant is just a name (title).  Anyone can call themselves one.

That's the problem with the referral industry.

Anyone can proclaim themselves an ed consultant and refer kids to children's programs.  No education required.

However, you are correct about members of the IECA. (Independent Educational Consultants Association).  To be a member you have to have a college degree and take a pledge NOT to accept fees from programs themselves for referrals.  There are other membership requirements as well but I don't recall offhand what they are.

Between the two, I'd have to say a parent would be better off with a member of the IECA.  It's a self-regulating group but at least they have some ethical standards that members are supposed to follow.

Whether they do or not, who knows?  Guess you'd have to do some research on that question.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)
« Reply #320 on: October 23, 2006, 02:43:36 AM »
Do more digging into the EICA.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)
« Reply #321 on: October 23, 2006, 02:44:14 AM »
IECA - sorry
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff Sue Scheff Sue Scheff Sue Scheff Sue Scheff
« Reply #322 on: October 27, 2006, 08:57:19 PM »
The programs Sue Scheff referred to ARE abusive. There is a mother who posts here regularly about her daughter who was abused in a program after being referred by Sue Scheff. You hate WWASPS so much, you are willing to align yourself with anyone who flys the anti-wwasp flag, no matter what their true intentions are. It's selfish to think that kids only get abused in WWASPS programs and then align yourself with a profiteer of troubled families, who refer to other programs which are known to be abusive! If you really want to know the truth read the WWASPS vs. PURE transcript in detail and see what kind of child advocate she really is. I was abused in a WWASPS facility and I am horrified at how she is using program victims horror stories to make money! Not to mention that she was the biggest referer to WWASPS and continued to refer after she took her daughter out! Wake up!

It seems the anti-wwasps advocates who support Sue Scheff and PURE have nothing to say about the revelation in those transcripts that Sue Scheff continued to refer to WWASPS after Sue Scheff took her OWN daughter ASHLYN SCHEFF out claiming Ashlyn Scheff had been abused, or if they have, I haven't seen the posts. I am curious though how they and Sue Scheff defend such actions? It just doesn't make sense, IMO. Anybody have a link to posts from these supporters? I'd like to know what their opinion is.
Thank you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)
« Reply #323 on: October 28, 2006, 11:00:38 PM »
How could they defend such actions?   Don't think anyone has bothered to try on this forum, have they?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Isabelle Zehnder Promoting Sue
« Reply #324 on: November 04, 2006, 01:21:12 PM »
PRESS RELEASES

10/16/06 Troubled Teen Programs - 25 Plaintiffs Join in Lawsuit Against WWASPS, Cross Creek Manor, Robert Lichfield, and Associates ? More Expected to Join In
  (click here)
10/15/06 Sue Scheff Reveals What Led to the $11.3 M Victory
  (click here)
10/8/06 Sue Scheff is Awarded $11.3 Million in Internet Defamation & Invasion of Privacy Claim in Jury Trial
 
 Click here  
08/26/06 WWASPS BACK IN COURT, AGAIN: Prominent and Prestigious Turley Law Firm and Famed Attorney Richard Henriksen File Lawsuit Against WWASPS
  (click here)
08/02/06 Death of 7-year old Angellika Arndt results in closure of Northwest's Rice Lake Clinic
  (click here)  
07/28/06 WWASPS Back in Court:  25 Parents File Class-Action Law Suit Alleging Fraudulent Tactics
  (click here)
07/10/06 Coalition Against Institutionalized Child Abuse Expands!
   (click here)
06/26/06 A VICTORY: P.U.R.E Satisfaction - Florida Mom prevails, again
  (click here)
06/23/06 Spring Creek Lodge withdraws from the WWASP
  (click here)
06/12/06  Parents for troubled teens can get PURE results
   (click here)
05/27/06 WWASP Fails, Florida Mom Prevails: Jury Rules in Favor of Mom
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Note to Lichfield: Sue ISABELLE ZEHNDER
« Reply #325 on: November 04, 2006, 01:23:35 PM »
If you bring another lawsuit against ISABELLE ZEHNDER you would have a lot of surprise witnesses who know a lot about the IZZY factor.

Sue scheff cannot get business insurance since her Utah lawsuit so the next million dollar defense will be on her mom.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff Isabelle Zehnder FRAUD AND CHILD ABUSE
« Reply #326 on: November 17, 2006, 06:47:49 PM »
Referral-Free Zone: Buyer Beware of Businesses Exploiting Children and Families
 
International Survivors Action Committee
9/9/2006 4:02:51 PM
 
Victims, Moms, and Advocates Join Forces to Expose

Fraud and Child Abuse in a Booming Billion Dollar Industry

CONTACT: Shelby Earnshaw

WEB SITE: www.referralfreezone.info

After operating separately for years, a group of survivors, moms, authors, and advocates have joined forces against child abuse in privately operated children?s programs. The group emphasizes that parents looking for family help, especially over the Internet, have no idea that agents and programs are operating without federal oversight.

The ?wolves in sheep?s clothing? begin with the self-described parent ?resource experts? and referral agents. ?No one is federally regulating or reigning in these businesses,? claims Shelby Earnshaw, who operates International Survivor?s Action Committee (ISAC). According to the coalition, the self-described "parent resource expert" or agent may frighten a parent looking for help for his or her child with descriptions of one bad residential program, only to lure the parent into another, from which the so-called "expert" is making big money.

ISAC is a watchdog organization that warns parents, collects evidence, and reports child abuse to authorities about privately operated children?s programs and those who refer to such programs. Ms. Earnshaw should know?she was a victim herself. Now an adult, with a family of her own, Ms. Earnshaw has dedicated her life to exposing the proliferation of fraudulent residential children?s programs. ?Many times the best help for the money is near home. We are here to at least warn parents about the unethical practices of self-described resource experts and referral agents.?

Some referral organizations tout their membership with the Better Business Bureau, claiming they are ?parents helping parents,? while, in fact, they are uneducated in relevant fields of child development or disorders from which children may be suffering. In reality, these Internet savvy companies are marketing experts--making their businesses traps for honest, but unwitting parents.

Thusfar, such businesses are operating with impunity because there are no federal standards by which to regulate and punish them when they go too far. Ms. Earnshaw states, ?It is not uncommon for skilled agents to talk parents into moving their children across state lines and even out of the country. The parents needing help may be under severe pressure and these companies take advantage of the parents? vulnerable state of mind.?

In starkest contrast, the Referral Free Zone is designed to provide information from researchers, authors, advocates, and parents who have no financial interest whatsoever in referring to children?s programs. ?It?s not uncommon for the operators of these programs to lie about the fact they are receiving fees. There are also no federal laws requiring ?parent resource experts? or agents to reveal child abuse or neglect that has occurred at the programs they have just referred someone to?it?s buyer beware, at its height."

One program may refer to another, with the parent not understanding the connection between the two companies. The sites all look very different from one another, giving the appearance they are independent of one another. ?This is an obvious conflict of interest,? says Ms. Earnshaw. ?We know of cases where owners are up on criminal charges or in the middle of criminal investigations for child abuse, but the ?expert or agent? turns a blind eye because they may be friends with the owners and they have been paid. It?s very dangerous for children.?

According to the Referral-Free Zone, the latest trend is to ?appear? to advocate, while referring to another company that earns money. Ms. Earnshaw explains, ?Since people have gotten wind of the for-profit referral business, referrers are now teaming up with ?child advocates.? These ?advocates? will gladly tell you how awful a particular facility is, and direct you to someone who will help you find an alternative, which happens to be a business in which they have an interest in one way or another.?

The Referral-Free Zone only allows dedicated members who do not refer to children?s programs. The coalition is committed to advocating and creating true public awareness about the increasing popularity of using our children as business commodities.

ISAC said the strength of the Referral-Free Zone?s will be through the Internet, books, and films, as well as political and media campaigns. ?Our power is growing and we will not stop until meaningful action is taken to regulate this dangerous private industry. The Referral-Free Zone will unify our efforts to educate and advocate.?

The Referral-Free Zone is found at www.referralfreezone.info ####

Related Links

www.referralfreezone.info
 
Contact Information:
Shelby Earnshaw
Founder
International Survivors Action Committee
(540) 522-6231
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Feels the Pain of the STRAIGHT SURVIVORS
« Reply #327 on: November 20, 2006, 08:12:48 PM »
FROM Sue Scheff new self promotion.  She says she feels your pain and the GREAT SUE will "research" and find safe programs.  Read below in bold cause Sue Scheff is the expert who knows all with her GED.   :flame: Such fraud.

Sue Scheff? - Bringing Families Back TogetherSM

Sue Scheff and P.U.R.E. work with organizations such as Coalition against Institutionalized Children Abuse (CAICA) www.caica.org in an effort to help bring awareness to a multi-billion dollar industry that continues to grow and that is virtually unknown.

Due to the overwhelming number of requests, Sue Scheff is in the final stage of writing her book - it will be a useful tool for parents and will include what desperate parents are saying today, options and alternatives, as well as real life experiences.

Sue Scheff was recently interviewed on WNN 1470 AM Health Talk Radio, discussing the need for parent awareness. Sue Scheff encouraged people to take a moment and sign the International Petition to End Child Abuse sponsored by CAICA.

Sue Scheff recognizes there are survivors of programs from many years ago who suffered the ultimate price. Sue feels pain for their experiences, however realizes that their apparent desire to close all programs is not the solution - helping parents find safe and qualified schools that can benefit today's teens is what is needed.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)
« Reply #328 on: November 20, 2006, 08:48:07 PM »
Personally, I still don't understand what or who CAICA is.

 :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
SUE SCHEFF and ISABELLE ZENDHER (PURE, CAICA, WWASP lawsuit)
« Reply #329 on: November 20, 2006, 09:02:21 PM »
Oh sure, refer parents to Isabelle's petition which IMO is nothing but a self-promotional ad for Caica and by association, her friend and colleague Sue Scheff of PURE.

Makes sense Scheff would rather people sign her pal Izzy's petition than the one sponsored by CAFETY which has been online much longer than Izzie's and has well over 1,000 signatures.

Not that petitions are gonna solve anything but at least Cafety's is focused on the issues and not sponsored by someone who clearly supports orgs. that are paid by the programs they recommend to "desperate" parents.

 :flame:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »