Who needs to worry about being sued? Telling the truth about WWASPS is horrifying enough.
If you want to place an ad without fear of being sued, talk to an attorney that works with ACLU. Don't ask ACLU to pay for the consultation, just explain that you're interested in paying for a consultation with a civil rights attorney with experience of SLAPP suits, and that you'd like them to suggest someone.
The deal is that most SLAPP suit laws only protect you if what you're talking about references pending legislation or somesuch---the details of the law are different from state to state.
A good civil rights lawyer could, for a fee that is probably genuinely small and affordable--as lawyers go, help you find out what research you would want do, and then vet your final ad copy to make sure you're covered.
See, someone like WWASPS can hit you with a SLAPP suit (if you tell uncomplimentary truths about them) without triggering the anti-SLAPP laws, but they'll lose in court. Trick is, it may cost a bit to defend it---or not. That's their gamble. See, if you tell the absolute, unflattering truth and they sue you, if some big organization like the ACLU or all of the rest of us takes up your cause, then they could get hit with frivolous lawsuit and malicious prosecution penalties and all kinds of crap could flow their way.
Also, they always risk drawing big time media attention to their pile of crap by making a big lawsuit against you for telling the truth---a big spotlight their dirt probably wouldn't survive. The media loves crooked politicians, too--if the media could get evidence close enough to a tasty quid pro quo (I don't know if one exists)--WWASPS could lose in a big way. As could the Litchfields directly.
Taking a frivolous libel or slander suit to court is a big risk for them.
Anyway, back to the main track of why it would be best, with an ad, if you could consult a lawyer and craft it to fall under the relevant state's SLAPP law provisions. If you could, the penalties for them even trying to sue you over telling uncomplimentary truths are huge. Said lawyer could explain, but the anti-SLAPP laws are NICE.
The thing about criticizing WWASPS successfully is you should never lie about them. You don't need to anyway. The truth is bad enough. Paradise Cove, Tranquility Bay, Casa by the Sea, Dundee.
Oddly enough, when I tell people the Costa Rican and Mexican authorities each shut down a WWASPS-linked "school" because they were concerned about the welfare of the kids....
Let's put it this way: I can almost see the wheels turning as the person I'm talking to puts together third world countries, with all the problems that entails, and thinks about what it would take to shock their police into action.
Be fair to WWASPS. Stick strictly to the truth when talking about them. The truth is damning enough.
Julie