"Neutral ground with no hang ups".
A rather lofty expectation, considering the hostility exhibited here from time to time. Attempting to control others peoples thoughts, memories and overall attitudes seems futile and will only result in frustration/disapointment for both parties. The notion of being "neutral", unfortuantely is an unrealistic expectation. The under currents of hate and resentment make being 'neutral' difficult at best.
The concept of a re-union would imply that we all were once united...and I think we all know we were anything but united...perhaps a common thread in our history is about all we share.
The question, "Would it be worth it?" could be answered by asking what is our intent for gathering? Personally, I would be inclined to attend this event, but I am not sure of my intentions for doing so. Straight was not a happy time, so evoking memories more than likely will be troublesome to a degree. Acting as if Straight was a happy time would be a farce, something I really don't think I could pull off. However, I would still be inclined to go.
Possibly, it is an age factor. Perhaps I have come of age that naturaly looks to years gone by and tries to make sense of it all. Could this be a time in my life that nostalgia has become important? Why after almost 3 decades has it become important to frequent this forum? To reconnect with long lost friends? After all, I believe I can count those I considered "friend" on one hand.
I think back to the Mel Sembler protest held in Tampa this year. There was much to do about it here on the forum. Although I did not plan to protest and said as much...I planned to go and I did. Now, was that worth it? Well, I am glad I went. But how can I put a value on it saying yes or no, it was worth it?
10-15-20 years ago I wouldnt even consider the thought of attending a so called reunion. But today is a lil different, for reasons I can't articulate. Would I be inclined to discuss other people...sure. Would I discuss TBPITW, well sure I would. Yet I would be insensed with the idea that I am restricted in my speech and thought. It would smell of Straight's influence and that would be all it took for me to bolt. What would be next? A rap? (oh god) who would lead it? I would have to run before there was a god damn song! Oy!
I tend to agree with the whole notion that anyones time in Straight was worse than any others. On the other hand, do I think Straight got progressively worse as time went on? I wouldn't doubt it for a minute! The period of time I was in Straight, we layed a foundation of hate and distrust for the staff as well as each other. This foundation made it easier for the likes of George Ross and Miller Newton to come in and make a shitty situation even worse.
It has been said that this forum doesnt have the stuff for a good read....well, there are other forums that steal from this forum to incite discussion in 'other' forums. How pathetic is that? Why comment somewhere else on a topic that was initiated here?
Another thing...The flamming and bashing of peoples character is not restricted to this forum. In just about every forum and every newsgroup I have been associated with there has been heated arguments and flat out war between participants. Perhaps it is just this medium of communication that makes it easier to berate people with differing views. (just like in Straight)
We meet here and have discussions...disagreements (whatever) why is it impossible to meet face to face? Why can't differing views be investigated rather than attacking the source. We earned our right to be suspicious, but I am not convinced that attacking the source of foriegn thought is the best thing in the long run.
I appologize for my choppy/rambling responce....Simply put, I can see many reasons why I would not attend a "reunion". I can think of no other good reason to attend a "get together" than, I would simply want to go.