Author Topic: Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge  (Read 3340 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #15 on: August 02, 2005, 07:07:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-08-02 14:53:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Face it guys you have nothing better to do with your lives than to sit her and complain about something that you cannot and never will be able to control, you all hate yourselves!  How does spring creek save lives, perhaps kids like yourselves who are so ignorant even after being in the program follow Darwinian theory and eliminate yourselves, since your are certaintly not the fittest:)~"


What? :question:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2005, 07:08:00 PM »
Just a programmed troll. Nothing worth responding to.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #17 on: August 02, 2005, 08:21:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-08-02 14:53:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Face it guys you have nothing better to do with your lives than to sit her and complain about something that you cannot and never will be able to control, you all hate yourselves!  How does spring creek save lives, perhaps kids like yourselves who are so ignorant even after being in the program follow Darwinian theory and eliminate yourselves, since your are certaintly not the fittest:)~"




wow. i certainly do feel a little de-evolved after reading that senseless post.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #18 on: August 02, 2005, 08:37:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-08-02 16:08:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Just a programmed troll. Nothing worth responding to.

"


Lets keep in mind that staff patrol these forums. It's possible that some posts come from staff and/or upper level program kids.

How many people have written letters? And were guidelines followed? Remember tone is everything. Hostility, threats, etc. won't be printed.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #19 on: August 02, 2005, 08:38:00 PM »
printed where?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #20 on: August 02, 2005, 08:43:00 PM »
I wrote a good letter, not hostile and followed the guidelines. No response yet, been a couple days. Ever since this post first showed up anyways.

I don't expect a response though, this guys obviously an insider by the tone of his article. Or just doesn't care.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #21 on: August 03, 2005, 08:26:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-08-02 17:37:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2005-08-02 16:08:00, Anonymous wrote:


"Just a programmed troll. Nothing worth responding to.


"




Lets keep in mind that staff patrol these forums. It's possible that some posts come from staff and/or upper level program kids.



How many people have written letters? And were guidelines followed? Remember tone is everything. Hostility, threats, etc. won't be printed."


I think he means printed in the letters page of the paper that ran the article. Here's the policy:

Letters policy: The Missoulian welcomes and encourages letters to the editor on topics of general interest. Letters should be about 300 words or fewer. The Missoulian reserves the right to reject or edit letters for content and length. The Missoulian prints as many letters as possible. Letters must contain the writer?s name, address and telephone number (phone numbers are for verification, not publication).
Mail to: Missoulian Letters, P.O. Box 8029, Missoula, MT 59807.
Fax: 406-523-5294.
E-mail: [email protected].
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #22 on: August 04, 2005, 03:49:00 AM »
Ooo- thanks for that! I was writing the author directly, much better to send it to his editor. Thanks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #23 on: August 04, 2005, 10:00:00 AM »
Quote
On 2005-08-01 10:55:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I emailed him a rather scathing review to say the least."


Well, if it was verbally abusive, and emotionally charged it will do no good at all.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #24 on: August 08, 2005, 09:21:00 AM »
It has been about one week and they still haven't printed one letter about the article. Hmmm...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #25 on: August 08, 2005, 07:28:00 PM »
not suprising, maybe someone who is a good writer should write a counter story and send it to a competing newspaper in the same area?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #26 on: August 08, 2005, 07:35:00 PM »
like the independant record
http://www.helenair.com

the missoula independent
http://www.missoulanews.com/

the messenger
http://www.montanamessenger.com/

topix
http://www.topix.net/city/missoula-mt/

the montana kaimin
http://www.kaimin.org/

KECI channel 13
http://www.keci.com/

KPAX montana's news station channel 8
http://www.montanasnewsstation.com/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Way too flattering article on Spring Creek Lodge
« Reply #27 on: August 08, 2005, 10:28:00 PM »
The Independents response to the Missoulians news article, containing really no news at all:

http://www.missoulanews.com/News/News.asp?no=5079

etc
by Independent Staff


No news is good news, right? Well, maybe not if you look to the Garden City?s paper of record for relevant information about Spring Creek Lodge Academy, a boarding school for troubled teens tucked quietly into the mountains near Thompson Falls.

On Aug. 1 Missoulian readers woke up to a sunny story about Spring Creek students being given ?a chance to paint a brighter picture for their futures? through sidewalk art. ?Spring in their Steps? crowed the headline, and the picture painted by reporter John Stromnes positively glowed: The art project was described as ?a disciplined, collaborative effort at creative self-expression disguised as a fun outdoor activity.? Of the school in general Stromnes wrote, ?Spring Creek, after all, is a highly regimented boarding school that demands respect for others and accountability for oneself?and conformance to rules, which really means respect for others.?

Sounds like fun, but we were puzzled that any real news about Spring Creek was missing in action. In our June 16 cover story, the Independent reported that Spring Creek and its umbrella organization, Worldwide Association of Specialty Schools and Programs (WWASPS), had been named defendants in a lawsuit, wherein plaintiff Gregory Gomez alleges negligent child abuse and physical and mental abuse while at Spring Creek. We also detailed the battle raging between state legislators and Spring Creek lobbyists over proposed state regulation of Montana?s burgeoning teen behavior-modification programs. Maybe all that struck our daily counterparts as beside the point, so stricken were they with the opportunity to print a colorful photo.

Or maybe they just didn?t hear about it from Jacqueline Rutzke, the Missoulian story?s main source, identified therein as a mere art teacher, though in fact she?s both an administrative spokeswoman and registered lobbyist for the school.

As a small weekly paper low on the media food-chain, we?ve become accustomed to breaking stories and not being credited when larger papers pick them up. But we?re happy, flattered even, when they make their way further into the public consciousness. We?ve received feedback?positive and negative?from all over the country about our Spring Creek story, and have been running letters to the editor about it nearly every week since.

Apparently the Missoulian missed it, because there?s not the faintest whiff of controversy?never mind the news?in their latest love letter to Spring Creek. Past stories have taken a similarly feel-good tack: A Valentine?s Day story this year printed ?postcards from the heart? written by Spring Creek students; a June 1 story announced the ending of a choir program partnership between the facility and Thompson Falls High School; a 2003 story highlighted Spring Creek?s Christmas program.

No news may be good news for Spring Creek, but can that really be true for Missoulian readers, too?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »