Author Topic: Dan Rather SUCKS!  (Read 2398 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« on: September 15, 2004, 11:39:00 AM »
Dan Rather, Professional Journalist, and CBS News, Professional News Network, want us to keep believing that they are the ordained purveyors of truth. They are the mature and responsible mavens of media ethics. They are the information gatekeepers with unparalleled judgment, dedicated to the high principles of The Craft of Journalism, unwavering in their crusade for the public interest.

 As the saying goes in the blogosphere: Bwah-hah-hah.

 With a click of the mouse and easy-to-use Web log software, Internet-savvy citizens across America and around the world are relentlessly unmasking the frauds of snob journalism as never before. The wall between the self-anointed press protectorate and the unwashed masses has crumbled.

 Rather and The Suits face crushing evidence that CBS relied on bogus military documents in a recent "60 Minutes II" hit piece challenging President Bush's National Guard service. Questions about the documents' authenticity were first raised last week on the indispensible conservative Internet forum, FreeRepublic.com, then amplified and supplemented by the intrepid independent bloggers of Powerline, Little Green Footballs, INDC Journal and Allahpundit.

 Rather and his geriatric empire are combating these powerfully persuasive blogs with anemic smears and sneers. And they are losing so very, very badly that they can't keep on top of their own spin.

 Rather recklessly suggests that the bloggers who broke the story are disciplined "partisan political operatives," presumably affiliated with the Bush campaign and/or Republican National Convention. Former CBS news executive Jonathan Klein, on the other hand, suggests that the bloggers are loose cannons and amateur yahoos. The blogger, Klein told Fox News, is a "guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas writing" without acceptable journalistic credentials or a genuine commitment to "checks and balances."

 It's no surprise, of course, that the conspiratorial, central-planning mindset of the mainstream media kingpins conjures up a top-down plot where there is none and where none could ever be orchestrated even if the Bush White House wanted one. Bloggers take orders from no one. But with that irresistible platter of publishing freedom comes a tall glass of responsibility. For serious blogging pundits and news-gatherers and discussion board operators, cyber-cred is everything. Mainstream media anthropologists often attach the adjective "free-wheeling" to the blogger culture -- ignoring the flip side of the brutally quick-fixing and 24/7 fact-checking nature of the medium.

 What is amazing is that Rather would shamelessly traffic in such paranoid nonsense against conservative-leaning bloggers, without a shred of substantiation, in the middle of his own disastrous journalistic hurricane -- and on the heels of CNN's recent disclosure that two of its most prominent talk show co-hosts, Paul Begala and James Carville, have been hired as official consultants to the Kerry presidential campaign but will remain in their current positions at the network.

 About these proven Democratic "partisan political operatives," Rather has made no comment on CBS.

 As for Klein, his pajama put-down will go down in media history as the death cry of snob journalism.

 With amusement, I have watched my colleagues in the Old Media fight every democratizing and choice-enhancing trend during the dozen years I've spent in the information business. They scoffed at Rush Limbaugh as a flash in the pan (and have searched in vain for a commercially viable liberal counterpart for the last 15 years). They sneered at The Drudge Report (then bookmarked his site for hourly reading). They sniped at Fox News (then ripped off every one of Roger Ailes' innovations). They laughed at Regnery Publishing (then snatched up its editors and formed New York knock-offs). They mocked the insurgent New York Post (as their own circulation figures and ad sales tanked). And now, in final desperation, they trash the blogging revolution as an irresponsible pajama party for unprofessional hobbyists (even as they launch their own corporate-scrubbed versions to exhibit their "edginess").

 Faced with an unstoppable onslaught of competitive traffic, Dan Rather and the great pretenders in Trusted Journalism have only one choice for survival: Yield.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline SyN

  • Posts: 1031
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2004, 10:02:00 PM »
to bad they arent saying the contents of the memo's are fakes.  Because they aren't.  
I for one say its just another way to skirt real issues and not focus on the facts that Bush is a failure.  This is the first election to not be decided on real issues, just on the past.  Makes me sick. There is going to be some serious changes in this country. Nov 2nd will decide what they are.  Look how Bush silences people at his conventions that dont agree with him. Carl Rove cant approve of the audience to the debates so Bush doesnt want to participate. Supreme court wont decide this one though.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
A word to the wise is infuriating.\"

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2004, 02:03:00 AM »
They are saying they are forged documents, where have you been , this whole BS about Vietnam service etc is getting old. Kerry is Fucking himself by skirting the issues with the help of CBS. Bush's military service is old news from the first election. All Kerry seems to have to run on is his artificial Vietnam record with 3 purple hearts after
three months in country...Impossible and thats all he has.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2004, 08:34:00 AM »
yes the documents may be fake.  But what the documents SAY is not.  I bet It was Rove not Kerry who brought these out.  Its a fukd up election year though.
 Kerry Bled W fled.
 Though I never liked these tactics from the begining.  Both Kerry and Bush's Nam records are of no concern in my oppinion.  But anything Rove can do to keep Bush N company from talking about how the last 4 years went works for him.  Bush is a horrible president. He promises to lower health care at the rnc, and the next day raises medicare 17.5%.  Bush admin in the last 4 years never met with Union or labor parties due to them shipping jobs out of the country.  Closed cabinet meetings on energy policy run by haliburton.  Closed door admin period.  I am not saying give away our secrets and tell us everything they do, but this admin is too shady and doesnt deserve trust or 4 more years.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline SyN

  • Posts: 1031
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2004, 08:34:00 AM »
yes the documents may be fake.  But what the documents SAY is not.  I bet It was Rove not Kerry who brought these out.  Its a fukd up election year though.
 Kerry Bled W fled.
 Though I never liked these tactics from the begining.  Both Kerry and Bush's Nam records are of no concern in my oppinion.  But anything Rove can do to keep Bush N company from talking about how the last 4 years went works for him.  Bush is a horrible president. He promises to lower health care at the rnc, and the next day raises medicare 17.5%.  Bush admin in the last 4 years never met with Union or labor parties due to them shipping jobs out of the country.  Closed cabinet meetings on energy policy run by haliburton.  Closed door admin period.  I am not saying give away our secrets and tell us everything they do, but this admin is too shady and doesnt deserve trust or 4 more years.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
A word to the wise is infuriating.\"

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2004, 09:28:00 AM »
"The documents may be fake , but what they say isn't"
? give me a fucking break where is the proof on that ? in Dan Rathers mind?, the fact that they are fake makes the content a load of shit, that is not even a argument. IAM NOT A BUSH FAN, let me say it again for the rest of you IAM NOT A BUSH FAN!by any means but what sickens me is that Kerry is the best the Dems could come up with to run against him. Kerry is the king of flip flops you never know to believe anything that comes out of his mouth I am not repeating what I hear on the news or radio  just look at his voting history on anything its on the congressional web site he is indecisive as hell and if you think it will get any better with him in office you are as delusional as the rest of the Libs on this site who think that some how when and if Kerry wins our country will be brought into some type of Utopia. Yeah maybe with redistribution of wealth. So Bush and Co gave the rich a few tax breaks, raised the child tax credit, made it so any child in the US that has no health insurance can get it via Medicaid thus the 17.5% medicare tax hike. This is bad? I know what your argument will be, he hasn't created jobs shit no president EVER CREATED JOBS shit Kerry will jack the taxes so far up on the middle classes ass it will put us all in the poor house. The Dems need to put up or shut up, they had the chance to put somebody in the race that was relevant and all they came up with is Kerry. Have you seen the wealth this guy had and has acquired since he married the ketchup lady??? You think he is for the regular guy? you just don't get it. He is a Senator, that is another word for the millionaires club. He has no clue of what the working man is and goes through, no more than Bush or any of the rest of the idiots on the hill. Oh well maybe next election the Dems will run Hillary and that would be a even bigger joke. And if you think shit is fucked up in Iraq now wait and see what happens when he takes the helm, the man has no clue on Foreign policy let alone any experience at it. Either way I can't wait for the debates because these two idiots will make for good entertainment. Bush you bet lesser of two evils, but put somebody else in the race that has substance and integrity and they got my vote but the Dems failed on this big time. The fact you bought Dan Rathers story hook line and sinker makes you one of his sheepeople(yes part sheep part person just following the herder) Two CBS experts on the documents suggested several times they axe the story because the documents were fake, come on Syn I think you are far more intelligent than that. And Deb and your little commie Buddy Mike007 I am sure the communist party could use some volunteers, if not I am sure Castro will find you two lefties a job in a Cuban sugar cane field. And Mike please in you infinate spelling and grammar snobbery feel free to run spell check on this, in between push starting your moped, or preaching the woes of the evil SUV.

_________________
Sarasota Straight Escapee
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2004, 01:24:00 PM »
Aw, come on you guys! What difference does it make. Kerry was in Vietnam on active duty while W. copped out and, maybe, did bullshit service stateside.

Who gives a flyin' run at a rollin' doughnut whether or not he actually showed up for said bullshit service?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2004, 01:32:00 PM »
I am with you Ginger, it just kills me how Kerry and Rather, Bush camp and those of the like keep beating a dead horse, who gives a shit just the current issues at hand please.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2004, 01:46:00 PM »
I think the big open secret is that there really and truely isn't a nickle's worth of difference between the two. The Büsh people want to consolodate power on the federal level to further the agenda of the Religious Reich while the Kerry people want to consolodate power on the federal level to futher the agenda of the left.

I will probably still vote Badnarik. Not that I think he'll win this election. Just that the bigger showing we Libs make on election day, the more cred local Libs have in future elections.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #9 on: September 16, 2004, 01:53:00 PM »
Understand what you are saying Ginger, I just wish some party out there could find a viable candidate to run in these elections that represent the little guy, all they have are political props bought off by special intrests and not Our best intrests in mind.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #10 on: September 16, 2004, 03:31:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-09-16 10:53:00, thepatriot wrote:

viable candidate to run in these elections that represent the little guy


I think that's an oxymoron, Patriot. In order to be viable on the national level, a candidate has to make it through the gauntlet of special interests and the political powers that be. It's not the job of the president to look out for the little guy. It's his job to look out for national interests, which should not include rounghly 90% of what the federal government is currently involved in.

I think the only way out by way of our established political process is to elect local government that's willing and able to slap the federal government back in it's constitutional place.

Writing about music is like dancing about architecture.
--

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2004, 03:01:00 PM »
Great letter to the Lincoln [Nebraska] Journal, Tuesday October, 12, 2004

Comparing CBS, Bush
What Dan Rather and CBS news did was inexcusable. They betrayed the trust of the American people by not fully investigating their information and rushed to judgement by using that information.
My question is this; Why is a TV anchorman held to a higher standard than the president of the United States?
                                                  Sean H. Kraft, Lincoln
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2004, 03:44:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-10-13 12:01:00, Deborah wrote:

"Great letter to the Lincoln [Nebraska] Journal, Tuesday October, 12, 2004



Comparing CBS, Bush

What Dan Rather and CBS news did was inexcusable. They betrayed the trust of the American people by not fully investigating their information and rushed to judgement by using that information.

My question is this; Why is a TV anchorman held to a higher standard than the president of the United States?

                                                  Sean H. Kraft, Lincoln



"


Of course a journalist is held to higher standars, they are trained over and over to check and validate their sources, we expect lying from politicians there is not a honest one in the bunch, not even Kerry maybe GAY but not honest

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee

Offline thepatriot

  • Posts: 570
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Dan Rather SUCKS!
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2004, 04:06:00 PM »
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arasota Straight Escapee