Most kids I met in a program are addicted, in jail or dead

[Anonymous]

The study was published in a peer reviewed journal and was conducted by Prof Shane O’Mara, Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience,
Trinity College. Keep it up though, john Reuben: your disinformation campaign does not influence anyone with 1/3 a brain, and evidences Aspen Education Group, CRC Health, as the unethical, dishonest, morally obtuse agency they are.


"But in an article published today in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, a neuroscientist compares torture’s “folk psychology” assumptions to current models of brain function during stress and trauma. His conclusion: Torture causes brain damage that can wipe out memories of the desired information, or even create false ones."

"Solid scientific evidence on how repeated and extreme stress and pain affect memory and executive functions (such as planning or forming
intentions) suggests these techniques are unlikely to do anything other than the opposite of that intended by coercive or ‘enhanced’ interrogation."

[Whooter]

The study was published in a peer reviewed journal and was conducted by Prof Shane O’Mara, Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience,
Trinity College. Keep it up though, john Reuben: your disinformation campaign does not influence anyone with 1/3 a brain, and evidences Aspen Education Group, CRC Health, as the unethical, dishonest, morally obtuse agency they are.


"But in an article published today in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, a neuroscientist compares torture’s “folk psychology” assumptions to current models of brain function during stress and trauma. His conclusion: Torture causes brain damage that can wipe out memories of the desired information, or even create false ones."

"Solid scientific evidence on how repeated and extreme stress and pain affect memory and executive functions (such as planning or forming
intentions) suggests these techniques are unlikely to do anything other than the opposite of that intended by coercive or ‘enhanced’ interrogation."

Wrong again:

Which program was this study conducted at?  How many students were selected?  How many control groups?  Did the parents participate?  Did they use surveys?
How do we know these kids were normal prior to entering the program, if in deed a program was studied at all?

You still have not shown us one study which fits the criteria.  At least when I present a study I make sure it was conducted within the industry, on kids who actually attended a preogram.