No need I am happy to start the list. I spent the evening speaking to a survivor again over this whole parent issue and I was thrilled that someone finally said enough.
First sentence doesn't make any sense. Second sentence doesn't really make sense either..."this whole parent issue"...damn, I didn't know there was a "parent issue", I suspect we all have
parent issues and I can see the need to discuss them as they relate to Straight Inc. but am I to understand I am to
out my own parents? Or am I to out your parents? probably most confusing of all is that you were "thrilled that someone finally said enough" Enough about what?
Ok , chime in and lets get their full names , devote a topic perhaps a site to them as mh suggest. Lets make sure if they are googled only this comes up.
Well, you have already "devoted" a topic, or at least a thread, so to that end...mission accomplished. In my own case, I am curious to know why anyone would want to Google an 87yo woman, now deceased (except perhaps her surviving friends) or an 87yo man who suffers from an estranged son, because of Straight Inc. and another son for whatever reason (I don't even know) doesn't have any contact with him.
I have issues with my dad, absolutely. And indeed there are things I would and most likely will discuss once he passes. But I am not sure that I would want his name brought up in a smear campaign. Not that he would ever catch wind of it, yet if he did, what purpose would it serve? I don't know how long he has on this planet....why should he go out knowing he own son publicly betrayed him? Yeah, he is/was a dick, but he is my only father. I have major resentments aimed at him because of Straight Inc. But why would I stoop to such a low level of betrayal and cruelty to settle a score? What would that say about my own character?
Also, most of the parents, if not all the parents I knew, the ones whose homes I stayed in were good people, gracious folks that took me in. Now I know not all parents we good to us as they took us in thier homes and that sucks. Maybe they werent finacially well off, or they were slobs. But what they are guilty of was caring and were doing the best they knew what to do with what was available. Granted, I know there were abuses, harrassments and in some instances gross negligences (sp) and it's an ethical descion one has to make for them selves to mention the names.
I guess what I don't understand is your reason for targeting parents....yours, mine or any others parents. Doubtfully it is with the intent of expressing fond memories, as it seems more malicious in intent. But if you insist, regardless of your intent...Helen Peterman was a parent.
A.C.O.P
Adult Child of a Parent
woof