Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MushroomKitty

Pages: [1]
1
Straight, Inc. and Derivatives / Re: Man the Harpoons
« on: July 19, 2008, 01:25:29 PM »
Slowly more and more anti-PFC videos are popping up on youtube. But I agree that it wouldn't hurt if more people posted comments on the pro-PFC videos about the truth of their ways in case others read them and are willing to follow links to other pages.

Then again, I really don't think possible program-parents are going to utilize the powers of youtube. It's more or less just something teenagers and young adults use to find funny videos and TV shows.

Perhaps if more users uploaded the videos featuring protests and reports about the truth that goes on there it will out number the pro-program videos. Which would make it easier for people looking into it to stumble upon.

2
Straight, Inc. and Derivatives / Re: KHK protested repeatedly
« on: July 19, 2008, 01:16:20 PM »
I always was very fond of the updates and plans quote.

Those where two very successful protests that we had. And it was great having so many out of towner's come.

I hope that our success can help inspire others to hold protests of their own.

3
Why should we have sex ed? So kids will actually learn. Fact of the matter is teenagers are going to have sex weather their parents like it or not. And as a parent and a school it is their job to make sure our youth knows how to protect themselves.

Here in Kentucky the only "sex-ed" that is state funded or allowed is the Abstinence Only plan. And in Kentucky schools it's a safe bet that 1 and 3 girls are gonna drop out before she reaches graduation because she got pregnant. The only thing the Abstinence Only plan does is make kids think that condoms don't work, so they wont use them and in turn are at a much higher risk for pregnancy and catching an STD. When the thing is condoms DO work. It's just people don't know how to use them right. (Gee, isn't that the purpose of sexual education? I think so!)

However in Chicago they start giving in depth sex ed classes when their students are only 10, and they have one of the lowest birth rates amongst teenagers in the entire country.

When you put a school that teaches sex ed up against one that doesn't the results are obvious. The schools that do teach it have less teen pregnancies and less instances of spread diseases. Why is this? Because they know how to protect themselves. Even if a teenager doesn't want/plan to have sex they should still have the knowledge in their head for when they do. We all know parents don't teach their children about sex.

It is my belief that every child in America at the age of 10 should be given the book "The Guide To Getting It On." and they should be made to read it as part of their school curriculum. Not only does this book teach you how to use a condom and other birth control, or about STDs, but it actually teaches you HOW to have sex in a fun and light hearted manner.

Teaching a child how to protect themselves sexually isn't going to 'encourage' them to jack squat. That's like saying teaching an adult woman how to use mace to protect herself is going to encourage her to spray random strangers in the face.

Pages: [1]