Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Oz girl

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 98
76
The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: The Culture Question
« on: April 01, 2010, 03:10:56 AM »
i think time on the couch can have it's uses if you are having an especially tough time with some sort of grief or a bout of depression or if you are genuinely mentally ill. it can get things in perspective. One of flaws of Australian culture is i guess the "suck it up and be a man" approach. it is possibly an expalanation for the high levels of alcoholism in this country. But the idea that a therapist is a sign that you have "made it" or that a kid should have a therapist whether they want one or not seems dangerous. So many programs talk about taking kids who don't like talk therapy. I dont think I want to know a kid who would sooner sit on a therapist's couch on a sunny day than kick a ball around or even play video games with some other kids.
At the moment i am studying & one of my topics is grief counselling. I was reminded recently of another discussion I recently had with Ursus about the idea that this industry can grossly distort or bastardize sound or benign ideas. i came across a classic example of this in wilderness therapy. Many psychs dealing with kids do now argue that a standard "couch" approach is indtimidating or just boring for kids and they are unlikely to trust or open up this way. Some suggest meeting them in their home and depending on age having them show you their favourite toys, or else maybe if they are older playing basketball or tennis with them or maybe chess and talking that way. I then read the front page of SUWS youth who noted talk therapy is sometimes ineffective. But rather than encourage doing something with the kid that is likely to put them at ease, of course the approach was to take them further from their comfort zone and punish them thus entirely missing the point. It makes me wonder if some parts of middle america are now encouraging their children to embrace therapy and being able to boast you sent your kid to suws or whoever is similar to boasting that you see a therapist on a constant basis.

77
It defies logic that they would hike between 11 and 3 during the summer in the first place. This is the hottest part of the day. Are they closed right now? They dont seem to have a website up

78
Facility Question and Answers / Re: Unita Academy, Wellsville, UT
« on: March 30, 2010, 01:54:28 AM »
Thanks Joelene. It is always helpful when someone shares what they know. Can i ask a few more questions?
Were you given access to your therapists notes if you wanted?
If there was group therapy were you able to opt out of sharing if you wanted to?
What about medication? Did you get any input?
You mention new haven. Were any of the staff ex New Haven staff?

79
The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: The Culture Question
« on: March 29, 2010, 10:01:49 AM »
I think that America is certainly in love with the idea of "therapy". Woody Allen often laughed at the idea that in some east coast middle class circles it is almost a status symbol to have a therapist.
I think that while this idea that you can never have too much therapy has obviously rubbed off on this industry (how  else to explain the concept of high school kids taking "therapy" sessions every single day at  whole special school where feelings come before the 3 rs )
one thing that plays a big part could be the legal system, particularly the rise of zero tolerance policing in the US. I dont know if this is cultural. i too would be nervous about what my kid was up to if their sex life could have them end up on an offender registry for years or if a bit of dope could land them in jail.

Personally I have never been able to embrace sitting on a couch navel gazing and paying someone to listen. Discussing your woes is far better done over a nice glass of white with the people you love, agression is more effectively expressed through some sort of team sport and sadness expressed by watching a mawkish chick flick and having a good cry. Lets face it people are social animals. We form friendships for a reason.

80
The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: willful suspension of disbelief
« on: March 26, 2010, 03:49:38 AM »
Sorry to post twice, Danny mentioned something about therapy optiond for kids coming out of programs. This is imagine is quite a conundrum. GIven that some kids in programs are there due to genuine existing problems and then some others develop issues because of the trauma they suffered, id  guess many do need some form of proper effective treatment. But many have spoken of being put off by the very idea of therapy because of their horrible experiences.

Those who read Julia scheeres Jesus Camp may be familiar with this. The Brother David became depressed and was self harming(probably because his asshole dad would regularly beat the crap out of him) His parents were more interested in getting rid of "the problem" than helping their son and sent him to be punished at escuele caribe & his sister only began to become rebellious when her only household ally was banished so she was sent there as well. She does not say whetner he got help for his initial symptoms when he left and he died in a car accident at 20 so nobody can ask, but she mentioned feelings consistent with pTSD after escuele caribe. S

81
The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: willful suspension of disbelief
« on: March 26, 2010, 12:19:01 AM »
I can answer this danny. The US would have to deal with delinquent/drug taking/rabble rousing/mentally ill/insert random ailment here kids in the same way that Britain, most of europe, Australia and New Zealand and any latin american country does. All of these countries have kids and families struggling through adolescence and mostly coming out the other end OK. When you also consider that the sheer cost of even a bargain basement program like WWASP means that the kids are by default mostly middle class it further weakens the pro program argument  as adolescent middle class "rebels" from most parts of the world are statistically the ones least likely to fall through the cracks. It just sometimes means natural consequences are a little more real. IE if you get expellled from your posh private school and your parents cant get you in anywwhere else, you go to a public one. If you dick around taking drugs when you should be studying and get really shit grades you either have to repeat year 12 or you dont get into university right from school. So you either work  for a couple of years and apply after 21 or you decide higher education is not for you. Either way our life is not eternally ruined.

Granted there are some things that make it harder for American families, like zero tolerance policing and in some states hysterical sex laws that put kids on sex registers for pretty benign behaviors, but these did not always exist and can be changed if enough people do something.

To people who say a program was the only choice I liken programs to mobile or smart phones. It genuinely feels to me like I cant live without my smartphone. But for the first 20 or so years of my life i did great without it. If it were taken away I can still be reached by skype, im  and at 3 email addresses. So while it feels to me like I cant in actual fact I can and there are people and places in the world where the thing is completely unnecessary.

82
Facility Question and Answers / Re: Unita Academy, Wellsville, UT
« on: March 22, 2010, 07:30:25 AM »
Thanks for posting Joester. Im sorry that they were such asses to you. Any professional or even decent human being I think would agree that it is not professional, helpful or kind to call anyone names or make personal remarks nor is it OK to hurt defenceless animals. So your complaints are not stupid at all. I was wondering if you would mind filling us in on the specifics of the program.
Was mail monitored? Under what circumstances?
Under what circumstances could you use the phone?
was there a level system. Was it similar to other programs that you attended?
What about schooling?

83
The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: Marie Osmond's Son Sent to Rehab
« on: March 20, 2010, 11:30:27 PM »
Walters daughter went to one of the cedu schools. Her name is Jacquie Danforth. She then tried to complete a degree a few times and never got the hang of it. Eventually she opened a wilderness program for girls that closed down during the economic down turn
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080101
http://www.strugglingteens.com/artman/p ... 1012.shtml

84
Straight, Inc. and Derivatives / Re: Straight Staff - silent too long
« on: March 14, 2010, 07:51:41 AM »
As you all know i am an outsider to all this. So i say this in the hope that it does not offend anyone hurt by this industry and the players within, but i am not sure whether or not people who worked at places like straight or even wwasp who had been promoted from within did so without coercion exactly. While it is not coercion in the sense that kids on low phases are coerced into lying about their drug habits, there also may not appear to be a lot of choices. I try to think what I would do if I had been convinced that 2 years of abuse had actually saved me from myself. Without the education to do anything different or even the social skills to rebuild  a life on "the outside" with normal well adjusted people and it becomes a whole lot less of a choice. Add to all this the fact that you are in most cases still a kid without any other experience of the world. Then on top of this after years of being told you are shit and nothing, you are a leader. You get paid a salary  even if it is shitty, parents and adults who used to see you as a menace suddenly are fawning all over you and thanking you for saving their kids. In addition you have internalized the idea that you might not be able to make it out in the world. From where i sit that looks and feels pretty coerced.

I accept that this does not make abusing anyone OK but apparently few among us have the level of moral integrity to take the noble road in this instance. I read the lucifer effect and what shocked me was not the behavior of the guards but the fact that the guy who designed the experiment got caught up in it. As the "superintendent" of the prison he allowed the abuse to occur and only stopped it when an outsider to the whole thing expressed her disgust. If this is what can happen to a smart, highly educated, middle aged adult who beleives strongly in freedom and questioning authority, it seems a kid doesnt stand much of a chance. So while I fully appreciate that i might feel entirely diferent if I had been treated badly by a malicious staff member, i feel for them because they have the pain of the program and the guilt of being a purpertrator. that cant be easy

85
Facility Question and Answers / Re: Unita Academy, Wellsville, UT
« on: March 13, 2010, 10:14:25 PM »
Good to hear it was positive for you
I was wondering as well as being able to call family did you get to call any school friends or wider relatives?
If you could call friends etc did staff listen to the calls or were you free to make them unmonitored?
Could you write to anyone you wanted or email them?
How often did the average student get to go off campus on an outing?
Were you ever allowed to go for a walk around the neighbourhood during freetime?
Were any academic credits transferable to a regular public school?
Were there any opportunities to play sports against other girls schools or do co curricular activities like chess or play an instrument?
Were there any group therapy sessions? If so was there the option to not share on any particular day?
Were you able to view your therapists notes?
If medication was involved did you get any input into its use or did they just make you take it?

86
Quote from: "Che Gookin"
http://http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100309/ap_on_re_eu/eu_vatican_church_abuse

The Poper's own brother says he ignored allegations of abuse.
At boystown?????

87
That i can not answer definitively because i do not work for the church or the vatican! I dont know that in western countries (at least the more secular ones like the UK and australia) the church is all powerful anymore. At least in this part of the world joe public has been fairly sympathetic toward most complainants.
Moreover the church is not the only thing with a powerful publicity machine. This industry has one too. But this does not mean its victims have been silent. You can read the program publicity, you can read what those who have been through programs have to say and make up your own mind. What always came across as telling to me is that those who claim xyz program saved them often dont deny some of the wierder or more horrid experiences. The just figure it was what had to be done. I have not heard from either group at boystown
 
What I do know of catholic education is only from my own experiences of it. This may not echo somebody elses. My relatives have kids at catholic schools which have a boarding wing though their own kids are day students and as an agnostic or a cathnostic I cant say i agree with everything that the school teaches. I don't know if i would choose this for my own kids. But I do know that the precedure for reporting abuse is extremely thorough and transparent and the diocese we live in has made it mandatory for all catholic schools to have the same systems in place. The schools sex education program while flawed in many ways also talks about good and bad touching and what to do about it from a very early age.
 I dont kid myself that this is because of the benevolence of the church. But there is no longer any conspiracy of silence that I can see. My own experiences (i graduated highschool in the 90s) were not of abuse either physical or emotional. I can remember in grade 3 the nun used to kiss each girl on the forehead as we left for the day but there was not anything sinister in it and most secular teachers in those days were a whole lot more tactile than they are today. I also remember once being smacked across the back of the leg by the same nun for climbing on a wall that was of of bounds because it was earmarked for demolition. The next year corporal punishment was banned in all schools. I appreciate that the population of boystown is more vulnerable that your average kid at a catholic day school or even a boarder but there are checks and balances in place and i have not yet heard any students accuse them of brinwashing techniques or communication interference or the rest of the insanity associated with this industry

88
joel ive never seen an oprah when she has sent a kid to one of these places but it is because of her that dr phil is where he is and all you need to do is go to his website and type aspen education and it will come up with a list of shows he has done on it. Wilderness is his favourite for obnoxious boys but he also likes slutty/runaway girl shows and they get sent to places like youth care (brendan blum's killers) and copper canyon (wwasp spinoff) he also once sent a pretty severely disturbed girl to provo canyon.The only thing he did do was criticise some parents for sending their kid to wwasp but even then he was still to pussy to name them outright.

89
whats creepy about that? Lots of principals of small boarding schools or parish priests do this. Id just assumed that in the US it is standard practice as it is in other western countries. Portsmouth Abbey for instance does this from time to time and it is not a gulag.
Id be more concerned by the fact that boystown had its own press officer with them for the dinner than the fact of it on its own.

90
OK I stand corrected on ppc. Bear in mind though that it has become a catch phrase in mainstream educational circles (at least here) for the most banal and benign practices eg senior students assistant coaching Jr school footy teams, making kids prefects, the ever fashionable "big brother" programs that every second school has set up for first years. I would bet my ass that your average deputy principal has no clue when they are using this catch phrase to dazzle mum and dad on open day that its roots are so bizarre.
As to boystown many of its practices and the article do make me concede that i would not really want my kid there. The clapping and cheering when a kid said something everyone approved of in particular seemed a little creepy. The putting on a show for the cameras a little less so as most school do that to a certain extent. But i stand by my original point. There have been isolated complaints of clergy abuse but as someone pointed out this has happened and been dealt with equally appauling incompotence in the past at other jesuit institutions that are just normal boys schools (well normal for a particularly miliraistic brand of catholic family :whip: ) I would be far more concerned if they took kids without their consent or if the complaints were of things like physical restraint, gestault therapy, group think exercises or limited communication with family and friends.
I shoud add that it is not that i view clergy abuse as a less serious issue. But to me the difference is twofold. It is about individual bad apples and the churches arrogant defence of them, not about an abusive educational philosophy or locking up citizens without right to due process. Secondly there are now and rightly so plenty of avenues for those who have been hurt by the church and the schools/communities involved have been forced to take complaints seriously and to put in sound preventative measures. The TTI is systemically abusive. Regulation can only go so far in stopping the most outrageous acts of abuse or neglect. Education needs to do the rest.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 98