76
The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: The Culture Question
« on: April 01, 2010, 03:10:56 AM »
i think time on the couch can have it's uses if you are having an especially tough time with some sort of grief or a bout of depression or if you are genuinely mentally ill. it can get things in perspective. One of flaws of Australian culture is i guess the "suck it up and be a man" approach. it is possibly an expalanation for the high levels of alcoholism in this country. But the idea that a therapist is a sign that you have "made it" or that a kid should have a therapist whether they want one or not seems dangerous. So many programs talk about taking kids who don't like talk therapy. I dont think I want to know a kid who would sooner sit on a therapist's couch on a sunny day than kick a ball around or even play video games with some other kids.
At the moment i am studying & one of my topics is grief counselling. I was reminded recently of another discussion I recently had with Ursus about the idea that this industry can grossly distort or bastardize sound or benign ideas. i came across a classic example of this in wilderness therapy. Many psychs dealing with kids do now argue that a standard "couch" approach is indtimidating or just boring for kids and they are unlikely to trust or open up this way. Some suggest meeting them in their home and depending on age having them show you their favourite toys, or else maybe if they are older playing basketball or tennis with them or maybe chess and talking that way. I then read the front page of SUWS youth who noted talk therapy is sometimes ineffective. But rather than encourage doing something with the kid that is likely to put them at ease, of course the approach was to take them further from their comfort zone and punish them thus entirely missing the point. It makes me wonder if some parts of middle america are now encouraging their children to embrace therapy and being able to boast you sent your kid to suws or whoever is similar to boasting that you see a therapist on a constant basis.
At the moment i am studying & one of my topics is grief counselling. I was reminded recently of another discussion I recently had with Ursus about the idea that this industry can grossly distort or bastardize sound or benign ideas. i came across a classic example of this in wilderness therapy. Many psychs dealing with kids do now argue that a standard "couch" approach is indtimidating or just boring for kids and they are unlikely to trust or open up this way. Some suggest meeting them in their home and depending on age having them show you their favourite toys, or else maybe if they are older playing basketball or tennis with them or maybe chess and talking that way. I then read the front page of SUWS youth who noted talk therapy is sometimes ineffective. But rather than encourage doing something with the kid that is likely to put them at ease, of course the approach was to take them further from their comfort zone and punish them thus entirely missing the point. It makes me wonder if some parts of middle america are now encouraging their children to embrace therapy and being able to boast you sent your kid to suws or whoever is similar to boasting that you see a therapist on a constant basis.