464
« on: May 31, 2010, 01:37:54 PM »
Got it, D.B. I am just sensitive when it comes to mitigating Program abuses, which I see as systemic rather than isolated, slip through the crack instances. Whatever happned pre-program was only exacerbated by the program.
I know some of the people on this forum. Here is where it all comes out - the good, the bad, the ugly. Or maybe its just the place you can duke it out. You would be surprised at how gentle many of them are in real life.
I came here because I had no one to discuss CEDU with. I went to CEDU and we all pretended I went to a legit boarding school. I never discussed it for 17 years after that. With anyone. I just had recurring nightmares all the time. On a lark, I googled CEDU and got to Fornits and it was all consuming for awhile. I FINALLY could talk about it, dissect it, and validate my experiences. I go through vast periods of time off Fornits and now, I visit from time to time.
To me, CEDU is like being abducted by aliens and the only people you can talk to are other abductees. No one else gets it. The few friends I have tried to share it with are aghast. But they don't come from families who outsource their kids. They actually have a hard time believing the US allows this type of program. (And CEDU didn't use physical violence or restraints - the mental aspects were enough.) People talk about prosecuting - not so easy if its mental. Not so easy if you are labeled "troubled teen." Now, in my profession, I see parents who try and outsource their kids for being non conformist. Or outsource them in damaging attempts to pray the gay away. None of these kids in my classes who are actually deported have been "bad" kids/addicts/or assholes. Just different. Many of the kids at CEDU were aggresssively, precociously inquisitive, intelligent, and creative. Some were overentitled rich shit brats. Families who sent them tended to be rich, emotionally negligent parents who treated their kids like plants - nicely housed and watered, but otherwise, just "there." Many of the parents lived totally self-indulgent lives and children were in the way. When the kid decided to assert his or her presence in ways that demanded attention, boom! Off to CEDU you went. This was especially prevalent in divorced families, with step parents driving the ostracism. (Not in my case, but in many others.)
One interesting thing about this forum from an almost sociological perspective is learning about the other programs. There is a commonality in methods: LGAT, emotional assault, and boundary demolition. (This is a very milquetoast description.) So, methodology is consistent throughout. But the Straight culture is different from the CEDU culture. I could pick out who went to CEDU and who went to Straight, for example. Similar methodologies, but differentials in population and setting.
In general, I see programs as stripping away the coping mechanisms essential for Life Outside, by eradicating healthy boundaries that are NECESSARY for self respect, trust, and relationships.
Elan is probably the site I feel least connected to, despite a commonality of practice. I actually haven't visited the Elan site in years, and even then, only a few times. I can't really put my finger on it, and don't know if I want to, but I sort of think of those kids as descended from parents in the Skull and Bones society.