My point is that what has happened at Hyde, especially in Woodstock, has a lot to do with the "Tri-State" elitist attitude.
These parents, a lot like Gary, expected service with a smile and when they didn't get it, would either blow out of the program or push the envelope so far that they disrupted the flow of daily activities.
It isn't happening anymore...Laura Gauld dumped the trash...faculty, staff, families that didn't understand what was going on there and has created the old community that made Hyde famous. Famous enough to be featured on National Television and in national publications.
Hyde is not perfect and never will be, there will always be disgruntled customers, just like in any business. The basic philosophy of character development and unique potential is a proven winner. And if Gary and Jerri weren't hucked out by McCrann on that fateful day, he'd be an active alumni parent helping out his NJ region....Isn't that right GE?
So I guess you guys can use this place to complain and try to gain momentum to put Hyde out of business...But I truly believe that there's a place for Hyde School. It really does help more than it hurts.
Sheesh
First of all, Sheesh deserves credit for taking a reasonable tone and presenting his/her arguments in a more thoughtful manner. I respect that.
As my paper reveals, I, like Sheesh, find much to admire in the dedication to developing healthy kids that so many of the staff evince on a daily basis. Without a doubt, my experience there helped me more than it hurt, and I never said otherwise.
This was, however, in part due to the fact that I never allowed myself to be railroaded. Nor did I take my feelings and stuff them in order to fly under the radar, as so my parents- and students- do to get by.
The reason I think a balanced article should be written and widely disseminated is not to destroy the Hyde School, Sheesh. The question is this: do you believe that holding people accountable for bad behaviors helps their character development? Do you believe it takes courage to speak truth- especially to people in power- and that those who do so should be commended and not belittled? If so, why did you take such a sarcastic and rhetorically charged tone in your initial posting?
Many people go through Hyde who have low esteem issues, who are confused, who are uncertain about the paths they are on. From what I have seen personally at the school, and from the numerous posts on this site and elsewhere, scores of them emerge from Hyde more damaged than they were upon entry. Their story- along with those from people like you who are grateful for the time they spent at Hyde- must be told, both to hold the staff's feet to the fire, that they may grow- and to ensure that incoming families have an accurate understanding of Hyde.
Again, I respect your changed tone- it makes true dialogue possible.
G