Fornits

General Interest => Open Free for All => Topic started by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 02:47:53 PM

Title: .
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 02:47:53 PM
.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Froderik on September 09, 2010, 02:51:06 PM
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Froderik must of realized he was in direct violation of rule #6 when he decided to remove his insulting post. But I kept a screenshot as evidence, so the panel of moderator judges can decide his fate with all the facts. If someone edits out their insult, does that mean they can not be held responsible? I read the insult, and my feelings were hurt, so the damage was already done. Take a look for yourself I captured a screenshot of this blatant rule violation.

(http://http://imgur.com/dZapu.jpg)

That never happened. The above "post" was fabricated.  :bs:  :rofl:
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Troll Control on September 09, 2010, 02:54:19 PM
And an obvious fabrication it was.  Dude, that didn't even look halfway legitimate.

Perhaps fabricating that post as a means to attack another poster is grounds for banning?  First test case coming up...
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 02:54:37 PM
.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 02:55:24 PM
Quote from: "Troll Control"
And an obvious fabrication it was.  Dude, that didn't even look halfway legitimate.

When the panel of moderators investigates they will find it to be accurate. I'm sure other posters here saw it as well before it was deleted, they can be called as witnesses against this blatant rule violator.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Troll Control on September 09, 2010, 02:58:34 PM
Sure it will.  Just explain how Frod's post count was the same in that "post" and also after he posted again, will ya?

But, seriously, MAX-IT, you even got the font all wrong.  It's not even close.

I believe you will be getting a stern warning from Psy.  If you do it again, I'm sure you'll get another stern warning.  And so on and so forth.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 02:58:45 PM
Quote from: "Troll Control"

Perhaps fabricating that post as a means to attack another poster is grounds for banning?  First test case coming up...

If I fabricated it, I agree to be banned from forntis forever. How about that? But if Froderik is found guilty of making that insulting post towards me, he agrees to be banned forever? If he is telling the truth as I am, surely he will agree to this.  How about it, Froderik?
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Froderik on September 09, 2010, 03:00:18 PM
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Quote from: "Troll Control"

Perhaps fabricating that post as a means to attack another poster is grounds for banning?  First test case coming up...

If I fabricated it, I agree to be banned from forntis forever. How about that? But if Froderik is found guilty of making that insulting post towards me, he agrees to be banned forever? If he is telling the truth as I am, surely he will agree to this.  How about it, Froderik?

This wouldn't be the first time you lied, Maxie.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 03:01:18 PM
Quote from: "Froderik"
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Quote from: "Troll Control"

Perhaps fabricating that post as a means to attack another poster is grounds for banning?  First test case coming up...

If I fabricated it, I agree to be banned from forntis forever. How about that? But if Froderik is found guilty of making that insulting post towards me, he agrees to be banned forever? If he is telling the truth as I am, surely he will agree to this.  How about it, Froderik?

This wouldn't be the first time you lied, Maxie.

So that's a no, then, you don't agree to this? I wonder why?
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: shaggys on September 09, 2010, 03:02:01 PM
Sorry Max/SUCK IT but your history here makes me doubt the credibility of your screen image. You are known for shameless hoaxes like this already. Give it up. Case Closed.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Froderik on September 09, 2010, 03:03:36 PM
Quote from: "shaggys"
Sorry Max/SUCK IT but your history here makes me doubt the credibility of your screen image. You are known for shameless hoaxes like this already. Give it up. Case Closed.

 :rocker:  :rofl:  :sue:  :twofinger:  :cheers:  :jerry:  :beat:  :fuckoff:  :fuckoff:
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: psy on September 09, 2010, 03:04:16 PM
I've yet to decide the standard of what constitutes an attack.  I thought about it a lot last night.  Once I figure out a solid definition (as objective as possible) it'll be enforced.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 03:04:45 PM
Well I'm sure there is somebody else reading this that saw it. I doubt they'll speak up against the group, but at least that person/people reading this get an idea how truth is obscured on fornits in the service of the group.

I already said, if I fabricated that screen image, then I agree to be banned. Will Froderik agree to be banned, if he is lying about making that post? Surely he would take this opportunity to get rid of me, why is he reluctant?
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Froderik on September 09, 2010, 03:06:18 PM
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Well I'm sure there is somebody else reading this that saw it. I doubt they'll speak up against the group, but at least that person/people reading this get an idea how truth is obscured on fornits in the service of the group.

I already said, if I fabricated that screen image, then I agree to be banned. Will Froderik agree to be banned, if he is lying about making that post? Surely he would take this opportunity to get rid of me, why is he reluctant?

Give it a rest, Maxie.  :fuckoff:  :roflmao:
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 03:07:40 PM
Quote from: "Froderik"
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Well I'm sure there is somebody else reading this that saw it. I doubt they'll speak up against the group, but at least that person/people reading this get an idea how truth is obscured on fornits in the service of the group.

I already said, if I fabricated that screen image, then I agree to be banned. Will Froderik agree to be banned, if he is lying about making that post? Surely he would take this opportunity to get rid of me, why is he reluctant?

Give it a rest, Maxie.  :fuckoff:  :roflmao:

So that's a no, you don't agree to that then. Hmm, I wonder why that is?
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Froderik on September 09, 2010, 03:09:11 PM
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Quote from: "Froderik"
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Well I'm sure there is somebody else reading this that saw it. I doubt they'll speak up against the group, but at least that person/people reading this get an idea how truth is obscured on fornits in the service of the group.

I already said, if I fabricated that screen image, then I agree to be banned. Will Froderik agree to be banned, if he is lying about making that post? Surely he would take this opportunity to get rid of me, why is he reluctant?

Give it a rest, Maxie.  :fuckoff:  :roflmao:

So that's a no, you don't agree to that then. Hmm, I wonder why that is?

Blah blah blah blah... LIAR!!!!  :twofinger:
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: psy on September 09, 2010, 03:10:13 PM
Quote from: "Froderik"
Give it a rest, Maxie.  :fuckoff:  :roflmao:
Yeah. Let's get back to the topic.  If you two want to fight it out, take it to OFFA.  Both of you.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 03:13:12 PM
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "Froderik"
Give it a rest, Maxie.  :fuckoff:  :roflmao:
Yeah. Let's get back to the topic.  If you two want to fight it out, take it to OFFA.  Both of you.

I think it's interesting that Froderik can get away with calling me a jerk, and a liar in the moderated section of fornits that has rules against these sort of things. If the rules are going to enforced differently depending on who is violating them, this should be known to posters here.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Anne Bonney on September 09, 2010, 03:17:04 PM
Quote from: "Maximilian"

I think it's interesting


I think it's interesting that you're constantly changing the title of the threads.  I think it's interesting that you created a hoax, trying to make it look like someone on Fornits was blackmailing you when it was you, in fact, blackmailing yourself (a little nutty, IMO).  I think it's interesting that changed your name from SUCK IT to Maximilian.  I think it's interesting that you've been proven to be a liar over and over again.


Wow....changed the thread title again??  Make up your mind man!
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: psy on September 09, 2010, 03:18:01 PM
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "Froderik"
Give it a rest, Maxie.  :fuckoff:  :roflmao:
Yeah. Let's get back to the topic.  If you two want to fight it out, take it to OFFA.  Both of you.

I think it's interesting that Froderik can get away with calling me a jerk, and a liar in the moderated section of fornits that has rules against these sort of things. If the rules are going to enforced differently depending on who is violating them, this should be known to posters here.

Max.  There is no solid definition of attack or insult at the moment.  Wait until I come up with one, and i'm not going to consider "jerk" as a violation of the rules.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 03:19:42 PM
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "Froderik"
Give it a rest, Maxie.  :fuckoff:  :roflmao:
Yeah. Let's get back to the topic.  If you two want to fight it out, take it to OFFA.  Both of you.

I think it's interesting that Froderik can get away with calling me a jerk, and a liar in the moderated section of fornits that has rules against these sort of things. If the rules are going to enforced differently depending on who is violating them, this should be known to posters here.

Max.  There is no solid definition of attack or insult at the moment.  Wait until I come up with one, and i'm not going to consider "jerk" as a violation of the rules.

Fair enough. Froderik must of thought jerk crossed the line, since he deleted that post while I was typing my reply. Did you know if you quote someone and they delete the quote, that post you were working on won't be allowed to post? That is why I resorted to a screen shot. I look forward to when the rules are more clear cut so we know what is allowed or not. Perhaps I'm wrong, and this will help fornits, I will have an open mind.
Title: Re: New Fornits Rules/Constitution [Ratified]
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 03:20:57 PM
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Maximilian"

I think it's interesting


I think it's interesting that you're constantly changing the title of the threads.  I think it's interesting that you created a hoax, trying to make it look like someone on Fornits was blackmailing you when it was you, in fact, blackmailing yourself (a little nutty, IMO).  I think it's interesting that changed your name from SUCK IT to Maximilian.  I think it's interesting that you've been proven to be a liar over and over again.


Wow....changed the thread title again??  Make up your mind man!

I'm elated you take so much "interest" in me, if you'd like I have a e-newsletter you can subscribe to. It has all sorts of "interesting" things in it you might find "interesting".
Title: Re: Froderik violates rule #6
Post by: shaggys on September 09, 2010, 03:24:55 PM
So much for the cleaned up version of SUCK IT to act with any kind of dignity. Maxie has constructed another of his zany hoaxes for us to devour. No thanks Max.
Title: Re: Froderik violates rule #6
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 03:32:06 PM
Do us all a favor and ignore my threads. I don't need personal stalkers like DJ is to Whooter, thanks.
Title: Re: Froderik violates rule #6
Post by: Froderik on September 09, 2010, 03:36:52 PM
Quote from: "Maximilian"
Do us all a favor and ignore my threads. I don't need personal stalkers like DJ is to Whooter, thanks.

Listen, Maxie -- you post on here, you "put yourself out there."
People will reply to your posts all they want to. It's not for you to try and tell them what to do.
Title: Re: Froderik violates rule #6
Post by: Maximilian on September 09, 2010, 03:37:41 PM
Like I said, feel free to ignore my threads. It will be better for everyone, thanks.
Title: Re: Froderik violates rule #6
Post by: Che Gookin on September 09, 2010, 08:48:03 PM
You are all being a bunch of fuckhead cocksuckers who ought to be shot in the parking lot and having your bodies donated to medical science.

Fucking morons.




^that's an attack.

And warn me all you want. I don't particularly give a shit.