Fornits
Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform => World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools (WWASPS) => Topic started by: Anonymous on February 08, 2007, 10:11:43 PM
-
Hey they don't call Sue Scheff--Mz. SUE-SUE for noth'en!
Seems Mz. SUE-SUE is threatening to subpoena Ginger Warbis and all the posts on fornits.
Do it DUMB SUE SUE!! cause you got lots of little tracks on fornits going right back to your computer. yea we heard all about Sue-Sue.
Not too bright are ya?
[/u]
-
This is the first I'm hearing of it.
-
Not fer sure, but I suspect the guest is referring to Mz Lexi's comments on the Pueblo Chieftain forum. Heated little debate goin' on over there and Fornits has been a topic mentioned with threats of subpoenaing your user IP addresses.
In case you wanna check it out:
http://forums.pueblochieftain.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10 (http://forums.pueblochieftain.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-
Waygookin - like your current photos much better.
What do you think about that Lexi chick? How could anyone become so infatuated with Scheff / Izzy in so short a time? I mean she exchanges a bit of email, and chats on the phone, and instantly, she is totally immune to the truth. Amazing.
I know I was once just as prone to excusing some of S.S. ez behavior; but I can't understand anyone being able to ignore her response to the Whitmore situation and still try to pretend she is any kind of advocate for the kid's protection. Beyond my comprehension.
What could explain it?
-
Lexi says she has been in some type of referral business herself.
COULD money explain her close, instant connection to IZZY and SUE SUE?
Also, check out Lexi's post on page 7 Post #70:
Thread "Can we discuss the Teen Help Industry?"
www.chieftain.com (http://www.chieftain.com)
Lexi states she is a non-working paralegal and a PI.
Sound like anyone else known here ?
Then Lexi goes on to say that she's hearing all about the "skeletons" in these posters closets who are criticizing IZZY and SUE SUE---, and when she "gets ahold" of the facts about these skeletons, she will use it. Then she says: "UNDERSTAND?"
Whoa!!!!
These must have been SOME conversations she had with IZZY and SUE SUE, huh?
-
Not a contender. IMO, Lexi is a one-man-marching-band.
Y.A.W.N.
-
WTF?
Someone posts links to other advocacy groups and discussion boards (like Fornits) and this lexi chick calls it SPAM? Who made this chick the posting police? Izzy posted a bunch of VERBOSE articles from her website and links back to herself on that same forum but that's not spam. It's a public service? GMAFB.
http://forums.pueblochieftain.com/showthread.php?t=650 (http://forums.pueblochieftain.com/showthread.php?t=650)
:flame: :flame: :flame: :flame: :flame: :flame: :flame: :flame:
-
Maybe everyone on this list should write to the WEBMASTER and ask:
"Why is this considered to be spam?"
"Who elected LEXI to be the spokesWOMAN for this forum?"
If this WEBMASTER wants traffic on this public forum, someone may need to get control of LEXI.
-
OT - Have you guys read the RMA thread?
stupidity or ignorance?
-
Thanks
-
Uh, guys? Lexie? Boulder Colorado? C'mon, folks! Registered since 01-09-2005?
-
Look ya'all we know "LEXI" is Fat Izzy. As for Sue-Sue threatening to subpoena Ginger----ummm... let er rip Sue-Sue because the moderators can prove you have been posting on fornits and recently as in 2006.
Your fat friend has been posting like a drunk monkey and Sue-Sue has had her "friends" post on fornits for her. Which is the same thing as Sue-Sue posting. Have at it Sue-Sue!
Now Sue-Sue has earned a NEW nickname of.....
Sue-Sue-Sub for subpoena. :rofl:
-
Hey, I found Morgan's Live Journal
-
That lexi is the most arrogant, ignorant, hateful person, I have come across on a forum, in a long long time.
Sure am glad she aint my neighbor or work college. Or ever worse - family :o
Poor, poor people who have to deal with her in "real" life!
-
That Lexi posted she has 7 children. Amazing anyone has time to be the "forum police" and mind that many children.
She is mean-spirited; and posts that she is "a paraleagal, PI; and says she is an adovocate for MANY causes--autism, inmates, children, education on-and-on-and-on."
Lexi was quick to beieve anything negative about Randall Hinton; but she bought into the IZZY, Sue SUE lies about Whitmore Academy and the Sudweeks immediately; and continues to post in their defense. Amazing.
-
Well, the Chieftain moderator didn't ban any posters, too bad for Lexi, just locked the threads. People can still FIND and READ the truth.
Sudweeks:
Have run afoul of the law in Canada, Mexico and Utah and yet, CAICA doesn't see fit to warn parents about the history of these folks. Whitmore is NOT listed on the CAICA facility watchlist but all the closed WWASPS programs are? Nice work Isabelle Zehnder. You have given new meaning to the title "child advocate" and that is unforgivable, IMO.
PURE:
No comment.
The WWASPS v. PURE transcripts speak for themselves. Sue Scheff confirmed in her own words to have continued to refer to WWASP after she started PURE and after she removed her own daughter from one of their programs, claiming it was abusive.
Also confirmed she did not have a college degree.
Just read the transcripts. Lexi claims to have done so, but apparently has a problem with comprehension because her response to questions posed to her about the transcripts were not consistent with what was actually in the transcripts, IMO.
-
That lexi is the most arrogant, ignorant, hateful person, I have come across on a forum, in a long long time.
Sure am glad she aint my neighbor or work college. Or ever worse - family :o
Poor, poor people who have to deal with her in "real" life!
Agreed!
The mods of that forum (Chieftain) ought to give her a major "time out" or ban her permanently. She used the term "we" when speaking to one of the posters. Said "We" don't need .... like she is the spokesperson for all the members of that forum. For that reason alone, the mods SHOULD BAN HER until she proves she is in with compliance basic posting etiquette rules and not using that forum as her PERSONAL soap box and means for controlling information and most important, the opinion of others.
This is my opinion. Understand? (To borrow a lexi-ism) :rofl:
-
Are you serious TSW? I think it's great Lexi picked up her marbles and went home. Shows what an intolerant you-know-what she is. Doesn't get her way (Kaila's post was deleted b/c it was inappropriate for her to post it and the PURE/CAICA links in the Webmaster's thread) so what does Lexi do? Throw a little hissy fit.
Childish IMO. Shows intolerance for other people's opinion. I'm glad she's gone.
-
Webmaster, then I want you to get after the people who started it. It wasn't fair to delete Kaila's posts.
THIS is why I won't be returning to this forum. If you want to house trash, then you'll have to do it without me.
Please delete my account.
House trash? Bet the moderator got a laugh out of that stupid parting shot.
:rofl:
-
Hmm I was positive my last post on that thread was just oozing sarcasm. Maybe I should have added in something along the lines of drowning a puppy in Lexi's name to pray over its cold body in worship of the horned one.
COME On.. apply the definintion of Sarcasm and think about the likely response of Lexi.
Well, I didn't miss the sarcasm - but I have zero confidence in Lexi's critical thinking skills. I mean, this is the chick who thinks big candy bars are better than little candy bars when everyone knows, it ain't the size, it's the quality. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
-
Oh no, I saw that post to Kaila and you know what? I had the best laugh I've had in a long time. Not just funnier than hell, but perfectly applied. Poetry in motion.
-
Umm....word is that Sue Scheff's hearing didn't go so hot for her and she was look'en a little like she's seen a ghost. I wonder who she is working hard to manipulate to testify for her at the next ongoing hearing in April?
Sue-Sue is no doubt praying to her gods that she doesn't have to face a real trial where Carey Bock's side of the story is heard.
::blushing:: A jury hearing Carey's side of the story could prove a little embarrassing for old mid-40s Sue Sue. Ya know all those "papers" comen out in court and all that. ::deal::
:smokin:
-
Wouldn't you think the same people who testified for SUE SUE at the so-called trial where SUE SUE "won" her $11.3 judgment would just show up again and offer their same truthful testimony on behalf of Ms. Sheff? The "truth" doesn't change from hearing/trial to trial, right?
This should be the chance for SUE SUE's loyal witnesses to offer testimony, and to be cross-examined by an attorney. in a REAL TRIAL.
What's the problem?