Clearly you don't have children, but are you a scientist? I'm not.
Are you saying that 1,4-butanediol doesn't metabolize into GHB?
If not, then go edit Wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1,4-Butanediol
and notify Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/ ... 2120071107
So, they should leave this product on the shelves so other kids can have the delightful experience of puking their guts out and coma? Death wasn't mentioned.
While 4-7 year old are less likely to ingest them, younger siblings that happen to find them lying around might. The beads are not large enough to be a choke hazard.
Uh... no one said that 1,4-Butanediol doesn't metabolize into GHB, nor did they say that this product should be left on the shelves, rather that GHB is not the same as MDMA which is what was stated in the article. More than that, the article is reactionary, inaccurate and intentionally sensationalist in a way that does not become any "journalist". But hey, that's the way y'all roll in the grand ol' U S of A, isn't it. Constant drama and
terror so that no one ends up thinking too critically.
I don't mean to imply that this isn't a fairly major issue that certainly should give parents reason to think twice about what they bring into their homes and let their kids chew on, I just can't stand misleading, emotion-wrought reporting that obscures actual facts and concerns with snappy, punchy story-selling headlines like "China Laces Toys with Ecstacy". And on the subject of malicious exportation of dangerous products, maybe a country responsible for the "War on Terror" not to mention the entire "troubled teen" industry shouldn't be throwing stones from within their clearly fragile glass McMansion.
Here are some more facts, and a bit less fear-mongering if you're interested.
http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2007/1 ... eized.html[/url]