On 2002-12-08 22:56:00, METALGOD8 wrote: " :eek: "Objection! Your Honor..< snip >....Dreams do come true sometimes..." |
In all life one should comfort the afflicted, but verily, also, one should afflict the comfortable, and especially when they are comfortably, contentedly, even happily wrong
--John Kenneth Galbraith
SEC. 802. DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM. (a) Domestic Terrorism Defined.--Section 2331 of title 18, United States Code, is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(iii), by striking ``by assassination or kidnapping'' and inserting ``by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping''; (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and''; (3) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and (4) by adding at the end the following: ``(5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that-- ``(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; ``(B) appear to be intended-- ``(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; ``(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or ``(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and ``(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.''. (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3077(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: ``(1) `act of terrorism' means an act of domestic or international terrorism as defined in section 2331;''. |
My question is why would a "professional" attorney be so willing to knock down everything here publicly as opposed to offering to review all that we have and offer to help us out. That?s my question? A real attorney would want to review the evidence before making a public statement on the issue. This is just my opinion. " |
On 2002-12-08 18:12:00, FueLaw wrote: the United States Constitution, allows the other side to confront their accuser. This is true in civil or criminal court. In order for an affidavit to be admissible in a legal proceeding you would have to appear for a deposition or at trial and let the other side cross examine you as to the contents of the affidavit. __________ Furthermore, if you come forward as a witness this opens you up for impeachment. In other words the Semblers or anybody can investigate and whatever mud they dig up can be used against you in court. This is true whether you are a party or a witness. If you don't want all your personal business put in to a public record _____ You also need to keep in mind that once you hand over these affidavits you have no control over who views them and for what use they will be put to. |
On 2002-12-26 19:19:00, FueLaw wrote: then go ahead and believe it. [ This Message was edited by: fuelaw on 2002-12-26 19:20 ]" |