Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Doctor_Magoo

Pages: [1]
1
New Info / SLS in Brewster, NY?
« on: October 01, 2007, 12:51:24 PM »
I actually have to say one more thing about this matter.  To people like snagglepuss especially.  How can you claim that people are lying about what happened at this program?  There is a website up that clearly documents the OMH investigations and the lawsuit.  To claim those are lies is absolutely astonishing to me, especially since all of that info is coming from patients and the actual governemnt.  So what lies are you actually claiming have been made?  I would love to hear what you have to say.

2
New Info / SLS in Brewster, NY?
« on: October 01, 2007, 12:48:31 PM »
Quote from: ""red lion""
Thanks for the clarification magoo. I appreciate that.


No problem red lion.  You found a forum where most of us have experienced the same types of abuse, whether as children or as adults.  I commend all of you who are involved in bringing this company down.

3
New Info / SLS in Brewster, NY?
« on: October 01, 2007, 12:43:28 PM »
Quote from: ""snagglepuss""
It is sad that some people take the truth and twit it as they see fit w/ no regard for the people they hurt. It is obviouse that all of you who speak against treatment facilities were probably in one for good reason. You cant stand to face facts and own your problems w/o blaming others. You all have the right to free speach just try not to lie anymore.
I do see how this would be hard for a little lawyer with short scrawney man complex...


Snagglepuss, your clearly working with SLS.  Go push your fraud on someone else.  Yes, i have read your posts on loHud.  Your not welcome in this forum.

4
New Info / SLS in Brewster, NY?
« on: October 01, 2007, 12:39:29 PM »
Quote from: ""red lion""

You know, Dr. Magoo, right? Just wondering, what kind of research are you doing? & why?

Funny thing to do research on, unless you had a particular "interest"?


Red_Lion, I am a friend of the cause and heavily involved with HEAL.  I have taken an interest to this specific case as well as the Hidden lake Academy class action lawsuit.  

I assure you that I am not working for anyone but myself and my personal interest comes from being a victim of an abusive program.

5
New Info / SLS in Brewster, NY?
« on: September 28, 2007, 11:20:30 AM »
What's the story behind the plaintiffs?  How did this all come out?  I'm asking because I am doing research on Class actions against abusive programs and understand that it is very hard to sue these kinds of businesses.  The lawsuit regarding Hidden Lake Academy sounds somewhat similar to this case.  

All I can say is that I hope both suits are successfully won.  I also hope we start to see more former patients of abusive programs start coming forward and try to gain justice.  By doing things like filing lawsuits against programs, we all have the ability to make an impact on the industry as a WHOLE and hopefully deter others from abusing it's clients.

6
New Info / Class Action Lawsuit
« on: September 28, 2007, 11:13:21 AM »
Here is an article from the Journal News covering the lawsuit.  I know red_lion posted a link to it but thought I would provide a copy in the thread:

Former patients sue Putnam mental facility
By TERENCE CORCORAN
THE JOURNAL NEWS

(Original publication: June 9, 2007)

SOUTHEAST - Two former residents of a private mental-health facility, which was fined by the state last year for breaking the law, have filed a class-action lawsuit against companies that run the facility, alleging they were abused physically and emotionally.

The suit, filed in federal court in White Plains, names as defendants companies affiliated with two residential treatment facilities in Southeast as well as the principals of those companies and several employees. The defendants include SLS Residential Inc., SLS Health, SLS Wellness, Supervised Lifestyles Inc., Chairmen Alfred Bergman and Joseph Santoro, a psychologist and several others employed by SLS.

The lawsuit, filed by former patients Nicholas J. Romano and Deborah A. Morgan of New Jersey on behalf of themselves and many unnamed patients, seeks $75 million in compensatory damages, $150 million in punitive damages and an injunction that would bar SLS from further violating patients' rights.

The plaintiffs, who are in their early 20s, also claim that SLS violated the rights of its patients under the Americans With Disabilities Act.

SLS runs residential treatment facilities for adolescents and young adults at two distinctive houses, one on North Brewster Road and the other off Putnam Avenue and Route 6 opposite Drewville Road.

The state Office of Mental Health last year fined SLS Residential $80,000 for violations of the state Mental Hygiene Law and ordered that it stop admitting patients - and stop violating the rights of the patients it was treating.

The OMH said SLS Residential routinely restrained clients and kept them from making phone calls. It also found that staff would search patients, their rooms and packages sent to them.

Spokeswoman Jill Daniels said the OMH has since allowed SLS to admit new patients.

She said the company has requested a hearing, scheduled for next month, to respond to the claims of violations. SLS has not paid the $80,000 fine and won't be required to until after the hearing, Daniels said.

The lawsuit says money was one reason that SLS staff prohibited patients from making and receiving phone calls, because if patients complained to their families and were removed, SLS would lose money.

"SLS advertises and holds itself out to the general public as a treatment facility that provides compassionate and effective treatment for individuals suffering from severe mental illness," says the suit filed by attorney Michael H. Sussman of Goshen. "... The corporate and individual defendants have made these false representations to induce individuals suffering from mental illness to enter SLS, for which their insurance companies pay daily rates as high as $900."

The families of Romano and Morgan paid in excess of $200,000 to SLS for "treatment that was harmful and exploitative," the suit says.

The abuses that Romano and Morgan allege to have suffered while at SLS are similar to the claims of violations for which the state fined the company last year. The pair allege that they and many other patients were subjected to those abuses and were assaulted by SLS employees.

Romano was a patient in 2004 and 2005, and Morgan was there in 2005 and 2006. Morgan was placed in an isolation room that SLS called the Intensive Treatment Room, but instead of treating her, staff members would taunt, ridicule and humiliate her, the suit says.

Romano said he was forced to participate in a group situation in which he and other patients were degraded and punished.

Sussman said the OMH findings prove that the patients who claim they were mistreated were telling the truth. The fact that SLS employs people who abuse patients shows that the company can't be trusted, which is why the suit seeks the injunction, he said.

"What's gone on appears to have been very exploitative to the very vulnerable," Sussman said.

Reached Thursday, Santoro said he would have an attorney call for comment, although none did. Previously, a spokesman for SLS noted that the state's findings last year were unlike any report SLS had received in its 20-year history and said an overwhelming majority of patients were satisfied with their treatment.

SLS made news last year when it took a Pleasantville lawyer to court to keep him from protesting outside SLS facilities.

Attorney Glen Feinberg, whose son was a patient at SLS in 2001 and 2002, felt that his son was traumatized from the treatment and wanted to picket SLS facilities to warn others. Feinberg, who was supported by the New York Civil Liberties Union, eventually won the right to picket.

Reach Terence Corcoran at [email protected] or 845-228-2275.

7
The Troubled Teen Industry / to the guest
« on: September 28, 2007, 11:03:36 AM »
I do not believe in any reason to sue a former program, just for money, unless you could get an injunction involved or the ability to completely shut a program down.  Not to mention, $10,000 would not even come close to covering the amount families pay for some of this so called "treatment".

8
The Troubled Teen Industry / Program Accredidation
« on: September 28, 2007, 11:01:39 AM »
Thanks for the information guys.

9
The Troubled Teen Industry / Lawsuits Impacting the Teen Industry
« on: September 26, 2007, 02:28:23 PM »
Thank you.  That sounds like a great start!  Is anyone aware of cases that exist currently?

10
The Troubled Teen Industry / Program Accredidation
« on: September 26, 2007, 11:26:21 AM »
I am involved in legally exposing a program who has it's accreditation through an agency called CARF. This is the same group who accredits Narconon. Does anyone have any information on this, or any other accrediting bodies?

11
The Troubled Teen Industry / Update on WWASP trial
« on: September 26, 2007, 11:21:29 AM »
The Judge can not making a ruling if it was just filed.  The opposing counsel in given an opportunity to argue their position and vice versa before a decision can be made.

12
The Troubled Teen Industry / Lawsuits Impacting the Teen Industry
« on: September 26, 2007, 11:08:01 AM »
Is anyone aware of former patients, students, members or whatever other name they use to call it's clients, successfully suing a program?

Pages: [1]