Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Carey

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
The Troubled Teen Industry / Bock V Scheff Appeal
« on: November 09, 2007, 09:59:34 PM »
If you would like to read the brief on the appeal that has been filed it can be found on my website www.careybock.com.  The link is under the blogroll on the right side of my home page.

It will explain the grounds for appeal.

Thanks to all of those who support me!

And to those who don't support me, you are entitled to your opinion, feel free to comment.

2
The Troubled Teen Industry / Sue Scheff Parent Advocate
« on: November 09, 2007, 09:53:52 PM »
Here is something to debate.

Do parents need an advocate in the Teen Help Industry?  Do they need someone to speak on their behalf?

What is an advocate?  
An advocate is one who speaks on behalf of another person. Implicit in the concept is the notion that the represented lacks the knowledge, skill, ability, or standing to speak for themselves.

Reason I ask, is Sue Scheff claims to be a Parent Adovacte.  Her posts, blogs and website all imply that she is a parent advocate.  Is she advocating for herself or is she saying she advocates for other parents?

I am of the belief that the teen help industry is in need of those who advocate on the behalf of children, those are the ones who's voices are not being heard.  Parents have rights and they can excersise those rights in most cases (except those who may be limited by some type of handicap).  

Is Sue saying she is a Parent Advocate and she is advocating for a parents right to chose what is in the best interest of their own child even if it means placment in risky programs.  Of course all of which is done for a profit.  Is that what she thinks makes her a Parent Advocate.

Personally, I don't think she is an advocate.  I think she is a business woman and she is trying to make a big...quick buck off of people who are at their "wits end."  

I don't think Scheff is an advocate at all unless she can be considered and advocate for Sue Scheff and Parents Universal Resource Experts (PURE)  Afterall, she is the only one who is speaking on her and her companies behalf.

3
The Troubled Teen Industry / Scheff's Obsession
« on: September 10, 2007, 03:36:27 PM »
http://technorati.com/tag/bock

Who's obsessed with who?  3 blogs in less than 24 hours.  

Someone needs to read their own "expert" advice on internet addiction.

4
The Troubled Teen Industry / Scheff's attempt to not allow peaceful protest.
« on: September 06, 2007, 08:39:30 PM »
The Planet-EV1 Legal Response Team
> https://www.theplanet.com/index.html?p=legal
> (214)782-7800 :: 1-800-377-6103
> Fax:: (214) 782-7756
>  
>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 31, 2007 2:50 PM
> *To:* Legal Response; Legal
> *Cc:* Abuse
> *Subject:* RE: Urgent - Abuse at ThePlanet - Death Threats and more
>
> And another - Read this email from sueschefftruth.com - Death Wish -
> Death Threat? - Please advise. I can't believe ThePlanet would > condone
> this. Everyone is taking this seriously.
>
>
> Author : Michael "Psy" Crawford (IP: 82.123.236.101
> ,
> ATuileries-153-1-29-101.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr
> )
> E-mail : http://www.sueschefftruth.com www.sueschefftruth.com/>
> Whois : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?que ... 23.236.101
>
> Comment:
>
> Hey BITCH. Why don't you share Joyce Harris's Happy testimonial.
> Howabout the GREENS. You are WORSE than WWASP. At least they don't
> pretend to be righteous. You sicken me more than any human being I > have
> ever known to exist and I hope you get hit by a truck. That was not a
> death threat, that was a curse. A death WISH.  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------> --
>
>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 31, 2007 3:34 PM
> *To:* 'Legal Response'
> *Subject:* RE: Urgent - Abuse at ThePlanet - Death Threats and more
>
> Dear Legal Response Team -
>
>
>
> I had forwarded the links in my previous email - attached they are
> copied and pasted into a Word Doc - the Links are within it.
>
>
> With or without the death threats - these websites clearly violate > your
> AUP and TOS since they are created to harass, malign, slander, defame,
> fraud and more. As I have attached previously, I have a Final > Judgment
> against Carey Bock - as well as a full investigation through the FBI
> regarding Michael Crawford who runs sueschefftruth.com.
 
>
> On your
> http://www.theplanet.com/about_us/legal ... Acceptable%> 20Usage%20Policy%20AUP%20011507%20FINAL.pdf
> AUP
> page 6 it states the violations these websites are in.
 
>
> If you condone this behavior, I would be shocked - as no reputable > Host
> Server has - and I doubt that you do. I will also let you know that
> reputable websites such as Digg and PR Webwire have banned these
> people. This is Internet Terrorism - and to allow it only promotes > more
> hate and abuse.
>
>
> Please advise me of what steps I need to take next. Again, please > keep
> my emails confidential.
 
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------> --
>
> *From:* Legal Response [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, August 31, 2007 3:14 PM
> *Subject:* FW: Urgent - Abuse at ThePlanet - Death Threats and more
>
> Dear Ms. Scheff:
>
>
> Please note that we were unable to locate on the web page
> www.fornits.com ; www.careybock.com
> and www.sueschefftruth.com
> any death threat as of 2:13:32 p.m.
> (GMT-6).
>
>
> Legal Response Team
>
> ThePlanet.com
>
>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 31, 2007 9:22 AM
> *To:* Legal; '[email protected]' ;
> *Subject:* Urgent - Abuse at ThePlanet - Death Threats and more
>
> **CONFIDENTIAL - NOT TO BE FORWARDED, COPIED OR PASTED OUTSIDE OF
> THEPLANET OFFICES**
>
> **THIS IS EXTREMELY SENSITIVE INFORMATION AND COULD POTENTIALLY PUT MY
> FAMILY AND MYSELF AT DANGER IF RELEASED.**
>
>
> To: The Planet Abuse Dept.  
>
>
> Re: Abuse on the the following websites that you host - > **according to
> your AUP** (Prohibited Activities) they are in extreme
> violation: www.fornits.com (**Death > threats**,
> defamation, encouraging bodily harm, invasion of privacy and more)
> www.careybock.com - used for hate, slander,
> libelous, harassment, **outright fraud**, and more. (See attached > final
> judgment) - www.sueschefftruth.com
> created by **Michael Crawford** (see attached bio) who is being
> investigated by the FBI - and they have the death wish he sent me via
> email - this website is full of malicious content, harassing, > fraudulent
> information - including a lawsuit I never received, links to
> Anti-Semitic postings, and more. I am confident you will agree this
> is purely being used as a "hate" and harassment site. Make note
> that prior landing on the Planet - they were removed from GoDaddy and
> Netfirms.
>
>
>
> If you go to the above listed websites and do a
> search on my name or my business - PURE (Parent's Universal Resource
> Experts, Inc) - you will be apalled at the** threats**,
> defamation, slander, Anti-Semitic postings and more -even listing a
> lawsuit (Green v Focal Point) I have never received to further slander
> me. I have attached the bio of **Michael Crawford** - who is driving
> this obsession of cyber-stalking - he is currently being > investigated by
> the FBI - you can confirm with Agent Jeff Etters and Agent Brad Rex,
> Miami FBI 305-787-6654.
>
>
> Last fall, I won in a **jury trial** a judgment of _$11.3M - $5M of it
> was for punitive damages_ for **Internet Defamation and Invasion of
> Privacy**. The defendants, Ginger Warbis -MCNulty (Fornits) and Carey
> Bock were working in conjunction to literally destroy and ruin me > and my
> business - as well as my children. At one point, someone had > posted my
> daughter was **dead**. Since the law is gray on the responsibility of
> the Host - (Warbis-Fornits), I decided to dismiss her from the lawsuit
> early on and only sue Bock. It was due to financial reasons, the > legal
> cost me over $150K with just the one defendant. I had to second
> mortgage my home and go through my savings to protect my children.
>
>
> At the end - I was fully vindicated - however it only escalated the
> abuse as they now post as anonymous - and want to prove my verdict > means
> nothing to them. I retained Reputation Defender to help me keep their
> horrors off the top of Google - however I have now learned there are
> **death threats** on the website www.fornits.com
> (in the forums). Emotionally, I can't go on
> that website, it nearly destroyed to the point I closed my office and
> never left my house. If you go to the website on the forum and do a
> search on my name (Sue Scheff) and PURE (they actually have PURE
> Bullshit as a forum) - I am confident you will have no problem seeing
> this horrific abuse.
>
>
> I was recently featured on 20/20 ABC News earlier this month - and > from
> there - this has escalated.
>
> They are also attacking my colleague, Isabelle Zehnder. **This is
> serious **- and I do hope ThePlanet takes this seriously. Just
> prior signing up for The Planet - they were "**removed**" from GoDaddy
> and Netfirms (in Canada).
>
>
> I have filed a police report with Broward Sherriff's office
> (File#W505031987) in Florida, I have filed a report with Internet > Crimes
> Bureau as well as my local FBI office (listed above). I am hoping
> criminal charges will be brought against these people. My lawyer is
> David Pollack, Miami, FL - 305-372-5900 or email at
> www.suescheff.com This is truly one of the
> worst forms of **Internet Terrorism** I have experienced. I have been
> interviewed by major media outlets - who did their due diligence on > me -
> I am a reputable person being targeted by Internet Terrorist - please
> don't all all them to "use" The Planet as their stomping ground.
>  
>
> I look forward to your response and swift attention. I only hope you
> will remove these sites from your Host Server. If you have any > further
> questions or comments, please call me or email me. **Please keep my
> name and email confidential.**
>
>
> Thank you in advance for time and prompt attention.

5
The Troubled Teen Industry / No Court Reporter But Plenty of Exhibits
« on: August 28, 2007, 11:01:59 PM »
All records have been requested for my appeallete case.  The records will include all documents exhibited, all testimony filed, all witness names and all juror names.  We know there was not a court reporter present but we know there were exhibits and people, witness and jurors who were present in court.

What is the point?  
1)  To check all exhibits for authinticty to determine if any exhibits were altered in any way.  If they have been altered or tampered with in any way, that constitutes purgery.

2)  Witnesses and jurors were present for Scheff's testimony and for Mr. Pollack's instructions to the jury.  The jury instructions provided by Mr. Pollack to the jury are within in question and to some constitute unethical practices in the court room.

3)  The exhibits that the plaintiff presented may raise many questions, if there were questionable practices that we feel may disclose any criminal activity on behalf of the plaintiff and her attorney, there will be witnesses and jurors who can set the record straight.

I have been told that its not only court reporters who can provide evidence as to what transpired in that court room.  I have been told there are witnesses, juorors and "exhibits" that can provide us with more about what went down during that trial.

We will be getting copies of the financial information that the plaintiff submitted.  If she suffered somewhere in the vicinity of 6MM as she claims she did then there has to be evidence that shows how she derived at that figure.

I will keep everyone posted.  So be looking for my new website [email protected]

6
The Troubled Teen Industry / Tech Help Needed
« on: August 28, 2007, 11:43:41 AM »
If anyone is willing to provide me with volunteer tech help with www.careybock.com please either send me an email at [email protected] or send me a private message on fornits.

Thanks!

7
PURE Bullshit and CAICA / Rep Def & Scheff Suppress My Voice
« on: July 26, 2007, 09:22:55 PM »
I got a phone call on Tuesday from Tom with Naymz.  He told me he received a complaint about my Nayme Profile.  He asked that I remove all content in regard to Sue Scheff, her company, Isabella Zehnder and Reputation Defender.  

I thought I would share a couple of the emails that we exchanged after our phone conversation.  Tom was very nice and I could tell he didn't want to become the victim of a law suit.

Quote
Subject:   Your Naymz Profile - Action Needed
 
From: "Tom Drugan"
Date: Wed, Jul 25, 2007 8:28 am
To: ,
 

      Subject:  Your Naymz Profile - Action Needed
  From: "Tom Drugan" To: ,
 
 

Hi Carey,

 

We established Naymz to be a tool to help individuals build and promote positive and accurate identities for themselves online. We encourage our users to include information about their professional backgrounds, credentials, skills, and likes. Unfortunately our platform is also occasionally used for malicious purposes such as defamation of character and misrepresentation. It’s the nature of the online identity beast we are trying to figure out and improve upon.

 

We understand your concern with the content about you and the lawsuit against you on Sue Scheff’s profile. We are giving her 48 hours to remove any content or links associated with your name or litigation that has occurred between any of the associated parties. If she does not comply, we will permanently delete her profile and block anybody who attempts to create a profile using her name moving forward. We would need to ask that you comply in the same manner. There are mentions and links of Mrs. Scheff as well as the lawsuit within your latest Naymz profile. We ask that you remove all mentions and links of Sue Scheff and the lawsuit within 48 hours. If this does not happen, we will be forced to remove your profile and permanently block your name from our site. Please review our Terms of Use you agreed to when signing up with Naymz for more details on our positioning of defamation and liability as a business.

 

We sympathize with the troubles you have gone through fighting for what you feel is right. We wish you luck in getting this unfortunate situation straightened out.

 

Thanks,

Tom

 

Tom Drugan

Co-Founder

Naymz.com

http://www.naymz.com/search/tom/drugan/4
 

Quote
Thanks Tom.  

Just please be sure she does the same thing.  

I do want to note that it is a shame that she has been allowed for at least the last 6 months or so to use your site, her naymz page, as she has without any problems until now.  That part I find to be a little upsetting.  I wish you guys had policed her profile from the beginning instead of waiting until now, when I have tried to shed light on the truth.

However, I understand.  I guess this is part of what she pays reputation defender to do.   It is a form of censorship that they are practicing.


Then he sent me one more email asking me to remove the tags at the bottom of my page.  I would post it but I can't figure out how to. It contains a print screen of my naymz page with Sue's, Izzy's, Reputation Defenders names circled in red.

8
PURE Bullshit and CAICA / Update
« on: June 08, 2007, 10:08:55 AM »
Hi everyone.  I am posting this for those of you who may be interested and so that you will have the opportunity to hear more than "one" side of the story.

First, I want to appologize to anyone who I may have offended in the past.  I know I said some things that were hurtful and I am sorry for that.  I hope you can forgive me and know that at the time those things were said I was in a very difficult situation and was facing serous family issues of my own.  

I am posting here the status of the law suit between Scheff and myself because this is where it all began.  I believe that the people who post on Fornits truely care about children and I believe that this is one of the few websites that does not censor the poster.

Yesterday we finished our testimony before the judge.  He is taking it under advisement.  The outcome should be made available in about 45 days.  I know there will probably be numerous blogs posted by Scheff on the internet and I will be more than willing to try and answer any legitimate questions that may arise because of her blogs.  I am not as internet savy as she is and I do not have the ability to hire a "reputation defender" to try and counter blog her posts.  

I don't want to walk away from what I think is a very serious issue just because some one has more resources at their disposal than I do.  This industry is unregulated and their are individuals taking advantage of that.  I truely believe that children with "behavioral" issues need qualified, educated, trained indviduals taking care of thier needs.  I think awareness of this industry needs to be continually made.    

I don't know what the judges decision will be, but he did state that there are grounds for appeal.

9
...is everybody doing?

10
I wrote to Scheff's attorney explaining I needed more time to find an attorney.   This is given I live in Louisiana and the case is to be in Florida.  They have ignored my request and are attempting to push this case through on a default basis.  

I have written to both David Pollack and Paula Reeves, as Reeves is who is cc on all the correspondence that Scheff sends to her attorney, to tell them I am going to fight the case.

11
The Troubled Teen Industry / Scheff lies in deposition
« on: February 06, 2004, 02:12:00 PM »
From Pacer:

Yet, in September of 2003, plaintiff discovered hundreds of e-mails between Scheff, Berryman and the witnesses listed in their disclosures which had never been produced, including, Paula Reeves, John France, Christopher Goodwin, Lee Colburn, Nancy Colburn, Carey Bock, Christine Gomez, Marion Haupert, Michele Ziperovich, Blanche Hardy, Christine Mocha, Lauire Berg, Gordy Lindstrom and BK DeLong.  Some of these e-mails were dated on the very dates Scheff and Berryman were swearing under oath they had produced all the correspondence in their possession.


Did Sue Scheff lie under oath?  YES.  Has Amberly lied under oath?  YES

12
The Troubled Teen Industry / WWASP Vs Houlahan
« on: February 06, 2004, 02:00:00 PM »
From the document filed on Pacer:

...Shortly after Ms. Boatright transferred her son, she was contacted by defendant at home in Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Defendant represented himself to Ms. Boatright as a reporter for the United Press International, or UPI.
Defendant represented to Ms.Boatright he had been investigating World Wide and its member schools for over eight months.
Defendant represented to Ms. Boatright he knew of facts surrounding her son's transfer form Ivy Ridge to Tranquility Bay.
Defendant respresented to Ms. Boatright her son had been physically abused at Ivy Ridge.
Defendant respresented to Ms. Boatright her son was being transferred to Tranquility Bay to facilitate further physical abuse.
Defendant's statements to were false.
Upon information and belief, defandant has contacted numerous other parents of students in World Wide member schools in the same manner.
Upon information and belief defendant has also published false and defamatory statements to such parents.
Upon information and belief, defendant has contaced an attorney in Utah invovled in the filing of frivolous lawsuits against World Wide.  Knowing the claims and lawsuits to be baseless and false, defendant nevertheless offered to use his position to publicize the claimants stories to injure plaintiffs.

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2004-02-06 11:01 ]

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2004-02-06 11:02 ]

13
The Troubled Teen Industry / Motion for Sanctions and Order of Deposition
« on: February 06, 2004, 01:40:00 PM »
Plantiff WWASP, by and through the undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully submits this Motion for Sanctions and Order of Deposition arising out of defendand Sue Scheff's failure to appear for her scheduled deposition in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida on January 22, 2004.  Under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 37(d), this Court may impose any sanction which is just for non-appearance. By this motion, plaintiff requests its costs and attorneys fees incurred in preparing for the deposition and traveling to Florida.  This includes attorney's fees in preparing for the deposition, attorney's fees in preparing this Motion, and travel and related expenses for plaintiff's attorneys and corporate representation.  Plaintiff further requests this Court order Sheff to appear in Salt Lake City, Utah for her deposition as soon as possible.  Plaintiff also requests a warning from this court that failure to appear may result in default judgement being entered against defendants Scheff and PURE.

14
The Troubled Teen Industry / ISAC your information is NOT accurate....
« on: February 04, 2004, 04:21:00 PM »
ISAC your information is not accurate.  You better go back and check your information.  If you don't have the details and facts straight you will be seen as less than creditable.

[ This Message was edited by: Carey on 2004-02-04 13:22 ]

15
Subj: RE: Inside Edition  
Date: 3/21/03 8:43:38 AM Central Standard Time
From: [email protected]
CC: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 12:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Inside Edition

 

Hi.  I just received another call from Ned Berkowitz with Inside Edition.  I think that both of you have talked to him also.  Isn't that correct?  I know that he has been corresponding some with Tim Rogers also.  Anyway, he wants to come next week and interview the boys and myself.  I just want to be sure that you both are in with me on this.  I know that WWASP is forming a "Special Parent Reference List" to try and discredit what we bring before the media.  Have you seen the letter that Ken Kay sent out to the parents with regard to the list?

I think this interview/story needs to be about Dundee, as that is the only school that we/I have any experience with. We need all teens, parents and directors (who are willing) to be available for any questions and interviews.  Ned may want to pay a visit to everyone who is willing to talk.  I believe Cathy and Karen would be willing to tell about their experiences.  I believe that you guys know of a few others.

If we decide to make it bigger then Dundee, then we would need other parental and teen involvment.  However, I am not sure what angle Inside Edition wants to take with the story.  I think if we start with our story, then the stories of the other schools will follow.  What do you think?

I think we will have a strong case as we have been at Dundee at times when they were in true form.  In other words, we were there when they were not prepared for parental visits.  

Give me your feed back.  I want us to be on the same page on this.  I want to expose Dundee for what it really is, a controversial and abusive holding facility for at risk teens that exploits teens and their families in a time of need.  "What they advertise is not what you get!"

Carey

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6