Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Nonconformistlaw

Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53]
781
The Troubled Teen Industry / all programs soon to be shut down
« on: August 07, 2005, 10:42:00 PM »
To the anonymous person who made this statement on 8/5-------"Those of us who's lives have been changed and saved will forever stand as witnesses to the true benifits of the program, after all it's not program jargon that life is based on results it truly is, ask any ceo, doctor, lawyer, or any employer for that matter and you will see. Even ask God himself, like surely is based on results, and those of us who are sucesful are much more believable that you."-----

From one whose life was almost completely destroyed by Straight, I will forever stand witness to the true destruction inflicted by programs upon children, the programs that use abuse, humiliation, coercion, intimidation, threats, and brainwashing. After all, program jargon and lies fill the pockets of program CEO's/Administrators everywhere, all the while misrepresenting their so-called results on unsuspecting vulnerable parents. Ask any Straight or other coercive program survivor, who come from all walks of life, some of which are former counselors, lawyers and other "successful" people as you call it....

As for your assertion that successful people are much more believable than us, program survivors...hmmm if your theory is right, then a Straight Survivor who also happens to be a successful lawyer, who would verify every horrifying detail about program abuses, coercion, humilition, etc., would make a more credible and believable "witness" than you or any of your programmed, program loving sucessful friends? Ya think???

Just for the record, true credibility has nothing to do with success or career achievements, a person is credible merely by their commitment to reveal the TRUTH of their experience! And by MY definition, NOT YOURS, any program survivor is a credible witness to the horrors and emotional aftermath of these programs.

782
Brat Camp / Great Idea
« on: August 07, 2005, 01:16:00 PM »
Was this what you were responding to Nihilanthic?, when Deborah said----
"They know his limitations, in terms of dealing with reality. They just smile and settle for a less-than authentic relationship with him. Something the programs did teach them."----

If so, that makes sense to me...because its really tough to live with that overactive "gift of awareness" forced upon me by Straight, that enabled me, and I assume many others, to see a crappy parent for what they really are. There's a lot of pain that comes with the truth of what Deborah said, and no amount of time erases it...its always there. In my case, I just have done the best I could with a less-than-authentic parent incapable if dealing with reality.

783
Brat Camp / Great Idea
« on: August 07, 2005, 12:28:00 PM »
I agree...a huge piece of many "troubled kids" is lack of parental attention so kids feel neglected and unimportant....but since most parents refuse to see themselves as part of the problem...the idea might not fly with most parents...but then again...who knows...sometimes great ideas just take enough people thinking the same thing at the same time, who are all willing to nourish the idea until it becomes reality...

BTW, speaking of people thinking the same thing at the same time... I know of one Delinquency Magistrate in a juvenile court who requires parental involvement by making them parties to a complaint against any child. In other words, this Magistrate understands that parents are part of the problem and have to be part of the solution.

A thought....Maybe add mediation (this is not a therapist!)to it....a neutral person along for the ride, or is close by and accessible, who does and says nothing until inevitibly tensions arise...its a technique used in some Juvenile Courts to help the problem solving along when families cant seem to communicate anymore without being at each other's throats...although mediator's can make suggestions, the idea of it is to encourage parents and children to find their own solutions. This still keeps them out of stranger's hands, which is one of the reason's its being used to keep the JJ system out whenever possible.

Mediation might be impractical, and not what you are thinking...but since it just hit me, I thought I'd throw it out there, because camping trips might not help if all a family's communication ability has completely broken down.

BUT, I do think there's something to your idea.... ::rainbow::  ::rainbow::

784
Brat Camp / BRAT CAMP TEEN ARRESTED
« on: August 07, 2005, 11:46:00 AM »
Insults are so counter-productive dont you think? I think DJ is right, when its gets sticky the certain persons disappear, pretend to disappear,etc. to avoid responding to tough questions.

785
Brat Camp / Karen In Dallas
« on: August 06, 2005, 07:56:00 PM »
Oops, I forgot to use my user name...the previous, extremely long post about mentoring in the JJ system was from me, nonconformistlaw. :smile:

786
Brat Camp / Karen In Dallas
« on: August 06, 2005, 05:31:00 PM »
I did not mean to suggest that you limit your kids to a 5 minute time limit as a definite cut off.  :smile: I think in your role as a parent, since you have consistently allowed your children to vent as you said, then 5 minutes or so (sometimes longer)might be all they need.

For kids in juvenile detention, since most of these kids never seem to have had any healthy outlet, I give them free rein on the venting because of their circumstances. And I occasionally throw in my thoughts, or ask a question to keep them going, but the vast majority of the time, they have the floor. For them it may take hours, days, weeks, months, etc. to express years of pent up rage and to learn to express their anger in words, not by acting out. I suspect kids in "programs" would also need free rein as well.

Anyway, I applaud the parenting/therapy "venting technique." I was really just elaborating on your point with my experience doing the same thing. I wish "programs" would give the idea serious consideration. It stands a chance of making a difference whereas coercion will only create more anger, that a kid will need to vent later, one way or another.

787
Brat Camp / Karen In Dallas
« on: August 06, 2005, 04:07:00 PM »
I agree with every word 100%. I just wanted to add one thing to what Deborah said.

---"When they got older I?d give them 5 minutes to spout off every nasty, mean thing they were thinking. Every single thing they resented me for. No holds barred. No resentment. When they were done letting off steam (letting me know what a shit I was), they?d return to their normal reasonable selves, capable of having a discussion or negotiating. I didn?t require an apology, but most times got one."---

I've done this exact same thing myself as a mentor, except that I dont limit the time ---I give them as long as they need, especially with the ones I mentored in juvenile detention centers. I think its effective because kids get to express/vent anger. And, by allowing the child to rant on and on for a while...someone is finally listening to them, showing them respect and validating their feelings....Kids constantly complain that adults wont listen to anything they have to say. And to a large extent, they are often right, that no one is listening. So, by listening to their anger and various rantings, I'm convinced that most kids become a lot more willing to listen to the adult, because its mutual cooperation, without coercion.

That said, some kids just are not interested in being reached in any way, period. And that is their choice. But showing genuine interest in kids, their anger, frustrations, pain, etc, can go a long way, for those who are interested in being reached.

Anyway, I agree that this kind of venting/validation should be a huge part of therapy, parent/child relationships, friendships, heck all relationships! ::rainbow::

788
Brat Camp / Karen In Dallas
« on: August 06, 2005, 02:58:00 PM »
Again, I think you ask very good and valid questions and I would love to see the research on them as well. ::bigsmilebounce::  ::bigsmilebounce::  ::bigsmilebounce:: here?s how I think Straight would have responded to your questions. (I've actually heard them respond to items 1 and 2 numerous times while "in the program" and 3 is a true fact, but never actually heard them have the nerve to use that line to respond to similar questions)

1)   70% success rate
2)   They all relapsed because they stopped  
        applying their program.
3)   Nancy Reagan came to visit and loved
        Straight! Why, we have the endorsement of
        the White House!!!  :eek:

789
Brat Camp / Karen In Dallas
« on: August 06, 2005, 02:39:00 PM »
I decided, since there are apparently two lawyers around here, I should go by some kind of name to avoid being mistaken for KareninDallas, which I am definitely not! :exclaim:, which are very good questions by the way. I?d love to see independent research on those issues as well.

Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53]