Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - DannyB II

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 11
61
The Troubled Teen Industry / Dead, insane, or in jail (general discussion)
« on: September 21, 2010, 12:35:29 AM »
Quote from: "Hedge"
In my facility, the mantra was dead-or-in-jail. Maybe because the "insane" was already presumed to be true.

It's been hard for me to recognize this mantra as being an untruth. After all, many of us were already almost dead, and some of us had already been in jail. That's what made it look like a fact.

I can see now how it was used to manipulate us. But I was wondering: how have other people dealt with this mantra as adults?

How have you been able to get it out of your head, away from your expectations for yourself and for the other kids who were in programs with you?

I may not like the "quote" because for a lot of folks I knew this was the reality. It never was a mantra for me.

62
Feed Your Head / Father's scare tactics go to far???? Defending Daughter
« on: September 19, 2010, 01:53:02 PM »
How would you have handled this situation? Be honest this is your daughter with cerebral palsy being abused to the extent she is hit and has condoms thrown at her. I could only wonder.


http://news.mydaily.com/2010/09/17/scar ... nk1|171215

Central Florida father, James Jones, has been arrested after boarding a school bus to confront his daughter's alleged bullies. 'Good Morning America' correspondent Yunjin de Nies chronicles the footage captured by the school bus' surveillance camera. "He orders his 11-year-old daughter to point out her alleged tormentors," de Nies explains. "Jones confronts the middle school students he says have been bullying his daughter, who has cerebral palsy. Bullies he says have taunted, hit, even thrown condoms at her."

During the profanity-laced rant, Jones not only threatens the students, but the bus driver as well, saying "If anything happens to my daughter, I'm (expletive) you up." Jones was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct and disturbing a school function. After getting released on bail, he defended his actions to reporters, saying "My daughter is not going to be hazed and beat up."

63
Quote
These essays, which have ended up pretty much making up a whole book, began as my attempt to clarify my own thinking about A.A., and to explain to others why I felt that there was something wrong with people trying to shove Alcoholics Anonymous on patients. I had signed up for a course of outpatient "alcoholism treatment", but ended up getting something more like "Introduction to Cult Religion 101," where most of the "course of treatment" consisted of compulsory attendance of Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous 12-Step meetings, and "group therapy" sessions where xeroxed copies of A.A. and N.A. literature was handed out and discussed by a 12-Step true-believer group leader, someone who just assumed that of course everyone who recovers will do it at 12-Step meetings...

I have never thought this guy who wrote the Orange Papers, was worth discussing because his fundamental presumption, came from a counseling session, with a few AA meeting sprinkled in. He was a drunk for twenty years and he found a way to get sober. Sounds like his experience with AA, pushed him forward.
So instead of all this cockamamie BS, lets just say, "Thank You" to AA.

Quote
I began to get the funny feeling that there was something wrong, that something didn't quite add up right. For instance, in a "group therapy" session, I mentioned the fact that a dozen years earlier, I had quit drinking, all on my own, and stayed quit for over three years. The counselor declared that I had not had a period of "recovery," that I had only been "abstaining," because "I had not been dealing with any issues." The counselor had not bothered to ask about my past, other than to ask how many A.A. meetings I had gone to before (only 4, ever), so he had no way of knowing whether I had dealt with any "issues." He simply assumed that I had not, and declared that I had not. He was wrong, totally wrong. You don't just quit and stay quit for three years without dealing with all of the issues, problems, and hassles of real life. Nobody gets a free 3-year vacation from all of their problems just by abstaining from both beer and A.A. meetings. (Heck, that would be a great recovery program if you could do that...) Then, when I wanted to debate that point, he changed the subject and wouldn't discuss it.

AA does not have counselors.

Quote
For example, Bill Wilson talks at length about the need to be freed from ego, the need to be freed from "the bondage of self." Now, liberation from ego is a great thing, if the student can accomplish it. It is a magnificent spiritual accomplishment, the culmination of a lifetime of training and preparation. Many spiritual schools teach techniques for doing it, like the Sufis, Zen Buddhists, and various yogis and swamis. But Mr. Wilson's methods are ineffective and harmful to people. He makes students wallow in guilt and shame, and grinds their faces in the mud. That doesn't work, it only makes the students neurotic. It is really just very common cultish guilt induction disguised as some kind of self-improving spiritual training. But hey, "Freeing the students from ego" sounds great on the surface.

Nope, AA, if you feel like practicing the steps properly would never bring about the feelings of shame, guilt and wallowing in self pity. We are not students/robots, we are Americans from all walks of life, that share a common malady.
AA is not a treatment center, cult, folks don't wallow like many folks from treatment centers in their anger/resentment. This guy who wrote these papers, learned AA from a counselor in a treatment center, good luck.

64
Addiction Treatment Philosophy / Rise in Drug Addiction
« on: September 15, 2010, 10:48:06 PM »
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39200536/ns ... ddictions/

Breaking News Rate of illegal drug use rises to highest level in nearly a decade - AP
Rate of illegal drug use rises to highest level in nearly a decade - AP

By SAM HANANEL
updated 2 hours 42 minutes ago
 
WASHINGTON — The rate of illegal drug use rose last year to the highest level in nearly a decade, fueled by a sharp increase in marijuana use and a surge in ecstasy and methamphetamine abuse, the government reported Wednesday.

Gil Kerlikowske, the director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, called the 9 percent increase in drug use disappointing but said he was not surprised given "eroding attitudes" about the perception of harm from illegal drugs and the growing number of states approving medicinal marijuana.

"I think all of the attention and the focus of calling marijuana medicine has sent the absolute wrong message to our young people," Kerlikowske said in an interview.
 
The annual report from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration found marijuana use rose by 8 percent and remained the most commonly used drug.

Mike Meno, a spokesman for the pro-legalization Marijuana Policy Project, said the survey is more proof that the government's war on marijuana has failed in spite of decades of enforcement efforts and arrests.

"It's time we stop this charade and implement sensible laws that would tax and regulate marijuana the same way we do more harmful — but legal — drugs like alcohol and tobacco," Meno said.

On a positive note, cocaine abuse continues to decline, with use of the drug down 32 percent from its peak in 2006.
 
About 21.8 million Americans, or 8.7 percent of the population age 12 and older, reported using illegal drugs in 2009. That's the highest level since the survey began in 2002. The previous high was just over 20 million in 2006.

The survey, which was being released Thursday, is based on interviews with about 67,500 people. It is considered the most comprehensive annual snapshot of drug use in the United States.
 
Other results show a 37 percent increase in ecstasy use and a 60 percent jump in the number of methamphetamine users. In the early 2000s, there was a widespread public safety campaign to warn young people about the dangers of ecstasy as a party drug, but that effort declined as use dropped off.

"The last few years, I think we've taken our eye off the ball on ecstasy," Kerlikowske said.

Meth rates had been declining
Meth use had been dropping after a passage of a 2006 federal law that put cold tablets containing pseudoephedrine behind pharmacy counters. But law enforcement officials have seen a rise in "smurfing," or traveling from store to store to purchase the medicines, which can be used to produce homemade meth in kitchen labs.

Kerlikowske attributed the rise in meth abuse to more people getting around the law and an increase in meth coming across the border with Mexico.

The rise in marijuana use comes as California voters prepare to decide in November whether to legalize the drug. An Associated Press-CNBC poll earlier this year found that most Americans still oppose legalizing marijuana, but larger majorities believe it has medical benefits and want the government to allow its use for that purpose.

Medical marijuana sales in the 14 states that allow it have also taken off since the federal government signaled last year that it wouldn't prosecute marijuana sellers who follow state rules. The survey does not distinguish between medicinal and non-medicinal marijuana use.

The survey found the number of youths aged 12-17 who perceived a great risk of harm from smoking marijuana once or twice a week dropped from 54.7 percent in 2007 to 49.3 percent in 2009.

65
Addiction Treatment Philosophy / Carl Jung's and Bill Wilson letters
« on: September 15, 2010, 12:12:12 AM »
http://www.sober.org/CarlJung.html


 Sometime in 1931, another man, a young, talented, and wealthy financial wizard, had found himself on the verge of despair over his inability to control his drinking. Having attempted virtually every other “cure,” he turned to one of the greatest medical and psychiatric talents of the time, traveling to Zurich, Switzerland, to place himself under the care of Dr. Carl Gustav Jung. For close to a year, Rowland H. worked with Jung, finally leaving treatment with boundless admiration for the physician and almost as much confidence in his new self.

To his consternation, Rowland soon relapsed into intoxication. Certain that Jung was his last resort, he returned to Zurich and the psychiatrist’s care. There followed, in Bill Wilson’s words written to Dr. Jung in 1961, “the conversation between you [and Rowland] that was to become the first link in the chain of events that led to the founding of Alcoholics Anonymous.” That conversation, in Wilson’s and Jung’s later memory, had made two points. “First of all, you frankly told him of his hopelessness, so far as any further medical or psychiatric treatment might be concerned.” Second, in response to Rowland’s frantic query whether there might be any other hope, Jung had spoken of “a spiritual or religious experience — in short, a genuine conversion,” cautioning, however, “that while such experiences had sometimes brought recovery to alcoholics, they were . . . comparatively rare.”

Concerning the first point, Wilson wrote to Jung: “This candid and humble statement of yours was beyond doubt the first foundation stone upon which our society has since been built.” In response to the second statement, which offered a slender thread of hope, Rowland had joined the Oxford Group, “an evangelical movement then at the height of its success in Europe.” In recalling to Jung this channeling of his idea, Wilson — who was linked to Rowland H. through their mutual friend Ebby T. — stressed the Oxford Group’s “large emphasis upon the principles of self-survey, confession, restitution, and the giving of oneself in service to others.”

Within the Oxford Group, Rowland had found “the conversion experience that released him for the time being from his compulsion to drink.” Returning to New York City, he joined and became active in the Oxford Group at its United States headquarters — the Calvary Episcopal Church of Rev. Dr. Samuel Shoemaker. Alcoholics had not been a primary interest of Oxford Group adherents in America or in Europe, but Rowland chose to devote to such sufferers his efforts at living out and promoting his own conversion experience. Thus, in August 1934, hearing that his old friend Ebby T. was threatened with commitment to an institution because of his drinking, Rowland H. intervened, and with his friend Cebra G., pledged for Ebby’s parole, leading him to the Oxford Group and so to his first period of sobriety.


**************************************************************************************************************************************************

Bill Wilson's Letter To Dr. Carl Jung , Jan 23, 1961


http://www.barefootsworld.net/wilsonletter.html

The below is the text of the letter dated 1/23/61, written by Bill Wilson to the eminent Swiss psychologist & psychiatrist Dr. Carl Gustav Jung. Bill considered it a long overdue note of appreciation for Dr. Jung's contribution to A.A.'s solution for alcoholism. The Big Book refers to part of the story on pages 26 & 27. This letter ellicited Dr. Jung's immediate reply.

My dear Dr. Jung:
This letter of great appreciation has been very long overdue.
May I first introduce myself as Bill W., a co-founder of the Society of Alcoholics Anonymous. Though you have surely heard of us, I doubt if you are aware that a certain conversation you once had with one of your patients, a Mr. Rowland H., back in the early 1930's, did play a critical role in the founding of our Fellowship.

Though Rowland H. has long since passed away, the recollections of his remarkable experience while under treatment by you has definitely become part of AA history. Our remembrance of Rowland H.'s statements about his experience with you is as follows:

Having exhausted other means of recovery from his alcoholism, it was about 1931 that he became your patient. I believe he remained under your care for perhaps a year. His admiration for you was boundless, and he left you with a feeling of much confidence.

To his great consternation, he soon relapsed into intoxication. Certain that you were his "court of last resort," he again returned to your care. Then followed the conversation between you that was to become the first link in the chain of events that led to the founding of Alcoholics Anonymous.

My recollection of his account of that conversation is this: First of all, you frankly told him of his hopelessness, so far as any further medical or psychiatric treatment might be concerned. This candid and humble statement of yours was beyond doubt the first foundation stone upon which our Society has since been built.

Coming from you, one he so trusted and admired, the impact upon him was immense. When he then asked you if there was any other hope, you told him that there might be, provided he could become the subject of a spiritual or religious experience - in short, a genuine conversion. You pointed out how such an experience, if brought about, might remotivate him when nothing else could. But you did caution, though, that while such experiences had sometimes brought recovery to alcoholics, they were, nevertheless, comparatively rare. You recommended that he place himself in a religious atmosphere and hope for the best. This I believe was the substance of your advice.

Shortly thereafter, Mr. H. joined the Oxford Groups, an evangelical movement then at the height of its success in Europe, and one with which you are doubtless familiar. You will remember their large emphasis upon the principles of self-survey, confession, restitution, and the giving of oneself in service to others. They strongly stressed meditation and prayer. In these surroundings, Rowland H. did find a conversion experience that released him for the time being from his compulsion to drink.

Returning to New York, he became very active with the "O.G." here, then led by an Episcopal clergyman, Dr. Samuel Shoemaker. Dr. Shoemaker had been one of the founders of that movement, and his was a powerful personality that carried immense sincerity and conviction.

At this time (1932-34) the Oxford Groups had already sobered a number of alcoholics, and Rowland, feeling that he could especially identify with these sufferers, addressed himself to the help of still others. One of these chanced to be an old schoolmate of mine, Edwin T. ("Ebby"). He had been threatened with commitment to an institution, but Mr. H. and another ex-alcoholic "O.G." member procured his parole and helped to bring about his sobriety.

Meanwhile, I had run the course of alcoholism and was threatened with commitment myself. Fortunately I had fallen under the care of a physician - a Dr. William D. Silkworth - who was wonderfully capable of understanding alcoholics. But just as you had given up on Rowland, so had he given me up. It was his theory that alcoholism had two components - an obsession that compelled the sufferer to drink against his will and interest, and some sort of metabolism difficulty which he then called an allergy. The alcoholic's compulsion guaranteed that the alcoholic's drinking would go on, and the allergy made sure that the sufferer would finally deteriorate, go insane, or die. Though I had been one of the few he had thought it possible to help, he was finally obliged to tell me of my hopelessness; I, too, would have to be locked up. To me, this was a shattering blow. Just as Rowland had been made ready for his conversion experience by you, so had my wonderful friend, Dr. Silkworth, prepared me.

Hearing of my plight, my friend Edwin T. came to see me at my home where I was drinking. By then, it was November 1934. I had long marked my friend Edwin for a hopeless case. Yet there he was in a very evident state of "release" which could by no means accounted for by his mere association for a very short time with the Oxford Groups. Yet this obvious state of release, as distinguished from the usual depression, was tremendously convincing. Because he was a kindred sufferer, he could unquestionably communicate with me at great depth. I knew at once I must find an experience like his, or die.

Again I returned to Dr. Silkworth's care where I could be once more sobered and so gain a clearer view of my friend's experience of release, and of Rowland H.'s approach to him.

Clear once more of alcohol, I found myself terribly depressed. This seemed to be caused by my inability to gain the slightest faith. Edwin T. again visited me and repeated the simple Oxford Groups' formulas. Soon after he left me I became even more depressed. In utter despair I cried out, "If there be a God, will He show Himself." There immediately came to me an illumination of enormous impact and dimension, something which I have since tried to describe in the book "Alcoholics Anonymous" and in "AA Comes of Age", basic texts which I am sending you.

My release from the alcohol obsession was immediate. At once I knew I was a free man. Shortly following my experience, my friend Edwin came to the hospital, bringing me a copy of William James' "Varieties of Religious Experience". This book gave me the realization that most conversion experiences, whatever their variety, do have a common denominator of ego collapse at depth. The individual faces an impossible dilemma. In my case the dilemma had been created by my compulsive drinking and the deep feeling of hopelessness had been vastly deepened by my doctor. It was deepened still more by my alcoholic friend when he acquainted me with your verdict of hopelessness respecting Rowland H.

In the wake of my spiritual experience there came a vision of a society of alcoholics, each identifying with and transmitting his experience to the next - chain style. If each sufferer were to carry the news of the scientific hopelessness of alcoholism to each new prospect, he might be able to lay every newcomer wide open to a transforming spiritual experience. This concept proved to be the foundation of such success as Alcoholics Anonymous has since achieved. This has made conversion experiences - nearly every variety reported by James - available on an almost wholesale basis. Our sustained recoveries over the last quarter century number about 300,000. In America and through the world there are today 8,000 AA groups.

So to you, to Dr. Shoemaker of the Oxford Groups, to William James, and to my own physician, Dr. Silkworth, we of AA owe this tremendous benefaction. As you will now clearly see, this astonishing chain of events actually started long ago in your consulting room, and it was directly founded upon your own humility and deep perception.

Very many thoughtful AAs are students of your writings. Because of your conviction that man is something more than intellect, emotion, and two dollars worth of chemicals, you have especially endeared yourself to us.

How our Society grew, developed its Traditions for unity, and structured its functioning will be seen in the texts and pamphlet material that I am sending you.

You will also be interested to learn that in addition to the "spiritual experience," many AAs report a great variety of psychic phenomena, the cumulative weight of which is very considerable. Other members have - following their recovery in AA - been much helped by your practitioners. A few have been intrigued by the "I Ching" and your remarkable introduction to that work.

Please be certain that your place in the affection, and in the history of the Fellowship, is like no other.

Gratefully yours,
William G. W.
Co-founder Alcoholics Anonymous

**************************************************************************************************************************************************

Dr. Carl Jung's Letter To Bill Wilson, Jan 30, 1961


Dear Mr. W.

Your letter has been very welcome indeed.

I had no news from Rowland H. anymore and often wondered what has been his fate. Our conversation which he has adequately reported to you had an aspect of which he did not know. The reason that I could not tell him everything was that those days I had to be exceedingly careful of what I said. I had found out that I was misunderstood in every possible way. Thus I was very careful when I talked to Rowland H. But what I really thought about was the result of many experiences with men of his kind.

His craving for alcohol was the equivalent, on a low level, of the spiritual thirst of our being for wholeness, expressed in medieval language: the union with God.*

How could one formulate such an insight in a language that is not misunderstood in our days?

The only right and legitimate way to such an experience is that it happens to you in reality and it can only happen to you when you walk on a path which leads you to higher understanding. You might be led to that goal by an act of grace or through a personal and honest contact with friends, or through a higher education of the mind beyond the confines of mere rationalism. I see from your letter that Rowland H. has chosen the second way, which was, under the circumstances, obviously the best one.

I am strongly convinced that the evil principle prevailing in this world leads the unrecognized spiritual need into perdition, if it is not counteracted either by real religious insight or by the protective wall of human community. An ordinary man, not protected by an action from above and isolated in society, cannot resist the power of evil, which is called very aptly the Devil. But the use of such words arouses so many mistakes that one can only keep aloof from them as much as possible.

These are the reasons why I could not give a full and sufficient explanation to Rowland H., but I am risking it with you because I conclude from your very decent and honest letter that you have acquired a point of view above the misleading platitudes one usually hears about alcoholism.

You see, "alcohol" in Latin is "spiritus" and you use the same word for the highest religious experience as well as for the most depraving poison. The helpful formula therefore is: spiritus contra spiritum.

Thanking you again for your kind letter

I remain

Yours sincerely

 C. G. Jung*

"As the hart panteth after the water brooks, so panteth my soul after thee, O God." (Psalms 42:1)

Dr. Carl Jung

From Dr. Carl Gustav Jung (July 26, 1875 - June 6, 1961)

Spiritum contra spiritus
Higher Power opposes alcoholism


**************************************************************************************************************************************************

There is no way--Bill himself found no way--to express what this letter meant to him. It was a confirmation of all that he, with no formal training, no real guidance, through his own intuition had come to believe. It was that and more. It came at a moment in his life when he needed it, only a few weeks after the death in St. Louis of Father Ed Dowling, the man who more than any other had understood his search. ("The divine dissatisfaction, the beautiful unrest that would keep him going, reaching out always . . ." )

Ever since his early AA days, when Bill had read Jung's Modern Man in Search of a Soul, he had looked on the great doctor as not wholly a theologian, nor a pure scientist, but as someone who seemed to stand with him in that strange no man's land that lay between. And now he had passed on the formula: spiritus contra spiritum.

Bill kept the Jung letter as a talisman. In time it was copied, read at meetings, reprinted in The Grapevine, but the original stayed in his top desk drawer and, sometimes, even though he knew it by heart, he would open the drawer, look down at the signature and reread a phrase.

66
The Melting Pot / New England Patriots, Who is your team and how do you feel
« on: September 12, 2010, 11:48:20 AM »
Well the day has finally arrived, we start another football season in which the football team with the most wins and championships in the last decade defends the next decade.
 
Uh, Tom Brady inks a record contract; "New England Patriots  Yesterday, the Patriots submitted the paperwork for the four-year contract extension that was recently signed by Tom Brady. The extension extends through the 2014 NFL season. Today, both Robert Kraft and Tom Brady issued statements regarding the extension. Read the full statement at: http://www.patriots.com/news/index.cfm? ... d=44459&cp".

I like our chances as I do every year, hope everyone has a great season.

67
Feed Your Head / Intellectual Cockroaches
« on: September 12, 2010, 11:37:55 AM »
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/09/100909-
Cockroach Brains May Hold New Antibiotics?
on.natgeo.com
Cockroaches and locusts produce natural antibiotics that can kill bacteria such as MRSA and toxic strains of E. coli, new research shows.

Christine Dell'Amore

National Geographic News

Published September 9, 2010

Cockroaches may make your skin crawl, but the insects—or, to be exact, their brains—could one day save your life.

That's because the central nervous systems of American cockroaches produce natural antibiotics that can kill off bacteria often deadly to humans, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and toxic strains of Escherichia coli, scientists said this week.

Two species of locust tested so far also have the same bacteria-killing molecules in their tiny heads.

The findings suggest that the insect world—which makes up 80 percent of all animals on Earth—may be teeming with new antibiotics, said study co-author Simon Lee of the University of Nottingham in the U.K.

Such a discovery is crucial, because scientists are scrambling to combat strains of several infectious diseases, including MRSA and E. coli, that are resistant to traditional antibiotics, Lee said.

(Related: "Sharks Carrying Drug-Resistant 'Bacterial Monsters.'")

"It's a promising new lead. We are looking in an unusual place, and to my knowledge no one else is looking there," Lee said.

"That's what we need in terms of [finding new] antibiotics, because all the usual places"—such as soil microbes, fungi, and purely synthetic molecules—"have been exhausted."

(Also see: "Blockbuster Ocean Drugs on the Horizon?")

Insect Brains Have "Clever Defense" Against Bacteria

Lee and colleagues dissected the tissues and brains of cockroaches—which "smell as bad as they look," Lee said—and locusts in the lab.

(Read more about how locust brains switch on swarming behavior.)

The team tested nine separate types of antibacterial molecules found in the insects' brains and discovered that each molecule is specialized to kill a different type of bacteria.

This "very clever defense mechanism" allows the bugs to survive in the most dirty of domains, Lee said.

The scientists found the bugs had antibiotics only in their brain tissue, the most essential part of the body, he added.

A bug might live with an infected leg, for instance, but a brain infection would almost certainly be fatal.

Insect-brain drugs for humans are still years away, Lee said, but there's one hopeful glimmer: When the team added the insect antibiotics to human cells in the lab, there were no toxic effects.

Preliminary findings on antibiotics in bug brains were presented at the Society for General Microbiology meeting held this week at the University of Nottingham.

68
Elan School / Status Elan 2010
« on: September 01, 2010, 12:34:29 AM »
Guys have some info for ya.

Got a call from a resident from 30 years ago today. Actually at lunch time. She pick my phone # off the Elan Alum Site.
We chit chatted a bit found out she arrived around Sept of 1977 and stayed until 1979. She is from Chicago and I do not have permission to say who she is.

Anyway she went on to tell me she had a conversation with Jeffery Gottlieb last Wenesday 8/25/10. In the course of this conversation Jeffery explained to her that Elan had been reduced to one house E-3 and that only 41 students resided there. That by late spring of next year after Graduation, that Elan would be closing down. She went on to say that Jeffery was retiring after next year, that there was nothing more to do. Sharon no longer really wanted to keep Elan open, that the building E-3 showed the affects of being neglected, all the houses other then E-3 had been sold off with the land.

Folks I have called others to verify this and it looks at this point to be valid info.

Man, I say bravo to the folks who have worked their asses off to see this day, many folks behind the scenes pushed and badgered many employees to stop the madness, most listened and moved on while others did not.
Why, no one I knew ever reported abuse or brought lawsuits against Elan, I am sad to say, "I just don't know". I don't have a answer why I sat around waiting for so many years and did nothing, I can not blame others.

69
Open Free for All / Marines
« on: August 31, 2010, 07:15:09 PM »
Semper Fi!

If You Are Not Willing To Stand Behind Our Troops, Please, Please Feel Free To Stand In Front Of Them!

70
Open Free for All / Aftermath of Suck-It
« on: August 27, 2010, 09:08:27 PM »
Quote
Re: aparently, adults want to go to programs too
Postby Whooter » 43 minutes ago

shaggys wrote:
Whooter's minions are dropping away. Even Danny can only muster a half-hearted defense of his former-God Whooter. I am just glad to be here to witness this.

Whooter wrote:
We must be entering yet another era. Hopefully the next one will be more improved than the last and people will have more tolerance towards those survivors who were helped by the industry, have positive stories and also tolerance towards proprogram people.
...


Re: aparently, adults want to go to programs too
Postby DannyB II » 11 minutes ago

DannyB II wrote:
Whooter, we are still hanging. Suck-It got off track there, I still don't know what that was all about. Maybe it was all the pressure, he did have many valid points. His writing was incredible, liked how he expressed himself through his writings.
One thing though I need to say, we all need to stay above board and have a certain respect for fairness.
What Art put this Site through back at the beginning of the year was crazy, uncalled for. Suck-It was showing signs of this behavior, we can harass, abuse, ridicule, demean, poke fun of, post nasty things ect....but the integrity of the site can not be fucked with.
When we get down to it, even though in anger at times I have said different, this site does help people, mothers, fathers, siblings, and kids. I know this to be true. We can fight with one another but we can not undermine the foundation of this site.
I will not stand for that. Just making myself crystal clear.
My opinion.

71
Open Free for All / CALO RELOADED/A piece of "Shit" called Aaron Seymour
« on: August 24, 2010, 11:58:26 PM »
Board index ‹ Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform ‹ Facility Question and Answers ‹ CALO - Change Academy at Lake of the Ozarks

Re: The Truth About Whooter/TheWho/Other Aliases

Quote
Postby Che Gookin » Today, 9:07 pm
Look, I axed all of whooters posts because he's banned from this forum. However, if this thread is flooded with mindless dribble and other garbage I'm going to start axing other people's posts. I probably whacked a few of yours Annie, but that is more on accident. I was hitting the delete button so fast my finger about fell off.
 

You fucking pussy. Oh Annie, I fucked up,  pa, pa, please let me lick your ass, the pic will do.
Well Whooter and Suck It I think it is time we high-jack the forum and bring it to another forum. Che is not able to do anything with it anyway. His one and only chance to talk with the big guy from CALO, he froze and ran in the closet. So Whooter no problem we take over and make our own forum. Fuck You fatty boy. You don't own this Web Site.
Calo Reloaded will now be a forum that will listen to all sides of the ever growing conversation, concerning CALO. I am probably sure we could get Ken, to come back and interview.
Remember "Daytop Reloaded" neither do I. That is how important Daytop is. CALO is right up there. OH, thats right, look at there moderators, dumbasses.

72
Open Free for All / Affliliations
« on: August 21, 2010, 02:31:47 PM »
Affiliations.
Che made a comment that Suck-It and Whooter are ignoring me. Well, I have not felt that and I never thought it was important that they listened to me or not. I have supported their opinions but then again, Che, I have supported yours also. I try to be fair when listening to others, take what they have to say under consideration.
 
I will say this, if you're looking for my responses to be more in line with Suck-IT or Whooters that is not going to happen, I am much more aggressive and animated. My language is definitely more colorful. I am not them nor want to be. Do I have similar experiences as Whooter or Suck-It, very little. Whooter had a child go to treatment, which helped her tremendously and Suck -it went to a WAASP program that helped him, as he has said.
I, on the other hand,  went to a program you all know, "Elan" that did absolutely nothing to help me. I am very clear about this and have said so unequivocally.
 
I believe Whooter, Suck-It and myself do merge through an ability to see all programs were not like, Elan.
 
I found this out shortly after I left Elan and ran into an old friend in the service over seas.  He had gone to another program for about the same amount of time that I went to Elan. The very first thing I noticed about him was his conformability, he was comfortable being back in life.  We talked about where we had gone, both of us had been in a lot of trouble, been institutionalized and were sent to programs, I told him of my horrible experience at Elan. He told me he was sorry for me, that he ended up going to a program which helped him a great deal. It showed in his presence and how  he spoke about the program.  He said the program had helped him to see the error of his ways, why drugs were never going to help, managing his anger, learning to deal with the pain he felt from a childhood of abuse, setting goals and accomplishing them and building a future of success.  I remember walking away hurt, I wanted what he had. Shortly after that meeting I sobered up and began, in earnest, with much help from professionals to help myself.
 
During my early sobriety, I stayed in contact with this gentleman, I now call him one of my best friends. He works for a program that is everything I have mentioned here above.  NO, I will not identify this program. I will say this it is nothing like what I have read about here on fornits.

This inspired me to get more involved with kids, that are going through what I went through and make sure they get the best help they can get. I can only help a few at a time because of my profession, I do what I can.  
There are good programs out there, they don't market or advertise. They do not have to, they are small population entities, which are very serious about their care for children.

I find it very suspicious that no one here knows of such programs and would argue of their success with kids.

I have been around almost a year and the programs I have read about are awful. So I do not have a problem with (fornits) members actions, but I also know first hand there are good places for kids that need help.
 
Now Che, if your saying that Whooter and Suck-It are ignoring me because I have views such as these, well OK. I would think that you would be mistaken but who knows here on fornits.
 
Difference between Che and myself, I don't have to like you (personally) to support you. Though I will say I do have to respect you. Which, for some reason, Che, you seem to want to test consistently.

I, personally will continue to support everyone and anyone who has an opinion, I can respect.
 
Suck-It and Whooter have spoken about the victimization they have suffered, I don't believe anyone could altercate this.
I have received my share but there is a difference here, how I react to it and how they have reacted. Just because my reactions have been outlandish this should not cover up the fact that I have been abused for my past affiliations and recent views. Example; Accusing me of dragging a child around by rope from behind a vehicle.
Many would say well, Danny, you have caused this. That would be a fact (no excuses) bad behavior begets bad behavior. I have curbed this demeanour by staying away from people here on fornits that would love to draw me into their reckless reactions. I have had a learning curve, no doubt. We all learn from mistakes or we suffer the consequences.

Changing the subject.

Stop for a second and think about this. Suck-It comes to fornits with a experience he believes, In fornits opinion he is suffering from "Stockholm Syndrome", so instead of going easy on him and trying to bring him around slowly. NO, y'all start a campaign to demolish him, totally debase him.
So we have another circumstance such as Morgan, opportunity to help or at the very least learn something but fuck no, lets kill what we fear or don't understand.
Ken Huey came on this site, great opportunity to learn something, ya know glean information about programs. We don't have to like him or respect him, he was a means to justify a end. NO!!!!!! We could not muster the vision (CHE) to see  what was right in front of us.Members here are very confusing to watch (read), your thoughts sway with the wind. Which ever way it blows.

So many member of fornits have said I have been helped here, my life was complete once I found this place. I am sure this has been true. I have just not seen this. Almost like my experience with my program, everyone else I know had a great experience with there program, I did not. Hey, don't go there. I am not complaining, I really don't expect anything from fornits at this point but a rational expressive conversation, maybe.

I did learn something from a good friend that there are venues that can help kids who need help, same as I will learn from fornits that there are programs still hurting children. I just hope fornits will learn their opinion is not the end all.

My thoughts.

danny

73
Open Free for All / Dissenting Opinions on Fornits, Can There Be.
« on: August 20, 2010, 06:20:17 PM »
Quote
Some excerpts from an interview Dr. Laura had with Paul Bond, Reuters. I copied some in full detail and others I did not. What I am trying to capture; here is Laura being silenced and bullied from speaking her own mind.
I am hoping fornits does not have to be labeled as such.



http://www.comcast.net/articles/enterta ... S-DRLAURA/

 "An organization whose existence depends on the principle of eliminating opposing opinions is very dangerous".

"Do the right thing ... regardless of pressures, fears, weaknesses. Life is ultimately better for yourself and for everyone if you focus on doing the right thing".

  "I went out to dinner with three friends after Larry King (on Wednesday). One of my friends who is gay is sitting there with another friend who is black, and he looks up and says, "I wonder what the media would do with this? You're with a black guy and a gay guy." We laughed, because we all understand what this is really about -- censoring a point of view".

"How hateful rhetoric has become. If you want to immerse yourself in the horrors of hell, go on the Internet. A colleague of mine said, "I expected nasty things to appear about you, but what really horrified me is the discussions at the end of the articles." The amount of hatred instead of discussion is frightening".
(Sound familiar folks.)

"Why should my voice not be heard? Because they don't agree with what I say"?

"I'm not for censorship and silencing. I'm for dialogue and debate and the American way, where people hear both sides and make up their minds".  

74
Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction"
It's interesting that although Len Buccellato is just now "officially" announcing "Ridge Creek School" (RCS is HLA for those of you who don't already know they just changed their name), RCS already has a sordid history of ORS violations including extreme violence, unreported incidents, police involvement, arrests, assaults, failure to follow treatment plans and a generalized underpinning of poor/unqualified staffing.

RCS has been hit with many serious ORS violations already and it sure looks like there will be plenty more to come.  Parents, beware Ed Cons promoting RCS and don't fall for RCS marketing spin.  They are already in serious trouble with watchdogs and they are reportedly colocated on a property where RCS principals also operate a privately run Georgia DOC juvenile lockup facility where convicted criminals are sent to do their time on a contract basis.  

This is a recipe for disaster for children who need legitimate help.

I know DJ, it is just horrible to read about how inner city kids are beating up on one another.
Grow the fuck up.

75
Feed Your Head / Illegal Border Crossings...
« on: August 13, 2010, 07:23:32 PM »
AP
Some say banning driver's licenses for illegal immigrants leads to more unlicensed, uninsured drivers on the road. Others say allowing them attracts illegal immigrants to certain states. What do you think?

I liked these thoughts..

IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD LABOR.
IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED INDEFINITELY.
IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.
IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE JAILED.
IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE HEARD FROM AGAIN.
IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE BRANDED A SPY AND YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.
IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO POLITICAL PRISON TO ROT.

If YOU cross the Mexican Border Illegally, you will end up in a Mexican Federal Jail for a very long stay that is NOT very nice! Believe me, you do NOT want to end up in a Mexican Jail!!!!!
IF YOU CROSS THE U.S. BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET:

1 - A JOB,
2 - A DRIVERS LICENSE,
3 - SOCIAL SECURITY CARD,
4 - WELFARE,
5 - FOOD STAMPS,
6 - CREDIT CARDS,
7 - SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE,
8 - FREE EDUCATION,
9 - FREE HEALTH CARE,
10 - A LOBBYIST IN WASHINGTON ,
11 - BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS PRINTED IN YOUR LANGUAGE
12 - AND THE RIGHT TO CARRY YOUR COUNTRY'S FLAG WHILE YOU PROTEST THAT YOU DON'T GET ENOUGH RESPECT.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 11