Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Notafriendofredcliff

Pages: [1] 2
1
Brat Camp / SEVEN MONTHS POST REDCLIFF ASCENT
« on: May 28, 2006, 08:46:00 PM »
I thought I'd pop in to give an update on my stepson.  He finished his 80-day sentence at Redcliff over 7 months ago.  Nobody from Redcliff has called, written or otherwise contacted us since his release.  

We are enduring his rage episodes every 8 - 10 weeks on average, and they last from two to five days each time.  The time between episodes is good.  He's almost the person he was before he got sent to Redcliff.  We get along well, and he behaves at school but he's having difficulty keeping up.  He's had a challenging workload due to missing 8 weeks of school while he was at Redcliff.  

He only talks about Redcliff when he's in a rage, and his memories are not fond ones.  Even though we didn't send him there, and did everything possible to get him out, he is still angry with us.  Once in a while, he has the opportunity to direct his rage at his mother and that offers him some relief for a while.  She still affects his life negatively, and continues to do hurtful things to him, which make his healing more challenging.  Just sending him into isolation for 80 days wasn't enough for her.

When my stepson was in Redcliff, they charged $425 per day for the first 60 days.  Now they charge $440.  Before they charged $160 for every day beyond 60.  Now that is $220 per day.  That's quite an increase in 7 months!  I hope the increase is due to reduced "enrollment".  Maybe the cost of dried oats and lentils has gone up.  Maybe the Redcliff owners all bought houses they can't afford.  I'm sure there's some reason for the increase.  I'm just excited to know that parents will have to dig a little deeper in their pockets before turning their children over to these people to be "fixed".  Maybe that will save a few kids.

I remain

Notafriendofredcliff

2
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: January 16, 2006, 07:25:00 PM »
I feel accused, and I feel the need to reply to some of the questions.  I don?t care for the ugly turn this has taken.

First of all, the need for a court order from Utah was what Steve Nadauld told us would be required for them to allow the boy to be removed from their program.  Any orders we could provide from our home state courts, which had jurisdiction over the custody, would not be recognized or accepted.  We asked to have this put in writing, and Mr. Nadauld refused.  I can prove this, should it ever be required.  By the time it could have been addressed in the Utah courts, it would have been too late to help.

So far as considering a lawsuit, we discussed it.  We have no obligation, moral or otherwise, to drag our family through the legal system.  I do feel an obligation to let others know that this ?business? can violate your rights as a joint legal custodian, in every conceivable way.  And they can put your child through their program against your wishes.  We don?t want tainted money that was made off the misery of children and incompetence/desperation of parents.   When he is an adult, he may pursue it legally if he chooses.  But for now he?s been through enough.  We are concentrating on helping him heal and do not want any distractions.  He has asked to see the documentation we have, and we have provided it to him.  We?ve answered all his questions about how he came to be there, and the reasons we were not able to have him released.  He can see that the forms were faxed back and forth between Redcliff, his mother?s employer?s fax, and the business fax of the unrelated third party that signed as his father, in the week prior to his abduction.  He lost 80 days of his life there.  He is entitled to know how that was allowed to happen to him.  

Yes, we contacted every official and agency that could possibly offer us any assistance.  We hit roadblocks repeatedly, due to privacy concerns.  We were shuffled from one agency to another.  We even tried to confirm that they had at least complied with the Interstate Compact laws that cover transporting children between states for this sort of purpose.  No dice, privacy issues.  We received a reply from Alan Sevison, the Assistant Attorney General in Utah, stating he could only help us if we had a complaint of abuse.  Unfortunately, Utah does not consider these activities to be abuse.  Apparently Oregon has the same view, and that is why these two states are such a haven for the WT business.  Redcliff claims that the law allows them to accept a child with the permission of a single parent or guardian.  They say they are under no obligation to recognize the legal rights of any other parent.  Their own contract contradicts this, but my husband could hardly force them to comply with an agreement he never entered into with them.  The state licensors would do nothing to help us.  They are only there to make sure Redcliff meets their requirements with regard to the health and safety of the kids.  I?m not sure their task is even achievable, given the nature and logistics of Redcliff.  How do you pop in unexpectedly somewhere in the midst of a 650 square mile wilderness?  

I haven?t bashed Redcliff.  I haven?t made damaging claims.  I HAVE STATED FACT.  If stating our factual experience is damaging, they should rethink their policies.  I?m sure Redcliff is aware of the things I have said.  I would invite them to contact me, and I would be thrilled to have the opportunity to address this with Steve Nadauld (or any of his associates), as he ended any dialogue some time ago by refusing to accept or return phone calls, and has not responded to certified mail.  He made it clear my husband had NO rights whatsoever.  A father?s right to see or even speak to his own son was superceded by the arrogant rights of a profitable business entity.  If they feel I have stated anything that is not 100% true, I invite their rebuttal.  I would love to hear them publicly justify accepting a child against the wishes of his father who had joint legal custody, with an application and contract that had more red flags than Tiananmen Square, against the recommendation of the child?s psychologist (whom they never even bothered to contact).  

I have not left out ?unflattering facts?.  I have hid nothing.  Frankly, the implication confuses me.  You strongly feel that you did everything you could to help your son.  You feel you utilized Redcliff as a last resort when all other options had been exhausted.  You are comfortable that after 100 days in the wilderness, your son has changed and has a new lease on life.  You have made this determination after spending a few days with him, and from phone calls you receive from him at school.  I seriously hope to God that you are right.  I want to believe this every bit as much as you do.  It hurts me to think of the kids who have lost precious time from their lives to this industry.  But in actuality you can?t possibly know until he is back with your family, interacting on a daily basis.  

By the way, did Redcliff come through with any of the academic credit they claim to offer?  The things they sent us were absolutely ridiculous, and I?m sure the local school board is still laughing that we would even present it to them for consideration.

My goal is to educate parents about our experience.  We felt like we were living in a communist country, or unable to wake up from a nightmare.  We worried that he would never be able to forgive us for being unable to help him.  It nearly killed us.  Our circumstances were different from yours.  Obviously Redcliff treated us differently than they did you and your family.  They denied a father access to his son, and somehow felt justified in doing so.  Any parents who are considering such a placement need to determine whether a facility has the INTEGRITY they should expect and demand from anyone who would be charged with helping their child.  They have to know their rights won?t be violated, and their family won?t be exploited.  Parents should share their experiences and support each other.  Otherwise we will all be at the mercy of carefully scripted websites and advertisements, designed to prey on the desperation of frightened parents.  And ultimately our children will pay the price if we aren?t thorough and diligent.

3
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: January 13, 2006, 02:17:00 AM »
If you filled out all the paperwork, you were just wasting your time. It wasn't necessary.  We weren't supposed to see the application, but we received (in error) a full copy of it after he was admitted. If memory serves me (I could check in the files) it was at least 30 pages long. We watched in amazement as it all came in over the fax. It was current with handwritten intake notations on it. The employee who provided it to us was transferred shortly afterward.  Yes, it asked for a tremendous amount of detailed information.  Most of it was left blank. They accepted it anyway.  The information that WAS provided was not sufficient to warrant any action, much less admission to wilderness therapy.

Redcliff wouldn't give us the name of the company who abducted and delivered the boy to them, so we pressed for ALL the documents they had on him.  We were jerked around repeatedly.  We made many phone calls to Steve Naudauld (Admissions Director) until he quit accepting/returning phone calls.  He had told us (and had his attorney assure us) that my husband's Joint Legal Custody was meaningless to them, and they had no intention of sharing any of the paperwork.  Among the paperwork we received in error was a form that listed my husband (amongst others) as someone authorized to receive ALL information about his son.  Steve Naudauld refused to acknowledge the existence of this release, which he had in the file, and we even faxed him a copy of.  Certified mail went unanswered.  We provided them with a court order allowing my husband access to the records.  They refused to acknowledge it.

These are the people you entrusted with your son's welfare.  Read their hiring policies.  You'll be amazed how little is required to be a field staff member.  I'd require more of a babysitter.  Yes, they are regulated, but only to the extent it is possible, when you consider how far out in the desert they are.  If abuse took place, how would a child report it?  Tell an employee?  They've just been abandoned to the "care" of these people, they cannot use a phone, and they certainly cannot get a letter to you that hasn't been in the hands of an employee before it is mailed.  I doubt they check the first batch of letters that go out.  They all start out the same with "Your children are a reflection of YOU".  Standard, and obviously dictated.

Their website shows "independent" studies that prove the effectiveness of their program.  Look up the CVs of their contributors.  One is on their board of directors, the other received over $200,000 for his research, from the OBHIC (then look at the people who run the OBHIC....plenty of Redcliff owners, etc).

The three peak climb is nothing more than an excuse to keep the child longer.  They tell you how much the child is looking forward to this great challenge/experience (and how could you deprive him of such a thing after what he's been through).  In our case it was canceled for some unknown reason.  As for spending the night in the outdoors with your son, you had the luxury of a bathroom and shower, which he never had there.  And you had food, not dried oats and rice.  And you were there of your own free will.  Makes it easier to enjoy the stars and the scenery.

Are you aware that the Redcliff land is a public hunting area? They don't own that land.  There are people walking around out there with guns.

Their contract has a full section on their policies regarding a child being withdrawn by another parent, regardless of custodial status.  It states clearly that ANY parent may withdraw the child with 24 hour's notice.  For reasons we'll never understand, they had different requirements for my husband.  They would not even accept a court order from our home state (which has jurisdiction over the custody), but required that we come to Utah and attempt to get a court order there.  WT is big business in Utah, with a powerful lobby.  We wouldn't have stood a chance.  Of course, they didn't tell us it had to be a UTAH court order until we had blown a ton of time and money in the courts here.  They were buying time.

I don't want to burst your bubble, and I truly hope your son is doing well.  But please understand it's quite common for a kid to experience the euphoric phase after being released from WT, and he still has not been acclimated back into the real world.  It's going to be a long time before you really know how he is doing.

We're not litigious people, and I doubt anything could be accomplished through the courts anyway.  But there needs to be a complete overhaul of this barbaric system, and some due process afforded the children whose families put them into it.  Redcliff accepts quite a few kids who are adjudicated to be there, but many others are placed merely at the whims of their parents. Redcliff SHOULD HAVE an affirmative moral obligation to confirm the status of applicants, to be sure they are not accepting children who are sent there through no fault of their own.  They accepted an innocent child, nearly destroyed our lives, and kept my husband from his son for 80 days.  If you'll read their contract, it basically says they have the right to accept anything you tell them as the truth. They don't have to verify anything.

Things are improving at home.  I'm almost afraid to say that, as every time I do it all goes to hell. We are doing the best we can to assure him we are in this for the long run, and we're not going to give up on him.  I think he's starting to trust us, and believes we are really here for him.  He has a lot of catching up to do since he missed so much school.  He is definitely benefiting from being in a stable loving household.  When I think of what he's been through, I am angry beyond description.  Nobody has the right to strip a child of all his human rights, isolate him from his family, and incarcerate him without justification.  But that's exactly what Redcliff did.

4
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: January 04, 2006, 01:08:00 AM »
Quote
On 2005-12-23 15:07:00, Anonymous wrote:

"There is no doubt that there are awful programs out there but I don't think Redcliff is one of them -- the industry is ripe for abuse and not well legislated or controlled and parents send kids who don't need to be there...
"


There is only ONE reason parents are ABLE to send kids who don't need to be there.  Redcliff knowingly ACCEPTS those kids, with no due process, and in our case against the recommendation of a qualified professional.  It is a highly profitable business that preys on desperate parents.  At some point they have to be accountable, and begin to make some cursory validation of the child's history.  Presently, the only true requirement is the ability to pay.  Once that is established, they will promptly incarcerate your child for you. Anyone looking at an enrollment application for wilderness therapy would expect to see a history of drug abuse, theft, truancy and/or violence.  And one would expect to see a long list of traditional therapy treatments that were explored prior to taking such a radical step.  My step-son's application had none of that.  No reasonable person would have believed he could be enrolled based on the information they were given.  That should have been a red flag.  It wasn't. A valid credit card authorization was included with the application; that was all that mattered.

5
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: December 16, 2005, 10:15:00 PM »
Thank you for sharing your experience.  If I may ask, did you bring your son home with you before he went on to boarding school?

Maybe Doc Dan was having an off day when we attended the seminar.  We did hang on until the bitter end.  We waited endlessly to hear him offer anything about aftercare.  Prior to the graduation, all we were told was to set him up with a local therapist before bringing him home.  Duh.  

I'm sure Redcliff accepted your son based on his past history of drug abuse, etc., and the knowledge that you had done everything possible to help him.  I still believe there should be some due process afforded anyone of any age before they are subjected to WT, but I'm not trying to judge you.  You did what you thought was best, as a last resort.  

Unfortunately, their system is purposefully flawed.  If the parents have the ability to pay, that's the only real requirement for enrollment.  In our case, they accepted him based on an obviously fraudulent enrollment contract signed by his disturbed mother and an unrelated third party who signed as his father.  They disregarded the psych evaluation that said he shouldn't be there. Nothing significant was done for him prior to being abducted and taken to Redcliff.  Even though their enrollment contract clearly states that any parent may remove their child for any reason, they refused to allow my husband to remove him.  They actively and deliberately denied my husband his rights as a father, and knowingly held a child who was sent there for all the wrong reasons.  He (and we) will be paying the price for this for years to come.  

I'm glad to hear that your son's experience was a positive one and I hope he continues to show improvement.  Knowing what we know about Redcliff, it's a minor miracle.  I hope he doesn't have to stay in a boarding school for too long, as he has already been isolated too long from his family.

6
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: November 29, 2005, 11:19:00 PM »
Why would you say that?  I don't understand why you think I'm covering my ass.  I just don't want him to feel more angry that 80 days of his life was totally wasted.

7
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: November 28, 2005, 02:29:00 PM »
More great advice!  Thanks!  We know the damage that has been done to him, but we also have praised him on the courage and strength it took for him to finish the Redcliff program.  We try to stress that to him, even though we privately believe the program is simply bogus.  We feel it's important for him to NOT to believe it was a total waste of his time, and trust me, that's not easy considering how we truly feel.  It's somewhat like supporting a war, lest the casualties of war will have sacrificed in vain.  We've told him if he could survive Redcliff, there's nothing he can't conquer.  That's about the most we can say to him about it, without being dishonest.

We aren't worried that he would steal from us.  But then we really don't know WHO he is at this point.  The reason we sleep with our wallets and car keys is so we won't unwittingly give him the means to run away.  At this time, we are just "covering the bases" for his own protection.  Of course, he could leave on foot at any time, but we don't want to enable him.  

We'll have good days and bad days, and I'm confident eventually the good will prevail.  It will be a long road.  He seems to do well with his friends so far.  No indication that he's treating them badly.  So that's encouraging.  We'll continue to keep the emotional door open to him if he wants to talk about anything.  I suppose that's not going to happen until he trusts us.  We can wait.  We're not going anywhere.  Eventually he may come to understand we are his advocates.  We are hopeful.

Thanks for helping.  Your support and advice is appreciated.  Who is this Miss Cleo person?  Is she for real?

8
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: November 28, 2005, 11:32:00 AM »
Thanks, Atomic Ant!  What thoughtful and intelligent advice!

We hadn't thought much about what he DOES believe in, mainly because it appears he doesn't believe in much of anything beyond having fun, material possessions and social status.  But surely there must be something there. His mother forced him into Catholicism to assure his continued enrollment in Catholic School, but he has no desire to attend mass, or to practice the religion.  We now have him in public school for the first time, and he loves it.  Actually I had recently researched the Unitarians, as they seem to promote free thinking, and it's about time he is encouraged to have some free thoughts of his own.  It may be just the place for him to be exposed to diverse thoughts, values and ideas.  It's worth pursuing.  Right now his thoughts seem to center around ONLY his immediate "wants".  I'd love to see him do some reading, and Ayn Rand would be an excellent choice to promote some free thinking.  But he sees reading as work, and won't do it.  Our house is practically a library, and we read a lot, so maybe he'll eventually see reading as a leisure activity and pick up a book!

We've given up on trying to explain values and other foreign concepts to him.  He thinks it's just Redcliff chatter, and he's tired of it.  We believed, from his written assignments at Redcliff  and the few letters we received from him, that he was gaining an understanding of these things, but he was just playing the game.  We have accepted that he will only learn these things by example, and hope we can set that example.  He has been told for years that we are evil incarnate, so that will take time.  He knows we are consistent, and that we are always here for him.  Although he is still belligerent, we can sense that he feels very secure here overall.  That's a good start, and probably the best we can expect.  He's tried to blackmail us by saying he wants to return to the place where he had no rules to follow, but in the end he said he would not consider leaving here. We have very simple and reasonable rules.  He has a set bedtime on school nights, we are all expected to be honest and respectful with each other, and if he goes to visit a friend, we have to know their last name and home phone number.  Hardly a gulag situation.  He had a really good day yesterday, and we were encouraged.  His trust has been violated by nearly everyone in his life who supposedly "cared" for him, so it's going to be a huge adjustment.  I believe in time, he will come to trust us, as he sees that we are caring people, and we demonstrate our values in our day-to-day lives.  It's up to him to develop his own values....all we can do is be an example.  It's something that should have been instilled, or at least demonstrated to him throughout his life, but unfortunately we are starting from scratch.

You hit the nail on the head.  He doesn't believe anyone truly loves him, and he believes he's not worthy of being loved.  He told us he expected we would physically abuse him, which is not in our nature to do, nor is it a remote possibility.  But it was his expectation, as this has been his experience in life.  I don't know how long it will take him, if ever, to fully lose that expectation.  I try to empathize, but I can only imagine what he has suffered, and how helpless and alone he must have felt.  Then he was further victimized by being sent to Redcliff, which only served to reinforce that he deserved to be punished for being abused.  All in all, it's amazing that he functions at all.

It sounds like your father is an amazing and insightful man, and his guidance was immeasurable. I'd love to know his methods.  I thought I was such an experienced parent, having raised a family in my previous marriage (and my grown children are simply amazing, thoughtful and kind human beings) but this is a totally new challenge for me, and I can't afford to screw it up.  He is too important.  He IS worth saving, and I love him dearly.  Well, now the tears are coming.  I really want to help shape him in life, without putting him into a mold.  I want him to be able to think for himself, form his own opinions, and he's never been allowed to do that before.  Most of all, I want him to KNOW he is loved, and that he DESERVES to be loved.  We will love him even when he's being a little snot.  We will love him when he makes mistakes.  We may not always like him, but we will love him.  It will take time for him to realize this, I know.  

Thanks so much for the insightful and helpful advice!

9
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: November 26, 2005, 10:36:00 PM »
I'm baffled.  We hadn't experienced this kind of behavior from him in the past.  He underwent an independent and thorough psych evaluation (prior to Redcliff) which determined he was a normal teenager with some valid anger issues.  We now have him in regular ongoing therapy, and I imagine we will for a long time.  

Maybe Redcliff has more success with a child who is deeply troubled, on drugs, etc.  But it was obviously overkill in his situation.  They KNEW his problems didn't warrant his placement there.  It WAS, as the psychologist warned (and Redcliff IGNORED), counterproductive.  

He went in relatively normal and came out a mess.     Magic Wilderness Therapy.  You say you know nothing about Redcliff.  I'm happy to educate you. Basically a child is dropped off there, or the parents arrange for an abduction, the child arrives, is strip searched, blindfolded while being driven to a remote location, and required to hike in the desert all day. They have a weekly session with the therapist in the field.  80 days of living in the desert, eating oats and lentils, isolated from family and friends.  The result is not surprising.  Maybe that's why so many of the kids go on to boarding school.  It's conceivable Redcliff exacerbates their problems, leaving them ill-prepared to return home.

Attempting to set limits is not going to work?  What would you recommend then? No limits?  Isn't that a bit irresponsible?

Thanks for the commentary, but all you said is that the blame doesn't belong with his mother and/or Redcliff (and you can say that knowing NOTHING about Redcliff, which is pretty amazing), and that we will not be able to meet his needs while he lives in our home.  I assume you are suggesting he needs an out-of-the-home placement (which he has just experienced for 80 days, much to his detriment).  We are dedicated to helping him in a loving family/home environment.  We knew it wouldn't be easy, but we weren't prepared for the person he had become while at Redcliff.  

I wasn't really seeking advice, I just wanted to finish the story for the helpful people who had been following it, now that I have solid knowledge of their methods and results.  Our experience with Redcliff was nothing short of disastrous.  Others may have different opinions / experiences.  I'd be happy to hear from any of them, and I hope they will post on this forum.  The more accurate information parents can access, the better decisions thay can make for their children.  Too many are only reading the propaganda.

10
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: November 26, 2005, 02:08:00 PM »
I haven't posted in a long time.  There was so much going on, and we had no luck removing my stepson from Redcliff by legal means.  His mother's permission, and the permission of her 3rd ex-husband (representing himself as the boy's father), along with approximately $31,000 (including the cost of his abduction) was sufficient reason for Redcliff to keep him as long as possible, against my husband's wishes.

FINALLY he did graduate.  It took 80 long days. We went to Utah and attended the parent's seminar.  Trust me, nobody wants to go through that.  It was ongoing hours of listening to Dr. Dan drone on about things that had absolutely no relevance.  I went because I expected them to tell us what to expect, and about aftercare.  Nope, it was just Dr. Dan enjoying hearing himself speak.  People were nodding off.  The boy had his FIRST SHOWER IN 80 DAYS.  It took about 3 weeks to finally chisel all the filth off him.  It's a wonder they didn't all have lice.

Fortunately, one good thing came out of this long saga.  The boy revealed enough about his home life to his therapist there that we were able to gain custody of him.  

We objected to him being sent to Redcliff because it was done without my husband's knowledge or consent, and against the advice of the boy's evaluating psychologist, who said it could be counterproductive.  It was established that all he needed was some regular local counseling to deal with anger issues (and now we know...boy, did he ever have reason to be angry!) and a more stable home environment.  For that, he was abducted by strangers and taken to Utah.  We had never had any problems with him other than him being quite spoiled, and having a sense of entitlement.  

That has sure changed.  We brought him home from Utah, and it has been chaos ever since.  The experience has nearly ruined him.  Of course, he had to enter high school late, so he will likely end up in summer school to attempt to catch up.  But he likes his new school.  Other than that, he hates everything.  He resents having rules to follow (very REASONABLE rules, I might add) and he has blatantly lied to us more times than I can count.  He has gotten into trouble, and he refuses to accept that he is grounded as a consequence of his actions.  Every day is a constant battle.  We've tried to talk to him about the merits of being honest and trustworthy, and he just says that's a bunch of crap, and he doesn't care if he's trustworthy, and why would anybody spend any time thinking about trust?  He is extremely disrespectful and cruel.  He says he is not going to respect the rules, that he shouldn't HAVE any rules, etc.  We read some of his written therapy assignments, in which he says how important trust & truth are, and how he wants to be a better person.  He now admits, he learned to play the Redcliff Game, and knew what was expected of him to make him worthy of graduating.  All the kids learn the game.  He just took longer than average.

Redcliff was advised within a few days of accepting him into their program, that his psychologist warned this was not right for him. They were given a copy of his evaluation.  I told him in a letter that the psychologist said he shouldn't be there, and we were trying to get him out.  Because I did that, I was banned from writing to him.  Now he says his Redcliff therapist told him a different story.  She allegedly told the boy she spoke to his psychologist, and she read the evaluation, and she stressed that he DID say he needed to be there.  We contacted the psychologist and he said he never heard from anyone from Redcliff.  Because he has done nothing but lie since he arrived, I wouldn't be inclined to believe him, but he volunteered the information.  And the therapist had lied to us on at least one occasion that we know of, so who knows what the truth is.

Regardless, I would say to any parent who is considering Redcliff:  Don't buy into the advertising.  Keep in mind that the success statistics they quote on their website were compiled by people who are (directly or indirectly) affiliated with Redcliff (one is actually on their board of directors). Do your research.  It DOES NOT WORK.  In our case, they knowingly accepted a kid who didn't need it, accepted him under false pretenses, refused to allow his father to withdraw him, and turned him into a frighteningly angry young man.  We sleep with our wallets and car keys.  His mother turned her relatively normal son over to Redcliff. He had some very justified anger issues over his home life. She expected them to fix him, when she was the one who needed fixing. After 80 days, we returned home with an extremely angry, unmotivated, sarcastic and cruel young man.  Redcliff is nothing more than a lucrative business, operating at the expense of children and their families, and a feeder program to get kids into even more lucrative boarding schools.  They should be ashamed of themselves.  They feed off the desperation of parents, promising to repair their broken children, and teach them responsibility, accountability, and integrity.  I mentioned integrity the other day, and he said "What is that?".  When I explained, he dismissed it as something he had no interest in. So what DID he learn at Redcliff?  He learned how to build a fire without matches, and he learned how to use a knife.

Even though we told Redcliff that nobody in the family could afford to send him to boarding school....it was NOT an option, they continued to provide him with brochures, and even the field staff told him to keep pressing his parents to let him go on to boarding school (I have the field staff's journal notes to prove it).  That's where the big money is, so they try to lure the kids on board.  The kids don't know any better.  They don't understand it's all a big money making scheme.

So, overall it was one big disaster.  He has been set behind in school, his attitude is frightening, and we have a LONG road ahead of us.  Every day is a new challenge, or a repeat of an old challenge.  Nobody from Redcliff has called to ask how he's doing.  They don't want to know.  They took a good kid and created a monster.  They are still counting the cash.  And we are trying to save a kid they destroyed.

11
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: August 31, 2005, 08:58:00 AM »
Oops.  Did we just feed a troll?

12
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: August 28, 2005, 11:48:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-08-27 21:57:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I spent 50 days at RedCiff and to be honest it might have saved my life.  Its a good program and had a positive effect on all the kids I was there with.  I saw that series 'Brat Camp' with the British kids and their expiriance was pretty much identical to mine so if you've seen that show and still think its abuse then you probably have some mental issues yourself that need to be worked out.  Instead of spouting off about all this 'suffering' and 'cruelty' it causes maybe you should look at some of the huge ammout of good it can do."


I'm glad Redcliff was helpful to you.  May I ask why you were placed at Redcliff?

13
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: August 26, 2005, 09:32:00 PM »
I am sad (understatement) to report that we have NO legal recourse.  As long as the mother signed along with the sicko-wannabe-father, there is nothing we can do.  Redcliff has a MORAL obligation in this, but not a legal one.  And moral doesn't count in anyone's book but ours, and maybe with parents who are considering signing away their own parental rights away to Redcliff. The fact that the child's psychologist determined this was unwarranted, and could be counter-productive (and has proven to be so)is not something Redcliff has a legal obligation to recognize.  As long as someone signs and pays, that's all they need.  We learned that we DO, in fact, have to go to Utah and get a court order to make anything happen.....to even get the records that the NH court says he is entitled to.  Geez, if we only had a couple of months to screw around with this legal stuff, while a child suffers. What a haven Utah is for the Wilderness Therapy Business. This is Day 33 for the boy.  Nobody gives a rat's behind what he is going through.

I have been in contact with a lot of news agencies about this....radio, TV and newspapers...and it will be exposed.

Okay, I'm mad at the world right now.  But I am NOT without resources.  I WILL FIND A WAY to make sure this child has not suffered in vain.  I know, that sounds melodramatic.  Bear with me.  I'm furious, and I'm worried.  An innocent 15 year old child has been shat upon in the worst possible way by his own MOTHER (and sadly she has the legal right to call herself a MOTHER), and we have no recourse.  The courts are heartless.  His mother is heartless and disturbed.  

Now his "mother" says she is going to spring him on the 2nd of September.  Why?  Because that's all his school is willing to allow...beyond that, they can't help him catch up, and he DOES have a minimum legal number of days to attend, even with a private Catholic School (we're not Catholic, he wasn't either.....his mother lied to the Priest to get him converted to assure his continued enrollment in Catholic School, while robbing his college fund to pay for it).  But if he stayed at Redcliff, with the unsatisfactory progress he is reluctantly making, they expect he would be there until late September, or early October before being graduation-worthy.

So, given that he is not going to be allowed to graduate and get the sense of satisfaction that MIGHT give him, why is he staying until the 2nd of September?  Wouldn't it make sense to pull him out now?  No. His "mother" (and each time I am using the term more and more loosely) has PLANS.  She has sailing events at the Yacht Club, and other plans with her boyfriend.  So he must remain in the desert, humiliated and angry.

Family members (hers!) have tried to get her to remove him before any more damage can be done, but she is adamant. She has plans, and she won't be denied her "party time" while her son is not in her "care".  In this case, this means while she flits about and the son's father sends her fat child support checks so she can feed her hairy live-in boyfriend.....while she has given her physical custody away to Redcliff Ascent. If nothing else, she's in for a surprise with regard to the child support.

I have a rhetorical question for anyone familiar with Utah law.  IF a therapist hears directly from a child that the child has been repeatedly exposed to (and possibly the victim of) violence, and is afraid for his (or her) own safety, is that therapist required by law to report it to the authorities? Just "curious".  Simply a rhetorical question.  Anyone know?

We are afraid that September 2nd, when he will be picked up by his "mother", will bring a family tragedy.  And our hands are tied.  

I will keep up my efforts to expose this situation so other parents won't mistakenly think they are somehow protected by having Legal Custody.  Yes, folks, a big business in Utah can take your child against his will, against YOUR will, and you have NO recourse.  They can simply refuse to acknowledge you exist, and refuse to acknowledge there is an authorization in the file that allows you to have information about your child (even if you fax them a copy of it), and refuse to acknowledge you have any custodial rights given by the court in your home state (where the child was BORN, and where the jurisdiction for custody lies).  It's NOT about the children.  It's about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$.

14
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: August 23, 2005, 09:42:00 PM »
Cute, Shortbus.  I needed the laugh today!  Thanks!  Our appointment with our attorney got moved to Thursday, so we're in limbo until then, while a child waits in the desert.  Limbo is a rotten place.  Like Purgatory.  Maybe I should change my handle to REDCLIFFSBIGGESTPAININTHEBUTT.  More accurate!

15
Brat Camp / Redcliffer
« on: August 22, 2005, 10:23:00 PM »
Update on Dr. Russell.  He's now at the University of New Hampshire. I'm confused that he's been doing all this research with positive outcomes for wilderness therapy, yet one of the Univ. of NH Alumnus had this comment to make about him joining UNH:

 <<
I am more than a little disturbed to be told that my school wastes the money necessary to maintain Keith Russell and to give him the implied credibility of "assistant professor" in the make-believe science of kinesiology; but it's good that somebody is pointing out the failure of the therapeutic education "boot camp" fad. In my opinion they are mostly job opportunities for otherwise unemployable psyche majors and their products are mostly stronger, more self-confident sociopaths.>>>

I wasn't aware he had done anything to point out the failure of the programs he had researched.  Maybe if I keep digging deeply enough, I'll find it somewhere.  This guy was a bit rough on him.  I hope he was able to reply.  I'd love to know if his feelings about wilderness therapy have changed.  I haven't found anything recent that he's done for the OBHIC.  I think 2003 was the most recent.

Pages: [1] 2