Home » Politics » US Politics » White House Insider: Eric Holder Is Gonna Fall
White House Insider: Eric Holder Is Gonna Fall
Published by Ulsterman on May 9, 2011 in US Politics
The second half of our April 28th interview with our longtime D.C. Insider.
Note: This is the second part of a two part communication with our D.C. Insider. The first part was titled Obama’s West Wing Civil War. Just prior to the second part being published, the events surrounding the death of Osama Bin Laden broke, including Insider’s explosive behind the scenes details of a quasi operational coup within the administration. The details contained in this update were understandably delayed from publication due to the Osama Bin Laden news. It is a somewhat lengthy read – but informative.
______________
…He called out the real Valerie Jarrett inside the White House. He showed the staff who she really is. And he is still there standing. That message will not be lost to those in and around the West Wing. It’s a pretty damn remarkable turn of events. I probably ain’t doing it justice in my telling of it, but it’s huge. Rahm was pushed out like a dog. Bill Daley is still holding strong.
Don’t think Jarrett is giving up though. That lady will fight back. Bet on it. Obama is gonna be on the road campaigning 24/7 in the coming months, leaving Jarrett and Daley to square off in creating policy. Those two are gonna be at each other’s throats. My money’s on Bill Daley. If he can help send Jarrett packing, he will be doing this country a huge favor. Huge.
Q: Can you repeat what you told me before – how Richard Daley stepping down and Bill Daley coming to the White House, and then Rahm Emanuel becoming Chicago’s Mayer. How all of that relates back directly to Valerie Jarrett and Barack Obama. You connected those dots better than anyone else I’ve heard from, but you didn’t want to publish it before. Can we share that now? What you said regarding that?
A: I won’t allow you to publish it. I WANT you to publish it. And I want to qualify that by explaining to you that I am running without fear now. I am not alone here. This has become much bigger than me, or the group of us that were working prior to the Midterms We are in every good hands now, and this thing has a real possibility of seeing the kind of outcome I thought impossible just a few months ago. And don’t get hung up on people believing or not believing what we are discussing here. That is not the point of this. As I told you some time ago, the real motivation of this operation is letting those know who are watching that we are also watching, and that no amount of effort on their part is going to fully prevent the truth from getting out there. And I am being absolutely honest with you when I say that at no other time since we began this have I been so confident in our eventual success.
Now getting back to your question about Richard Daley stepping down, Rahm stepping in, and Bill Daley’s entrance into the Obama administration, it is foolish for anyone to not think all of that is no connected to something far greater than simply political repositioning. You have already reported on the Jarrett-Richard Daley connection, so no need for me to get you up to speed on that. What you might not know is that Richard Daley had something of a falling out with Jarrett, and by default, the Obama’s prior to Obama becoming a U.S. Senator. Now when it comes to Chicago politics, the Daley machine owns all of it. Everything. This includes information – every kind of information, on anyone of political importance in and around Chicago. When Obama went “national” as a Senator, Jarrett’s influence went national right along with it, right. By then she was the primary guide for Barack Obama’s political career. Every decision went to her, through her, and ultimately had to be approved by her. Obama did nothing without her approval. This has largely continued to this day in the White House, though as I just indicated, Bill Daley is fighting to alter that arrangement. So what happens when the great keeper of Chicago secrets, Richard Daley, announces he is stepping down? A huge power vacuum that sent the Obama White House into panic mode. Daley had a working agreement with Obama and Jarrett to keep a lid on the “unsavory” details related to each of them. Details stemming from years working among the most powerful and corrupt forces in Chicago politics, including Daley himself. And while many dislike the man that is Richard Daley, none will dispute that when a deal is made, he holds to it. And he has held to his deal with Jarrett and Obama. Almost every avenue investigated against those two has been effectively shut down in Chicago. With Daley’s departure as mayor, that will no longer be so easily accomplished, and the figure now in control of that apparatus is none other than disgruntled former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
Q: I have been told by others that Rahm’s voyage back to Chicago was coordinated by the Jarrett White House to continue keeping those secrets you speak of under wraps. That seems like a very strong possibility to me. You are stating that is not the case?
A: Not only is that not the case, but it is among the single greatest concerns currently being dealt with by Jarrett and White House operations. That is to say, keeping an eye on Rahm Emanuel in Chicago. That scenario you lay out, the idea that Jarrett sent Rahm back to Chicago, is a superficial ruse by Jarrett meant to keep the donors and their concerns minimized. Nobody wants to make a substantial investment on a horse with a bad leg. I have detailed to you the conflicts between Rahm Emanuel and Valerie Jarrett. Money and resources were spent against Rahm’s campaign by the Obama people. Rahm then received support, very important support, from two powerful allies. One was political machine of outgoing mayor Richard Daley. The other was from Bill Clinton. But I am not quite prepared to relate the Clinton connections as they relate to Chicago because that may compromise what is still underway.
And then of course you have Richard Daley’s brother Bill being placed within the Obama West Wing as new Chief of Staff. That decision was not Jarrett’s. I have told you that already. There is a trap being built around both Jarrett and Obama and they certainly are aware of that now. Once we get Holder out of the DOJ, the cracks will really begin to appear. The DOJ is holding off every significant inroad against Jarrett and Obama at the moment. But that situation is temporary. Holder is going to find himself in some very serious legal trouble shortly. He may survive it, but I would consider that outcome likely. He cut off the NBP case. Held it off long enough to do so. Ok then. We have moved on to the next scenario and this time we have much greater help in pushing this one through.
Q: And then back to Chicago?
A: And then back to Chicago, yes. As I have always said. The big difference now are these two theatres are working almost simultaneously, so once the first wall is breached, the second should fall far faster than we were initially thinking.
Q: Wall?
A: Sorry, speaking figuratively there. Sort of. Mean to say that once one event happens, which will be Holder related the protection coming out of Chicago will likely collapse much faster as well. Dominoes might have been a better term to use.
Q: What part does the Blago trial play in all of this?
A: The Blago trial is a very big Domino. The forces being used against him are a very big wall. He will cut a deal. Some kind of deal. No doubt about that. The trial itself and its outcome are not the critical component to all of this. It’s important, but it won’t decide the outcome one way or the other. Ask yourself this though. Those tapes. The Blago tapes of his phone conversations that the Feds are using to try and convict. Why was that taping cut short? Or were they? The spin was that the Feds moved in to charge Blago, maybe a bit early, right? They exposed the operation before they had enough to easily convict, right? Why did they do that? Or did they?
Q: What do you mean “Or did they?”
A: What if the Feds actually didn’t stop the investigation too early? What if those tapes have all they needed to easily convict Blago and more? A federal investigation is normally a very slow and deliberate process, but in this one, it came out very quickly, charges were filed, and then soon after, concerns about possibly having stopped the taping of the Blago phone conversations too early started to be disseminated by the media. The media was simply regurgitating what was being forwarded to them via the Feds, at least those few involved with the Blago case. Why would Federal prosecutors start putting out a view that they may have stopped recording Blago’s conversations too early even before the trial was underway? Why do that?
Q: I have no idea. They are admitting incompetence? Trying to get ahead of a story of then possibly losing the trial?
A: That’s what they want you to think. I’ll say it again. What if they actually had not stopped the recording of the conversations too early? What if those tapes have information directly tying the Obama administration to the charges being levied against Blago? What if both Valerie Jarrett and Barack Obama were complicit in the alleged crime and those tapes prove it? And what if one of the primary tasks of Eric Holder was to squash any and all investigations within the Department of Justice that would make that connection? What if Federal prosecutors were working under extreme pressure to withhold any and all evidence directly linking Valerie Jarrett and the president to the investigation? And what if, once Eric Holder was forced to resign, the dynamics of the political firewall were essentially destroyed? This entire administration is then under the assault of the truth. And the questions won’t stop at the Blago related material. And it won’t stop at Holder’s Department of Justice workings. And it won’t stop at those actions taken since Barack Obama became President of the United States. Those questions, and the eventual answers, will go back to Chicago, back to both Obama and Jarrett. That is, if we ultimately successful with what we are attempting to pull off. You have seen an uptick in the some negative press related to the Obama administration. If things are going well for us, you should note an even greater increase in such coverage over the next month or so. Some very powerful hands are now pushing this rock up the hill. It’s a long, steep climb, but it’s getting done, which is a hell of lot more than I could say not so long ago.
Q: Is Trump helping with this? Donald Trump – is he playing a part? You starting pushing him as a possible candidate and initially I thought you were crazy to do so, but I have to admit that soon after he was making a huge move in the polls and is now enemy #1 among the media. Are you connected to the Trump phenomena in any way?
A: Not exactly. I was simply aware he was going to make noise and given his celebrity, and resources, considered him at the time the most viable threat to Obama politically. And frankly, I feel comfortably saying I was proven right. Donald Trump forced the birther issue onto the mainstream, and because of that, Valerie Jarrett knew they had to release a birth certificate to nullify the momentum that issue was creating.
Q: Why do you say it like that? You say “a birth certificate” instead of the birth certificate. I have learned nothing you say is without a reason – so what’s the reason for that specific choice of words?
A: Let’s move on from that subject for now. I won’t go there at the moment, ok? But I will talk Trump. Why I was pushing him…
Q: Ok – but does that mean you’re not pushing him anymore?
A: Not necessarily. I am open to anyone and anything that will help to put a political end to the Obama White House. Donald Trump…look at how he is being attacked now. That is proof positive he is considered a serious threat. I would support a Trump campaign. Absolutely. I would support a Hillary Clinton campaign. Most certainly. God how I wish she was willing to make that kind of move. The fact is though, at this point…at this time, I am willing to work for anyone who can defeat Obama. And I am. When I speak of we – when I let you know I’m not the only one involved in trying to secure at the very least a real choice for 2012 – we aren’t all Democrats. There are Republicans involved. There are business leaders now involved – some of them who like me, strongly supported the president back in 2008 but have since been shocked and dismayed to see just how inept and dangerous he is to this country…(Long pause) There is something I have wanted to reveal to you but always pulled back because I was never quite certain of it’s a basis in reality. It was a rumor, or even a rumor of a rumor back in 2008 that at the time I laughed off as stupid conspiracy bullshit. Ironically the kind of description a lot of people probably label your publishing of our little talks as. Remember when I told you about the “McCain the campaign” strategy that the Democrats, working in conjunction with certain media figures, pulled off during the Republican primaries? How we actually worked to make John McCain the nominee?
Q: Yes. What about it?
A: That was only half the equation. At least that’s how it was presented to me. I know about the “McCain the campaign” strategy first hand. I played a bigger role in that than I originally revealed to you. But the other part…that’s not my world. I don’t know if what I was told was legit or just…at the time it was crazy. But then…damned if it didn’t happen. Thing is, for it to happen would have taken help by Republicans at the time.
Q: Ok – get to it then. What happened? Or what were you told happened?
A: The collapse. The economic collapse in the fall of 2008. Before that what was the biggest subject during the early parts of the campaign? It wasn’t the economy, it was the war. It was foreign policy. Now I know this because I saw the internals from both sides. That was the issue that had both camps, the McCain and the Obama teams, being told to work on. That of course favored McCain, and those same internals were showing that to be the fact. Barack Obama, like most other areas, had almost no experience in foreign policy, and the campaign team went through scenario after scenario trying to figure out how to minimize that situation. Nothing worked. Historically, if the voters are concerned about foreign policy, concerned about safety, law enforcement, military strength – who do they vote for?
Republicans.
A: Exactly. And that is what every internal was coming back to us with, and it had the higher ups in the campaign very concerned to the point of panic. So…something had to be done. The dynamic had to altered.
Q: Stop for a minute. If foreign policy was the primary concern, why would the Democrats have helped secure McCain as the Republican nominee if that was his strength? Wouldn’t that be a huge mistake?
A: Great question. And you’re absolutely right – it was a terrible miscalculation by the Obama camp. We thought the war would prove unpopular enough that McCain would get hammered on it. He’s not a strong public speaker, and the campaign team was convinced that the Senator, – then Senator Obama, would be able to strike political gold on that. It didn’t pan out. The surge was working, McCain had the foreign policy credentials, and the Obama campaign was scrambling to redefine what the defining issue would be in November. I was told there would be a change in the economy. Not by chance. A directed change in the economy. And the first time I heard this, the primary battle between Clinton and Obama was still going strong.
Q: How would that be possible?
A: That’s what I said back then. Having the media push McCain as the nominee – that I understood. Both sides had initiated that kind of maneuvering before. But to alter the economy…that seemed…unlikely to me at the time. But that is what they did.
Q: Who?
A; Right. Who? It had to be somebody with a lot of influence in both political parties, because the Republicans in power at the time were the ones to get the ball moving in the direction the Obama people needed. What I can say for certain is that big money – very big money, was rolling into the Obama campaign by then. The investment had been made, and their boy needed to be the next president to get a full return on that investment, right? It sounds crazy. Yeah – I know. Believe me, I ignored the talk. The rumors, and I just did my job. But then it happened. The market crashed, and overnight, the national dialogue turned almost entirely onto the economy. Obama’s polling jumped. McCain dropped and he never recovered. Bear Stearns…that was – I believe that was intentional to favor either Hillary or Obama. I really do. I don’t have verification of it…the people who could do that kind of thing live in a world far away from my own, but that is what I think, and even back then, the thought crossed my mind and stayed there. And after Bear Stearns, after Obama was the nominee, we saw the collapse in the fall of 2008 – a classic October surprise. There was nothing the McCain campaign could do to win that election. Nothing – and we all knew it. The economy had been made the defining issue of the election – just as I had earlier been told it would.
Q: Hold on here…you are saying Republicans – people in the Republican Party, helped to elect Barack Obama? That they were in on this plan? That’s outrageous and seems very improbable. Sorry, but this scenario you’re laying out…it’s crazy.
A: Yeah – it is. But why are you so willing to believe when Democrats are playing dirty politics, but not Republicans? Open your eyes. I was told they were going to make the economy the issue to decide the campaign. Prior to the economic crash that seemed highly unlikely. The economy was hurting, there were certainly some warning signs, but before September and October 2008, it didn’t look anywhere close to what eventually happened.
Do you remember Bear Stearns? It was bailed out in the spring of 2008 – when the primary races were still going on. Do you know who initiated that bailout? There was involvement by the Bush administration of course – but who initiated the actual bailout? Who directed it?
Q: I don’t know. Who?
A: Don’t feel bad – most people couldn’t answer that question. It’s that kind of ignorance that allows political operatives to keep spinning the machine around and around. People tune out. Most don’t really want to know the answers.
Q: So who initiated the bailout?
A: Timothy Geithner – our current Secretary of the Treasury. A guy who has mishandled his position at Treasury since day one…yet there he remains.
Q: Geithner wasn’t Secretary of the Treasury in spring of 2008…that was—(interrupted)
A: Right…he wasn’t Secretary of the Treasury in 2008. He was Chairman of the New York Federal Reserve. And it was in that position Timothy Geithner initiated the bailout of Bear Stearns – its cannibalization by rival JP Morgan, and the use of tens of billions in Federal Reserve funding to do so. Geithner testified before a Senate committee shortly after the bailout and defended it as essential to saving the economy. He stated that if the saving of Bear Stearns had not occurred, the stock market and housing prices would fall dramatically.
Q: So? You’re losing me here. What does this have to do with the economy – the campaign, in 2008?
A: It has everything to do with it. I didn’t connect it all then, but I do now. It’s been explained to me in terms I could understand, by someone who would certainly have been in the position to know. Part of the “We” I refer to regarding defeating Obama in 2012. Give me a chance here – I will do my best to explain my understanding of it.
So Timothy Geithner, as Chairman of the New York Federal Reserve, with assistance from Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke, and then-Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson, himself the former head of Goldman Sachs. The same Goldman Sachs that would later donate a million dollars to the Obama campaign and help elect him President of the United States. These are investors we are talking about here – you understand what I’m saying, right? And do you know who donated almost $800,000 to the Obama campaign? JP Morgan – the same institution Timothy Geithner helped to acquire Bear Stearns at a rock bottom rate with an additional $30 billion dollar credit line via the Federal Reserve. Are you keeping up now?
I’m with you – keep going.
A: So we have Timothy Geithner and the Federal Reserve, acting in conjunction with some of the largest and most powerful financial institutions working to, if Geithner’s testimony at the time is to be believed, “saving the American economy.” And these same financial institutions then begin to funnel millions in campaign contributions to the Obama campaign. Then fast forward to the fall of 2008. What happened then?
I don’t know. Just keep talking and if I have a question I’ll let you know.
A: Lehman Brothers. In September of 2008, at a time when John McCain is still edging out Barack Obama many of the national polls, Lehman Brothers is allowed to collapse. Unlike Bear Stearns, the Federal Reserve does not intervene. Nor does Paulson from Treasury. Lehman Brothers collapses, and the entire financial system freezes up. The stock market tumbles, John McCain is caught flat footed, while the Obama campaign, its campaign messaging, appears as if was prepared ahead of time for the collapse. McCain drops in the polls, Obama rises, and a man the country hardly knows anything about, is elected President of the United States. And who is then made Secretary of the Treasury – none other than the same man who saved one financial institution, while ignoring another – an act that directly benefited the campaign of the man who would then place him in one of the most powerful and influential positions in the world. And despite numerous blunders, Timothy Geithner remains in that position to this day. Another keeper of secrets.
And what followed after that? Billions and billions in funds to these financial institutions. Easy money policies. Broad expansion of Federal Reserve powers. One hand washed the other…
Q: You make the Obama administration sound like big money Republicans.
A: That’s a stupid thing to say. Power doesn’t discriminate between one political party over the other. I’ve seen that proven true so many times I can’t recall when it wasn’t a fact of my own life, such as it is. Big money deemed Obama was to be their candidate of choice because he was likely the most open to policies that would make them the greatest profit and enjoy the most influence. I also believe they thought him to be easily controlled. They were partly right. Barack Obama is easily controlled, but what they failed to recognize, is that Valerie Jarrett is not. She has been molding Obama in her own political likeness for too long to allow others to alter the course she has set out for him. That b-tch has been off the Democratic Party reservation since day one. Day one!
Jarrett is Obama’s greatest weakness though. His vulnerability. Valerie Jarrett – she has burned so many bridges in the financial community. So many in the business community. Her Chicago version of government-business cooperation has not been well received outside of Chi-town. And so, some of those former big money donors are seeking alternative political investment to Obama. Not all of them – not yet. But some. And the knowledge they have to what is going on inside the Obama White House is…impressive.
First up is Eric Holder. He is gonna fall. Watch for Holder news – it’s coming. They are gonna fight hard to keep him in there. He’s done a hell of a job keeping the lid on so much sh-t. But that’s about to change. I ain’t saying I trust Issa, but it’s been explained to me that he knows that he’s doing and it’s getting done. So ok…I’ll see if that’s the case. Then it’s on to 2012 with the information in hand that will be the result of Holder stepping down from the DOJ. It’s gonna be a race to get it out there before the election, but we sure as hell are gonna try. And even if Obama manages to get his re-election, we will cripple him politically…we will trip him up enough, that his second term will be nowhere near the threat to the country that this one has been. And he may not be able to complete that second term. The information that will be forced into the hands of the media, the people, the party leaders, the donors…the man thinks he’s under political pressure now? Just wait. They made a big mistake, and we got them. We got them…
__________
Part One of this interview found here:
http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-polit ... civil-war/Read more:
http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-polit ... z1MzvCVklh
Show Posts