Fornits

General Interest => Open Free for All => Topic started by: TheWho on March 07, 2008, 01:44:51 PM

Title: WhoSpam Junk Bin
Post by: TheWho on March 07, 2008, 01:44:51 PM
So, you are against Awareness Training? Why?
 :guesswho:
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anne Bonney on March 07, 2008, 02:19:51 PM
Quote from: "Guest"
So, you are against Awareness Training? Why?


Newage bullshit, cult-like tactics.

LGATs:

http://skepdic.com/lgsap.html (http://skepdic.com/lgsap.html)


http://www.freedomofmind.com/resourcece ... /landmark/ (http://www.freedomofmind.com/resourcecenter/groups/l/landmark/)


http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?opti ... &Itemid=12 (http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=957&Itemid=12)


http://www.rickross.com/groups/landmark.html (http://www.rickross.com/groups/landmark.html)
Title: Whospam1
Post by: TheWho on March 07, 2008, 02:25:54 PM
Quote from: "Guest Wants to know"
Quote from: "SettleForNothingLess"
Doing research and through my own personal journey, not every program is bad. A LOT most surely are, but there are some that I do believe to be helpful. It seems like most are against ANY program whatsoever.

Discuss this with me?

Settel For Nothing Less,
Could you tell readers which programs you believe are "helpful?" and where you did your research to find such helpful programs?   Can you list these helpful programs?

Lets not start listing programs please.  I have always watched it end in a war.  This is a good discussion which may produce some new thought or perspective. Awareness training I had never thought to be a bad thing a guy named Leo Buscaglia had enormous positive feed back from the use "love thy enemies" i think?  I could see how it could be misused, but Awareness training isnt all bad.
 :guesswho:
Title: Whospam1
Post by: psy on March 07, 2008, 02:28:01 PM
Quote from: "Guest"
So, you are against Awareness Training? Why?
 :guesswho:
I knew you wouldn't keep your word.  Be gone!

(http://http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/b/bb/Urband.jpg)
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anne Bonney on March 07, 2008, 02:28:19 PM
Quote from: "Guest2"
I could see how it could be misused, but Awareness training isnt all bad.  In my opinion



FTFY

 ;D
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 02:34:54 PM
Oh please LGAT is a bunch of crap.  Anyone in their right mind knows that.  It's about making money first and foremost.  Go to Rick Ross and read up about the fraudulent LGAT industry.
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anne Bonney on March 07, 2008, 02:40:55 PM
Quote from: "psy"
Quote from: "Guest"
So, you are against Awareness Training? Why?
 :guesswho:
I knew you wouldn't keep your word.  Be gone!


I KNEW it!!!

Moronic dickhead.
(http://http://smileys.smilchat.net/smileys/argue/tatete.gif)
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 02:45:57 PM
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Guest2"
I could see how it could be misused, but Awareness training isnt all bad.  In my opinion



FTFY

 ;D

Yes, this is a discussion, so it is all our opinons.  I dont see a need to put this after each response.
 :guesswho:
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 02:51:13 PM
Quote from: "GTYYU"
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Guest2"
I could see how it could be misused, but Awareness training isnt all bad.  In my opinion



FTFY

 ;D



Yes, this is a discussion, so it is all our opinons.  I dont see a need to put this after each response.

FLAG ON THE PLAY?
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anne Bonney on March 07, 2008, 02:51:36 PM
Quote from: "GTYYU"
Yes, this is a discussion, so it is all our opinons.  I dont see a need to put this after each response.

Ok.  I do.

(http://http://smileys.smilchat.net/smileys/happy/partytime.gif)
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 02:53:10 PM
Quote from: "ZenAgent"
Time-definitive residential is a big start - acute care for stabilization, not indefinite incarceration for the sake of profit.

One of the big issues I have read here is not having an end point.  I wholeheartedly think there should be a time limit impossed.
 :guesswho:
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anne Bonney on March 07, 2008, 02:54:41 PM
Quote from: "OHTWHE"
FLAG ON THE PLAY?


What?
Title: Whospam1
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 03:12:38 PM
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "OHTWHE"
FLAG ON THE PLAY?


What?

I thought Psy was going to tag it.
Title: moar WhoSpam
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 03:22:31 PM
Quote from: "SettleForNothingLess"
Doing research and through my own personal journey, not every program is bad. A LOT most surely are, but there are some that I do believe to be helpful. It seems like most are against ANY program whatsoever.

Discuss this with me?

It is a natural reaction to be touting that all programs are bad if you personally had a bad experience with them.  If you had a good experience you would probably be thinking they are all good.  But logic dictates that it probably lies somewhere in between.  They are not all bad or all good.   There is no way that each school can be effective for everyone.  As time goes on I think we will see more and more specialty schools the same way we have seen less and less General practitioners and more and more specialists in the medical field.  Seems a reasonalble path.
 :guesswho:
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 04:56:58 PM
Parents fought hard for due process and like the person above stated, we do have that now for our kids.  If parents take the extra time they need get outside help they can figure out which places are not good for there kid and find a good placement.
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 05:27:36 PM
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Hinni"
Parents fought hard for due process and like the person above stated, we do have that now for our kids.  If parents take the extra time they need get outside help they can figure out which places are not good for there kid and find a good placement.

No, the KIDS need to have due process, not the parents OVER the kids.

Silly Whobit

(I'm guessing)

So you are suggesting a new law, thats cool.  But until then we need to live by the ones we have, parents need to have the power to send their kids to the school of their choosing.  Catholic, public, private boarding school, home school etc.
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 05:38:22 PM
Just schools.  The provisions doesnt cover a parent from them sending a child to boot camps or abuse pits.  Boarding schools fall under the provision and home schooling.  Parents need to do what they feel is right for their kids.  Many families homeschooled their kids before the law was passed and maybe that was legally wrong but the families felt it was in the bet interst of their child.  Eventually the laws coaught up, so I can see new laws in the future like you suggested but the parents need to act today
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 05:48:49 PM
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Quote from: "Hinni"
Just schools.  The provisions doesnt cover a parent from them sending a child to boot camps or abuse pits.  Boarding schools fall under the provision and home schooling.  Parents need to do what they feel is right for their kids.  Many families homeschooled their kids before the law was passed and maybe that was legally wrong but the families felt it was in the bet interst of their child.  Eventually the laws coaught up, so I can see new laws in the future like you suggested but the parents need to act today


Uh huh, but we're not talking about regular boarding schools.  We're talking aobut places like ASR, WWASPS programs and in general any of them that use LGATs, levels, monitored parent/child communication etc. etc. etc. etc.

We are talking about due process.  That applies to ASR, WASPS, Boarding schools homeschooling, public school catholic school etc.  all of them.  Some parents feel Catholic school would be better than WASPS, others feel their kids would do better in AASR or a boarding school.  The parents have been given the right to choose what is best.  That is the right they have fought for and won.
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anne Bonney on March 07, 2008, 05:55:57 PM
Good for them, sucks for the kids.
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 06:03:29 PM
Sux for the kids{/quote]

Some of them it does, but thats the way it is until here are new laws.  My friends daughter hated wearing those rediculous dresses in catholic school, she want to go to public school were she could dress in jeans, not wear a bra if she felt like it, but here parents made the decision.  Suxs until she is 18.
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 06:05:52 PM
Quote from: "Hinni"
Sux for the kids{/quote]

Some of them it does, but thats the way it is until here are new laws.  My friends daughter hated wearing those rediculous dresses in catholic school, she want to go to public school were she could dress in jeans, not wear a bra if she felt like it, but here parents made the decision.  Suxs until she is 18.

Fuck off, you illiterate douche.
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anne Bonney on March 07, 2008, 06:08:51 PM
Quote from: "Redbone"
Quote from: "Hinni"
Sux for the kids{/quote]

Some of them it does, but thats the way it is until here are new laws.  My friends daughter hated wearing those rediculous dresses in catholic school, she want to go to public school were she could dress in jeans, not wear a bra if she felt like it, but here parents made the decision.  Suxs until she is 18.

Fuck off, you illiterate douche.

Seconded.






Well, assuming you were talking to him.
(http://http://www.clicksmilies.com/s1106/grinser/grinning-smiley-001.gif)
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 06:13:48 PM
Is Hinni the who?

Wow, say that phrase 3 times fast.
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 06:20:31 PM
Quote from: "anonER"
Is Hinni the who?

Wow, say that phrase 3 times fast.




It might.  Anne always gets pissed off and starts using words like fuck off and kiss my ass after she tangles with who.  Fun to watch, she loves getting her butt kicked.
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anne Bonney on March 07, 2008, 06:25:03 PM
Gee.  I guess you really put me in my place, huh?  Wow.  I bow to your superior wit.


(http://http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/rolleyes008.gif)
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 06:36:50 PM
Quote from: "Redbone"
Quote from: "Hinni"
Sux for the kids{/quote]

Some of them it does, but thats the way it is until here are new laws.  My friends daughter hated wearing those rediculous dresses in catholic school, she want to go to public school were she could dress in jeans, not wear a bra if she felt like it, but here parents made the decision.  Suxs until she is 18.

Fuck off, you illiterate douche.

That was uncalled for, so I dont use spell check or I write to fast sum times. My ideas still come across and that is what is important,
Title: moar WhoSpam2
Post by: psy on March 07, 2008, 06:47:01 PM
Quote from: "Anne Bonney"
Gee.  I guess you really put me in my place, huh?  Wow.  I bow to your superior wit.


(http://http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/rolleyes008.gif)

Please stop feeding TheWho
Title: moar whoSpam3
Post by: Anonymous on March 07, 2008, 07:09:17 PM
We are talking about due process.  That applies to ASR, WASPS, Boarding schools homeschooling, public school catholic school etc.  all of them.  Some parents feel Catholic school would be better than WASPS, others feel their kids would do better in AASR or a boarding school.  The parents have been given the right to choose what is best.  That is the right they have fought for and won.
Ha,Ha,Ha,
 :guesswho: