Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Paul St. John

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
61
Open Free for All / Land of the Free
« on: October 04, 2003, 08:45:00 PM »

62
Open Free for All / [Humor] How do you....
« on: October 04, 2003, 08:42:00 PM »
How Do You Catch a Unique Rabbit?

Unique Up On It.

 

How Do You Catch a Tame Rabbit?

Tame Way, Unique Up On It.

 

How Do Crazy People Go Through The Forest?

They Take The Psycho Path

 

How Do You Get Holy Water?

You Boil The Hell Out Of It.

 

What Do Fish Say When They Hit a Concrete Wall?

Dam!

 

What Do Eskimos Get From Sitting On The Ice too Long?

Polaroid's

 

What Do You Call a Boomerang That Doesn't work?

A Stick.

 

What Do You Call Cheese That Isn't Yours?

Nacho Cheese.

 

What Do You Call Santa's Helpers?

Subordinate Clauses.

 

What Do You Call Four Bullfighters In Quicksand?

Quatro Sinko.

 

What Do You Get From a Pampered Cow?

Spoiled Milk.

 

What Do You Get When You Cross a Snowman With a Vampire?

Frostbite.

 

What Lies At The Bottom Of The Ocean And Twitches?

A Nervous Wreck.

 

What Kind Of Coffee Was Served On The Titanic?

Sanka.

 

Why Did Pilgrims' Pants Always Fall Down?

Because They Wore Their Belt Buckle On Their Hat.

 

What's The Difference Between a Bad Golfer And a Bad Skydiver?

A Bad Golfer Goes, Whack, Dang!

A Bad Skydiver Goes Dang! Whack.

 

How Are a Texas Tornado And a Tennessee Divorce The Same?

Somebody's Gonna Lose A Trailer

63
Elan School / Hey.. If you wanna check it out.. ~Fuck Elan $chool~
« on: October 01, 2003, 01:43:00 AM »
http://www.angelfire.com/ultra/ph_ck_elan_school


ain't much.. links to message/e-mail list


Paul St. John

64
Elan School / Hey Syn...
« on: September 27, 2003, 06:01:00 PM »
Can you email me those firts few chapters of that book that Dan promotes.


Thanks,
Paul St. John

65
Elan School / About the Law Suits
« on: September 25, 2003, 12:58:00 AM »
Sure is a lot of talk about the law suits.  I just wanted to add, in case nobody has thought of it, that besides the residents suing, there is also a case for all the parents.  I cannot imagine a more clear-cut case of fraud.

.. don t know the statute of limitations on fraud myself.


Hell, there is no statute on murder.. too bad that doesn t apply to the murder of spirits, and minds.


Paul

66
Elan School / If there was one thing I hated..
« on: September 25, 2003, 12:44:00 AM »
It was the anoying voices of some of those minions, as they screamed, and whined the reality that thye had concieved with the help of the program.

Ahhhh...


How tiring.. I remember thinking.. " Fuck man.  I am 16 years old, I should really not have to deal with idiots like this until I at least have my own children.

I hated those damn minions.. They d ofetn come in a pack, and they d latch right onto you and start working thier mojo as best as they could.  They were all so scared, or some just stupid, but pretended that they had seen the light..


seen the light, as they sell you out, and profit off of your pain..

bunch of fucking vultures.. all in there to eat eachother up.

and those counselors.. man...

Boy did they have some power round there?

People said their names the way Five- years olds would say " BatMan", or

how those hard, hard, hard core Christains would say God.


We use to have a rule that was called " Don't abuse house rules."

meaning do not use the many bullshit terms in vein or in humor..

" Oh.. Okay.. Assholes.

I ll make a note of that.


I ll do whatever the fuck you want with your house rules.. You don t like it?  Then kick me the fuck out of your house already!"

LOL

OMG!  What an annoying day it was...  that one day that seemed to spread through months.. cause it really was all like one big fcking day.. Nothing ever got accomplished.

Closed house, Open house, this person's shot down, that person's shot down..

LOL!! I think I spent nearly half my time there shotdown..
I started to like working in the kitchen though, which was often the job given to the shotdown. The job I had to do was literally imposiible ... clean and dry the dishes for like 60 people in a few minutes, and then dry them.. Somehow I learned to do it.. Go figure!!!

LOL!! This is how stupid the idiots that worked in this joint were.  They use to give use napkins to dry the tissues.. we would go thorugh like a bag a meal.. I suggested dish towels.. I think they trhought taht Iw as crazy.

Hey waht the fuck!!! Keep buying towels!!! Afterall, it is not their money!!!!!


One of my greatest successes in that place was that I got out of there without ever once, assaulting anyone.


Paul St. John

67
Elan School / It's all about the broken will..
« on: September 23, 2003, 12:48:00 AM »
It's all about a broken will.. That is what it comes down to.  That is what these programs operate on.  Most people here probably already know that.

The fucked up thing is that most other people don't .  I went to Daytop, Elan's predecessor.

Daytop kids, or clones, if you like, go to schools all over my area and preach to teens.  They stop a day in class, and have Daytop residents of status come in and talk to kids, in classes..  LOL!

Like they are the good guys, or they have some specail knowledge or something.


What exactly do they preach to all these classes, when they have no idea what they are talking about?  They are nothing more then either brainwashed or good actors, but that is the way it goes sometimes, I guess.

Hell, Elan got a commendation from the State for making a CD-Rom, that spread awareness of itself, as if spreading their stupidtity makes them great benefactors to society or something.

We all know.  We all post it here all the time.

Noone else does though.. or few anyway.. It s fucked up, I think, really.

A year or so after I got out of Daytop, I was working cooking food at a health fair, and,lol, Daytop had a booth there, from which they were "spreading awareness".

Can you imagine that?

Funniest fucking thing too.  When I was there, in daytop, there was this unhappy bitch named Lyn.  She went in there as one of the worst.. Obnoxious, and hard to control.  The counselors did not like her very much, and to be honest, neather did I!
But she broke quickly, and easily started becoming one of the "good guys"  She focussed more and more of her unhappiness into being an asshole for a "good cause", and then she was loved by the status, and counselors.. She was trust-worthy in their eyes.

Anyway, I saw her there.. The fucking bitch came up to buy food from me. I was nice to her.. I hadn t seen her in so long, and to be honest, never thought that I would ever see one of those people again.  I said," hey Lyn, what's up?  You a coordinator now?"  I knew she would be!! ( Feel bad for the residents who had her as a coordinator)  She very proudly said, "yes", as though she had some otherwordly greatness above me and everyone else in the vicinity.

Well, anyway, I had a huge line, and just asked her thos quesytions, as I fixxed her food.  LOL!!

Check this shit out!! The bitch then starts to confront me on the line, with my line full of customers, right behind her.  The lady I was working with could not even belive what she had witnessed.  She's like, " Who the fuck would say shit like that? "

I thought, " LOL! You shoulda been to Daytop!"


Hey Lynn, if you are out there, thank you for causing me five to ten minutes of less happiness then was possible, just to make yourself feel powerful.  Perhaps, someday, I will show up to your place of work to repay the favor.


I have always considerred myself a pretty nice guy, but as I watched that ugly Lynn walk away, all I could think was that I could not wait til that cloud that she is walking on falls right out from under her.


Paul St. John

68
Feed Your Head / KIDS
« on: September 13, 2003, 02:03:00 PM »
According to today's regulators and bureaucrats, those of us who were kids in the 30's, 40's, 50's, 60's, 70's or even the early 80's, probably shouldn't have survived.

Our baby cribs were covered with bright colored lead-based paint.

We had no childproof lids or locks on medicine bottles, doors, or cabinets, and when we rode our bikes, we had no helmets.

Not to mention the risks we took hitchhiking...

As children, we would ride in cars with no seat belts or air bags. Riding in the back of a pickup truck on a warm day was always a special treat.

We drank water from the garden hose and not from a bottle. Horrors!

We ate cupcakes, bread and butter, and drank soda pop with sugar in it, but we were never overweight because we were always outside playing.

We shared one soft drink with four friends, from one bottle, and no one actually died from this.

We would spend hours building our go-carts out of scraps and then rode down the hill, only to find out we forgot the brakes. After running into the bushes a few times, we learned to solve the problem.

We would leave home in the morning and play all day, as long as we were back when the street lights came on. No one was able to reach us all day. No cell phones. Unthinkable!

We did not have Playstations, Nintendo 64, X-Boxes, no video games at all, no 99 channels on cable, video tape movies, surround sound, personal cell phones, personal computers, or Internet chat rooms.

We had friends! We went outside and found them.

We played dodge ball, and sometimes, the ball would really hurt. We fell out of trees, got cut and broke bones and teeth, and there were no lawsuits from these accidents. They were accidents. No one was to blame but us. Remember accidents?

We had fights and punched each other and got black and blue and learned to get over it.

We made up games with sticks and tennis balls and, although we were told it would happen, we did not put out any eyes.

We rode bikes or walked to a friend's home and knocked on the door, or rang the bell or just walked in and talked to them.

Little League had tryouts and not everyone made the team. Those who didn't had to learn to deal with disappointment.

Some students weren't as smart as others, so they failed a grade and ere held back to repeat the same grade. Horrors!

Tests were not adjusted for any reason.

Our actions were our own.

Consequences were expected.

The idea of parents bailing us out if we got in trouble in school or broke a law was unheard of. They actually sided with the school or the law.

69
Marijuana ruling smokes foes
By DAN RICE, Staff Writer
Adults can legally possess as much as a quarter pound of marijuana in their home, the Alaska Court of Appeals declared in an opinion released Friday.The opinion, which stemmed from an appeal in a Fairbanks case, called personal marijuana use in the home by an adult a right guaranteed by the state constitution. "With regard to possession of marijuana by adults in their home for personal use, (the law) must be interpreted to prohibit only the possession of 4 ounces or more of marijuana," wrote Court of Appeals Judge David Stewart in the conclusion of the unanimous decision. Friday's decision relied primarily on a controversial 1975 Alaska Supreme Court opinion rendered in Ravin v. State. Written by the late Fairbanks law icon Jay Rabinowitz, the opinion declared that adults can possess marijuana for personal use in their home because the state's interest in prohibiting them from doing so is not great enough to violate a citizen's right to privacy.

The appeals court declared that the Ravin decision was still the law despite a 1990 voter initiative that criminalized possession of all amounts of the drug. The court ruled that voters, who approved the criminalization measure by a 55-45 percent tally, did not have authority to change the state constitution. Friday's decision defined 4 ounces or less of marijuana as a personal-use amount that is permissible. Unless there's a successful appeal by the Attorney General's Office to the state Supreme Court, Friday's decision means that Alaska once again has the most liberal marijuana laws in the nation. The Supreme Court would essentially have to reverse itself to make it a crime again to possess 4 ounces or less of marijuana. Attorney General Gregg Renkes said in a press release that his office will petition the Supreme Court to hear an appeal. "Some of the court's language goes too far by drawing into question the constitutionality of the current law," Renkes said. The decision was made in the case of David Noy, 41, a North Pole man arrested at his Parkway Road house on July 27, 2001. The arrest occurred after a North Pole Police Department officer on patrol reported to other law enforcement that he could smell the odor of marijuana coming from Noy's residence, where Noy and a group of people were outside barbecuing salmon. After a debate about whether Noy would allow them in his home, officers searched Noy's house and found five immature plants and about 11 ounces of harvested marijuana in the form of buds, leaves and stalks. Officers put all the marijuana except the immature plants in a paper bag and sent it to the state's crime lab, according to background information contained in the Court of Appeals decision. But during trial, the prosecution never entered the bag into evidence, leaving the jury to rely on testimony and photographs to determine what was placed in the bag. After being instructed that the stalks of marijuana plants and fibers produced from the stalks do not count in determining the weight of marijuana, the jury found Noy not guilty of a charge of possessing more than 8 ounces of marijuana but guilty of a lesser charge of possessing less than 8 ounces.Renkes contends that District Court Judge Jane Kauvar improperly instructed the jury on how to measure the aggregate weight of marijuana, a mistake that allowed him to argue that he possessed less marijuana than he actually did. The personal use argument never should have been reached in the Noy case, Renkes said. In current statutes, 8 ounces of marijuana or more is considered to be an amount for commercial use, while anything less than 8 ounces is considered a personal use amount. But when the Legislature changed the marijuana statutes in light of the Ravin decision, 4 ounces was used as the dividing line between personal and commercial use. Friday's decision relied on the 4-ounce figure, claiming that the current marijuana statute must be interpreted to allow possession of up to 4 ounces of marijuana in the home. The decision dismissed Noy's misdemeanor conviction but allows the Fairbanks District Attorney's Office to retry the case if prosecutors think they can prove that Noy possessed more than 4 ounces of marijuana. He cannot be tried again for a charge of possessing more than 8 ounces because he has already been acquitted of that charge. Four ounces of weed carries a street value of about $1,200 to $1,600, said Sgt. Ron Wall, head of the Alaska Bureau of Alcohol and Drug Enforcement office in Fairbanks. "Hell, that would last a month or more," Wall said. Bill Satterberg, the victorious defense attorney who represented Noy, quipped that 4 ounces would last most of his clients "about a week; no, make that three days." While Noy's case is the first time a court with the clout of the Court of Appeals has upheld the Ravin decision, Noy is not the first defendant to argue that personal marijuana possession in the home is guaranteed by the state constitution as determined by the Ravin decision. In a June decision, Scott A. Thomas, another Satterberg client, convinced Fairbanks Superior Court Judge Richard Savell to throw out a misdemeanor pot conviction using the Ravin argument. The argument also worked for a defendant in a 1993 Ketchikan case. But since the 1990 voter initiative criminalized all marijuana possession, the Ravin argument has never made it past the trial-court level, preventing a high court from analyzing the conflict between Alaska's constitution and the state's marijuana laws. Satterberg, reached by phone in Luxembourg where he is meeting with clients and vacationing, said prosecutors have been diligent in keeping Ravin from reaching the state's appellate courts. When trial court judges dismissed cases on the Ravin issue in the past, state prosecutors have not appealed the decision to a higher court in an effort to prevent a new interpretation of the marijuana laws. He said it basically took 13 years for the right case to surface as a challenge to the 1990 voter initiative. "I think the state, from the state's perspective, made a very bad decision in prosecuting a case that probably should have been dismissed," Satterberg said of the Noy case.While the appeals court decision clarifies the issue of a statute that conflicts with the constitution, it also leaves many questions. Under current law, someone could possess as much as 4 ounces of pot in their home but could be arrested while transporting it there. "I think the next question that is going to arise out of this is your right to privacy in a vehicle if you're not using" marijuana, Satterberg said. The decision does allow someone to grow marijuana in their home, he said. Friday's decision applies only to Alaska law. Possession of all amounts of marijuana remains a crime under federal law, meaning that federal agents could still arrest someone for having small amounts of the drug in their home. Satterberg called the Noy opinion a confirmation of people's constitutional rights, regardless of their moral stance on marijuana. Gov. Frank Murkowski reacted differently. "Substance abuse continues to have a devastating impact on the people of Alaska and our communities," Murkowski said in a press release issued by his office. "It is regrettable that the Court of Appeals has, in essence, rejected the will of the people of Alaska who recriminalized the use of marijuana in a 1990 initiative." Reporter Dan Rice can be reached at [email protected] or 459-7503.

70
Elan School / I thought that this was interesting...
« on: September 10, 2003, 03:16:00 AM »
... was written by that Dan, the publisher guy,
down at Close The Doors...



The lawyers in maine wont take the case because nearly all competent law
firms have been retained by Joe and Elan for vaious purposes....I spoke
to Joe about tjhis acouple of times. His motive for retaining as many
firms in maine was simple: if he had done busienss with them, they
could NOT accept a case from someone who wanted to sie him using that
same law firm...he must have retained over 50 firms..



A lot of bad thing have been said about Joe Ricci around here.

Well, one thing you can say..

He was a MASTER CRIMINAL!

Paul

71
Elan School / WHAT CAN NOW BE SAID ALOUD..
« on: September 08, 2003, 09:45:00 PM »
Elan Sux!

72
Elan School / Nazi
« on: September 07, 2003, 07:34:00 PM »
What's your deal?

E-mail me if you want, man..


Paul St. John

73
Elan School / Beaten Twice Over
« on: August 10, 2003, 07:08:00 PM »
The victims of these programs, are not merey beaten once but twice.  I can imagin the effect that in can have as a person, especailly having this shit take place as a kid.  My place fuckingg sucked, and I know that there were others who had it much worse( though I kinda wish they had a ring in my place..lol)


First, you're beaten by the program, but then, life just goes on as nothing happenned, and no justice is served, it's like being beaten by society.  It's like the victims of these programs.. it's like we're some type of side project of the US.  Justice was never served.

I mean, when you look at the shit that people can sue for in this country, and the amount of money that they get.. almost any person who went to these programs would, or at least should have the right to sue,(AND WIN EASILY), these places for like 100 different torts and offenses each person.  If any of this shit happenned in the middle of some civilised street somewhere, it would be a whole another story.  Why?

Paul St. John

74
Elan School / Citizen of
« on: August 10, 2003, 02:54:00 AM »
I was just thinking about this, and I'm only posting it merely because I have always found it so interesting.  I'm not sure if this was the case in Elan, but in Daytop, upon being signed in, you were no longer a ctizen of whatever state you lived you in, but were now a ctizen of the Daytop Village, which resided as a seperate entity from the state, and in some ways was outside of jurisdiction.  The laws that you had to follow as a resident were the laws of the program, one of those laws, which were outside the program, you must observe the laws of any state down to the key, even the most minor ones.
It really was interesting.. like for example, inside of the Daytop building, gambling was legal, in spite of the fact that in New York, where the building resided it is illegal.  You could gamble all you wanted in that place, legally.  Also, we got a few smoke breaks a day, outside the building, long after a law had been passed, that it was illegal for students to smoke on any type of sholl grounds.  The only thing that the program really had to worry about was it's sponsors, 'cause if they dissapproved, they were out of funding.  I remember that even te schooling was not up to NY state standards.  I finally got out of ninth grade by taking a bunch of RCT's that I had already taken in like 7th garde.  I had already taken all the regents for the subjects, which they were giving me RCT's ( practice regents.)

They, literally had their own little government, however the hell they worked that out, and they only had to answer to their sponsprs for the sake of funding.  I remember that the sponsor of Daytop, when I was there was something with the word "Rainbow" in it.

It's kind of amazing to me that they needed actualy sponsors for funding.  For each kid that went there, the school district supplied money for transportation, and the school district supplied other money as well.  Also, the parent's op the children had to pay.  I know my father had to pay some in cash, and some in insurance, if I remember correctly, and in addition to that, the government funded them according to how many kids were there at each time, in numerous ways.


.. and it's not like they needed janitors, just a few counselors..

with the residents there, as trained cleaning machines, and all

and they didn't invest in a nurse or anything like that..


Well, who knows?


Paul St. John

75
Elan School / Daytop on Doctors
« on: August 08, 2003, 11:08:00 PM »
There was this one time, when everybody in the house was getting sick.  It was the same bug, and it was getting passed around to everybody.  I think that it may have started with this co-ordinator, Jen, who insisted on coming in while being sick, with what she belived to be bronchitis, and non-communicable( I suppose that the fact that nearly everyone in the house caught in, myself included, was a cooincidence).

It's only natural that we would all catch it, being packed like sardines into those morning, and afternoon meeting.  As a result of widespread illness throughout the house, there were more people absent in the house, then usual, and so a whole big thing went down, and blow aways were given, and speaches, etc., etc.

and a new rule was made that anyone out for even a single day, would now have to have a doctor's note..

.. so shortly after that, a girl was sick.. I can't remember who, but I do remember that she was one of the younger members, and so she was absent, and came in with a doctor's note.

She was questioneed by a counselor in front to the family( a female one whom I can't really remember)

The counselor was pushing to prove that the girl had actually been fine, and that her doctor had lied on the note, and was insinuating, that the poor girl manipulated him into doing it.

The gilr said something like " He's a doctor.  He wouldn't do that."

That was all the counselor needed.. That counselor.. that rogue rebel against reality, and peace, and happiness stood up there now giving a sermon againt doctors..
saying things along the lines of:


" What does a doctor care?  All doctors are evil.  He'll do anything you want, just to get more money form your parent's whom you also manipulate.."

" Maybe your doctor helps you manipulate your parents."

" You think a doctor cares what is true and what isn't"

" Doctors are dishonest"

lol.. and I think that she may have even said at one point that she thinks that the girl had contracts with her doctor



Ladies and gentelman.. There was no shred of evidence that any of this could've been the case.. This was a sick woman's imagination, BUT the kids didn.t notice that, and I hope that none of those guys or girls wanted to be doctors some day, because by the end of her srmon, she had every person in that place believing that doctors were evil..



As I listenned to this shit, tightly pressed inot my chair, motionless, military style( the approved way), I almost fell out of my seat.  Never before had I seen such hypocrisy as from the likes of this sick bitch, who traded in a drug addiction, for an addiction to cause problems wherever she could, in the name of sobriety.


Dishonest?
don't care about the truth?
Greedy?


"Have you looked in the mirror lately, you life-hating cunt?"


Paul St. John

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6