Fornits
Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform => EdCons and referring organizations and agencies => PURE Bullshit and CAICA => Topic started by: Anonymous on November 04, 2006, 01:41:48 PM
-
Isabelle Zehnder writes:
Q&A: CAICA has been asked: Was the award handed down by the jury a default judgment?
Answer: No.
Just when did this tupperware salesperson and fired receptionist become a lawyer?
The lawyers we have talked with say it was a judgment by default that Sue Scheff got against the poor mother in New Orleans. Isabelle you are such a wanna-be and liar. Get off the internet and fornits.
-
The judgment against Carey Bock was, indeed, a judgment by default. That resulted in the jury determining only the amount of damages. These are technical issues that are intertwined. Information to the contrary is wrong.
-
Was Izzy really a tupperware sales "lady/"
Was Izzy really only a "legal" receptionist, and not a paralegal as she claims? And a fired one at that? Really?
How do these people get by with just claiming they have these credentials, if in fact they really don't?
That's just plain weird, if it is true.
-
It's called "scamming" or "conning" or "bait and switch" or "consumer fraud" or .................................
-
The judgment against Carey Bock was, indeed, a judgment by default. That resulted in the jury determining only the amount of damages. These are technical issues that are intertwined. Information to the contrary is wrong.
And highly misleading by Isabelle Zehnder. It's little wonder the folks in Montana run when they hear ISABELLE ZEHNDER as did the lawyer in California when he shewed you away from his advocacy---Tom of the emancipation project.
-
Was Caica ever known as Kids in Captivity or are these two separate orgs?
-
Kids in Captivity -- Main Page
COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE CAICA EN FRANÇAIS. CHILDREN ARE PRECIOUS ... THEY NEED OUR PROTECTION CAICA HOME ? NEWS ? FACILITY WATCH ...
www.caica.org/About%20Isabelle%202.htm (http://www.caica.org/About%20Isabelle%202.htm)
-
Didn't Izzy close down Kids in Captivity ,and then open up CAICA with the help of her friend Sue Scheff? Is that how it happened?
-
How long did Izzy run this in-home-day-care facility?
Running a day care, and being a "paralegal" too?
Busy, flexible lady, huh?
-
Isabelle Zehnder says she has "25 years of research in child behavior and child development"
This should be good. Tell us exactly what that "research" you claim you did PROFESSOR DIZZY-IZZY?
And since when is a "secretary" a "paralegal"? Which is it Diz? Tupperware mom, secretary or paralegal? And the "La Leche League" is an impressive credential to show your expertise in ripping children from their parents and sending them to your counterpart, Sue Scheff. We can all see how the benefits of breast feeding relates to the complex business of mental health and substance abuse with children.
They don't call her Dizzy-Izzy for nothing. You really are a dumb one. "Idiot" comes to mind.
"ISABELLE ZEHNDER
PRESIDENT
"President of the Coalition Against Institutionalized Child Abuse "CAICA." Working to help regulate the for-profit youth industry that, for the most part, is unregulated. Isabelle learned of the injustices that occur in these facilities October 2004 and has felt compelled to make a difference for the children who have been harmed and their parents who have been defrauded.
25 years of research in child behavior and child development;
Litigation legal Secretary/Paralegal for 6 1/2 years;
Attended and participated in series of seminars on child abuse & child abuse prevention;
Formed "Parents and Teens Unite," a program developed to work individually with parents and teens, then bringing them together to learn ways in which to communicate more effectively and to understand and respect one another;
Director of Positive Solutions, preparing and teaching workshops for children, teens, and parents;
Volunteered at elementary schools for 14 years assisting teachers with curriculum and to assist children who were having difficulties learning to read;
Operated a licensed in-home day care providing a safe, loving, and educational environment for young children;
Active member of Block Parent program developed to provide a safe haven for children in the neighborhood;
Tutored children and teens who needed assistance to meet their potential;
Member of Board of Advisors, volunteer investigator, and researcher for the Emancipation Project;
Active member of the PTA;
Active member, researcher, and speaker at Positive Parenting group;
Active member of La Leche League researching the benefits of infant/parent bonding;" ::bangin:: :wstupid:
-
The Emancipation Project? What is that?
-
What the hell does this woman want and need from the people on this site.? Why do you try so hard Isabelle?
Who gives a fig about your so called "credentials."
-
Obviously you care. if you had ever worked in a law office then you would konw that a person can be a legal secretary and a paralegal all at the very same time. but you wouldn't konw that woudl you?
-
I haven't seen her ask anyone for anything on this site. That was a very strange statement.
-
Obviously you care. if you had ever worked in a law office then you would konw that a person can be a legal secretary and a paralegal all at the very same time. but you wouldn't konw that woudl you?
A paralegal requires a certification. A legal secretary does not. Is Izzy claiming she has such a credential?
-
Obviously you care. if you had ever worked in a law office then you would konw that a person can be a legal secretary and a paralegal all at the very same time. but you wouldn't konw that woudl you?
A paralegal requires a certification. A legal secretary does not. Is Izzy claiming she has such a credential?
Dizzy-Izzy claimed she was a paralegal but then when others questioned her, she said she was a secretary. Then the law firm she worked for fired her for her incompetency. She disappeared for a while and found another job but not in a law office. She refers to advice she gets from "her lawyers" but no one knows who these so-called lawyers are or if they even exist. Diz-Izz has a rich fantasy life mostly thinking she is very important like Sue Scheff.
-
This is posted on CAICA (Disclaimer)
Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this website represents the opinions of the author and is based on court documents, interviews with victims and parents, information from government officials, court documents, over 250 news media reports, television and radio interviews, personal observations, and personal experiences. If any statement is believed to be factually incorrect, or if you desire to make a fair comment in response to any information in this web site, please contact Isabelle Zehnder, in writing, at [email protected] (http://mailto:[email protected]) with your concerns or comments so corrections may be considered. Contrary opinions and fair comments are welcome.
------------------------------
Note: Paula Reeves Dot Com does not promote PURE, unlike CAICA who does (see parent resources page) yet these two disclaimers are very similar. In fairness, it appears Isabelle Zehnder only recently "expanded" the disclaimer on her website. Paula Reeves, on the other hand, has had the same disclaimer for quite some time.
-
Wonder why CAICA felt the need to post a disclaimer, especially one that sounds a lot like the one on Paula Reeve's (who IS a lawyer) website?
-
We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.
What does this statement mean? That CAICA is funded by some other entity or that it is self-funded?
Again, very confusing IMO.
-
Wonder why CAICA felt the need to post a disclaimer, especially one that sounds a lot like the one on Paula Reeve's (who IS a lawyer) website?
No, I don't.
-
Could think of one reason:
When her friend stops being her friend and she hears the words sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue
-
Could think of one reason:
When her friend stops being her friend and she hears the words sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue
Looks like Isabelle modified CAICA's disclaimer a few days ago (11-5-06) to read as follows:
Copyright © 2005
Last modified: 11/05/06
DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.
Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this website represents the opinions of the author and is based on court documents, interviews with victims and parents, information from government officials, court documents, over 250 news media reports, television and radio interviews, personal observations, and personal experiences. If any statement is believed to be factually incorrect, or if you desire to make a fair comment in response to any information in this web site, please contact Isabelle Zehnder, in writing, at [email protected] with your concerns or comments so corrections or additions may be considered. The author warns against privately operated children?s programs that cuts off visits or phone communication with your child, or other family members, without a court order. This should raise serious concerns about the quality and safety of such a program. This site if for informational purposes only; it is not for referrals to programs. We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.
---------------------------
We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.
So who (if anyone) does fund CAICA? Very odd statement, in my opinion but then again, CAICA does actively and even aggressively (judging by Isabelle's numerous press releases and promotional articles) recommend to it's readers (the potential consumer) the services of PURE which is a private for-profit referral company that according to it's own website is "funded by several schools and programs as well as private funding". In addition, it appears Isabelle is supportive of certain transport companies and recommends their services to it's readers (the potential consumer) as well. (See Fornits thread Escort or Abduction, You Decide).
One thing for sure is that CAICA does not appear to be a not-for-profit advocacy organization such as ISAC which is a non-profit 501 (c) corporation. If it were, I would rather expect to see a public disclosure on CAICA like ISAC has, which includes their IRS number and invites the public to verify their non-profit status.
See this press release posted on Paula Reeves:
Referral-Free Zone: Buyer Beware of Businesses Exploiting Children and Families
-
Could think of one reason:
When her friend stops being her friend and she hears the words sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue sue
Looks like Isabelle modified CAICA's disclaimer a few days ago (11-5-06) to read as follows:
Copyright © 2005
Last modified: 11/05/06
DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.
Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this website represents the opinions of the author and is based on court documents, interviews with victims and parents, information from government officials, court documents, over 250 news media reports, television and radio interviews, personal observations, and personal experiences. If any statement is believed to be factually incorrect, or if you desire to make a fair comment in response to any information in this web site, please contact Isabelle Zehnder, in writing, at [email protected] with your concerns or comments so corrections or additions may be considered. The author warns against privately operated children?s programs that cuts off visits or phone communication with your child, or other family members, without a court order. This should raise serious concerns about the quality and safety of such a program. This site if for informational purposes only; it is not for referrals to programs. We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.
---------------------------
We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs.
So who (if anyone) does fund CAICA? Very odd statement, in my opinion but then again, CAICA does actively and even aggressively (judging by Isabelle's numerous press releases and promotional articles) recommend to it's readers (the potential consumer) the services of PURE which is a private for-profit referral company that according to it's own website is "funded by several schools and programs as well as private funding". In addition, it appears Isabelle is supportive of certain transport companies and recommends their services to it's readers (the potential consumer) as well. (See Fornits thread Escort or Abduction, You Decide).
One thing for sure is that CAICA does not appear to be a not-for-profit advocacy organization such as ISAC which is a non-profit 501 (c) corporation. If it were, I would rather expect to see a public disclosure on CAICA like ISAC has, which includes their IRS number and invites the public to verify their non-profit status.
See this press release posted on Paula Reeves:
Referral-Free Zone: Buyer Beware of Businesses Exploiting Children and Families
From the press release:
According to the Referral-Free Zone, the latest trend is to "appear" to advocate, while referring to another company that earns money. Ms. Earnshaw explains, "Since people have gotten wind of the for-profit referral business, referrers are now teaming up with ?child advocates.? These ?advocates? will gladly tell you how awful a particular facility is, and direct you to someone who will help you find an alternative, which happens to be a business in which they have an interest in one way or another."
-
"We are not funded directly or indirectly by any treatment programs."
It probably means she (CAICA) is funded by a referral company, such as PURE.
-
Well, IF Caica is funded by PURE (Sue Scheff)...then Izzy is "indirectly" funded by programs.
There's just no way IZZY can get around this, IF IN FACT, Caica is funded in any way by PURE, Scheff.
-
Miss Zehnder certainly was claiming she was a paralegal. She is a liar like Sue Scheff.
-
From the press release:
According to the Referral-Free Zone, the latest trend is to "appear" to advocate, while referring to another company that earns money. Ms. Earnshaw explains, "Since people have gotten wind of the for-profit referral business, referrers are now teaming up with ?child advocates.? These ?advocates? will gladly tell you how awful a particular facility is, and direct you to someone who will help you find an alternative, which happens to be a business in which they have an interest in one way or another."
Isabelle Zehnder and Sue Scheff are some of those who "appear" to advocate "while referring to another company that earns money."
Scammers:
-
ISABELLE ZEHNDER ("IZZY") HAS ANNOUNCED THAT SHE TOO WILL BE WRITING A BOOK ABOUT HER LIFE AS A TUPPERWARE SALESWOMAN WHO NOW DOES PRETEND-O ADVOCACY FOR "KIDS IN CAPTIVITY."
IZZY WILL CO-AUTHOR HER BOOK WITH HER FRIEND AND CAICA'S FORMER "ADVOCATE OF THE MONTH," SUE SCHEFF. CAICA IS THE FAMOUS ORGANIZATION FORMED BY IZZY, WHOSE ONLY KNOWN MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS----IZZY.
MISS SCHEFF WILL WRITE HALF THE BOOK ABOUT HER EXPERIENCES WITH BEING AT HER WITS END WITH HER TEEN AGED DAUGHTER, WHICH PLASTIC SURGEON TO USE ON HER NOSE, AND WHICH DESIGNER DRUG TO USE FOR HER ANXIOUS PERSONALITY. ALL THIS TRAUMA COMBINED TO DRIVE MISS SCHEFF TO FORM HER COMPANY "PARENTS UNIVERSAL RESOURCE EXPERTS." A/K/A PURE. $$$$ CHUMP CHANGE FOR HER COSMETIC SURGERY.
WE ARE WAITING WITH BATED BREATH FOR THE COMBINED HEARTBREAKING STORY OF THIS 21ST CENTURY POWER COUPLE TO BE RELEASED IN 2007.
-
Isabelle Zehnder and her alter ego CAICA have a bad reputation for literally stealing the words and photos belonging to others and so doe Sue Scheff. They have obviously both stolen from the Paula Reeves Dot Com web site and Izzy has stolen photos.
Richt Izzy? Care to respond?
-
How about using the deaths of teens like Aaron Bacon to promote some poem/song while at the same promoting the same industry (wilderness therapy) that took his and other children's lives? Is that what one calls "advocating" for the protecting of children?
::bangin::
-
If I were the Bacons and Izzy wrote that song/poem about my dear son without my persmission, I'd be hiring an attorney and suing her fat ass.
-
Some of the Paula Reeves/Sue Scheff postings seem a bit confusing. Are these two women "friends" or not? Anyone know?
-
Some of the Paula Reeves/Sue Scheff postings seem a bit confusing. Are these two women "friends" or not? Anyone know?
Which posts are you talking about? I'm not sure we know what you mean. I know they both had lawsuits against WWASP as did a lot of folks who were being sued by WWASP to shut them up.
Sue Scheff had "motives" such as she was competing to sell her own programs to parents, but to my knowledge none of the others sued by WWASP were involved in selling programs. There were 10 or more such people but I think they have stopped suing because they keep losing.
-
Paula Reeves and Sue Scheff are not friends dumb ass.
-
WTF. :rofl:
-
Cracks me up how Mademoiselle Isabelle Zehnder seems to be a sucker for her own hype but hey, if you wanna learn French, I guess it's is a good place to pick up some key phrases. CACA en Français?
:rofl:
-
If I were the Bacons and Izzy wrote that song/poem about my dear son without my persmission, I'd be hiring an attorney and suing her fat ass.
I have it on good authority that Isabelle Zehnder was asked several times by Mrs. Bacon to remove mention of her son and all photos of him from the Caica website. Mrs. Bacon also expressed her family's extreme displeasure with Isabelle's poem/song which essentially reflects Isabelle's own version of what Aaron Bacon was thinking and feeling before he died. Apparently, she either misunderstood the Bacon family's request or simply chooses to ignore it as to date, she has made no effort to remove the offensive material from the song/poem. Either way, it's unconscionable IMO that this issue has yet to be resolved. Perhaps Ms. Zehnder believes lighting a candle in Aaron's and other children's memory will somehow redeem her credibility as a child/parent advocate. If so, she could not be more wrong.
-
IMO if IZZY will not honor the Bacon's request to remove this material about their son; then they should sue her fat ass and make her remove this poem/song and any mention of their son, and any photos of this boy. I do not blame the Bacon family for being upset about this poem/song. My opinion, it is disgraceful for anyone to assume they know what this boy was thinking just prior for his misfortunate death. Anyone would think, Izzy would simply remove this material, if the parents requested it.
-
Why would this stupid woman, Izzy Zehnder, bother to follow the law now? She has stolen the photos belonging to others and she has royally ripped off information from Paula Reeves web site. She blantantly invades the privacy of anyone and everyone to satisfy her self-absorbed needs.
-
Maybe Mrs. Bacon should consider contacting one of the members of CAICA's Board of Directors to discuss this issue?
-
http://www.caica.org (http://www.caica.org)
Run your browser over the BLANK space just above Izzy's disclaimer holding down the highlight button on your mouse. These words should appear:
-------------------------------------------
Reeves www.paulareeves.com (http://www.paulareeves.com) Sue Scheff www.helpyourteens.com (http://www.helpyourteens.com) teen help troubled teen www.isaccorp.org (http://www.isaccorp.org) www.fornits.com (http://www.fornits.com)
-------------------------------------------
Links in "invisible ink" or is Isabelle just shy?
:rofl:
-
:wave: Isabelle
Looks like you deleted the links, rather than make them visible by using a contrasting font color? Or did you move them somewhere else on your website? Like your parent resources page which is where one would expect to find such "helpful" links?
And who says Izzy doesn't read Fornits? :silly:
-
"Reeves www.paulareeves.com (http://www.paulareeves.com) Sue Scheff www.helpyourteens.com (http://www.helpyourteens.com) teen help troubled teen www.isaccorp.org (http://www.isaccorp.org) www.fornits.com (http://www.fornits.com)"
I dont get it. Why would the Mrs. Idiot Izzy include ISAC, Paula Reeves, and Fornits, who HATE THE IZZY-CUNT, in her web and with Idiot #2, Mrs.Scheff, also HATED, sandwiched in between?
Does it help Izzy rip off materials or is she illegally linking them to her site? Sorry I just dont understand
-
This is why Izzy did the illegal invisible links to Paula Reeves, Fornits and ISAC. An engine search on their names will link you right to the Isabelle Caica site. Tis, tis Izzy. You may be getting a little lawsuit. Isn't Reeves a lawyer? And didn't Turley already tell Izzy to remove their headings?
NATIONAL CRISIS Paula Reeves www.paulareeves.com (http://www.paulareeves.com) Sue Scheff www.helpyourteens.com (http://www.helpyourteens.com) teen help troubled teen www.isaccorp.org (http://www.isaccorp.org) www.fornits.com (http://www.fornits.com) ...
www.caica.org/ (http://www.caica.org/) - 141k - Nov 30, 2006 - Cached - Similar pages
-
There's no such thing as an illegal link.
Put down the crack pipe.
-
(http://http://www.thirdage.com/news/features/images/news.yawn.jpg)
-
Personally, I think IZ needs to invest in a spell check program if she wants people to think there is a light on upstairs.
Pssst .... It's LOSE WEIGHT not LOOSE WEIGHT.
:roll:
-
This is why Izzy did the illegal invisible links to Paula Reeves, Fornits and ISAC. An engine search on their names will link you right to the Isabelle Caica site. Tis, tis Izzy. You may be getting a little lawsuit. Isn't Reeves a lawyer? And didn't Turley already tell Izzy to remove their headings?
NATIONAL CRISIS Paula Reeves www.paulareeves.com (http://www.paulareeves.com) Sue Scheff www.helpyourteens.com (http://www.helpyourteens.com) teen help troubled teen www.isaccorp.org (http://www.isaccorp.org) www.fornits.com (http://www.fornits.com) ...
www.caica.org/ (http://www.caica.org/) - 141k - Nov 30, 2006 - Cached - Similar pages
My guess is CAICA could be using google analytics or something similar?
http://www.google.com/analytics/ (http://www.google.com/analytics/)
-
My guess is the Anon above meant that the "linking" in the manner done by Izzy is illegal and not that the links themselves are illegal. This is fraud under some federal and state statutes. Scheff got sued for business fraud and she is on her way again. The stuff Izzy is doing with the fraudulent linking and other antics will get her sued too. It just goes along with the immoral characters they both are.
There's no such thing as an illegal link.
Put down the crack pipe.
-
My guess is the Anon above meant that the "linking" in the manner done by Izzy is illegal and not that the links themselves are illegal. This is fraud under some federal and state statutes. Scheff got sued for business fraud and she is on her way again. The stuff Izzy is doing with the fraudulent linking and other antics will get her sued too. It just goes along with the immoral characters they both are.
There's no such thing as an illegal link.
Put down the crack pipe.
Apparently, the "invisible ink links" are gone. AND Isabelle even corrected her embarassing spelling error (loose weight camps). I'm beginning to think Isabelle should make a NICE BIG FAT donation to Fornits in appreciation for its members hard work in proof reading the information she posts on her site and offering such constructive criticism as this:
(http://http://stfuanddie.com/gallery/d/195-1/010-stfu.gif)
-
Looks like Izzahell has cleaned the bogus links off the site BUT, in her haste, she left some of the code behind. This code is still in most of her web pages -
-
This is just too damn funny. :rofl: :rofl:
-
Thanks for spotting this. It will be good evidence to hand over the the lawyers who have Izzy #1 on their Christmas List. :rofl:
Looks like Izzahell has cleaned the bogus links off the site BUT, in her haste, she left some of the code behind. This code is still in most of her web pages -
-
if you search for these words (as typed) paula reeves sue scheff fornits, look what comes up?
NATIONAL CRISIS
Paula Reeves www.paulareeves.com (http://www.paulareeves.com) Sue Scheff www.helpyourteens.com (http://www.helpyourteens.com) teen help troubled teen www.isaccorp.org (http://www.isaccorp.org) www.fornits.com (http://www.fornits.com) ...
www.caica.org/
-
IMO if IZZY will not honor the Bacon's request to remove this material about their son; then they should sue her fat ass and make her remove this poem/song and any mention of their son, and any photos of this boy. I do not blame the Bacon family for being upset about this poem/song. My opinion, it is disgraceful for anyone to assume they know what this boy was thinking just prior for his misfortunate death. Anyone would think, Izzy would simply remove this material, if the parents requested it.
I would imagine the Bacons are not the only ones who have a problem with Isabelle Zehnder.